New Zealand aims to double foreign international education market by 2034
New Zealand's government on Monday released a plan aimed at doubling its international education market to NZ$7.2 billion ($4.32 billion) by 2034, which includes relaxing rules around international students working part-time while studying.
Education Minister Erica Stanford said in a statement that with international student enrollments steadily increasing since 2023, the government wants to 'supercharge that growth track.'
'In the short term, Education New Zealand will focus its promotional efforts on markets with the highest potential for growth,' she added.
New Zealand's international education market is currently worth NZ$3.6 billion to the economy and the government would like to double that over the next decade and wants to see international student enrollments grow from 83,700 in 2024 to 105,000 in 2027 and 119,000 by 2034.
This comes as countries including Australia look to reduce foreign students due to the impact on house prices and the impact on the university experience for domestic students.
New Zealand said, to encourage more foreign students to come to New Zealand, it plans to increase the number of hours that eligible international students can work to 25 hours from 20 hours and extend which foreign students are allowed to work in New Zealand while studying in the country.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
22 minutes ago
- The Diplomat
Gas Pains: Why Australia Must Reset Its Energy Ties With Japan and South Korea
Australia can't be a regional climate leader unless it has hard conversations about LNG with its friends in Japan and South Korea. Behind closed doors, Australia has been lobbying hard to secure its bid to host the UNFCCC's annual climate forum in 2026. Although the deal has yet to be inked, key stakeholders in this space are already preparing for an Australia-Pacific COP31, with an end to fossil fuel expansion expected to be a key pillar of negotiations. Following its decisive re-election in May, Australia's center-left Albanese government is confident it can sell its climate credentials on the world stage. This is in no small part due to a rapid rollout of renewable energy projects, with over 40 percent of Australia's main electricity grid now powered by solar, wind, and hydropower. However, this success story is dramatically undercut by Australia's unwavering support for its fossil fuel exports, and the diplomatic nexus protecting this trade. Australia is the second-largest exporter of gas in the world, and Japan and South Korea are two of the primary destinations for this gas. While these countries have historically relied on Australia's gas exports (i.e. liquefied natural gas, or LNG), both Japan and South Korea have made public commitments to transition away from fossil fuels and increase renewable energy capacity, and their domestic demand for gas is already declining. In spite of this, the Japanese and Korean governments continue to invest heavily in the extraction, processing, transport, and deployment of gas. Between 2008 and 2024, both countries contributed over US$20 billion of public finance into Australian gas projects, as outlined in Jubilee Australia's newly released research report. Such finance, funneled through export credit agencies, has been a key factor in the economic viability of many large Australian gas projects. With these projects facing increasing scrutiny on the grounds of their intensive emissions contributions, international civil society have called for an end of the Japanese and Korean taxpayers bankrolling fossil fuel expansion. In what have become familiar refrains in diplomatic and trade talks, Japanese and Korean financiers point to two key justifications for their expansion of Australia's gas production. The first is the need for further gas supply to meet their domestic energy security requirements. The second is that LNG is a bridging fuel, needed to transition regional developing economies out of coal and into renewables. Neither argument stacks up. A growing evidence base has been produced by independent financial analysts that demonstrates Japan is contracting more gas than its domestic economy requires. The surplus is resold around the region, with the buildout of the LNG supply chain intended to keep the gas industry operating and profiting for as long as possible. Japanese companies and public financiers invest heavily in downstream infrastructure, such as power plants, to 'cultivate Asian demand.' While Korean investment in Australian gas projects has declined in recent years, major industry firms continue to invest in LNG shipbuilding and transport. These corporate profit margins rely on the Australian government keeping the tap running, by opening up new and emissions-intensive gas fields for export purposes. This 'Gas Empire,' as detailed in the Jubilee report, is heavily reliant on a sophisticated diplomatic apparatus to protect its interests. When the Albanese government has developed policies to support Australia's climate and energy priorities that would potentially derail proposed fossil fuel projects, Japanese government-aligned think tanks and industry bodies have made bold interventions in the Australian media to skew the domestic energy debate. These interventions appeal to Australia's national pride in being a reliable energy trading partner, with the more benign being calls to 'keep the lights on in Tokyo.' However, more alarming rhetoric has implied any moves by the Australian government to phase down its fossil fuel exports would jeopardize global peace. Some members of the Australian government have seemingly welcomed these interventions, expressly inviting submissions by Japanese and Korean gas industry groups in drafting Australia's energy policies, notably last year's Future Gas Strategy that envisaged a role for gas 'beyond' 2050. As concern continues to grow within the Australian public about its own energy security, and the substantial taxpayer subsidies and favorable arrangements provided to the fossil fuel industry, we have to ask the question: can the Australian government exercise sovereignty in its own energy policies? With COP31 on the horizon, the Albanese government is running out of time to answer this question. A key test in the lead up to this event will be at the Asia Zero Emissions Community, or AZEC. Despite the name, civil society groups around the Asia-Pacific have lambasted AZEC as a greenwashing exercise for Japan's fossil fuel expansion. The criticism is that AZEC enables fossil fuel interests to promote technologies to 'mitigate' their emissions. These dangerous technologies, such as carbon capture and storage and ammonia co-firing, are proposed as solutions but consistently fail in their efforts to reduce emissions. Instead, they are promoted to justify opening up new gas projects. The gap between Japan's rhetoric and its action has previously been noted by other analysts on The Diplomat. As a member of AZEC, Australia has a responsibility to hold it to account. Australia is involved in 12 proposed joint ventures under the initiative, only three of which are actually focused on renewables. With renewable energy alternatives already cheaper, cleaner, and less susceptible to geopolitical tensions, Australia's continued support for Japan's mythical fossil fuel abatement technologies is placing it on the wrong side of history. Though the comparison may have seemed unlikely some years ago, these diplomatic efforts to greenwash fossil fuels stand in stark contrast to China, which is well on the way to realizing its vision of being the region's renewable energy export superpower. As humanity stands on the precipice, United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres has called for world leaders to scale up ambition to avoid irreversible climate damage. At a recent summit with world leaders he proclaimed that 'the world is moving forward, full-speed' and added: 'No group or government can stop the clean energy revolution.' Diplomatic efforts between Australia, South Korea, and Japan must reflect this imperative. Australia's commitment to the Clean Energy Transition Partnership has marked an end to its public financing of the international fossil fuel sector, and the Albanese government must now take active steps to welcome South Korea and Japan into the agreement. Bilateral decarbonization agreements must be struck to support an orderly transition away from fossil fuel reliance. And in the lead up to COP31, Australia must set a clear standard that rejects the influence of fossil fuel lobbyists in multilateral climate negotiations. But above all, Australia, South Korea and Japan must embrace the diplomacy of the future: no new coal, oil, and gas.
The Mainichi
23 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Nepal to open final pavilion at Osaka expo on Saturday after delay
OSAKA (Kyodo) -- Nepal will open its pavilion at the World Exposition in Osaka on Saturday, becoming the last participant to do so more than three months after the event began, a source familiar with the matter said Friday. The pavilion will be the last to open among the 158 participating countries and regions. Construction of the self-built Type A pavilion had been suspended due to delays by the Nepalese side in paying its Japanese builder, with work resuming on June 16. Organizers gave the green light on Friday for the pavilion to open to visitors, according to the source. The selection process for builders of the overseas pavilions, particularly those categorized as Type A constructions, proved difficult due to their complicated design and lack of coordination by the Japan Association for the 2025 World Exposition. Delays in preparation were noted even before the exhibition began, while unpaid construction fees to subcontractors were an issue for several other pavilions as well. Angola's pavilion, whose operation had been suspended since the day after the expo kicked off on April 13, was reopened on June 26.
The Mainichi
23 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
US Treasury chief sure of 'good' tariff deal with Japan: Ishiba
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on Friday quoted U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent as saying he believes the two countries can reach a "good" deal in the ongoing tariff negotiations. Bessent's comment came after Ishiba asked him to "vigorously" advance the talks at the ministerial level with Japan's negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, according to the prime minister, who spoke to reporters after his meeting with U.S. officials at his office in Tokyo. The roughly 30-minute meeting took place amid stalled bilateral negotiations, with the Aug. 1 deadline for U.S. President Donald Trump's so-called country-specific reciprocal tariffs fast approaching. "Secretary Bessent said there will definitely be a good agreement," Ishiba said, adding they did not discuss the Trump administration's plan to impose a 25 percent tariff on goods from Japan. Ishiba also expressed his willingness to hold direct talks with Trump if necessary to defend Japan's national interests, although he said no specific date has been set. Bessent, the U.S. point man on tariff talks, is in Japan to lead a presidential delegation for the World Exposition in Osaka and attend his country's "national day" event on Saturday. Following the meeting, Bessent thanked Ishiba and Akazawa for "their warm welcome" to Japan in a post on X. "A good deal is more important than a rushed deal, and a mutually beneficial trade agreement between the United States and Japan remains within the realm of possibility," Bessent said, adding that he looks forward to continuing formal talks between the two countries in the future. Hours later, Akazawa, Japan's minister for economic revitalization, reacted to Bessent's view on the social platform, writing in English, "I fully agree with get it done." Bessent's first visit to Japan since Trump returned to the White House in January came as the key U.S. ally entered the final days of campaigning for Sunday's House of Councillors election. Ishiba, who leads the Liberal Democratic Party, has ruled out rushing a deal at the expense of national interests. Akazawa, who has held multiple rounds of negotiations with Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, is scheduled to host the U.S. delegation at the expo on Saturday. Earlier this week, Trump suggested that reaching an agreement with Japan before the Aug. 1 deadline would be difficult. Among the tariff measures already implemented by Trump, a 25 percent levy on U.S.-bound cars is seen as a heavy blow to Japan's economy, in which the auto sector is a major driver of growth. The auto duty is among the sticking points in the bilateral negotiations. The United States has also imposed higher tariffs on steel, aluminum and auto parts, along with a baseline 10 percent rate as part of country-specific tariffs. Trump's tariff measures have complicated an otherwise strong alliance with Japan. Ishiba told the U.S. delegation that bilateral cooperation is necessary, as the security of Asia, the Middle East and Ukraine is "intertwined." He said economic security is an area where the longtime allies can work more closely together. As Trump has been urging NATO nations to ramp up their defense spending, concerns have grown in Japan that he may also pressure Tokyo to shoulder more of the cost of its defense. "I said we will take the initiative and proactively strengthen our defense capabilities for the peace and security of our country," Ishiba said.
