logo
Warren prods DOJ to sue to block Capital One-Discover deal

Warren prods DOJ to sue to block Capital One-Discover deal

Yahoo14-05-2025
This story was originally published on Banking Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Banking Dive newsletter.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-MA, urged the Justice Department to sue to block Capital One's pending acquisition of Discover, according to a letter she wrote Tuesday to the agency's antitrust leader, Gail Slater.
Warren cited an address Slater gave in late April warning of the risks that consolidation could again – after the 2007-08 financial crisis – create institutions that are 'too big to fail.'
'This transaction will reveal whether you back your words with action,' Warren wrote Tuesday.
The DOJ has 30 days to sue after banking regulators approve a merger application, Warren noted. The Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency gave a green light April 18 to Capital One's $35.3 billion proposed transaction. Warren wrote the Fed on May 1, urging the central bank to reconsider.
'Absent a rescission of the Fed's approval order, the responsibility to prevent this dangerous transaction now falls to the DOJ,' Warren wrote Tuesday.
Slater, however, determined there wasn't sufficient evidence to challenge the Capital One deal in court, publications reported last month, citing people familiar with the decision.
Nonetheless, Warren pressed that the DOJ 'does not need to have previously filed an adverse comment with regulators' about a deal to attempt to block it. The senator Tuesday expressed disappointment that the DOJ had not filed such a comment – 'despite reportedly finding competitive concerns with the deal.'
Warren urged Slater to lean on the Clayton Act – and the DOJ's own updated merger guidelines – to block the Capital One deal, citing that a merger may violate antitrust law if it 'significantly increases consolidation in a highly concentrated market' or 'eliminates substantial competition between firms.'
Warren noted that during its initial evaluation of the Capital One-Discover merger last year, DOJ reportedly 'told regulators that it was concerned, in part, about the deal's impact on potential credit card users who had no credit' and that agency representatives showed concern that the transaction 'would harm competition in the subprime sector.'
Warren asserted, in particular, that Discover 'offers interest rates two percentage points lower than Capital One' to borrowers with nonprime credit scores – but that that offer would likely go away once the firms combine.
'Less competition among those with lower credit scores could mean Capital One can raise credit card rates for vulnerable families with limited alternative options, which could be the difference between getting by month-to-month and entering a financial downward spiral,' Warren wrote Tuesday.
Warren repeated concerns that, by acquiring Discover, Capital One would carry more than 30% of the nonprime credit score market, driving the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index – a legacy measure of market consolidation – up by roughly 400 points. For new-to-credit customers, she added, the Fed's analysis found 'the post-merger HHI would increase by 766 points to 1971.'
The DOJ last year withdrew guidelines that leaned heavily on HHI on the idea that the gauge is outdated. But even using it, a transaction that boosts HHI by 200 points or scores above 1,800 generally has been flagged as anticompetitive.
'A merger that creates a firm with a market share over 30 percent and increases HHI by more than 100 points is presumptively illegal under antitrust law,' Warren reiterated Tuesday.
Warren added that DOJ 'has previously been skeptical of deals 'that would enable firms to avoid a regulatory constraint because that constraint was applicable to only one of the merging firms.''
Capital One has said it aims to convert its debit portfolio to Discover networks, Warren asserted.
'The reason is clear: Discover is not only a card issuer but also a card network, which means it is not subject to the limit on debit card interchange fees imposed by the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Act,' Warren said.
While Capital One, before the merger, wouldn't be able to charge merchants more, Discover can, she said.
'And in case there was any doubt about whether Capital One plans to raise swipe fees, the company told its investors that converting its debit and some credit products to Discover networks would be worth an estimated $1.2 billion,' Warren wrote Tuesday.
By moving some of its credit card volume to Discover's network – but not all of it – Capital One would retain the leverage to negotiate interchange fees as a credit card issuer with Discover's largest competitors.
Warren labeled that 'a recipe for coordination' among Discover, Visa and Mastercard.
'The solution to an anticompetitive market is not to anoint a new giant, but to fight to level the entire playing field, like the DOJ is doing with its lawsuit against Visa for monopolization,' Warren wrote Tuesday.
Warren argued, too, that a Capital One-Discover combination would put a damper on existing innovation.
She noted that in the February 2024 call announcing the deal, Capital One CEO Richard Fairbank admitted that his bank's Quicksilver card was a direct response to Discover's It card.
'As Capital One absorbs a major competitor, fewer players in this market could … diminish incentives for remaining firms to offer more generous rewards,' Warren warned.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell plays model inmate as she seeks path out of prison
Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell plays model inmate as she seeks path out of prison

Fox News

time30 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell plays model inmate as she seeks path out of prison

As Jeffrey Epstein's most notorious accomplice and former girlfriend is angling to have her criminal conviction dropped, a look at Ghislaine Maxwell's life behind bars could offer clues about her motivations outside of prison. Maxwell has reportedly rebranded herself while serving out her two-decades-long sentence for her involvement in Epstein's sex crimes. "I did a double take, because I recognized her face immediately from the news," Jessica Watkins, a former Oath Keeper who was imprisoned in the same low-security Florida facility as Maxwell, told the Daily Mail. "I was like, 'Is that who I think it is?'" Watkins was initially sentenced to 8.5 years in prison for her involvement in the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Her sentence was commuted by President Donald Trump on his first day back in office earlier this year. "My friend who was with me was like, 'I don't know - who is it?'" Watkins said. "I caught her up on the situation. Started asking around and it was definitely her." She and Maxwell would converse regularly — often while the pair were exercising in the open-air prison yard — with Maxwell only bringing up her case on occasion, Watkins told the outlet. "We don't talk about cases as inmates because people will think you're a snitch," Watkins explained. "It's an unspoken rule among inmates. You don't ask." However, Watkins reportedly could only recall one time when Maxwell mentioned Epstein. "She did say that the DOJ had no interest in her until after, her exact words were until after Jeffrey, and then she paused for a second and said 'died,'" Watkins said. "That was the only time he ever came up." During the pair's time together in prison, Watkins noticed Maxwell "didn't seem unduly worried" while behind bars, adding, "She seemed very at ease, very calm and approachable." Her reportedly calm demeanor makes sense to former Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg, who was elected into office six years after Epstein's case concluded. "The other inmates know who she is and why she's behind bars," Aronberg told Fox News Digital. "I'm sure a lot of the other inmates have their hands out. They want the commissary money. They want a free education from her, whatever she can provide." While in prison, Maxwell offers legal advice and classes to her fellow inmates, often helping individuals access the necessary forms related to their case and working in the law library, according to Watkins. "She was very concerned about peoples' medical well-being," Watkins said. "So she did have that kind side to her." She also reportedly focused her free time on reading books, working on her own case or working out — foregoing the prison's television privileges. However, her work behind bars could indicate an attempt to win over her fellow inmates' favor while leveraging her educational background, according to Aronberg. "She had status when she was not behind bars," Aronberg said. "She took that into the prison facility with her, and she is using that." Watkins also described how she and Maxwell found a friendship in their choice to not partake in drug use while locked up. "We avoided most of the inmates [because] they were high all the time, and we didn't want to be around that," Watkins told The Daily Mail. "[Maxwell] would gravitate towards people who were also sober." Watkins' attorney did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Maxwell's reported decision to not use recreational drugs while in prison could be a larger move to remain out of trouble while she makes a bid for freedom, according to Aronberg. "An inmate's good behavior won't impact their ability to get a new trial," Aronberg told Fox News Digital. "But it does impact their ability to get clemency." Aronberg pointed to Maxwell's two days of meetings with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last week, as President Donald Trump commented on his ability to hand the convicted criminal a pardon. "This is a convicted sex trafficker," Aronberg said. "This is someone who committed sexual assault on minors. This is someone who is indicted for perjury. And yet, she got a private audience with the No. 2 person at the DOJ. Had she been less of a model prisoner behind bars, perhaps the administration wouldn't be rushing to meet with her and believe her in what she's saying." Blanche spent nearly two days at a federal courthouse in Tallahassee interviewing Maxwell, who answered questions "about 100 different people," according to her attorney. "She never invoked a privilege," David Oscar Markus told reporters on Thursday. "She never refused to answer a question, so we're very proud of her." The talks come as a House committee subpoenaed Maxwell to testify in a congressional deposition over her knowledge of the scope of Epstein's crimes, while lawmakers continue to demand the DOJ hands over files related to the case. However, Aronberg urges caution from federal prosecutors when taking Maxwell's words at face-value. "If you're a model prisoner behind bars, then prosecutors are more likely to believe that you really are trying to do the right thing, you're reformed and you are telling the truth this time around," Aronberg said. "But it's hard to ignore the fact that she is a liar." On Monday, Maxwell's legal team submitted a brief asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear her appeal of her federal sex trafficking conviction, citing the government's "obligation to honor" an agreement struck by Epstein that should have shielded Maxwell from any criminal charges. Federal prosecutors have argued the deal only applied in Florida, ultimately ruling out Maxwell's case in New York. "No one is above the law — not even the Southern District of New York," Markus said in a statement. "Our government made a deal, and it must honor it. The United States cannot promise immunity with one hand in Florida and prosecute with the other in New York." Markus went on to appeal to Trump, who has previously said he has the power to pardon Maxwell but has "not thought about" doing so. "President Trump built his legacy in part on the power of a deal—and surely he would agree that when the United States gives its word, it must stand by it," Markus said. "We are appealing not only to the Supreme Court but to the President himself to recognize how profoundly unjust it is to scapegoat Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein's crimes, especially when the government promised she would not be prosecuted." The DOJ did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence for her role in Epstein's scheme to sexually abuse numerous young girls. She is anticipated to testify under oath on Aug. 11 at or near the federal prison she is currently serving her sentence in. "Jeffrey Epstein could not do what he did without Ghislaine Maxwell," Aronberg said. "She's no victim. She is the devil's accomplice."

DOJ files misconduct complaint against Judge James Boasberg over ‘improper' comments about Trump: ‘Undermined the integrity of the judiciary'
DOJ files misconduct complaint against Judge James Boasberg over ‘improper' comments about Trump: ‘Undermined the integrity of the judiciary'

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

DOJ files misconduct complaint against Judge James Boasberg over ‘improper' comments about Trump: ‘Undermined the integrity of the judiciary'

The Justice Department filed a misconduct complaint against District Judge James Boasberg on Monday, demanding that the jurist be reassigned from a migrant deportation case over 'improper' remarks he allegedly made about President Trump. 'Today at my direction, [DOJ] filed a misconduct complaint against U.S. District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg for making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration,' Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X. Boasberg, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, is presiding over a case involving Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport suspected criminal migrants. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement The complaint, written by Bondi's chief of staff Chad Mizelle and sent to the Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit Sri Srinivasan, refers to comments Boasberg allegedly made during a March 11 judicial conference attended by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and other jurists. 'While there, Judge Boasberg attempted to improperly influence Chief Justice Roberts and roughly two dozen other federal judges by straying from the traditional topics to express his belief that the Trump Administration would 'disregard rulings of federal courts' and trigger 'a constitutional crisis,'' Mizelle wrote, according to Fox News. 'Although his comments would be inappropriate even if they had some basis, they were even worse because Judge Boasberg had no basis — the Trump Administration has always complied with all court orders,' Mizelle continued. 'Nor did Judge Boasberg identify any purported violations of court orders to justify his unprecedented predictions.' Advertisement Boasberg, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, allegedly made the remark just days before he presided over a case involving Trump's use of the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport suspected migrant gang members to a notorious maximum-security prison in El Salvador. Boasberg, 62, maintains the Trump administration violated his March 15 order to halt deportation flights to El Salvador. Mizelle referenced Boasberg's deportation flight order that has since been overturned by the Supreme Court and argued that 'Within days of those statements, Judge Boasberg began acting on his preconceived belief that the Trump Administration would not follow court orders.' 'Taken together, Judge Boasberg's words and deeds violate Canons of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, and, erode public confidence in judicial neutrality, and warrant a formal investigation,' he wrote, asking that Boasberg be removed from the Alien Enemies Act case 'to prevent further erosion of public confidence while the investigation proceeds.' Advertisement Trump has argued that Boasberg should be impeached. REUTERS Bondi argued that Boasberg's alleged comments 'have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that.' Trump has previously slammed Boasberg as a 'Grandstander' and 'highly conflicted,' 'radical left' judge who is attempting to 'usurp' his presidential power. Advertisement 'This judge … should be IMPEACHED!!!' the president fumed in March 18 Truth Social post. A DC district court spokesperson did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment.

DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge
DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge

Axios

time5 hours ago

  • Axios

DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge

The Department of Justice filed a misconduct complaint against federal Judge James Boasberg"for making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration," Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Monday. The big picture: The D.C.-based U.S. District Court chief judge has previously angered the Trump administration with his rulings on deportations. Boasberg has been the target of an impeachment effort by Trump and House Republicans after the George W. Bush-appointed judge questioned the administration's decision to disregard an order against the deportation of hundreds of Venezuelans. Driving the news: Bondi said on X that she had directed the DOJ to take the action because the judge's comments "have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that." Representatives for the DOJ did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment on what the complaint specifically refers to and Boasberg's chambers did not immediately respond to Axios' Monday night phone message seeking comment on the matter. Catch up quick: Boasberg raised the ire of the administration in March when he ordered that flights deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members should turn around. The White House said it ignored the judge's order because it was issued after the flights had already departed and left U.S. jurisdiction. The Trump administration defended its decision to follow through with the deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th century war time law. The president said Boasberg "should be IMPEACHED" over the matter — prompting Chief Justice John Roberts to issue a rare statement saying that impeaching a federal judge is "not an appropriate response" to disagreeing with a ruling. Meanwhile, Boasberg said in April that he found probable cause to hold the administration in contempt for defying his order.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store