
Sam Faiers is branded 'irresponsible and naive' by 'horrified' skin doctor after admitting her three children don't wear sunscreen as she wrongly claims many SPF brands are 'harmful' in controversial statement
Currently on holiday in Mallorca, the mother-of-three took to Instagram on Tuesday as she responded to a fans question asking what suntan lotion brand she uses.
The former TOWIE star revealed none of her family use sunscreen as she wrongly claimed some brands of SPF are 'harmful' and full of 'toxic ingredients'.
Now skin cancer prevention doctor Ross Perry has told Daily Mail he is 'absolutely horrified' by Sam's comments and called her 'naive and irresponsible'.
Dr Perry, who is the owner of skin clinics chain Cosmedics, claimed the reality star is 'misleading' fans into not using sunscreen on their children and it can 'double the risk of getting skin cancer' as they 'do not build up a tolerance to sun exposure'.
He told Daily Mail: 'I am absolutely horrified at Sam Faiers' comments to followers (2.5 million of them!) are both irresponsible and naive.
'Children do not build up a tolerance to sun exposure, they are just storing up more sun damage for later on in life.'
He continued: 'It is a well-known fact that children if they get any degree of sunburn as a child it more than doubles their risk of getting skin cancer at a later date so that is completely false and misleading.
'Children do NOT build up a tolerance to sun exposure. I would totally advocate the use of sun protective clothing as a alternative for those who do not tolerate suncream being regularly applied, especially for children regularly in and out of the water, but they will only cover certain areas so an SPF is still required.
'It is misleading to say that children need to have sunlight in order to promote their health as they will absorb more than enough sunlight through day-to-day activities rather as an over exposure or potential sunburn on holidays.
'The standards that still apply and are good guidance are that people apply SPF when out in particularly hot sun environments and do not take the risk of getting any sunburn and that involves wearing hats, appropriate clothing and avoiding hot times of the day for sunbathing.'
'Remember that ANY tan or sunburn is creating damage to the skin so SPF should always be worn in the sun,' he concluded.
Sam revealed that she doesn't use suncream on her children by sharing a snap of her youngest son Edward, two, playing in the shade.
She wrote: 'So this is always a bit of a controversial one, but honestly, me and my whole family don't actually wear sunscreen.
'Over the years, the kids have built up a really good tolerance to being in the sun. Of course if it's really hot and the sun feels too harsh I'll make sure we head into the shade... usually around lunchtime we'll go in, have something to eat and just avoid those peak hours.
'I'm really careful about sunscreen in general, because a lot of them are actually pretty harmful and full of toxic ingredients.'
Sam then revealed the alternative way she makes sure her children stay safe in the sun as she added: 'If you do want to protect your kids, I think SPF swimwear is such a good and safer option.
'But also, don't be afraid of the sun! Early in the morning or later in the afternoon when it's not as strong, I love letting the kids run around and soak it up, it's good for them.
'That said, I do always bring a Tallow Zinc SPF with me when I go away, just in case. And hats or caps are a must! Especially for us ladies because no one wants extra sun damage (I've had my fair share over the years because I am such a sun lover!).'
Sam isn't the first celebrity to admit they don't use SPF on their children after Kelsey Parker, TV personality and widow of The Wanted singer Tom Parkewr, previously claimed that her children 'don't burn' and wrongly alleged SPF 'causes skin cancer'.
Speaking on her podcast with fellow mum Georgia Jones she said: 'My kids do not wear sun cream.'
Instead, she uses 'organic' sun cream to protect her children and claimed they 'do not burn'.
'Sun cream is so bad', she said, adding that growing up she 'never used to wear sun cream, sun cream causes skin cancer'.
'The only thing that I may put on them is an organic sun cream. My kids, we went on holiday, I never put sun cream on them and they do not burn.'
Lauryn Goodman also spoke out about sun cream last year after she took to Instagram to tell her followers: 'you're brought up to wear sun cream [to] protect yourself', but 'everything you think you know isn't correct'.
She insisted: 'training your skin is key' as she added: 'It's about building up your melanin to handle the sun as well slowly.
'I did it with K [her eldest son] and will do it with little girlie.'
Responding to a comment from a follower who advised that UV rash vests offer 'more protection' than cream, she also said 'skin is so much better in the sun'.
Dr Bav Shergill a consultant dermatologist at the Queen Victoria Hospital, London and spokesman for the British Association of Dermatologists hit back at her claims.
He previously told the Daily Mail: 'Sunscreens are a safe and effective way to protect your skin from burning and other forms of sun damage.
'Millions of people have used sunscreen over many decades so we can be confident about their safety profile.
'For people with lighter skin tones, there is a common misconception that you can build up a base tan which will protect you.
'A tan is a reaction to sun damage, so to develop a base tan, you have to damage your skin.
Responding to a comment from a follower who advised that UV rash vests offer 'more protection' than cream, she also said 'skin is so much better in the sun'
'Evidence also suggests that a "base tan" offers the equivalent of SPF 4 – not enough to provide meaningful protection.'
He added: 'If you don't want to use sunscreen, you need to be really on top of other forms of sun protection.
'Make good use of shade, minimise the time you spend out in the sun when the UV index is three or above, and wear clothing that covers your skin.
'These tend to be very effective ways of protecting your skin – though ideally you would use sunscreen in addition to these options as a final line of defence.'
Meanwhile Dr Richard Parsons, a senior lecturer in biochemical toxicology at Kings College London, warned that any sunburn still raises the cancer and long term damage risk.
He told the Daily Mail last year: 'Building a base tan is fine. But you have still got to have that level of protection.
'If you burn you are still going to increase your chances of getting those DNA mutations which can increase your risk of cancer.
'As you get older, you can get lost elasticity in the skin you can get skin damage like wrinkles. So that's actually lasting damage.'
He added: 'We're not talking "I've got a real bad sunburn, but it's ok it'll be gone in a few weeks". That will have lasting implications.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Danish drugmakers jump as Eli Lilly's weight-loss pill data disappoints
Aug 7 (Reuters) - Shares in Novo Nordisk ( opens new tab rose as much as 14% on Thursday after trial data from Eli Lilly's (LLY.N), opens new tab experimental weight-loss pill fell short of expectations, boosting investor confidence in the Danish drugmaker's market-leading obesity treatment. The company later pared some gains and were trading up 9% at 1240GMT. The market had anticipated Eli Lilly's orforglipron pill to become a strong competitor to Novo's weight-loss drugs, Kepler Cheuvreux analyst David Evans said in an emailed comment. However, with Thursday's results falling short of those expectations, Evans said investors were likely to rethink the competitive outlook in the GLP-1 obesity drug market, a shift that favours Novo's oral semaglutide. Eli Lilly shares were down 7.8% premarket at 1152 GMT. The battle between injectables and oral GLP-1 drugs is shaping obesity treatments, as companies race to deliver the best mix of results and safety for patients. Novo's shares plunged last week after it slashed its outlook for 2025 sales growth, marking the second forecast cut for the Danish drugmaker this year. Lilly's weaker pill data helps restore investor confidence in Novo's obesity lead, easing fears of an imminent threat to Wegovy's dominance and pricing power, Nordnet analyst Per Hansen has said. Novo's domestic peer Zealand Pharma ( opens new tab rose around 7% in afternoon trade. Shares in Germany's Gerresheimer ( opens new tab, maker of injector pens for Wegovy and Zepbound, also rose around 3%, as weaker oral pill data points to sustained demand for injectable obesity treatments. Up to the previous session's close, Novo and Zealand shares had lost more than half their value since the start of the year.


Reuters
38 minutes ago
- Reuters
Novo Nordisk shares jump as Eli Lilly's weight-loss pill data disappoints
Aug 7 (Reuters) - Shares in Novo Nordisk ( opens new tab rose 13.6% on Thursday after trial data from Eli Lilly's (LLY.N), opens new tab experimental weight-loss pill fell short of expectations, boosting investor confidence in the Danish drugmaker's market-leading obesity treatment. The market had anticipated Eli Lilly's orforglipron pill to become a strong competitor to Novo's weight-loss drugs, Kepler Cheuvreux analyst David Evans said in an emailed comment. However, with Thursday's results falling short of those expectations, Evans said investors were likely to rethink the competitive outlook in the GLP-1 obesity drug market, a shift that favours Novo's oral semaglutide. Novo's shares plunged last week after it slashed its outlook for 2025 sales growth, marking the second forecast cut for the Danish drugmaker this year.


The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Weleda Skin Food review: The dry skin saviour I can't live without
*If you click on a link in this story, we will earn affiliate revenue. I LOVE a good moisturiser — it's probably my favourite beauty product to review, and I have one in my bag at all times. But there's only one moisturiser I know I can always depend on: Weleda Skin Food. My OG hand cream that keeps my dry spots at bay Credit: Chantelle Symester Weleda Skin Food 75ml, £12.07 £9.48 at Amazon Over the years, this once under-the-radar green tube has become a holy grail beauty product. Its long list of celebrity fans includes Victoria Beckham, Traitors host Claudia Winkleman, Hailey Bieber and even model Bella Hadid, who claims to get through eight tubes per MONTH. There are plenty of plus points when it comes to this OG beauty product: organic ingredients, dermatologist-approved formula, great smell and hydrating benefits. I, like many people, suffer from dry skin (all year round) and have tried a plethora of moisturisers for dry skin with varying degrees of success. Keep reading to find out if Weleda Skin Food is still a miracle worker on my dry patches... or if it's time for me to find a new hydrating essential. Pros Versatile Clean beauty credentials Suitable for vegetarians Hydrating and nourishing on skin Great for dry skin Thick consistency and a little goes a long way Smells amazing Cons Pricier than some alternatives on the market Not great for oily skin types Largest size is 75ml Rating: 8/10 Weleda Skin Food review: Quickfire Q&A How much is Weleda Skin Food? A 75ml bottle of Weleda Skin Food costs £16. It is also available in a 30ml size, costing a reasonable £9.50. Where to buy Weleda Skin Food: Weleda Skin Food is available from many online and high street beauty retailers, including Amazon, Boots, Holland & Barrett, Lookfantastic and Superdrug, among others. Who's it best for? It's ideal for dry skin, but also great for eczema sufferers. What we loved: The organic formula is rich and very hydrating (though I would steer clear if you have acne-prone skin as it has quite a greasy texture). It also smells divine. What we didn't: The small size means you can use it up very quickly. I would advise lovers of this cream to stock up when it's on offer. Weleda Skin Food review: The Nitty Gritty First impressions I love the rich consistency Weleda Skin Food 75ml, £12.07 £9.48 at Amazon Skin Food is Weleda's bestselling range, and for good reason. It sells a bottle of the stuff every eight seconds and has won a slew of beauty awards. Its distinctive, vibrant green packaging is hard to miss. The eye-catching colour stands out on the shelves and is easy to recognise, with a minimal, fuss-free design — a masterclass in #cleanbeauty branding. One thing I love, and something most people note when trying it for the first time, is the incredible scent. Weleda Skin Food is made with assorted botanicals, sweet almond, organic rosemary, calendula and chamomile extracts. As soon as you flip open the lid, you get a pleasant waft of the sweet fragrance, which is a great first impression if you've never used it before. I have even had people compliment me on the scent after I've applied it to my hands, so if you're not a lover of fragranced products, you might want to skip this. However, Weleda did launch its 'light' version for this reason, which I have tried before and is a great alternative if you don't want something as heavy. It's still very hydrating but has a lighter, more whipped consistency that seems to absorb more quickly into the skin. Does it deliver? The lighter version is still very hydrating Weleda Skin Food Light 75ml, £12 £9.52 at Amazon It's a product that comes with lots of hype, but in my opinion, Skin Food lives up to it. My aforementioned dry skin means I crave a deeply nourishing moisturiser that works on my face and body. Skin Food has many 'clean' organic ingredients that make it better for drier skin types. The sunflower and sweet almond oils deeply nourish, while the beeswax and lanolin give it a slightly more greasy consistency. I think this enhances the level of hydration, as it almost coats the skin rather than immediately soaking in and disappearing. The thicker, balmy texture of Skin Food works for me as I like to feel the weight of a cream on my skin, especially my hands, which get dry very quickly. However, I would say if you have oily or acne-prone skin, this might not be the moisturiser for you. It is probably too rich and may clog your pores. The versatility of Skin Food as a moisturiser is probably one of its biggest USPs (along with its green credentials). Whether you want a standard cream, primer, hair frizz tamer or cuticle cream, Skin Food can do it all. You can use it post-shower or bath, or as an all-over moisturiser for your face and body for serious hydration. I prefer using it to target specific dry patches on elbows, knees, feet and hands. It's also great as a barrier; in fact, Weleda states that it's microbiome-friendly and can help restore the skin's protective layer, so it's great for rashes or eczema too. A little does go a long way, so although it's pricer than some other brands, you can make it last, and I find I don't need to top up as frequently when I use it as a hand cream. How much is Weleda Skin Food? Considering the price of many of its competitors, I think Skin Food is pretty reasonably priced: 30ml will set you back just £9.50, while a 75ml tube costs £16. You can also often find it discounted during key sales periods like Prime Day and Black Friday, providing an opportunity to stock up. Currently, the best price we've found online is £9.48 for the bigger 75ml version at Amazon, which is a great saving on its usual price of £15.95. Where to buy Weleda Skin Food It's easy to find at all major high-street cosmetics stores, and is stocked widely online. You can currently find it at: Weleda Skin Food alternatives It'll come as no surprise that there's no shortage of options when it comes to a nourishing, hydrating moisturiser. Last year, Aldi's beauty brand, Lacura, came out with a "Rich Moisturising Cream" that had an eerily similar design to Skin Food, and retailed for just £3.99. It doesn't currently seem to be stocked in its stores, but that doesn't mean it won't make a return. A similarly priced product is Avene's Hydrance cream. It's slightly more expensive than Skin Food, but it is highly rated and said to have many of the same benefits. If you're on the lookout for other alternatives, check out our roundups of the best moisturisers for dry skin and best body moisturisers for dry skin. Weleda Skin Food review: The Verdict Weleda Skin Food gets a massive thumbs up from me. I have used this for years, and there's a reason so many beauty insiders and A-listers love it and sing its praises. It is one of those must-haves that I believe lives up to the hype, but the original formula is best suited to drier skin types. I love that it's a versatile beauty essential that I can stick in my bag to keep my hands moisturised, apply topically to dry patches or use in place of other products when I don't want to carry my full arsenal of makeup items. It's a product that I always come back to, and for that reason, I think it is worthy of its 'cult' status. Weleda Skin Food 75ml, £12.07 £9.48 at Amazon - buy here Weleda Skin Food FAQs Do dermatologists recommend Weleda Skin Food? Weleda Skin Food does get a dermatologist's seal of approval thanks to the range's inclusion of ingredients that are microbiome-friendly. Thanks to this formulation, it helps to restore the skin's protective barrier and is particularly helpful for skin conditions such as rashes and eczema. Many dermatologists have taken to social media to recommend it as a highly beneficial and hydrating cream. Can you use Weleda Skin Food for your face? Many people swear by using Weleda Skin Food on their face as a daily moisturiser to keep skin supple and soft. As mentioned, Bella Hadid says she lathers it on and gets through up to eight bottles a month, and Victoria Beckham loves using it to lock in her tan. Singer Anne-Marie's make-up artist, Emma Osborne, uses it as a staple in her kit. She says, 'Weleda Skin Food is my go-to product for that fresh summer glow. "I love to add a touch to the high points of the face, i.e. cheekbones/brow bones for that dewy, glossy finish. "For my clients, it's a must-have beauty essential'. While Weleda Skin Food can be used on your face, that's not the way I generally use mine. Because of the rich formula and beeswax ingredient, it tends to trap moisture in; great if you are in desperate need of some serious hydration as a one-off. But using it daily may be too heavy for some skin types, especially anyone with oily or acne-prone skin.