Toy and game prices rise at the fastest rate on record as Trump's tariffs on China hit industry hard
The cost of toys and games is rising at a record rate as the industry begins to feel the impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs on China.
While inflation held steady last month at 0.1 percent, the price of toys, games and playground equipment saw a rise of 2.2 percent between April and May, according to figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The latest figures capture the period after Trump unveiled his global reciprocal tariffs in April, and while the full impact is yet to appear in the data, experts say it's a gloomy indication of what's to come for the toy industry.
After months of back and forth, tariffs on Chinese imports – which at one point rocketed to 145 percent – are currently at 30 percent until mid-August.
Nearly 80 percent of the toys sold in the U.S. are sourced from China, according to The Toy Association, and the industry is bracing itself.
Isaac Larian, chief executive of MGA Entertainment, which manufactures brands including Bratz and Little Tikes, told The Washington Post that inflation 'is only just starting.'
'There's going to be a domino effect: You're going to see prices go even higher,' Larian said. 'You're going to see empty shelves and a lack of innovation.'
Trump acknowledged that his tariffs could lead to higher prices or less inventory. 'Well, maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls,' he said in April. He also suggested those two dolls could 'cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally.'
Some toy makers say they have no choice but to pass on the tariffs to customers.
'It's a tough situation,' Scott Clarke, the president of Douglas, which sells stuffed toy animals, told The Post. 'We've absorbed some of the tariffs, but there's only so much we can do. Ultimately, this is a tax on American businesses, and it's the consumer that's having to pay.'
Last month Mattel, the creator of Barbie, Hot Wheels, Uno, American Girl and more, was threatened by Trump for refusing to move its production to the U.S. – the ultimate goal of the president's tariffs.
Ynon Kreiz, the chairman and CEO of Mattel, told CNBC it was unlikely the company would move production to the U.S as a result of tariffs; preferring instead to diversify production to other countries or just raise prices on U.S. consumers.
'That's ok. Let him go, and we'll put a 100 percent tariff on his toy, and he won't sell one toy in the United States, and that's their biggest market,' Trump said.
Greg Ahearn, president and CEO of The Toy Association, previously said that price increases of 15 percent to 20 percent are expected on games, dolls, cars and other toys by the back-to-school shopping season.
The price range that U.S. consumers are willing to pay is anywhere from $4.99 to $19.99, leaving little wiggle room to raise prices, he said.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
擷取數據時發生錯誤
登入存取你的投資組合
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
10 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Chill in U.S.-China Relations Hits Stock Listings
Wall Street's welcome mat for Chinese stock listings long transcended rocky U.S.-China relations. Increasingly, the stock market relationship is succumbing to distrust between the world's two largest economies. More than 80 Chinese companies have delisted their shares from U.S. exchanges since 2019, according to data provider Wind. Around 275 China-based companies now represent less than 2% of the capitalization of shares traded on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. The NYSE hasn't hosted a new listing from China since carmaker Zeekr went public in May 2024. Chinese initial public offerings still pour in—in fact, 2024 saw the highest number in years—but most are tiny, highly speculative stocks, not the megabillion-dollar 'red chips' of yesteryear. The 62 Chinese offerings last year raised an average of under $7 million. Some struggle to maintain the minimum 300 public shareholders, a red flag for investors that they could be risky or outright scams.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Most Hawkish BOJ Member Flags Rate Hike Risk as Inflation Gains
(Bloomberg) -- The Bank of Japan's most hawkish member said it may be necessary to raise interest rates should inflation risks rise even if economic uncertainty lingers. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags 'When the likelihood of achieving the price stability target increases, or when upside risks to prices grow, I believe that the bank may face a situation where it should act decisively, despite heightened uncertainties,' Naoki Tamura said Wednesday in a speech to local business leaders in the northeast city of Fukushima. He spoke soon after the release of a summary of opinions from the BOJ's policy meeting last week. The brief record showed policymakers saw little need to rush on their next rate hike along with a broadening view that price gains have been stronger than expected, indicating a chance the central bank could revise up its inflation forecasts at next month's policy meeting. The BOJ is waiting to see the impact of US tariff measures and how trade negotiations between Japan and the US play out, and has cited 'extremely' high uncertainty ahead in recent communications. Tamura said he doesn't expect the situation will be 'entirely cleared up.' Speaking to reporters in the afternoon, Tamura said it's unlikely the bank would raise rates while the trade talks are still underway, although the chance of a hike isn't zero if authorities fear they face the risk of falling behind the curve to address inflation. 'There is a possibility,' Tamura said. 'But the likelihood isn't that high in reality for upside prices risks to rise so much when the talks are underway.' Tamura's remarks in the morning helped strengthen the yen against the US dollar temporarily as they suggested the central bank could move earlier on rates than a majority of traders expect. In the afternoon, his comments weakened the yen as they suggested no imminent policy action. Tamura has been a consistent hawk, and at the December 2024 meeting at which the BOJ held rates steady he was the lone dissenter in favor of a hike. Governor Kazuo Ueda's board raised borrowing costs to 0.5% at the following meeting in January. On Wednesday Tamura said that recent inflation data have been stronger than expected. Japan's key price measure hit a fresh two-year high in May, leaving the Asian nation with the fastest price gains among Group of Seven economies. In a February speech, Tamura, a former senior executive at Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, said he estimates that Japan's neutral rate is at least around 1% and that borrowing costs need to be set around that level when the inflation target is met. The central bank currently expects to meet its sustainable inflation goal around the second half of a three-year projection period ending in March 2028. Tamura flagged the possibility it may happen sooner. 'I believe there is a good possibility that the price stability target will be achieved earlier than expected,' Tamura said. Traders are pricing in around a 30% chance of a rate hike by the October meeting and a more than 70% probability of an increase by year-end, according to overnight index swaps. (Updates with comments from Tamura's afternoon press conference from the sixth paragraph.) Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Sees Limited Damage to Iran Atomic Sites as UN Watchdog Urges Inspections
(Bloomberg) -- US President Donald Trump disputed an intelligence report that found the airstrikes he ordered on Iran had only a limited impact on its nuclear program, even though the assessment came from the Pentagon. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags 'The nuclear sites in Iran are completely destroyed,' Trump said on Truth Social. He said CNN and the New York Times, which first reported the intelligence findings on Tuesday, 'have teamed up in an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history.' The assessment from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency said the bombing on June 22 likely didn't cripple the core components of Iran's program below ground, including its centrifuges, according to people familiar with its contents. The findings are in line with open-source satellite imagery that shows new craters, possible collapsed tunnel entrances and holes on top of a mountain ridge but no conclusive evidence the attack breached the most heavily protected underground facilities. Trump had said the strikes — on atomic sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — 'totally obliterated' their targets, and dismissed reports casting doubt on the claim. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X Tuesday that the intelligence finding of limited impact was 'flat-out wrong.' Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy for the Middle East, appeared on Fox News Tuesday night and described the reports as 'completely preposterous.' The head of Israel's military, Eyal Zamir, late on Tuesday said the assaults on Iran had set back its nuclear and missile projects by years. Still, the Pentagon assessment was backed up to some extent by the International Atomic Energy Agency. It's chief, Rafael Grossi, told Fox News that while Iran's atomic program 'has been set back significantly,' it's hard to specify whether that means months or years. Trump brokered a ceasefire to end the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran that appeared to be holding early Wednesday. The president had lashed out at both countries Tuesday, and particularly Israel, over what he said were early violations of the truce. Both nations have said they'll honor the ceasefire provided their enemy does the same. The de-escalation triggered a slump in oil prices — erasing almost all of its increase since the conflict broke out. Still, the ceasefire remains fragile as the focus shifts back to nuclear diplomacy. A stated goal of the American and Israeli strikes was to destroy Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon, adding urgency to assessments of how much damage was done. Witkoff, who told Fox would be almost impossible for Iran to resurrect its nuclear program, said he was already speaking with the country's officials about restarting formal negotiations. The talks so far have been promising, he said. The IAEA's Grossi said inspections by the United Nations atomic watchdog should resume 'as soon as possible' to determine what's happened to Iran's stocks of uranium enriched to 60% levels, not far short of the 90% required to build a bomb. The IAEA says it last verified those inventories a few days before Israel's attacks on Iran started on June 13, and their whereabouts is now unknown. The DIA's report found considerable damage on the surface at the nuclear sites, with the US strikes likely to have set Iran's program back by several months to as much as a year, according to a person briefed on the report's contents. The assessment has been shared with House and Senate leadership. Before the strikes, Trump had said Iran was 'weeks away' from having a nuclear bomb, though some experts and US intelligence estimates said it could take months or years for the nation to develop a weapon. The US strikes involved dropping more than a dozen 30,000-pound so-called bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear sites, their first use in combat, according to the Pentagon. Tomahawk missiles were also fired from a US Ohio-class submarine in the Arabian Sea. Before Israel's attack on Iran, the US had held five rounds of negotiations with the Islamic Republic, seeking a diplomatic solution to concerns over its nuclear program — effectively a replacement for the 2015 nuclear deal that Trump abandoned during his first term. An agreement hadn't been reached, though a sixth round was scheduled before the Israeli missiles led to Iran canceling it. Tehran has insisted on its rights under international law to enrich uranium for civilian purposes such as fueling nuclear power plants. In calls with regional counterparts reported by state media on Tuesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian appeared to reiterate that stance. 'The Islamic Republic of Iran is solely pursuing its legitimate rights and has no ambitions beyond that,' he told UAE officials. In Iran, 606 people were killed by Israeli strikes, according to the government. Israeli emergency services said 28 people were killed by Iranian missiles, including four on Tuesday morning just as the truce was about to start. Israeli authorities said Tuesday that wartime safety directives had been lifted. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the nation that immediate threats from Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missiles had been eliminated — though his military chief, Zamir, cautioned that 'the campaign against Iran is not over.' --With assistance from Akayla Gardner, Maeve Sheehey, Erik Wasson, Courtney McBride and Rosalind Mathieson. Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio