logo
Hotel Art Fair: Indian galleries are checking into five-star hotels to create art collectors of tomorrow

Hotel Art Fair: Indian galleries are checking into five-star hotels to create art collectors of tomorrow

Hindustan Times2 days ago
Buying art has become a five-star experience. Artix, India's first hotel art fair, has opened a new meeting place in the country's fast expanding art market
A new hotel art fair, a first in India, is allowing art collectors to view and buy artworks within the ritzy confines of a five-star hotel.
Galleries are checking into luxury hotels to set shop in the swanky interiors of their well-appointed rooms, considered the new meeting place in the fast growing Indian art market.
Artix, the Indian hotel art fair, transforms hotel rooms into tastefully curated art spaces, offering a fresh way of exchange between galleries, artists, connoisseurs, collectors, hotel guests and visitors.
First held in Delhi at the Taj Mahal Palace hotel two years ago, Artix has grown to become the country's only hotel art fair organised multiple times in major cities every year with an annual edition in the national capital.
A travelling fair, it works by turning whole hotel floors into exhibition venues. In its new edition, Artix has returned to Delhi (The Claridges, August 2-3), with an increased presence of young and emerging artists. Housed on two entire floors, the fair has artworks mounted on the walls and even bathrooms.
"Artix is an art fair with a twist where the hotel room becomes an art space where the buyer and seller can get to know each other and imagine art like how it would be in their own space," says exhibition co-founder Payal Kapoor.
The fourth edition of Artix (The Claridges New Delhi, August 2-3) in the national capital is spread over two floors.
Luxury meets creativity
"It is more intimate, immersive and quiet than usual art fairs. The luxurious feel relaxes the buyer and seller and visitors can view and imagine artworks in their own environment," adds Kapoor, who founded the Arushi Arts gallery in Delhi more than three decades ago to help promote tribal and contemporary art.
"The exhibition explores the intersection where luxury meets creativity. It is a sophisticated platform for art enthusiasts and collectors," explains Artix co-founder Malvika Poddar, who owns the fashion boutique Carma.
Hotel art fairs have become the latest trend in an expanding global art market, the quiet and intimate setting of private rooms offering enough opportunities to loosen up a guest or visitor and loosen their purse strings too.
The art world has welcomed hotel art fairs with much enthusiasm ever since it started to spring up in major cities across the world, following the first such event in New York three decades ago.
ART, the hotel art fair in Tokyo, Japan, the Hybrid Art Fair in Madrid, Spain, the Asia Hotel Art Fair in Hong Kong and the Arrival hotel art fair in Massachusetts, United States and the Hotel Art Fair, Bangkok have all done well to embrace the idea of selling and buying art in hotel rooms.
"At a hotel art fair, the collectors know they get good prices and provenance for the artworks," says Kapoor. "We give whole rooms to artists who are new to provide a launching pad," she adds.
"Artix is a fair of young artists and young collectors," echoes Poddar. "If you target young people, then you will have a growing Indian art market."
The recurring business meetings at luxury hotels help thicken the plot. The first Indian hotel art fair in Delhi in 2023 coincided with the G-20 summit of world leaders, allowing participants of parallel business meetings to sneak into its venue, a whole floor, at the Taj Mahal Palace hotel.
Participating galleries and artists at the fair mount artworks on the walls of hotel rooms.
A fair for all
Delhi-based artist Prarthana Modi, who has participated in both previous Artix editions in the capital, considers exhibits at the fair "affordable" even if it is happening in a luxury hotel. "While the audience is limited in a gallery, a whole cross-section of people come to a hotel art fair," says Modi, whose works at the current edition, as the artist describes, "captures the silence of landscape, people and animals".
Among the regular participants at Artix is Artrise Art, the online auction house of Dhoomimal Art Gallery, one of the oldest art galleries in the country. Its exhibits include a semi-abstract Chinar tree painting by Kashmiri artist A K Raina.
Art Nouveau, a Gurugram-based gallery, has mid-career artists like Ramesh Gorjala from Andhra Pradesh and Vivek Kumavat from Mumbai, along with the works of masters like Jogen Chowdhury and Nandalal Bose. "Mid-career artists like Gorjala and Kumavat have tremendous potential and are the masters of tomorrow," says Ameeshi Tapuriah of Art Nouveau.
Artix co-founder Poddar says the fair is expanding with plans to host future editions also in tier-2 and tier-3 cities. "We want the fair to grow, nationally and globally. We plan to take Artix to different countries," she says.
Indian art has witnessed record sales in recent years. In March this year, modernist icon M F Husain's Gram Yatra was bought by art collector and gallerist Kiran Nadar at a Christie's auction in New York for 13.7 million dollars (about 118 crore rupees), making it the most expensive work of Modern Indian Art ever sold in a public auction.
According to several market data analysis, the demand for Indian art has shown a remarkable increase in recent years. The Hurun India Art List 2024 showed a combined sale of a whopping 301 crore rupees for the country's top 50 artists last year, a 19 percent growth. Art product and services company Asign's Indian art market report for 2024-25 presented an over 50 percent growth in the 1-10 crore rupee price bracket.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pay to stay? US may ask tourists for $15,000 bond – What it means? Should you be worried?
Pay to stay? US may ask tourists for $15,000 bond – What it means? Should you be worried?

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Pay to stay? US may ask tourists for $15,000 bond – What it means? Should you be worried?

US President Donald Trump administration has unveiled a new 12-month pilot program that could require foreign visitors applying for B‑1/B‑2 tourist or business visas to post a bond of up to $15,000, in an effort to curb visa overstays and improve vetting standards. "Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure (B-1/B-2) and who are nationals of countries identified by the Department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering Citizenship by Investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot program," the US department said in a Federal Register notice on Monday. "Consular officers may require covered nonimmigrant visa applicants to post a bond of up to $15,000 as a condition of visa issuance, as determined by the consular officers," the notice added. The Department said it will roll out the new 12-month visa bond pilot program, starting August 20 and it will remain in effect for one year from the date. What Indian travelers should know While the program hasn't yet named target countries, India's existing history of visa violations, particularly in overstay and screening lapses, could raise the risk of being included. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pierce Brosnan's Wife Lost 120 Pounds - This Is Her Now Undo According to a public notice posted on the Federal Register's website, the program will require certain applicants for B-1/B-2 nonimmigrant visas, typically used for tourism or short-term business trips, to post refundable bonds of $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000. Eligible travelers include nationals from countries with high visa overstay rates, insufficient screening procedures, or offering 'Citizenship by Investment' programs without residency requirements. The pilot program gives consular officers the discretion to determine bond amounts 'sufficient enough to ensure the alien does not overstay,' while also factoring in the applicant's individual circumstances. "The funds will be returned to travelers if they depart in accordance with the terms of their visas," the notice stated, emphasising that the bond is fully refundable upon compliance. While the notice did not name the countries included, it clarified that the list of covered nations will be announced at least 15 days before the program takes effect and could be updated throughout its duration. These will include countries with "high visa overstay rates," and "deficient screening and vetting information," or those offering citizenship-by-investment (CBI) programs where citizenship is granted without any residency requirements. The State Department said the pilot is not just about enforcement, but also intended as a "tool of diplomacy", encouraging foreign governments to tighten their internal security systems. "The pilot program is further designed to serve as a diplomatic tool to encourage foreign governments to take all appropriate actions to ensure robust screening and vetting for all citizens in matters of identity verification and public safety... and to encourage specified countries with visa overstays to ensure their nationals timely depart the United States after making temporary visits," it added. Quoting data from the Department of Homeland Security, the document noted that in fiscal year 2023, the US recorded over 500,000 suspected in-country overstays, individuals who remained beyond their authorized period of stay. This comes as tough immigration policies under Donald Trump continue to impact travel to the United States, with some international visitors opting to skip US trips altogether. Adding to traveler concerns, a new provision passed in July by the Republican-led US Congress introduces a $250 "visa integrity fee" for all approved non-immigrant visa applicants. It will take effect from October 1. US visa bond pilot program: Key FAQs 1. Who it affects Applies to applicants from certain high-risk countries. Applies to B-1/B-2 visas (business/tourist). Designed to reduce visa overstays and ensure travelers return home on time. 2. How the process works A. Visa application Apply as usual through the US embassy/consulate Pay regular visa fees and attend an interview A consular officer will determine if the applicant falls within the scope of the Pilot Program. B. Bond requirement During interview, if you're selected under the pilot, the officer may require a bond: $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000 Visa will be denied temporarily (under INA 221(g)) until bond is posted. C. Paying the bond You'll receive a link by email to submit Form I-352 and pay the bond. Anyone can post the bond (you or a sponsor). Bond rules apply until you leave the US. 3. Getting the visa: Once bond is posted and you're approved: Visa issued is valid for a single entry. Must enter within 3 months of visa issue. Visa will show a special note saying bond has been posted. 4. Entry rules Entry allowed only through specific ports of entry (to be announced). Stay in the US limited to 30 days by CBP officers at the airport. 5. Bond refund (cancellation): You'll get your money back if, You leave the US on time. You don't use the visa at all. You are denied entry at the airport by CBP. No interest is paid on refunded bonds. You can also request manual bond cancellation: 6. What if you overstay Bond is forfeited if you break visa rules (e.g., overstay or work illegally). DHS will decide final bond breach after a review.

$15,000 visa bond: US tightens rules for visitors from overstay countries
$15,000 visa bond: US tightens rules for visitors from overstay countries

Business Standard

time44 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

$15,000 visa bond: US tightens rules for visitors from overstay countries

Soon, visitors to the US could be asked to pay bonds of up to $15,000. Starting August 20, 2025, the United States could start requiring bonds of up to $15,000 (Rs 13 lakh) for certain tourist and business visa applicants. The move is part of a pilot programme to discourage visitors from overstaying their visas, according to a government notice seen by Business Standard on Monday. Under this programme, US consular officers will be given the authority to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays or where screening and vetting information is considered inadequate. Which visas are affected and who decides? The programme applies to B-1 (business) and B-2 (tourist) visas. Consular officers will have discretion to impose bonds of $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000, but the default expectation is $10,000, the notice said. These funds will be refunded if the traveller leaves the US within the permitted time. This initiative is linked to Executive Order 14159, 'Protecting The American People Against Invasion,' which directs the Departments of Treasury, State, and Homeland Security to establish a bond administration system under the Immigration and Nationality Act. A spokesperson for the State Department said countries will be identified based on 'high overstay rates, screening and vetting deficiencies, concerns regarding acquisition of citizenship by investment without a residency requirement, and foreign policy considerations.' The countries likely to be impacted While no formal list has been published yet, the notice mentioned that countries with high visa overstay rates, particularly in Africa and Asia, are under scrutiny. Nations previously targeted by Trump's travel ban—including Chad, Eritrea, Haiti, Myanmar, and Yemen—are also likely candidates. Customs and Border Protection data for fiscal year 2023 showed that countries like Burundi, Djibouti, and Togo recorded high overstay rates. Additionally, 12,882 Indian nationals on leisure or business trips overstayed their visas in 2023, as per the US Entry/Exit Overstay Report. When does the programme start and how long will it run? The pilot programme will go into effect on August 20 and is expected to run for about a year. A similar attempt was made in November 2020 during the final months of Trump's first term but was never fully rolled out due to pandemic-related travel disruptions. Trump's immigration crackdown continues Former US President Donald Trump has consistently focused on tightening immigration controls. He issued a travel ban in June that restricted entry for citizens of 19 countries on national security grounds. These actions have already impacted travel trends—transatlantic airfares in May dropped to pre-pandemic levels, while travel from Canada and Mexico to the US fell 20% year-on-year. $250 visa integrity fee adds another layer Alongside the visa bond pilot, a $250 'visa integrity fee' will be introduced on October 1. This fee, passed as part of a spending package in July, will be charged to all non-immigrant visa applicants once their visa is approved. The U.S. Travel Association has voiced concerns, saying, 'If implemented, the U.S. will have one of, if not the highest, visitor visa fees in the world.' The group estimates that around 2,000 applicants from a handful of countries with low travel volume to the US will be affected by the bond programme. Key points to note • Bond amounts will be $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 per applicant, with $10,000 as the norm • effective August 20, for a duration of one year • bonds apply to B-1/B-2 visa holders from countries with high overstay rates or insufficient vetting • $250 visa integrity fee will be mandatory from October 1 for all non-immigrant visa applicants • bonds will be refunded if visitors comply with visa departure rules • around 12,882 Indian visitors overstayed in the US in 2023

‘He is 65, literally grandparents ka generation': Netizens react to Suniel Shetty's comment on marriages; expert on balancing gender roles in parenting
‘He is 65, literally grandparents ka generation': Netizens react to Suniel Shetty's comment on marriages; expert on balancing gender roles in parenting

Indian Express

time44 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘He is 65, literally grandparents ka generation': Netizens react to Suniel Shetty's comment on marriages; expert on balancing gender roles in parenting

When actor Suniel Shetty recently shared his thoughts on marriage and parenting in an interview, his comments ignited a wave of backlash online. Speaking to Pinkvilla, he said, 'Shaadi kya chiz hai mujhe samajh mein hi nahi aata. Bachhon mein patience hai hi nahi. Shaadi kuch time ke baad ek samjhauta hota hai (I don't understand what marriage is anymore. Kids these days have no patience. Marriage is a compromise after some time), where you have to understand each other, and live for each other. Uske baad ek bacha aata hai, aur patni ko yeh jaan na zaruri hai ki husband career banayega toh bachhe ko main dekh rahi hoon (Then comes a child, and the wife needs to know that if the husband makes a career, I will take care of the kids). Husband, of course, saath mein dekhega hi. Aaj kal sab cheez mein pressure bohot ho gaya hai, kyuki gyaan dene wale bohot log hain. (The husband will, of course, look after them together, but there is a lot of pressure in everything these days, because there are a lot of people to give you unsolicited advice).' He added, 'I think experience se hum seekhe toh better hota hai (if we learn, it is better) – from the mother, from the naani, from the daadi, the sister, the in-laws. I think woh cheez bohot maine rakhta hai (That is very important, I think).' His remarks, suggesting that the wife should take primary responsibility for raising a child so that her husband can focus on his career, drew strong criticism on social media platforms. Many netizens didn't hold back. While some called his mindset outdated and 'typical of Indian uncles,' others described it as outright misogynistic. One Reddit user commented, 'Honestly, guys why are you surprised. He is not exactly speaking for our generation. He is 65, literally grandparents ka generation.' Another wrote, 'So he's a typical misogynist,' while one user remarked, 'I'm a hard-core feminist. Yeah, he's imagining a world where husband is the one working, and life can continue on a single income. But there's nothing intentionally sexist about it.' Neha Parashar, clinical psychologist, Mindtalk, tells 'This assumption stems from deeply entrenched gender roles that view caregiving as a woman's natural duty and career-building as a man's. When society reinforces this narrative, it strips both partners of the opportunity to choose roles based on personal strengths, preferences, or practical realities.' Psychologically, she mentions that it positions motherhood as an obligation rather than a choice, which can lead to 'internalised guilt or resentment in women who wish to pursue professional goals.' It also places undue pressure on men to be sole providers, potentially cutting them off from emotionally rewarding aspects of parenthood. 'The first step is to remove the idea that caregiving has a default gender. Parenting needs to be viewed as a skill set, not a role based on gender. Couples should actively discuss their expectations, values, and support systems even before the child arrives,' notes Parashar. In dual-income households, transparency and planning are key. This means dividing responsibilities not just based on availability but also taking into account each partner's emotional bandwidth, career stages, and long-term goals. Most importantly, couples must give each other permission to be vulnerable, tired, or imperfect. Co-parenting is about mutual respect and emotional presence from both sides, concludes the expert.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store