Terry Newman: Quebec's anti-Israel protesters mimicking early tactics of FLQ terrorists
In a video circulating on social media, protesters can be seen holding Palestinian flags. Viewers can hear the banging of pots in the background — a common protest accompaniment in Quebec. Several of those gathered have their faces covered with keffiyehs.
Also visible is a stream of mostly English words projected across the top of her apartment building, proclaiming, 'Melanie war criminal — every time Melanie lies a child in Gaza dies. Israel terrorist. Melanie complice (complicit).'
An unidentified woman with short blonde hair and a keffiyeh draped over her shoulders speaks through a megaphone in French. Her words translate to: 'Canada's arming of Israel during this genocide is the greatest stain of our generation. Ms. Joly's actions warrant immediate consequences.' She did not elaborate on what she felt those consequences should be.
This kind of aggressive and threatening behaviour toward politicians and school administrators who displease pro-Palestinian protesters in Montreal has escalated since the October 7 massacre.
In October 2023, not long after Hamas's barbaric attack on Israel, sit-ins were already being held at the Montreal offices of Liberal MPs David Lametti, Rachel Bendayan and Joly, who was then serving as minister of foreign affairs.
The blood at the Nova Festival had barely dried, yet the protesters weren't there to condemn Hamas's actions. They were there to pressure MPs who had not yet signed a letter demanding a ceasefire. At the time, the Liberals still officially supported Israel's right to defend itself, though that seemed to be changing quickly — not even a month after the attacks, 33 MPs, including 23 Liberals, had already signed the letter.
It was clear, even at the time, that there was a well-organized pressure campaign aimed at convincing MPs to speak out against Israel's war of self-defence. A Montreal Gazette report at the time noted that the demonstrations at political offices were 'part of a pan-Canadian series of sit-ins organizers said were taking place at 17 offices in 12 cities across the country in solidarity with Palestinians.'
The campaign has continued ever since. On Dec. 18, 2023, a rally of about 50 protesters organized by the Palestine Solidarity Network Canada gathered outside Steven Guilbeault's Montreal constituency office to pressure him to support a ceasefire.
In September 2024, three pro-Palestinian protesters were arrested and charged with criminally harassing then-immigration minister Marc Miller, who represents a suburban Montreal riding. One called him a 'child-killer.' But the charges were dropped.
Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante also got a taste of pro-Palestinian protesters' aggression. On July 9, 2024, a council meeting in Montreal was disrupted by about a dozen protesters. This resulted in the temporary removal of Plante and other councillors as a precaution.
Prior to this disruption, Plante had been more critical of McGill than the protesters, negatively contrasting its approach to an anti-Israel encampment on its campus, which was eventually taken down with the help of a public health order, with Université du Québec à Montréal, which ceded to most of the protesters' demands. But a few days before the council meeting was disrupted, she drew the ire of protesters by ordering the dismantling of a Pro-Palestinian encampment in Victoria Square.
In October 2024, three months after they disrupted her meeting, she finally called pro-Palestinian protest activity in Montreal, which included widespread vandalism, 'unacceptable,' saying that it would 'not be tolerated.'
Yet a month later, after anti-Israel rioters smashed windows and burned cars, she said the violence was the work of 'professional vandals' and 'agitators,' suggesting a few bad apples had co-opted otherwise peaceful protests.
It's not only politicians' homes that these pro-Palestinian groups target.
In May 2024, McGill University President Deep Saini told the campus community via an email that the homes of school administrators had been targeted more than once. He described the actions these protesters took as being designed to 'threaten, coerce and scare people.'
In one instance, he said that protesters stayed for hours and used a megaphone to shout, 'You can't hide.' In another, an administrator was followed home from campus and harassed.
'None of this is peaceful protesting,' wrote Saini. 'It is completely unacceptable. In each case we have reported what has happened to the police and urged them to act.'
Saini said that these tactics were used to try to pressure the administration after students chose to walk away from negotiations to end the encampment, and was baffled by the inaction on the part of Montreal police.
It is all baffling at first glance, until you consider the province's history of violent activism and its ties to the Palestinian movement.
Quebec is the only province in Canada where an activist group has killed a government official. In 1970, a separatist group, the Front de libération du Québec (FLQ), kidnapped Pierre Laporte, Quebec's minister of labour, and James Cross, a British diplomat, during what is known as the October Crisis. Laporte was eventually murdered.
The escalation from activist protests to kidnapping and murder takes time. It doesn't happen overnight.
The FLQ, like these pro-Palestinian protesters, dabbled in the rhetoric of anti-colonialism and anti-capitalism. Two FLQ members, Normand Roy and Michel Lambert, were trained in guerrilla warfare by the Palestine Liberation Organization.
The FLQ started out as a non-violent movement in the early 1960s. It distributed propaganda and painted pro-independence slogans on public buildings.
But its actions quickly escalated to Molotov cocktail attacks and then bombings. In 1963, an FLQ bomb exploded at an Army recruitment centre in Montreal, killing a night watchman by the name of Wilfred O'Neil.
In 1969, FLQ terrorists bombed the Montreal Stock Exchange, injuring 27 people. That same year, the FLQ bombed the home of Montreal Mayor Jean Drapeau, who opposed Quebec separatism.
It seems as though Montreal police were not very useful back then, either. The situation continued to escalate until it reached a crescendo in October 1970, with the kidnapping of Cross and Laporte.
Laporte was eventually found strangled to death in the trunk of a car. Cross was released two months later, through negotiations that resulted in his abductors being granted safe passage to Cuba.
Minor bombings still occurred after this, though public support for the FLQ began to dwindle. But perhaps the group, and the radical ideas it espoused, never completely disappeared. Today, anti-Israel groups are emulating many of the tactics used by the FLQ, and the relationship between Quebec activists and the Palestinian Liberation Organization's goals seems like it's been revived.
It started out with relatively peaceful protests, but quickly escalated with the firebombing of multiple Montreal-area Jewish institutions in November 2023 and the riot at the pro-Palestinian, anti-NATO protest a year later. And it is clear that many of these demonstrators have no qualms about targeting politicians they disagree with personally, including harassing them at their private homes.
Their acts have increasingly become normalized by the frequency of the protests, the lack of sufficient police action, equivocating government statements, misplaced sympathies from academics and celebrities, and broader anti-Israel and antisemitic narratives that have permeated the news media and popular culture.
Will people have to die before Canadian governments, police forces and the general public start taking the threat posed by these protesters seriously? Let's hope not.
National Posttnewman@postmedia.comTwitter.com/TLNewmanMTL
Jamie Sarkonak: This is what reconciliation looks like — the end of property rights
Adam Pankratz: B.C.'s shameful race to give up public land
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Carney Eyes Mid-September Visit to Mexico Amid Strained US Ties
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is planning to visit Mexico on Sept. 18, according to a person familiar with the matter, as he seeks to boost trade and strengthen relations with the country amid punishing US tariffs. Carney is expected to meet with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, and the two are likely to discuss reinforcing supply chains and key infrastructure to grow bilateral trade, said the person, who asked not to be identified to discuss private matters. It's possible the exact timing of the meeting may change, but the current plan is for mid-September.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cliffs Inks Multiyear Steel Pacts with US Automakers in Tariff Aftershock
(Bloomberg) -- Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. has signed fixed-price contracts to supply steel to multiple US carmakers for up to three years, an unusually long duration that signals the auto industry is guarding against potential inflationary pressures. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The new two and three-year accords are for industry-standard sheet steel, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified because the details haven't been publicly disclosed. General Motors Co. is one of the carmakers to agree to a multiyear pact, according to another person familiar with the matter. While it's unclear what prices were agreed to, the duration of the agreements mark a notable change for Cliffs, the biggest supplier of automotive steel in the US, whose previous automotive contracts were usually signed in one-year increments. Shares of the Cleveland-based steelmaker surged as much as 3.9% after the Bloomberg report. The stock traded 1% higher as of 1:17 p.m. in New York. The move is a hedge for both parties. It indicates some automakers are solidifying multiyear prices of key steel input for their cars and trucks amid widespread concern that President Donald Trump's tariffs will stoke inflation. It also shows that Cliffs, which has lost auto market share in recent years, is trying to capitalize on Trump's steel sector duties. Trump imposed 25% tariffs on US imports of foreign steel in March, and then increased the levy to 50% in June. Trump contends tariffs will help protect US jobs and encourage companies to invest more in the country, as well as raise government revenue. But many economists say tariffs will hurt growth as higher prices for goods put a squeeze on household budgets. Trump's broad-reaching tariffs policy — which includes sector-specific and country-level duties — are widely expected to push up vehicle prices by thousands of dollars. Automakers are now taking the chance to lock in a fixed steel price as tariff costs risk sapping demand for new cars. While some companies have indicated they may raise consumer prices in the second half of the year, they are also constrained by the fear of losing market share to competitors with a bigger domestic footprint and lower costs. It wasn't immediately clear which carmakers entered into the longer-term supply agreements. Cliffs' position makes it one of the most important suppliers to GM, Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis NV. A Cleveland-Cliffs spokeswoman declined to comment. GM had no immediate comment. Stellantis didn't respond to a request for comment. Ford declined to comment. Detroit automakers are particularly flummoxed that the Trump administration has negotiated trade deals with Japan, South Korea, and the European Union without hammering out accords with neighboring Canada and Mexico, saying the agreements put them at a disadvantage to foreign competitors. US automakers face billions of dollars in tariff exposure from Trump's duties on imported cars and parts as well as those on steel, aluminum and other goods. Ford has said Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum are impacting the company, namely through price increases from its suppliers that purchase the raw materials. It expects a net $2 billion hit from tariffs this year. Canada is the biggest foreign supplier of steel to the US, accounting for about 23% of American imports in 2024, according to US government data. --With assistance from Keith Naughton. (Adds shaeres in fourth paragraph.) Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Statement from CUPE on Air Canada's Request for Binding Arbitration
TORONTO, August 15, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Air Canada Component of CUPE has respectfully urged Employment Minister Patty Hajdu not to intervene pursuant to section 107 of the Canada Labour Code thereby permitting collective bargaining to continue and allowing the parties to negotiate a resolution. The integrity of the collective bargaining process depends on allowing the parties to reach a resolution through free and fair negotiations, without undue interference. Rather than continuing to negotiate in good faith, Air Canada appears to have anticipated government intervention and has opted to suspend meaningful discussions, contrary to its legal obligation to bargain in good faith. On August 11, 2025, the Union submitted a revised wage proposal, which included the withdrawal of its long-standing position seeking the same wage adjustment previously provided by Air Canada to its pilots. Despite this significant concession, Air Canada declined to meaningfully engage with the proposal and did not present a counter-proposal. On August 12, 2025, the Union made additional and substantial modifications to its wage position. The Union did not receive a response to its proposals, instead, it learned for the first time, when meeting with Minister Hajdu on August 12, 2025, that it had been rejected. On August 12, 2025, Air Canada unilaterally declared an impasse and withdrew from the bargaining table. It has not returned. On August 12, 2025, unbeknownst to the Union, the Company made an extraordinary and premature request to the Minister seeking the application of section 107 to prevent a strike or lockout. It is clear from Air Canada's submissions to the Minister that it had planned to withdraw from bargaining and ask the Minister to interfere with the bargaining process. Early on August 13, 2025, given Air Canada's refusal to bargain, the Union issued notice of its intent to commence a legal strike beginning Saturday, August 16, 2025. Within minutes, Air Canada served a lockout notice. The Union submits that the appropriate course of action is for Air Canada to return to the table and resume good faith bargaining. Accordingly, Air Canada's request for ministerial intervention under section 107 should be firmly rejected. The mere prospect of ministerial intervention has had a chilling effect on Air Canada's obligation to bargain in good faith. Air Canada's request for intervention should be denied. Such a decision would reaffirm the principles of free collective bargaining and compel Air Canada to return to the bargaining table – where it ought to be – and engage meaningfully in negotiations, where it is likely that the Parties may be able to reach an agreement. View source version on Contacts Hugh PouliotCUPE Communications613-818-0067hpouliot@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data