DeSantis said he sent $900M back to the feds. Here's the rest of the story
'Almost a billion dollars of your taxpayer money saved,' Musk touted.
The claim was misleading. The money DeSantis said he was 'returning' was for two federal programs that Florida never asked for in the first place. One of them was more than a year old.
Those details were left out of the governor's Friday night announcement on X, which was viewed 33 million times. In the post, DeSantis said that Florida was trying 'for years' to return money to the federal government, but President Joe Biden's administration 'couldn't even figure out how to accept it.'
'Today, I met with @elonmusk and the DOGE team, and we got this done in the same day,' DeSantis wrote, referring to President Donald Trump's 'Department of Government Efficiency.'
DeSantis included a screenshot of the top half of a governor's office memo notifying the U.S. Treasury Department that Florida was 'formally returning $878,112,000.00 in taxpayer dollars.'
But the rest of the memo — with the details of what was being returned — was not released. His spokespeople did not respond to text messages or emails asking for the entire memo.
DeSantis' announcement caught the immediate interest of legislative leaders, who are actively crafting their proposed budget for the next fiscal year. Nearly $1 billion would be a significant hole that they would potentially have to patch up.
A spokesperson for Senate President Ben Albritton, R-Wauchula, said in a statement Monday that leaders asked DeSantis' office for the details on Friday.
'This morning, we inquired again and learned that the $878 million was related to unspent federal drawdown authority for two programs, refugee resettlement and carbon reduction,' the spokesperson wrote. She noted that Senate officials had received the information over the phone and not in writing.
A copy of the memo obtained by the Herald/Times states that $320 million as part of Biden's carbon reduction program was 'formally rejected' by Florida's Department of Transportation in December 2023. The state 'has yet to receive confirmation' that funds have been withheld, the memo states. Only $49 million of that was given to the state, according to the memo, and was being returned to the federal government through a wire transfer.
The money was part of an Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act program to help states reduce vehicle emissions. Florida's Department of Children and Families was also 'returning' the authority to spend $557,725,139 in federal dollars on 'refugee social service grant funding.' The federal Refugee Admissions Program resettles people in the United States who are unable to safely return to their home countries.
DeSantis was asked for the details on Monday while campaigning in Idaho to pass an amendment to the U.S. Constitution requiring Congress to produce balanced budgets.
He said 'refugee money' was returned to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. And about $350 million was to go to the U.S. Department of Transportation for road projects that were attached to 'DEI and woke policies, which were totally contrary to our state's policy.'
'We had kind of led the fight against that stuff,' DeSantis said. 'Now, it's more fashionable to be against it.'
DeSantis has struggled to tie himself to Musk's DOGE efforts since the tech billionaire's team began taking an axe to federal government spending programs in the Trump administration. DeSantis announced in February that he was forming his own DOGE team to investigate waste in state government, but further details haven't been released.
State lawmakers have since been delving into spending by his agencies and grilling DeSantis' officials over their findings.
'If the governor had really wanted to be DOGE, then the budget he submitted to us several months ago would have been DOGE,' Rep. Vicki Lopez, R-Miami, told reporters last week. 'What we are finding is the Legislature is actually doing the DOGE efforts.'
DeSantis also refused to return billions of dollars in federal COVID relief funding in the pandemic, despite Republicans including Sen. Rick Scott calling on states to do so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump offers Putin, Zelensky contrasting approaches
President Donald Trump has offered his critics, the world and U.S. allies contrasting images on how America treats its friends and adversaries after failing to broker a ceasefire in Russia's unprovoked war to annex Ukraine. At the Alaska-based summit Russian President Vladimir Putin received a red-carpet welcome from the U.S. that included a B-2 bomber fly-by and a ride in the presidential limousine, nicknamed "The Beast" with video of him laughing with Trump. The two superpower leaders exchanged flatteries, with Putin saying the war wouldn't have started it Trump had been president in 2022. Andrei Gurulyov, a Russian parliament member and retired general, described it as a "breakthrough" moment that was played up heavily on Russian state television. Putin's foreign ministry said it marked an end to the foreign country's reported isolation. That showcase is in sharp contrast to a fiery exchange Trump and top administration officials had earlier this year with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy when the foreign ally's leader was told in the Oval Office he was being disrespectful to the U.S. and risking World War III. Zelenskyy was teased by Trump and others for his attire and eventually booted from the White House. Republican lawmakers, such as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., suggested Ukraine's president should either resign, change his tune or "send somebody over that we can do business with." The administration went as far to pause intelligence sharing and weapons shipments to Ukraine after the incident, and while Trump has threatened to impose sharp economic penalties on Russian if an agreement to end the war wasn't reached, he suspended those sanctions after the Alaska sit-down with Putin. Now, Trump is poised to welcome Zelenskyy back to Washington on August 18 to discuss a peace agreement. Republican praise Trump's strength, Dems fret 'it was just theater' After being hyped by the administration and its congressional allies as an opportunity to end the more than three-year conflict in region, Trump's dealmaking skills are being tested in an international negotiation that could backfire on the country and globe. "The goal is always peace," the White House said in an Aug. 15 post on X, amid the talks. Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Arkansas, said in an Aug. 16 post on X that Trump "stood firm in defense of U.S. interests," and that the summit marks a critical first step to a "durable and stable peace that protects Ukraine's territorial and economic sovereignty." But Democrats and other detractors warn that the summit has largely benefited Putin, who is facing war crime charges from the International Criminal Court and seeking legitimacy on the global stage after starting a war that has resulted in more than 1.4 million casualties, according to studies. "Our fear is that the Trump-Putin meeting wasn't diplomacy—it was just theater," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, said in a post on X ahead of the talks. Trump seeks reset in pursuit of peace as Europe worries Trump returned to Washington on Aug. 16 carrying plenty of compliments from Putin, who said the war wouldn't have started if Joe Biden hadn't been in charge back in 2022. But without a deal the administration appears to be skipping cease-fire discussions altogether and pivoting quickly to reset its public relationship with Zelenskyy, who will be returning to the Oval Office on Aug. 18 for a talk that remains inconclusive to most observers. Trump began to tip-toe away from Putin and toward Zelenskyy in late April after Russia bombarded Kyiv with missiles. The president, however, is also reportedly considering land swaps including Ukraine areas not currently occupied by the Russians, according to the New York Times, something U.S. allies have opposed in the past. Zelenskyy said in an Aug. 16 post on X that he spoke with Trump and European leaders, adding that the "killings must stop" but that the battling must pause first before a larger peace agreement can be made. "The positions are clear," he said. "A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions." In a joint statement, European leaders echoed that sentiment and expressed support for a Putin-Zelenskyy summit. "I'm disgusted that Donald Trump met with Putin on American soil and did so with no representatives from Ukraine," Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, a retired Army helicopter pilot, said in an Aug. 16 post on X. "Trump and his inflated ego may not realize it, but it's clear that Putin is not engaging in good faith to end this war."
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Schumer to Trump: No Nobel Peace Prize for ‘selling out Ukraine'
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) tore into President Trump early Saturday after his high-stakes meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska ended without a deal, accusing the president of 'selling out' Ukraine. 'Looks like once again Trump is selling out Ukraine and bowing down to dictator Putin,' he wrote on social media platform X. 'No Nobel Peace Prize for that.' His critique comes days after former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton quipped that she would nominate Trump for the coveted prize if he successfully squeezed a ceasefire agreement out of the Russian leader. Trump and Putin met at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday for a roughly three-hour discussion. While details of the conversation have not been released, the president touted the meeting as 'productive' and signaled that while progress was made, a deal was not yet on the table. 'We didn't get there, but we have a good chance,' he told reporters following the summit, but did not take questions. The president later briefed NATO and European leaders — who responded by doubling down on their support for Ukraine — on the meeting. Schumer, in separate comments late Friday, accused Trump of rolling out the red carpet for Putin, who he called an 'authoritarian thug.' 'Instead of standing with Ukraine and our allies, Trump stood shoulder to shoulder with an autocrat that has terrorized the Ukrainian people and the globe for years,' he wrote on X. 'While we wait for critical details of what was discussed — on first take it appears Trump handed Putin legitimacy, a global stage, zero accountability, and got nothing in return.' 'Our fear is that this wasn't diplomacy — it was just theater,' the New York Democrat added. Trump defended the outcome of the summit in an interview with Fox News's Sean Hannity late Friday, saying it is up to Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to come to an agreement. Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet on Monday at the Oval Office. Clinton earlier this week said she would support Trump's quest for a Nobel Peace Prize if he is able to negotiate an end to the more than three-year war that repudiates the Kremlin's claims to Ukrainian territory. The president later expressed gratitude for his former opponent's remarks. Zelensky has pushed back on Trump's suggestion that any truce would likely require a land swap of territories Russia has taken over since it's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. 'We will never leave the Donbas,' the Ukrainian leader told reporters on Tuesday.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Where D.C. crime is bad, residents question Trump's motives
'If Trump is genuinely concerned about safety of D.C. residents, I would see National Guard in my neighborhood,' said Karen Lake, 62, a lawyer who has lived in Congress Heights since 2017, in the far eastern corner of the diamond-shaped district. 'I'm not seeing it, and I don't expect to see it. I don't think Trump is bringing in the National Guard to protect Black babies in Southeast.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Trump might have found a more sympathetic audience in the distant southeastern quadrant of the city, far away from the National Mall, the White House, or the restaurants and clubs of 16th Street and 14th Street, where a young employee of the Department of Government Efficiency recently was beaten in an assault that raised the city's criminal profile to presidential level. Advertisement In neighborhoods such as Congress Heights and Washington Highlands, where the District of Columbia abuts Prince Georges County, Maryland, the city's Black working class struggles with the twin challenges that have diminished the ranks of what was once, when Washington still had a majority-Black population, affectionately called Chocolate City. There's crime, for sure, but also gentrification driving Black residents into suburban Maryland and Virginia. Advertisement In Ward 8, where Congress Heights is found, there have been 38 homicides this year, according to data from the District of Columbia government. That's almost 10 times as many as Ward 2, where the National Mall is located. But when Trump on Monday described the district as 'dirty' and 'disgusting,' menaced by 'roving mobs of wild youth,' he offended some who otherwise might have been more receptive to his 'law-and-order' pitch. 'I know that we're not those things,' said Le'Greg Harrison, who lives in Congress Heights and said he is supportive of more law enforcement, so long as Black residents aren't the target. 'I know we have a beautiful city.' Trump did not mention Congress Heights by name, but residents say they are well aware of the community's crime statistics and the challenges their neighborhood faces. Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said that federal law enforcement agents had increased their presence in all of the city's neighborhoods, including those in Ward 8. In parts of the ward, she said, arrests have been made in connection with illegal guns and drugs, as well as murder, cruelty to the elderly and other offenses. 'President Trump is committed to making D.C. safe again for all residents,' she said in a written statement. On a humid, overcast afternoon in Washington this week, hungry patrons, mostly Black, pulled up to the retail space known as Sycamore & Oak, which Harrison helped bring to Congress Heights. They grabbed a bite from Black-owned restaurants and discussed what they called Trump's takeover of their city. Advertisement Among the residents of Congress Heights and other neighborhoods of Southeast Washington, the apparent new order has been met with a sense of both incredulity and inevitability. Despite the area's challenges, residents say they take pride in their neighborhood and their city and feel disrespected by the president's portrayal. They feel unseen and misunderstood, their challenges reduced to crime statistics, their children cast as threats, and their culture caricatured. They don't reject safety measures outright. Gerald Walker, a 38-year-old Congress Heights resident, said federal intervention was 'definitely needed.' The National Guard, the FBI, a federalized District of Columbia police force -- 'the more the better.' But many said they were by no means seeking out additional federal involvement in their neighborhoods. And some said they resented being treated as political piñatas in a larger national narrative. It has 'nothing to do with crime in D.C.,' said Ronnie McLeod, 68, a retired bus driver and lifelong Washingtonian who lives in Congress Heights. 'Crime is already down!' 'It's got something to do with something else,' he said. Most of all, many Congress Heights residents say they do not trust Trump's motives. 'He's very out of touch with D.C. people in general,' said Michelle Lee, 42, who lives in Southeast Washington. He may know the political culture of the city, may even have a passing understanding of the ritzier parts of town, she said. Lee, seeming to address the president personally, added, 'You have no idea what an actual resident of D.C. does, goes through.' Advertisement It's not the first time a violent crime against a young, white political staffer has prompted outrage from the federal government. In 1992, an aide to Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama was murdered on Capitol Hill. In the aftermath, Shelby forced a referendum to restore the death penalty in Washington; the initiative was overwhelmingly rejected by voters. Some residents of Southeast described the president's decision to declare a crime emergency and federalize the Metropolitan Police Department for a 30-day period as a power grab or a way to appease affluent white Washingtonians who are anxious about crime. (Any extension would have to be granted by Congress.) Some residents saw the move as a sly way to further gentrify what is left of affordable Washington, by striking fear in residents of low-income neighborhoods that federalized police officers will harass them, or worse. The city has already showed more interest in developing luxury condominiums than in building community recreation centers for children, said Jimmie Jenkins, 35, who grew up in Congress Heights. Many Black residents are not benefiting from the city's growth, he said, and if conditions don't change, Black people will no longer be a significant part of the city's future. Now Trump is pushing aside the city's Black leadership and bringing in federal troops. 'They're definitely aiming to push more Black people out,' said Tyree Jones, 30, who works in Congress Heights. Salim Adofo, a member of the Advisory Neighborhood Commission that represents parts of Congress Heights, was not surprised that residents were drawing connections among crime, federalized law enforcement and gentrification. 'It's becoming harder to live in this specific community as it continues to get developed,' he said. 'It's all wrapped up in together. You really can't separate any of these things.' Advertisement Like opponents of Trump on national cable talk shows and social media, residents of Southeast Washington said the president's message of 'law and order' was undermined when he pardoned even the most violent assailants who attacked police officers during the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. They also brought up his own criminality and raised the possibility that he was deploying forces in Washington to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. But the residents of Southeast Washington have taken the president's moves personally. Trump, they said, is using them. Older residents remember a time when crime was much worse. 'I grew up in the town in the '90s, when we were, quote unquote, the murder capital for almost 10 years,' said Harrison, 40. 'I wouldn't call what we have a state of emergency,' he said. Still, any deployment of extra enforcement must be done with sensitivity for Black citizens, he added. Many Black communities have said for years that they want to be protected from crime, but they don't want to be aggressively targeted for simply being Black. The president's orders have only underscored those positions. 'My father was murdered in my home when I was 15 years old,' said Erica Champion, 28, who was born and raised in Southeast Washington. 'I watched him die.' Champion said she believed the federal government should step in to prevent violent crime, but she is concerned about abuse of power from law enforcement officers and the White House. 'I just don't want him to use it as a means to make it a dictatorship,' she said. Advertisement Local residents said a more comprehensive strategy to combat crime in the city would involve bigger investments in recreation centers, arts and youth job programs. But that will be difficult after Republicans in Congress forced a $1 billion hole in the district's budget. Trump's federal government layoffs already have Washington officials slashing revenue projections. This article originally appeared in
