logo
3 times HELOC rates could fall this summer

3 times HELOC rates could fall this summer

CBS News26-06-2025
HELOC interest rates could be positioned to decline again later this summer.
Getty Images
For a few months earlier this year, it felt like interest rates on home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) were on a permanent decline. After cooling for much of 2024, rates on the popular home equity borrowing product dropped to an 18-month low in January, a two-year low in February and another one in March. By early April, the average HELOC interest rate was comfortably below 8%, marking a remarkable two-plus percentage point drop in less than six months. And it seemed possible that rates could fall closer to 7% by the summer.
But that possibility hasn't come to fruition, and HELOC rates have made a gradual but steady rise since then to 8.27%, where they currently reside. But since rates here are variable and subject to change monthly, both existing borrowers and prospective ones shouldn't worry too much either. Rates here are still much lower than what can be secured with alternatives like personal loans and credit cards. And they'll decline with no effort (or refinancing costs) on behalf of the borrower.
That said, when exactly could HELOC rates fall again? Below, we'll examine three calendar dates when HELOC rates could fall again this summer.
Start by seeing what HELOC rate you'd currently qualify for here.
3 times HELOC rates could fall this summer
While predicting the future of interest rates is inherently impossible to do with precision, if recent history is any indication (and with an understanding of what drives HELOC rates), they could become cooler on one or more of the following dates this summer:
July 15, 2025: The June inflation report release
Inflation ticked up by a single basis point in May after falling for a few months prior. Now at just 2.4%, the rate is many percentage points lower than its June 2022 high of over 9%. And with the Federal Reserve's target goal of 2%, inflation is closing in on where the bank wants it to be. Should the next inflation reading released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on this date show another decline or, potentially, the rate even nearing that 2% goal, it could give the Fed the motivation it needs to reduce rates while offering home equity lenders the data support they need to start preemptively lowering rates in anticipation of a formal cut.
Compare your current HELOC rate offers here to determine affordability.
July 29, 2025: The July Federal Reserve meeting
Earlier this year, many economists and experts were all but guaranteeing that the central bank would reduce rates at their mid-summer meeting. And they still might, should economic conditions change in a way that encourages them to take action. If they do, HELOC rates may decline on or around this date. While not nearly as likely as once expected, the Fed can cut rates here. And, even if they don't, comments made post-meeting about any future rate reductions could be strong enough to cool the rate climate anyway, including those on HELOCs.
September 17, 2025: The September Federal Reserve meeting
Sure, this is the very end of the summer but this is arguably the most realistic date when borrowers could expect HELOC rates to change. On this date, the Federal Reserve will conclude its two-day September meeting and, with it, likely issue its first rate reduction since December 2024. Right now, the CME Group's FedWatch tool has a cut here listed at more than a 90% likelihood. Yes, economic factors could skew this outlook and, yes, HELOC rates may change before or after the meeting, but if you're trying to time your HELOC application or looking for relief in your current HELOC repayment structure, this is the top time to pay attention to this summer.
The bottom line
Market conditions are constantly evolving but there's reason for homeowners borrowing with a HELOC to be cautiously optimistic this summer. There are multiple dates in which rates could fall, either individually or collectively. That said, home equity loan rates right now are approximately the same as HELOCs and rates there are fixed. So, if you know you want to borrow home equity but don't want to have to continually monitor the market for changes that could impact your monthly repayments, a home equity loan may be the preferable option.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI and tech stocks slide as summer rally peters out
AI and tech stocks slide as summer rally peters out

CNN

timea minute ago

  • CNN

AI and tech stocks slide as summer rally peters out

Tech stocks were under pressure this week as Wall Street's AI enthusiasm slowed and investors adjusted portfolios after a strong summer rally. The Nasdaq Composite fell 0.67% on Wednesday after sliding 1.46% on Tuesday. The tech-heavy index was on track to snap back-to-back weeks of gains. Meanwhile, the broader S&P 500 fell 0.24% and posted its fourth day of losses in a row. The Dow hovered around the flatline. Tech stocks had steadily rallied in recent months, lifting the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to a streak of record highs. Now Wall Street is taking a breather while optimism about the AI boom is facing some friction. Palantir (PLTR), a star of the AI trade, fell 1.1% on Wednesday after falling 9.35% on Tuesday. Meanwhile, Nvidia (NVDA) edged lower by 0.14% on Wednesday after sliding 3.5% on Tuesday. 'Investors rotated out of high-momentum tech stocks, reflecting renewed jitters over the sustainability of the AI trade,' Ulrike Hoffmann-Buchardi, head of global equities at UBS, said in a note. Investors are also in wait-and-see mode ahead of a critical day for markets on Friday when Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is set to deliver remarks at the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium. 'It's just a pause that may refresh as investors retrench and rethink how they want to position their tech dollars,' Rob Haworth, senior investment strategy director at US Bank Asset Management Group, told CNN. Powell's closely watched speech on Friday could provide signals about the Fed's potential rate-cutting path and comes at a key inflection points for markets after past months' ascent to record highs. Excitement about AI propelled markets higher in recent months, boosted by robust corporate earnings and enormous spending by companies like Meta and Microsoft. But Wall Street's eagerness was tested this week after Sam Altman, chief executive at OpenAI, said he thinks the market might be in a bubble. 'Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes,' Altman told reporters last week, according to The Verge. The OpenAI chief also said he thinks AI will provide value for the economy. 'Is AI the most important thing to happen in a very long time? My opinion is also yes,' he said. Also, researchers at MIT on Monday published a report detailing how the majority of companies testing new generative AI tools are seeing zero returns. While there was not an explicit catalyst for the decline of tech and AI stocks decline this week, investors said Altman's comments and the MIT report could be contributing to negative momentum. AI chip and semiconductor companies Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Marvell Technology (MRVL) were each down almost 7% this week. 'Altman's comments spooked some people when he talked about the AI bubble,' Dan Ives, head of global technology research at Wedbush Securities, told CNN. 'Tech stocks have had a massive run, so I think it's just typical that investors are starting to take some chips off the table going into Labor Day,' Ives said. 'But I believe it's going to be short lived.' Each of the Magnificent Seven tech stocks — Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), Meta (META), Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA) and Tesla (TSLA) — fell on both Tuesday and Wednesday, dragging down the broader market. As of Tuesday, they made up 33.5% of the S&P 500's total market value, according to S&P Dow Jones Indices, reflecting their outsized influence on the index's performance. 'Stocks have been on an absolute tear. Valuations have sprinted up,' said Ross Mayfield, an investment strategist at Baird. 'The fundamentals are good but not keeping pace with the price action.' 'I think along the way we'll see pockets of profit taking, even if it doesn't mark the end of the bull market in general,' Mayfield said. While tech dragged on the market, about 70% of stocks in the S&P 500 had closed higher on Tuesday, UBS' Hoffmann-Buchardi said. Sectors that outperformed included consumer staples, utilities and real estate. It's a sign that investors are shifting out of Big Tech and AI-related trades and toward more defensive stocks as they reassess the markets. Nvidia as of Monday had surged 93% since a low point in early April. 'We've been expecting this type of a pullback,' said Jay Hatfield, chief executive at Infrastructure Capital Advisors, who said he has taken down his exposure to tech in recent months. It's also the start of a historically weak season for stocks, Hatfield said. 'We're neutral on the market right now, but still really bullish for year end.' Palantir is still up 106% this year. But shares in Palantir are down six days in a row and had dropped as much as 9.8% on Wednesday before paring losses, reflecting the volatility in AI stocks. 'Now we're getting the downward momentum,' Hatfield said. 'Palantir is like the poster child for excessive valuation, and those investors are learning that the momentum works in both directions.'

FTC sues LA Fitness operators for 'exceedingly difficult' gym cancellation policies
FTC sues LA Fitness operators for 'exceedingly difficult' gym cancellation policies

Washington Post

timea minute ago

  • Washington Post

FTC sues LA Fitness operators for 'exceedingly difficult' gym cancellation policies

NEW YORK — The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is suing the operators of LA Fitness, over allegations that they make it 'exceedingly difficult' for consumers to cancel gym memberships and other related services offered in their clubs nationwide. In a Wednesday complaint, the FTC accused Fitness International and its subsidiary Fitness & Sports Clubs of illegally charging consumers 'hundreds of millions of dollars in unwanted recurring fees' as a result of cumbersome cancellation processes. The agency said that tens of thousands of customers have reported difficulties with these policies to date. 'The FTC's complaint describes a scenario that too many Americans have experienced — a gym membership that seems impossible to cancel,' Christopher Mufarrige, director of the agency's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement. Beyond LA Fitness, California-based Fitness International operates brands like Esporta Fitness, City Sports Club, and Club Studio — spanning across more than 600 locations with over 3.7 million members nationwide. And the FTC pointed to two 'unfair and unlawful' cancellation processes that it says these gyms have used for years: in-person cancellation or cancellation by mail. Both of these options require consumers to print out a form on the gym's website, which includes logging in with credentials that the agency says some customers don't have or remember. And if a customer opts for in-person cancellation, there's limited hours and often difficulty finding a manager to process the forms, the complaint notes — while mailing the form comes with additional costs. 'Each of these cancellation methods is opaque, complicated, and demanding — far from simple,' the FTC writes in its complaint. It also alleges that the company doesn't adequately disclose cancellation offerings when consumers sign up for memberships, and that some will be signed up for additional services with recurring charges without realizing there may be different cancellation requirements. According to the FTC, Fitness International now offers website cancellations for subscriptions 'with stand-alone agreements' — but the agency said the process 'still imposes unnecessary burdens' on customers and claims that that option is buried online. It's also still not possible to cancel memberships on the company's mobile apps, the FTC added. Fitness International did not immediately respond to The Associated Press' request for comment on Wednesday. This isn't the first time that federal regulators have accused gym operators — and other companies with subscription services — of making their cancellation processes too difficult for consumers. Under the Biden administration, the FTC adopted a 'click to cancel' rule, which would have made it easier for consumers to end unwanted subscriptions. But last month, days before that rule was poised to go into effect, a federal appeals court blocked the proposed changes . In its litigation against Fitness International, the FTC says it's seeking a court order prohibiting the allegedly unfair conduct and money back for consumers who were harmed by difficult cancellation processes.

Their Window Seats Lacked Windows, So Delta and United Passengers Sued
Their Window Seats Lacked Windows, So Delta and United Passengers Sued

New York Times

timea minute ago

  • New York Times

Their Window Seats Lacked Windows, So Delta and United Passengers Sued

Two lawsuits filed Tuesday accuse Delta Air Lines and United Airlines of knowingly charging passengers extra for window seats that were not next to a window. The class action suits were filed against Delta in federal court in New York and against United in federal court in San Francisco, and accuse each carrier of selling more than one million window seats that were, in fact, windowless. 'We're seeking to hold United and Delta accountable for charging customers premiums for products that they didn't deliver, and misrepresenting the nature of the products that they did deliver,' Carter Greenbaum, an attorney whose law firm, Greenbaum Olbrantz LLP, filed the suits, said in an interview. 'They sold customers window seats and ended up seating them next to a wall.' Delta declined to comment. United did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The suits claim that some of the airlines' Boeing 737, Boeing 757 and Airbus A321 aircraft were built with at least one 'window seat' that is adjacent to a wall, not a window, generally because of the placement of air conditioning ducts or electrical components. Other carriers, such as American Airlines and Alaska Airlines, operate similar aircraft types but disclose during the seat selection process if a seat does not include a window. 'United and Delta could easily implement the same disclosures,' Mr. Greenbaum said. The suits say United and Delta 'affirmatively' describe 'every wall-adjacent seat as a 'window' seat,' even when they know certain seats do not include a window. Delta passengers may be charged more than $70 to select a window seat compared with a basic economy fare, and United passengers may pay more than $50 to select a window seat in basic economy on domestic flights, or $100 on international flights, according to the suits. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store