MAS ‘stands ready to curb excessive volatility in the Singapore dollar'
From an overnight rate of around $1.3429 SGD to the USD, the rate spiked to US$1.3488 by 8.00 am before easing back to $1.3429 by around 1.00 pm.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) says Singapore's foreign exchange and money markets continue to function normally after US President Donald Trump announced tariffs on US trading partners worldwide.
In an April 3 announcement, Singapore's central bank says it stands ready to curb excessive volatility in the Singapore dollar, and to ensure that Singapore's foreign exchange (forex) and money markets continue to function in an orderly manner.
MAS says it is 'closely monitoring developments and assessing the implications for the Singapore economy'.
The central bank's statement did not make reference to a sharp movement of the Singapore dollar versus the US dollar earlier today.
From an overnight rate of around $1.3429 SGD to the USD, the rate spiked to $1.3488 by 8.00 am before easing back to $1.3429 by around 1.00 pm.
Trump said on April 2 (April 3, Singapore time) that he will apply a minimum 10% tariff on all exporters to the US, which will take effect on April 5.
Trump also announced 'reciprocal tariffs' on nations that run trade surpluses with the US — Singapore included. Singapore's imports to the US will be levied an additional 10% tariff, which will take effect on April 9.
8% y-o-y in 1Q2025; geopolitical tensions cited as top risk to economy
New MAS document outlines adoption of Singapore-Asia Taxonomy among banks and corporates, hopes to encourage wider use
Read more stories about where the money flows, and analysis of the biggest market stories from Singapore and around the World
Get in-depth insights from our expert contributors, and dive into financial and economic trends
Follow the market issue situation with our daily updates
Or want more Lifestyle and Passion stories? Click here
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Citi Identifies Broadcom as a Reliable Stock for Strong Upcoming Profits
Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) is one of Best Dividend Stocks to Buy for Dependable Dividend Growth. The stock was recently added to Citi's updated 'Positive ROE Trend' stock basket, an index of companies expected to see rising return on equity (ROE), largely fueled by improved margins or enhanced efficiency, as measured by total asset turnover, according to strategist Scott Chronert. A technician working at a magnified microscope, developing a new integrated circuit. Citi Research noted that high-quality companies generating strong returns are becoming increasingly difficult to find. Chronert explained in a client note that ROE, which is a measure of profitability calculated by dividing net income by shareholders' equity, is 'increasingly scarce' among large-cap stocks. Still, Citi believes Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) stands out as a reliable profit generator. The company is projected to achieve an ROE of over 43% by the end of 2026, marking a sharp increase from current levels. The stock has jumped approximately 51% this quarter and is up by over 7% year to date. Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO)'s CEO recently stated that the firm expects its AI-related revenue growth in fiscal 2025 to 'sustain into fiscal 2026,' driven by continued strong demand for its custom AI chips and networking products. Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO)'s dividend policy is also very strong, as the company has been rewarding shareholders with growing dividends for the past 14 years. It pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share for a dividend yield of 0.95%, as of June 17. Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) is a global tech firm that designs, develops, and delivers a broad portfolio of semiconductor and infrastructure software products. While we acknowledge the potential of AVGO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Hubbell Stock Underperforming the Nasdaq?
Shelton, Connecticut-based Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and utility solutions in the United States and internationally. With a market cap of $20.9 billion, the company operates through Electrical Solutions and Utility Solutions segments. Companies worth $10 billion or more are generally described as "large-cap stocks", and HUBB fits this description perfectly. The company offers a broad range of electrical products, including plugs, receptacles, connectors, lighting fixtures, high voltage test and measurement equipment, and voice and data signal processing components. Dear Tesla Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for June 22 Trump Is Giving Tesla's Robotaxis a Leg Up Ahead of June 22. Should You Buy TSLA Stock Now? Nvidia Says Quantum Computing Is Nearing an 'Inflection Point.' Here Are the 3 Best Stocks to Buy Now to Profit. Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Hubbell currently trades 18.7% below its all-time high of $481.35 recorded on Nov. 6, 2024. HUBB's stock has surged 13.7% over the past three months, notably outperforming the Nasdaq Composite's ($NASX) 9.6% uptick during the same time frame. In the long term, HUBB stock has declined 6.6% on a YTD basis, underperforming the Nasdaq's 1.1% increase. Moreover, shares of HUBB grew 2.5% over the past 52 weeks, also underperforming NASX's 9.3% returns over the same period. HUBB stock has been trading below its 200-day moving average since early February but climbed above its 50-day moving average in mid-April, underscoring a trend reversal. Hubbell stock declined 5.5% following the release of its disappointing Q1 earnings on May 1. The company's net sales declined 2.5% year-over-year to $1.4 billion, mainly caused by a decline in its Utility Solutions segment's net sales, which came out to be $857.1 million, and failed to surpass the Street's estimates. Its adjusted operating margin also fell by 40 bps year-over-year to 19.3% and drove its adjusted operating income to fall 4.1% year-over-year to $263.9 million. HUBB's adjusted earnings decreased 2.8% from its year-ago value to $3.50 and failed to touch the consensus estimates by 6.2%. Its peer, Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT), has performed better over the past year. VRT stock has grown 2.6% in 2025 and has surged 30.2% over the past 52 weeks. Among the 11 analysts covering the HUBB stock, the consensus rating is a 'Moderate Buy.' Its mean price target of $424.22 suggests an 8.4% upside potential from current price levels. On the date of publication, Aditya Sarawgi did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Has A New Plan To Get Women To Have More Babies. What Could Go Wrong?
In an effort to get Americans to have more children, the Trump administration has proposed ideas such as a $5,000 'baby bonus' or a $1,000 tax-deferred investment account for children born between 2025 and 2029. It's as if we're suddenly in a game of Monopoly: Have a baby, pass go and collect cash! Their concern is that declining birth rates may lead to a smaller workforce amid an aging population, potentially straining economic stability and the social safety net. But having children can be a swift way into debt. According to the Brookings Institution, a financial think tank, the average middle-income family with two children — median income $80,610 ―spends $310,605 on each child by the time they reach 17. Additionally, having children in the U.S. comes with risks that go well beyond economics. Maternal morbidity is significantly higher in the U.S. than in other developed countries, and since abortion bans came into effect in some states, deaths have risen — inTexas, maternal death shot up 56%, according to the Gender Policy Equity Institute. For white women, the rate doubled from 20 per 100,000 to 39.1; for Black women, who are historically at greater risk, rates jumped from 31.6 to 43.6 per 100,000 live births. And those are just the implications for mothers; there are risks to babies as well. I made it through birth without too many complications, but my second son nearly didn't. He was born with VACTERL syndrome, a birth defect which affects multiple body systems. In the U.S., birth defects affect 1 in 33 babies and are the leading cause of infant death, making up 1 in 5 of all infant deaths. Racial disparities persist here, too,Black infants are over twice as likely to die relative to those born to parents of other races according to KFF. My son has a 'rare' disease — fewer than 200,000 people in the U.S. have it. Collectively, however, rare diseases aren't as 'rare' as they may seem. An estimated 25 to 30 million Americans have one, and birth defects like gastroschisis — a condition in which an infant is born with its intestines protruding outside the body — carry higher risk factors for younger women. Having a child with serious medical issues is like having a bomb explode in the heart of your family. After my son's birth, I was stuck at a hospital in Greenwich, Connecticut — my doctor refused to release me — as my newborn was sent via ambulance to a hospital in New York City for surgery. Emotionally, this was devastating. My family was lucky; my son survived. My spouse had insurance coverage through his job. Our boy got the immediate and ongoing medical attention he needed. But out-of-pocket copays for the three surgeries that marked my son's first 100 days of life came to $10,000 per month. Instead of staring into our baby's eyes, we were staring into a dark abyss that foretold possible bankruptcy. As exhausted as I was nursing, pumping, tending to a very sick child and his older brother, I also lay awake at night, terrified at the possibility of losing our health insurance. We made it through that first year by the skin of our teeth. Others aren't so fortunate. With high premiums and higher deductibles, health insurance becomes prohibitive to many if not most Americans. Today, 41% of adults in the US have health care debt, according to KFF. Those without health care coverage, and possibly even those with it, are only one accident or unfortunate circumstance away from bankruptcy. The inequities in health care grow the gap between wealthy and poor. According to the Center for American Progress,congressional Republicans' plans to slash Medicaid funding and allow Affordable Care Act tax credits to expire, ACA health insurance marketplace premiums may increase by thousands of dollars each year. If the GOP dismantles the ACA, those with preexisting conditions — like my son ― could be denied coverage. The Trump administration suggests that individuals who need help are lazy; that they must earn their keep. But women and families are trying — and it's clearly not possible. Young families can't afford children. Yet conservatives insist women have them anyway. The Biden administration was criticized as elitist for forgiving student loan debt, butstudent loan debt actually delays fertility for women, especially at the higher levels. Granted, it's easy for me to suggest not having children — I have two, both nearly grown. But women deserve to know the risks that can alter their lives. As a mother, I felt helpless watching my child endure so much suffering. More recently, I regret bringing my children into a world in which abundant resources are shared as if they were scant. It's terrifying to know my sons may not have access to the support they need when they need it. In countrieslike Japan, parents get a child Italy, working women with two or more children receive additional pension Hungary, women below the age of 40 who marry for the first time are eligible to receive an interest-free general-purpose loan worth $36,000 — which is forgiven in full for those with three offspring. The program was so successful that 2,400 families applied for the loan within the first two weeks. But offering financial incentives to having children has had lukewarm success over the long term. For example,Hungary's birth rate in 2019 was 1.55 babies per woman. In 2024, it was 1.38 and declining. The underlying assumption these countries and the Trump administration make is that individuals — both women and men — inherently want children. For whatever reasons, we may not. We may have goals exclusive to family and babies. Just because a government or country 'needs' them, it doesn't mean individuals do; and just because women can biologically have them, it doesn't mean they aspire to. If the Trump administration truly wants women to have children, it should support them in real and practical ways. Offer child care facilities, adequate financial aid and programs to help families and children. Provide affordable health care that's accessible to everyone. Reinstate Medicare funding. Protect the Affordable Care Act. Recognize abortion as a part of maternal health care. Knowing it is safe to have a child, and that the child will be safe in the world it is coming into, would be much more effective and persuasive than any one-time bonus. Do you have a compelling personal story you'd like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we're looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@
