Man (30s) killed in gangland shoot out at sports club on the Costa Del Sol
Calahonda from the cliff in backlight. Calahonda in the municipality of Motril, province of Granada, Andalusia, Spain. Calahonda is in the central part of the region of the Costa Granadina. Calahonda in September 2024.
A 'British' man has been killed in a Costa del Sol street shooting.
Police were last night hunting the killer, believed to have fled the crime scene in a getaway car later found torched nearby.
The murder happened around 8.15pm Monday evening in the popular British holiday resort of Calahonda between Marbella and Fuengirola.
The victim was already dead by the time police and paramedics reached the scene.
Locals told cops they had heard between eight and ten shots being fired. The incident has been described as a gunfight.
A Cupra vehicle with foreign number plates was found burned out nearby shortly afterwards. Insiders said weapons had been found inside.
Investigators are working on the theory it was the getaway car and was set on fire by the assassin and possible accomplices.
Police have not yet officially confirmed the nationality of the victim, partly because the post-mortem has not taken place.
But well-placed sources close to the ongoing investigation described him last night as British and said they were working on the basis he was a 30-year-old man from Liverpool.
The murder is being investigated by the Guardia Civil police force.
Last week a 34-year-old man was rushed to the Costa del Sol Hospital in Marbella after being shot outside a nightclub in the famous Costa del Sol resort.
Read more Builders back at Spanish villa of gangster Johnny Morrissey 10 months after €60k prison bail
The incident happened around 4.30am on Good Friday.
Witnesses said the suspect fled the scene in a getaway vehicle.
The victim was hospitalized after suffering a gunshot wound to the shoulder.
No arrests are yet believed to have taken place.
Well-placed sources close to the ongoing investigation said last night they believed the victim's killers waited for him to finish a game of football before targeting him.
The murder happened in a street called Don Jose de Orbaneja Street, where there is a well-known tennis and padel tennis club called Club del Sol as well as a neighbouring holiday resort called Finca Naundrup which has sports facilities.
Police put the area on lockdown after the shooting.
A Brit expat wrote on social media shortly after it happened, assuming it occurred at Club del Sol although police have not said yet exactly where in the street it happened: "Anyone know what happened at Club del Sol?
"Heard gunshot-like sounds then lots of police".
Another Brit answered: "Apparently a guy was shot seven times. Police lockdown."
A third Facebook user writing on a local expat site said: "It happened on the slip road down towards Finca Naundrup outside Club del Sol.
"My son was at the football pitch from 8pm when I dropped him off and is finally home now."
He added of the lockdown late yesterday evening: "No-one is allowed to leave there yet. Police still there."
A Scottish expat added: "I was playing padel at Finca Naundrup earlier. Glad I missed it." The car believed to have been used as a getaway vehicle is currently being analysed by police forensic experts.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The little-known story of the Trinity student shot during the War of Independence
When Kathleen Alexanderson Wright, an arts student, was shot dead at a game of cricket in Trinity College Dublin during the War of Independence , she did not cry out in pain. In fact, she barely made a sound. Her fiance, George Herbert Ardill, only realised something was wrong when he heard her gently moaning. 'I opened the coat which she was wearing at the time and then I noticed blood on the front of her blouse,' he later said. 'I tore open the blouse and saw a wound on the right side of the breast.' By this point a crowd had gathered around Wright, who was 21. Three men stepped forward to help, saying they were doctors. An ambulance was called but one of the doctors remarked to the crowd that her 'case was hopeless and that the lady would only live a few minutes'. Undeterred, Ardill carried her out to the ambulance. Wright was pronounced dead on arrival at Sir Patrick Dun's Hospital, Grand Canal Street. READ MORE She was shot at about 5.20pm in the evening. Play resumed in the cricket game for about 15 minutes before the Trinity provost, Dr JH Bernard, called for the match to be abandoned. Thirty-four years later Pádraig Ó Conchubhair gave a statement to the Irish Bureau of Military History about his time in the IRA during the War of Independence. (The bureau, established in 1947, gathered 1,773 witness statements and other records from the conflict.) Ó Conchubhair described how he and fellow IRA man Jimmy McGuinness opened fire on the crowd watching the cricket match from behind the TCD boundary wall at Lincoln Place. They had been ordered to 'stop this match taking place' as it was a charity game between the Gentlemen of Ireland and members of the British military, with tickets sold for the benefit of Great War veterans. As Ó Conchubhair put it: 'After the first couple of rounds were fired, a lady spectator jumped up from one of the seats and got killed by a stray shot. The match was not proceeded with.' He never mentioned Wright by name. Although this story is not well known to the public, it is familiar to some historians who specialise in the Irish Revolutionary period. Wright's killing was the moment when the reality of the War of Independence first struck many students of the university. 'The tragic death of a lady student who was shot in College Park while looking on at a cricket match ... somehow, marked a closed chapter on the carefree days,' one student observed a year after the shooting. What happened next, however, has never been publicly discussed. Like many other stories from those violent times, it was hidden among the voluminous records of the National Archives in Dublin. The facade of Trinity College Dublin, on College Green, circa 1920. Photograph:I had not gone to the archives looking for information about Wright's death. I had recently graduated from Trinity with a history degree and was starting research on a project that involved going through many of the War of Independence personal injury compensation files. On my first day in the archive I was surprised to see the description for Wright's file. Why had no one mentioned her when I was studying in the college, specialising in this period? The more I looked into her story, the more this struck me. On the day that Wright was killed, June 3rd, 1921, Ireland was just over a month away from the Truce that was the key step towards the ending of the War of Independence. However, June 1921 saw the most military and police casualties of the conflict , meaning she died as levels of violence and disorder peaked. One regional newspaper, the Lurgan Mail, gave over just one small paragraph on the last page to her killing. The war brought about a complete breakdown in long-established institutions of law and order. Nationalists contested the legitimacy of such structures, seeking to replace them with Republican Courts. In addition, the Westminster parliament passed the Restoration of Order in Ireland Act of August 1920. This law empowered the British military to imprison people without a trail and to hold trials behind closed doors with no juries and the authority to sentence people to death. [ From Turmoil to Truce: A mature reflection on the War of Independence Opens in new window ] Coroners' courts, which sit after someone dies suspiciously or unnaturally to decide whether the case warrants further investigation, were suspended. They were replaced with private 'military courts of inquiry'. The 'Court of Inquiry in lieu of Inquest' into Wright's killing sat in Sir Patrick Dun's, three days after she was declared dead there. The witnesses included her fiance Ardill, who was from Sligo, and Dr William Bernard Pemberton, who had declared her dead. Evidence was also taken from Godfrey Marcus Goodbody, a member of the RIC who had arrived at the scene moments after the shooting. The fourth and final witness was Joseph Marshall, then chief steward of the college. 'Immediately after the shots were fired, I saw a young lady who had been sitting on a bench about three or four yards from where I was sitting lying on the ground. Some person remarked that she was 'in a faint'. I looked at her and said, 'no, she is dead'.' In the moments before the shooting, Marshall 'saw two gentlemen coming down Kildare Street whom I knew'. These men were heading in the direction of Lincoln Place, where the shooters opened fire on the crowd. None of the military personnel presiding over this inquiry asked any follow-up questions regarding the identity of the two men. The written judgment was issued by Captain EJ Earle, president of the inquiry, and Lieutenant AV Greenfield and 2nd Lieutenant AC Gilbert: 'Kathleen Wright of Trinity College Dublin died ... from shock and haemorrhage caused by gunshot wounds inflicted by some person or persons unknown, such person or persons being thereby guilty of willful murder.' No one was ever charged in relation to her death. The only real insight we are offered into who Wright was as an individual, and who she might have become, is a letter of 1924 from her father, Rev Ernest Alexanderson Wright, an Irishman and vicar of All Saints, Clapham Park, London. Three years after his daughter's death, he instructed his London solicitors to write to the UK minister for Ireland to begin the process of making a claim for compensation for the expenses of her funeral. He had heard that other parents whose children were killed in Ireland had been reimbursed for the costs of their funeral and some of the expenses of their children's education. Wright's funeral had been particularly expensive as her body had to be brought to London for burial. Though Rev Wright was born in Belfast to an Irish family, his job as a vicar had taken him across Britain and Ireland. He was ordained a priest in 1889 and had been the curate of churches in Cahir and Seapatrick, before moving to Liverpool, Hull and Brixton in South London. The total funeral expenses came to just over £131. In the letter Rev Wright is described as 'not being a man of means and holding only a small living'. His annual income was later reported as being £370, meaning the funeral had cost him more than a third of his pay for the year. It is here that we get a glimpse into Wright's plans and dreams for her future. When she died she 'was about to earn her own living, [and] had expressed her intention of repaying her father the cost of her education', said her father. In 1921 it was still something new for daughters of upstanding members of society to attend university, and even more unusual for them to desire to work outside the home. TCD first admitted female students in January 1904, when three women were accepted into the college. By the time Wright studied there in the early 1920s, women made up about 15 per cent of the student population. Female students were subjected to strict rules meant to enforce the separation of men and women in all aspects of student life, apart from lectures and exams. Women were denied campus accommodation. At the time of her death Wright lived in Trinity Halls, Milltown, which was housing built for female students four kilometres from the city centre. Rev Wright told an English newspaper that four or five generations of his family had studied in TCD. However, it is very likely that his daughter was the first women in her family to do so. It is also possible that Wright faced pushback within her family for enrolling in university. Her uncle was Sir Almroth Edward Wright, a well-known bacteriologist. Eight years before her death he had published an uncompromising argument against giving women the vote. In The Unexpurgated Case Against Woman Suffrage, Sir Almroth claimed women had innate 'intellectual defects' that meant they could never equal men intellectually. He also railed against the notion that 'women shall be included in ... every masculine foundation, university, school of learning, academy, trade union, professional corporation ... until we shall have everywhere one vast cock-and-hen show'. There was more: 'The proposal to bring man and woman together everywhere into extremely intimate relationships raises very grave questions.' In the end Rev Wright received £200 to cover the expenses of his daughter's funeral and some of the costs of her education. The compensation came under a 50/50 arrangement whereby the British and Irish states each agreed to pay half of the compensation. This occurred in cases when it was unclear which government was liable for the victim's death. There was a certain morbidness in the state providing compensation for the costs of Wright's education, as if returning funds for a failed investment. Wright's family were devastated by her death. Her brother, Ruthven Alexanderson Wright, was also a TCD student. He had not been present at the fateful cricket match and found out about his sister's murder from Ardill, who was 'unable to say very much as he was in a state of collapse'. A journalist for the London Evening Standard described her parents as 'pitiful ... wandering about the house overcome with grief' when he visited them. Rev Wright had planned to travel to Ireland to bring her body to London for burial but 'was advised not to make the journey' due to his emotional state. Three years later, he expressed willingness to go Dublin or the hearing of this compensation claim if it was 'absolutely necessary'. But in view of 'the painful circumstances connected with it he trusts that it can be dealt with effectively in his absence'. Rev Wright died suddenly 11 months after sending that letter. Ó Conchubhair went on to have a successful military career. On his retirement he became the governor of Limerick Prison and was awarded a pension for his service. In 1950 he recounted his experiences of fighting in the War of Independence, describing the decade after he joined the Irish Volunteers in 1913 as 'the liveliest and best time of my life – so far'. He died of heart failure in 1953 and received a military funeral. Today you can read his entry in the National Dictionary of Irish Biography, though you will not find mention of Wright in it. There is no plaque, no memorial. In fact there is nothing at all to commemorate Wright on the TCD campus. There is, however, a plaque for Private Arthur Charles Smith, a British soldier killed during the 1916 Easter Rising, whose body was initially buried in the college campus before being moved to Grangegorman. His plaque is on Trinity's boundary wall, facing the cricket pitch where Kathleen Alexanderson Wright was shot.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
My Saxophone Saved My Life by Des Lee and The Killing of the Reavey Brothers by Eugene Reavey: Angry accounts of atrocities and the continuing search for answers
My Saxophone Saved My Life Author : Des Lee ISBN-13 : 9781786052551 Publisher : Red Stripe Press Guideline Price : €19.99 The Killing of the Reavey Brothers 978- Author : Eugene Reavey ISBN-13 : 1917453981 Publisher : Mercier Press Guideline Price : €19.99 In his introduction to Des Lee's book, which tells the story of the 1975 Miami Showband massacre and his quest since for justice, Fr Brian D'Arcy says that few under 50 will recognise the picture of the island of Ireland it paints. The same could be said of Eugene Reavey's book recounting the brutal killings of his three brothers six months later and the horror of living in a place where death stalked the land. The books, both co-authored by journalist Ken Murray, are filled with anger at the obstacles put in their way by the British authorities as they have fought to discover the truth of what happened half a century ago. In his book, Reavey tells the story of a short drive with Jon Boutcher, now chief constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), along the Kingsmill Road in south Armagh shortly after the Englishman was appointed in 2016 to lead a new investigation into old Troubles killings. Reavey drove Boutcher, whose escort followed behind. In just two miles, there were memorials to 17 people – including his brothers and the 11 Protestants killed in the Kingsmill massacre 24 hours later. [ Kingsmill massacre report: Watchdog identifies series of failings in investigation Opens in new window ] From there, the two drove just two miles to the Mitchell farmhouse in Glenanne, from where a loyalist death-squad operated, one that included members of the Ulster Defence Regiment and the Royal Ulster Constabulary. [ Miami Showband massacre: 'I heard my platform shoes click against each other. I still had both legs' Opens in new window ] Boutcher was 'amazed' that so many blatantly sectarian killings had taken place so close together. 'What really shocked him was the failure of the RUC to properly investigate them,' writes Reavey. Rightly so. Given the false charges of IRA membership laid at the door of his dead brothers, and the late Rev Ian Paisley 's equally false allegation that Eugene had been involved in the Kingsmill massacre, his anger is hardly surprising. In Reavey's narrative, SAS soldier Robert Nairac was everywhere – the instigator of the Dublin/Monaghan bombings, the Miami Showband massacre, the Reavey killings, the O'Dowd murders 15 minutes later near Lurgan, and others. The charges against Nairac, later killed by the IRA, are not, however, proven by Lee, even if the collusion involving RUC officers, the UDR and the regular British army in the murders of Catholics in the 1970s went high up the ranks. [ Who was Robert Nairac and what happened to him? Opens in new window ] Equally, his insistence that he has found proof that the killings of his brothers and the Kingsmill massacre were orchestrated by the British military to provoke an outright civil war is questionable. His book lays great stress on a report written by a British army major with 3rd Infantry Brigade the day after the Reavey brothers were shot. The report was unearthed in the British National Archives in Kew. 'With the acute alarm that has been caused by the KINGSMILLS murders of 5 Jan '76, the chances of wholesale indiscriminate slaughter of Catholics must re-emerge,' the note declares. 'When I read the note,' writes Reavey, 'I was shocked.' The document clearly states, he goes on, that the targeting of Catholics must be closely controlled and directed by UVF leaders to provoke a civil war. However, a fuller reading of the report, whether it be right or wrong, makes clear that it is an assessment of the UVF's actions, rather than an outline of a strategy the British were directing, using the UVF as its tool. Again, it may be true, but it is not proven. The tenor of Lee's book contains anger, too, but it is more controlled. Few of those who heard early morning radio headlines on Thursday, July 31st, 1975, will forget the horror felt when word broke of the attack on the showband. For both, the past is not the past, it remains the present: 'For many people, 1975 is a long time ago, but every other day, the horrors of that night come back to haunt me and remind me repeatedly of how lucky I am to have made it this far.' In April this year, hundreds marched in Moygashel, Co Tyrone to honour Wesley Somerville, one of two UVF men killed when a bomb they were putting under a seat in the van exploded prematurely. The plan had been that the bomb would explode later, fuelling charges that the showband and the many others crossing the Border regularly were involved in transporting weaponry for the IRA. Neither author expects that the full story will ever be released, though both believe that the collusion unearthed already between the UVF and the British military barely scratches the surface. For their sakes, one must hope they will get the answers they seek.
The Irish Sun
11 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
I had revenge sex after boyfriend bedded my pal – but he thinks what I did was WORSE and constantly brings it up
DEAR DEIDRE: AFTER my boyfriend slept with my friend, I had revenge sex with someone from work. I forgave my boyfriend but apparently what I did is still an issue. We're eight months on and he constantly brings up my cheating. Yet, somehow, his infidelity isn't as important. I'm 25 and he is 26. We've been together for almost two years. A while back we went through a bad patch, because I felt neglected and needed more affection from him, but he refused to change. Miserable, I decided to take a break to see if he would change his mind. It backfired because within a week he had sex with a friend of mine. I was heartbroken but he convinced me to give him another chance. It played on my mind and I couldn't forget what he'd done. We decided we needed some space from one another to work out what we wanted. I was so angry and admit I behaved recklessly. One night I went out after work and got drunk. Looking back I can see I was on a mission: I flirted outrageously and went home with one of my colleagues, my mind was full of revenge. I knew this guy liked me, he had made it obvious before. He's 30 and single but he was a let-down in bed. Afterwards I felt so guilty, I confessed to my boyfriend. Spotting the signs your partner is cheating Still, I was taken aback when he admitted he'd been getting to know another girl and she had given him oral sex. We agreed to forgive one another but my boyfriend is finding it difficult to forget. He always brings up what I did, even though I don't say anything about his behaviour. My sex drive is almost non-existent now. I wonder if it's because he won't accept we are as bad as each other. DEIDRE SAYS: As you now know, two wrongs do not make a right. I understand your anger with your boyfriend but, as you discovered, revenge didn't give you the satisfaction you were seeking. Every time something goes wrong in your relationship, you both run away from the issues. But unless you can dig in, talk about how you feel and start to open up, it won't be possible to create trust. You both will continue to question the other, think the worst of them and – in time – no doubt stray again. You need to be positive about the future and the pleasures you can share but if nothing changes you should think about calling it a day. My support pack Cheating – Can You Get Over It? will help. Get in touch with Deidre Every problem gets a personal reply, usually within 24 hours weekdays. Send an email to deardeidre@ You can also send a private message on the DearDeidreOfficial Facebook page. I'VE LOST WIFE TO THE GYM DEAR DEIDRE: MY wife wants to move out, leaving me and the kids. I put it down to her gym obsession – or one of her workout buddies has turned her head. She joined a gym three years ago, now she's addicted. She's constantly posting on social media about how far she's run or how many bench presses she's done. Is anyone interested? Even our two teenage kids are fed-up. It's as if we don't exist – she'll meet friends from the gym on Tuesdays and Friday nights and now it's spilling into our weekends. We had a row about me feeling second-best but she said she can't give up the gym and we'd be better off with her living elsewhere. I'm a 45-year-old man, she's 40. There's a guy who always goes out with her. He's 43 and equally obsessed with fitness. She says they're friends. But why this sudden urgency for her to get her own place? DEIDRE SAYS: She's checked out – but you can fight to keep her invested, for the sake of all of you. Keep calm and hold a mirror up to her obsession. Explain the children are missing her presence and so are you. She may be feeling a crisis at reaching 40 but she's paying a high price. Be honest – if you've neglected your relationship too, tell her that you're going to wipe the slate clean and look at it through fresh eyes. Counselling will help. See or call 020 7380 1975. SEXY PHONE PICS ENRAGED LOVER DEAR DEIDRE: SOME revealing pictures and messages sent to me by an old friend have flipped out my girlfriend, after she went into my phone and saw them. I am 27 and my girlfriend is 24. We have been together for two years and I absolutely adore her. We met online but I am the first proper boyfriend she has had and the only guy she has fallen in love with. I have no intention of ever cheating on her but do have a bit of a reputation for being flirty. I bumped into my old friend in a coffee shop in town. I have known her since we were both 16. She looked amazing and it was good to see her. My friend and I had never got together but I'd always fancied her so when I discovered she had always liked me it was a huge ego boost. That day we sat and chatted and she admitted she had always had a crush on me. I didn't really know what to say so just laughed it off. But a few days later she messaged me and we began chatting. At first it was just day-to-day stuff but then the messages became flirtier. I now realise a little bit of flirting can run away with you and soon become out of control. My girlfriend has accused me of cheating, which I guess it was. I am now wondering whether I will ever be able to have a relationship without harming it. I can't eat or sleep worrying about the damage I have caused to my relationship. DEIDRE SAYS: Flirting may seem harmless but some see it as micro-cheating. Your girlfriend clearly feels you have betrayed her. She needs to know that you are there for her, because your attention has certainly been elsewhere. Ask yourself how you would feel if she was exchanging revealing pictures and messages with another guy. Talk to her about her boundaries, and what constitutes cheating in her eyes, and see if you can agree limits. Talking this through will bring you closer. Flirting can be driven by low self-worth. My support pack Raising Self-esteem explains more about the underlying causes. BOYFRIEND DUMPED ME FOR ARMY DEAR DEIDRE: I AM heartbroken because my boyfriend is joining the Army and no longer wants to be in a relationship with me. I have begged him to reconsider but he is adamant that he has made up his mind. I have even said I will move to wherever he is going to be based, so we can be closer, but he is not listening. He doesn't want to know. I am 19 and my boyfriend is 20. We have been together for almost a year. We discussed marriage and kids, even though he never made as much effort as I did during our time together. I have been saving for our wedding for over a year and he told me he was putting money aside to buy me an engagement ring. I know he has always wanted a career in the Army and there is nothing wrong with him being ambitious. What I can't understand is why he is being so cruel by completely cutting me out of his life. I am devastated. DEIDRE SAYS:I am sorry he has dealt with this in such a hurtful way. He is young, and clearly wants to see more of life and broaden his horizons before he settles down. Even though it is devastating for you, it is better that you find out now rather than later down the line. My support pack Mend Your Broken Heart will help you to learn from this and move on.
