Trump threatens backing primary challenge against GOP Sen. Thom Tillis over his 'big, beautiful bill' vote
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Saturday criticized Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., over his opposition to a bill that would fund much of his domestic agenda, threatening to meet with primary challengers to Tillis, who is running for re-election next year.
"Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis," Trump wrote Saturday night. "I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America."
Trump criticized Tillis extensively in a post on his social media platform for his opposition to the funding measure, dubbed the "Big, Beautiful Bill." It came hours after Tillis said in a statement that he"cannot support this bill in its current form," pointing to expected cuts to Medicaid he said would "result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities."
Trump in return — via Truth Social — accused the two-term senator of grandstanding "in order to get some publicity for himself, for a possible, but very difficult re-election."
"Looks like Senator Thom Tillis, as usual, wants to tell the Nation that he's giving them a 68% Tax Increase, as [he is] opposed to the Biggest Tax Cut in American History!," Trump wrote, adding,"Thom Tillis is making a BIG MISTAKE for America, and the Wonderful People of North Carolina!"
Tillis launched his Senate re-election campaign last December, but has faced calls to step aside due to concerns over his ability to win the race, particularly after polling found he trailed Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper in a hypothetical match-up. Tillis won his previous two Senate races by fewer than two percentage points.
Prior to Trump's post, Tillis told reporters Saturday evening that he gave the president a heads up about his opposition during a call he characterized as "very professional" and "very respectful."
'I had a very good discussion with President Trump last night. I told him at that point that I had problems with the [Medicaid] implementation. And I said the House bill, I think, would be a good mark,' Tillis said. 'I do believe the president is really focused on getting the tax portion of the bill done, and I support that, full stop. But it has evolved from a tax bill to one that includes health care and other things. And I said that in non-tax areas, we have a problem.'
Asked if he was concerned about Trump endorsing a primary challenge to him, Tillis responded, 'No.'
Trump has threatened to primary GOP lawmakers critical of him in the past, wielding his influence to oust Republicans who voted to impeach him after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, including former Utah Rep. Liz Cheney. Last week, two Trump advisers launched a super PAC aimed at removing Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., another frequent critic of the administration's agenda.
However, Trump hasn't always followed through on the threats, opting against endorsing a primary challenger to Massie in 2024, and — according to the Tampa Bay Times — standing down on a threat to target a Florida state lawmaker that endorsed Gov. Ron DeSantis during the 2024 presidential cycle.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Satellite pictures show secret activity at Iranian nuclear site that the U.S. bombed
New satellite photos have revealed that Iran is trying to piece back together its nuclear site after the U.S. bombed it. Heavy machinery was seen at the Fordow site as Iran appears to be intensifying its construction and excavation of the nuclear facility after U.S. B-2 bombers struck it last Saturday in Operation Midnight Hammer. Activity was seen near the tunnel entrances and near the points where the American buster bombs struck in Donald Trump's early-morning attack. Construction equipment was also seen digging new access roads to the facility and repairing damage to the main one in order to restore access to the country's main nuclear facility. Trump said the strikes 'completely obliterated' Iran's nuclear program and set it back years, but the new aerial images suggest the country has taken preliminary efforts to protect its facility. Iranian media said the sites had been evacuated prior to the strikes and the enriched uranium was transported to a 'safe location'. It is unclear how much uranium was left at the site during the bomb, but officials said there is no contamination after the strikes. Earthwork also showed signs tunnel entrances might have been sealed off before the attacks, Newsweek reported. Similar construction activity was seen at the Fordow site prior to the strikes, where Iranians were seen shipping contents from the nuclear site to another location a half a mile away. Despite the extent of the damage being up to question, International Atomic Energy Agency - the UN's nuclear watchdog - said Fordow's centrifuges were 'no longer operational' and suffered 'enormous damage'. A leaked preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency, a U.S. government intelligence group, suggested there was 'low confidence' that the Middle Eastern country's program had been set back. Even Iran's leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said the U.S. hit Tehran's nuclear sites but achieved 'nothing significant'. He said: 'Anyone who heard [Trump's] remarks could tell there was a different reality behind his words - they could do nothing.' The Trump Administration - including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director Of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard - pushed back on the report. Hegseth slammed the media for diminishing the strikes, which Trump compared to Hiroshima. 'Your people are trying to leak and spin that it wasn't successful, it's irresponsible,' he said at a press conference. 'There's nothing that I've seen that suggests that what we didn't hit exactly what we wanted to hit in those locations,' he explained without offering further evidence that the uranium was destroyed. Trump has threatened to sue The New York Times and CNN for reporting on the preliminary report. The Times reported on Thursday that Trump's personal lawyer Alejandro Brito had reached out to the newspaper and said the article had damaged the President's reputation. The letter demanded The Times 'retract and apologize for' the story, calling it 'false,' 'defamatory' and 'unpatriotic'. The newspaper's lawyer responded by noting that Trump administration officials had confirmed the existence of the report after The Times published its findings. 'No retraction is needed,' The Times' lawyer David McCraw said in a letter. 'No apology will be forthcoming. We told the truth to the best of our ability. We will continue to do so.' A spokesperson for CNN told The Times that the cable news network had responded to Trump's lawyer in a similar fashion. Operation Midnight Hammer marked the end of a 45-year stand-off between the U.S. and Iran. Trump warned Iran not to try and rebuild its nuclear program. 'I don't think they'll ever do it again,' he said while attending a NATO summit. 'They just went through hell. I think they've had it. The last thing they want to do is enrich.' But the President also didn't rule out another airstrike if necessary. When asked whether the U.S. would strike again if Iran built its nuclear enrichment program, he replied: 'Sure.' In total, the U.S. launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and more than 125 military aircraft in the operation against three nuclear sites.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Israel says Iran was building warheads capable of hitting London
Iran has been building the biggest ballistic missile arsenal on the planet, producing one-tonne warheads capable of reaching London, Israeli officials have warned. The focus since last weekend's US strikes on Iran has been on the country's nuclear programme and controversy over whether or not it was 'completely obliterated', as President Trump has claimed. But Israeli officials say that was not the only objective when the attack on Iran was launched in the early hours of June 13. 'We actually acted because of two existential threats,' said Oren Marmorstein, spokesman for Israel's foreign ministry. 'One was nuclear, and we acted when we did because Iran was at the 11th hour of being able to build a bomb. But the other was the ballistic threat.' Before the conflict, Tehran was estimated by the US to have about 3,000 ballistic missiles but the regime had been in the midst of an operation to increase production to 20,000, Marmorstein said, including some with payloads of one or two tonnes. He said that on the morning of Tuesday last week, just before a ceasefire came into effect, a missile killed four people in their safe room in the southern Israeli town of Beersheba. 'Imagine if Tehran sent 10,000 of those,' he added. 'That threat was as existential to us as a nuclear bomb. 'They were moving into industrial scale and about to become the No 1 ballistic missile producer in the world. Some of these are intercontinental, which are not for us.' He said these had the range to reach European cities, including London. On the nuclear programme, Israel has yet to release the intelligence that prompted it to launch Operation Rising Lion — what Trump calls the 12 Day War. 'They were getting closer and closer, almost to the point of no return,' Marmorstein said. He claimed Iran stepped up its programme after Israel's assassination of Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader, in Beirut in September. It is a claim that has been echoed by Trump, though not by the US's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, when she testified to Congress in March. 'On uranium enrichment, they had stockpiled enough for nine nuclear bombs and we saw extreme acceleration on weaponisation. This was all part and parcel of a bigger plan for the annihilation of Israel with three elements — nuclear, ballistic and physical invasion,' Marmorstein said. Marmorstein described the Israeli operation as 'successful beyond our expectations', adding: 'Just imagine the first night we took out the entire senior command of Iranian regime — think of the Nazis being deprived of the entire Wehrmacht command in the first days of World War Two. 'And these were surgical operations, getting to the right window at the right time, almost like James Bond.' The Israelis are still assessing the damage done by America's bunker-buster bomb strikes — a question that has seen heated exchanges of words in Washington — but are confident, according to Marmorstein, 'it has been taken back years. The nuclear race has received a huge blow.' The ballistic programme had also been damaged severely, he said, with many missiles eliminated, as were more than half of Iran's 300 missile-launchers, and the production facility for Shahed drones — something he said 'the Ukrainians are pleased about', because hundreds had been used by Russia against Kyiv. A strike was also launched on a military facility in Yazd that houses Iran's heaviest declared missile, the Khorramshahr — a copy of a North Korean missile carrying a two-ton warhead. The line of used espresso cups behind Marmorstein's desk testify to late nights over the past fortnight. The first Israelis knew of the war was when they were woken at 3am on Friday June 13 by an air raid siren. 'I told my wife and mother, 'This is very serious',' he said. 'We had expected the Iranians to react very soon and on a bigger scale. But they were so blown away by the scale of the Israeli operation, it took them more time to react than expected.' Although some Iranian missiles managed to evade Israel's Iron Dome air defences, taking down blocks of apartments and killing 25 Israelis, this was far fewer than the hundreds or even thousands feared. On Thursday, in his first public appearance in more than a week, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, declared victory against Israel and America. The US had been forced to enter the war, he said, 'because it felt that if it did not, the Zionist regime would be completely destroyed. Marmorstein smiles at this. 'The fact of the matter is the Iranian regime suffered huge blows not just to its nuclear and ballistic programme but to the IRGC [Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps], the Basij militia, and I think there is hope for something else …' Although he says 'regime change was not part of this operation, that's for the Iranian people to decide', his office has been very busy with public diplomacy, putting out material in Persian on Instagram and other channels that has had more than 380 million views. He insists: 'This is not a fight with the Iranian people but with the regime.' Since the ceasefire, Tehran has started a new crackdown and Marmorstein's office has noticed 200,000 Iranians have left the Instagram account. He has a warning for the international community. 'This was a huge landmark, perhaps a turning point, but it's not over,' he said. 'We took Iran's nuclear programme years back but I'm not sure the nature of the regime's ambitions have changed. The international community needs to demand that the regime refrain from any foolish attempt to try and resume.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Iran's judiciary says at least 71 were killed in Israel's attack on Tehran's notorious Evin prison
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
