Ofcom investigates 4chan and porn site over suspected child safety breaches
The platforms under investigation include 4chan, porn provider First Time Videos, which runs FTVGirls.com and FTVMilfs.com, and seven file-sharing services: Im.ge, Krakenfiles, Nippybox, Nippydrive, Nippyshare, Nippyspace and Yolobit.
Ofcom said it received complaints about illegal activity on 4chan and potential sharing of child abuse images on the file-sharing sites.
It also said none of the services responded to legal information requests.
The First Time Videos probe will examine whether it has 'highly effective' age checks to stop children viewing porn, which is now a legal requirement for such sites.
A spokesperson said: 'We have received complaints about the potential for illegal content and activity on 4chan, and possible sharing of child sexual abuse material on the file-sharing services.'
If the companies are found to have broken the law, Ofcom can impose fines of up to £18 million or 10% of global turnover, and even seek court orders to block UK access.
The regulator said more enforcement action is expected as wider parts of the Online Safety Act come into force from the end of July.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Britain's porn crackdown in numbers: Pornhub loses more than 1 MILLION visitors in just two weeks – as Brits refuse to show their ID to prove they're over–18
Britain's pornography crackdown has sent the number of visits to the most popular adult sites tumbling as Britons refuse to show their ID to prove their age. Visits to many sites halved within two weeks of the introduction of enhanced age verification rules under the Online Safety Act. Pornhub, the UK's most popular adult site, has lost more than one million visitors since the start of the new restrictions, according to data gathered by Similarweb. Between July 24 (the day before the rules came into effect) and August 8, Pornhub's average daily visits fell from 3.2 million to two million – a reduction of 47 per cent. This comes as Britain's Online Safety Act ushers in some of the world's most restrictive rules on accessing online pornography. Since July 25, visitors to adult sites have had to verify that they are over 18 either by providing credit card details, uploading a picture of their ID, or using a selfie to estimate their age. These rules, intended to make it harder for under–18s to see explicit material, have seen huge reductions in the number of Britons accessing pornography. Similarweb data found that visits to the 90 most popular sites fell 23 per cent between July and August, with the largest sites taking the biggest hits. Daily visits to Pornhub actually spiked on the day the new rules came into place, reaching 4.1 million visitors on July 25. However, this has now fallen to 1.8 million as of the latest available data from August 18. Likewise, average daily visits to XHamster, the third most popular site, fell 39 per cent from 1.7 million to 1.2 million between July and August. XVideos, another popular adult site in the UK, saw average daily visitor numbers fall by 47 per cent over the same timeframe. Similarly, the popular adult content site OnlyFans saw average daily visits decline by eight per cent month on month. At the same time, data shows that downloads of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) have massively increased. A VPN allows someone to disguise their internet traffic so that they appear to be in a different country, bypassing the UK's age verification laws. Some VPNs, such as NordVPN and Proton, have boasted of tenfold increases in usage since the new rules came into force, and VPN apps topped the Apple Store's most downloaded list. Since someone using a VPN would not appear to be browsing from the UK in Similarweb's data, it isn't clear how much of the change is due to individuals using VPNs. Although average visits to adult sites from the UK fell, the change was not distributed evenly, with some smaller sites showing explosive growth. For example, daily visitors to the site ' increased more than 130 per cent month on month. A spokesperson for Pornhub said in a statement: 'As we've seen in many jurisdictions around the world, there is often a drop in traffic for compliant sites and an increase in traffic for non–compliant sites.' The regulator Ofcom is already investigating four companies that control over 30 different sites for not doing enough to prevent under–18s accessing explicit content. The Online Safety Act requires the operators of online platforms to prevent children from viewing 'harmful content'. That includes explicit content, like pornography, but also content that encourages self–harm or suicide, promotes dangerous challenges, shows serious violence, or incites hatred against people. Platforms found to be in breach of the act could face a range of punishments, including fines of £18 million or 10 per cent of global turnover. In extreme cases, companies may be blocked from operating in the UK. The laws were created in response to what many consider to be an alarming rise in young children accessing disturbing or harmful content online. A study conducted last year by the charity Internet Matters found that seven in 10 children aged nine to 13 said they had been exposed to harmful content online. Children in this age group reported coming across hate speech (13 per cent), coming across mis/disinformation (15 per cent), and one in ten has seen violent content or content that promotes violence. Similarly, Ofcom research has found that eight per cent of UK children aged eight to 14 visited a porn site at least once a month. However, Similarweb's data shows that daily visitors to social media sites have been largely unaffected by the changes. X, formerly Twitter, and Reddit have shown relatively steady traffic figures since introducing age verification checks, despite both sites hosting pornographic content. Children as young as EIGHT are finding adult content online New research from Ofcom reveals the extent to which children are accessing porn online, and underlines the need for new measures to protect them. It found that eight per cent of children aged 8–14 in the UK visited an online porn site or app in a month – including around 3 per cent of 8–9–year–olds – the youngest children in the study. Ofcom's research tracked the use of websites and apps by 8–14–year–olds across smartphones, tablets and computers over a month. Boys aged 13–14 (19 per cent) were mostly likely to visit a porn service, significantly more than girls the same age (11 per cent). With older teenagers also likely accessing pornography, the total number of under–18s exposed to adult content will be higher still.
Spectator
6 hours ago
- Spectator
Why women trust Farage more than Starmer
Labour's attack dogs have Nigel Farage firmly in their sights. A vote for Reform will leave women and girls at risk from all manner of online nasties, is their latest salvo. Apparently, only Labour can offer us women the protection we need. Well, as one such woman, I would far sooner have a pint with Farage than be looked after by Starmer. First came technology secretary Peter Kyle, who, at the end of July, accused the Reform leader of 'wilful disregard for the safety of children online' after he proposed repealing the Online Safety Act. Angela Rayner then ramped up the panic. Scrapping online safety laws would enable 'a vile, misogynistic culture on social media' by opening the floodgates on revenge porn, the Deputy Prime Minister proclaimed. This would 'fail a generation of young women,' she added for good measure. And now this week sees the launch of a Labour attack ad scurrilously linking Farage to Andrew Tate – a self-declared 'misogynist' and 'sexist' facing charges, which he denies, of rape and human trafficking in more than one country – after Farage discussed Tate's appeal to young men in a podcast. The crude message being drummed home to voters is that women and girls will not be safe with Farage in charge. That Labour needs to confuse online and real world harms, that it seeks to blur the boundary between the actions of Jimmy Savile and internet pornography, not only speaks of desperation, it is insulting to women. There isn't a woman alive who doesn't know the difference between a podcast interview and being intimidated or physically threatened in real life. Or, for that matter, between even the vilest online content and the actions of a rapist or paedophile. To suggest women don't know this – and need to be protected in the online world just like girls – is patronising in the extreme. In case Labour's PR team needs reminding, women are morally and intellectually equal to men. Of course there are things online I would not want children to see. But, as a mother, I consider it my role – not the job of government ministers – to protect my daughter. Because, let's be honest, when it comes to protecting women and girls in real life, the Labour government does not have a leg to stand on. Just this weekend, while Rayner was busy arguing Farage would fail women, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy joined Wigan's Pride march sporting a 'Protect the Dolls' T-shirt, 'doll' being slang for a man who 'passes' as a woman. Was a government minister really suggesting that males should be allowed access to women's single sex spaces – presumably including toilets, changing rooms and hospital wards – places where women really are vulnerable? So much for women's safety. And if we're discussing risks to girls, what has Labour done about the Pakistani-heritage grooming gangs that have preyed on working class girls in towns across Britain? Jess Phillips, the minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, huffed with irritability when forced to listen to Conservative Katie Lam's Parliamentary plea for justice for the victims of 'racially and religiously aggravated' crimes. When the issue of grooming gangs was raised on Radio 4's Any Questions, Leader of the House of Commons, Lucy Powell, dismissively retorted, 'Oh, we want to blow that little trumpet now do we,' and 'let's get that dog whistle out shall we'. And let's not forget that Starmer initially ruled out a national inquiry into grooming gangs, accusing those calling for one of jumping on a 'far-right bandwagon'. So much for the safety of girls. Labour has nothing to offer women and girls other than promises of censorship. Restricting free speech online might suit the current government but it is scurrilous to use women's safety as a reason for this control. In any case, patronising women while smearing Farage could backfire spectacularly. With women now leading protests against asylum seekers being housed in hotels, Reform is targeting female voters directly. Women are listening: latest polls suggest that Reform is gaining ground not just among women but among young women in particular. Even trendy women's mag Cosmopolitan has been forced to admit that 'Nigel Farage and co are winning over more female voters.' It seems I'm not the only one who would prefer a pint with Farage to being looked after by Starmer. Joanna Williams is an academic and author. Follow her on Substack here
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
What's YOUR phone network doing to stop scam and nuisance calls? We asked all of the biggest providers
Britons are being battered by millions of nuisance cold calls a year. Two in five phone users have received a suspicious call in the last three months, according to data from communications regulator Ofcom. Scammers frequently call out of the blue claiming to be from trusted businesses in the hope of gleaning personal information they can use to steal your money. They are able disguise their overseas numbers as UK numbers using a tactic known as spoofing. If you pick up and speak to them, they can clone your voice using artificial intelligence - allowing them to impersonate you and get past firms' security checks to confirm your identity. We look at what the biggest phone networks are doing to quell the high number of scam and spam calls plaguing Britons on their phones each day. O2 and Virgin Media Virgin Media and O2 use a service called Call Defence which uses AI to flag suspected nuisance and scam calls. The service analyses phone numbers and determines whether it could be a scam or spam call. Customers are alerted to any risk before picking up by a display showing 'suspected spam' to help them decide whether they want to answer the call or not. O2 was the first mobile provider to roll this out as a free service to its customers, with the technology flagging over 150million suspected scam and spam calls since launching last year. Landline customers can also prevent nuisance or scam calls. They can register their number with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) which will prevent unwanted calls or sign up for Virgin's Anonymous Caller Rejection which blocks incoming calls from withheld numbers. BT and EE EE provides a free of charge call screening service for its landline customers which has helped to block around 6million scam calls and flagged more than 57million as potential nuisance calls in the last year. There is a paid-for service called Scam Guard which customers add on to their phone plan at a cost of £1 per month. It was created in partnership with software firm Norton and offers nuisance and scam call labelling, dark web monitoring, and access to three months of free Cyber Security Duo, covering identity and device protection. BT is also deploying AI in the fight against nuisance calls, using a tool powered by US-based protection company Hiya which monitors incoming calls to notify customers of any suspected spam or scam calls. It introduced the scam prevention tool in May 2024 and in a four month period it stopped 2.7million scam calls and 17.7million 'nuisance' spam calls. Vodafone and Three The merger of Vodafone and Three completed in June 2025 when it became the biggest mobile network in the UK, serving around 29million customers. Vodafone Three does not currently offer a specific display feature to filter suspected scam calls and display them as scam or spam calls on customers' phones. The phone network giant is looking into this area as the technology evolves. Vodafone and Three say they collectively block 1.7million fraudulent calls to its customers each day. What can you do if you are plagued by scam calls The Financial Conduct Authority advises that customers treat all unexpected calls, emails and text messages with caution. Don't assume they are genuine, even if the person knows some basic information about you. Scam calls should be reported to the telecommunications watchdog, Ofcom, by forwarding them to 7726. Marijus Briedis, chief technology officer at VPN service provider NordVPN says: 'If you are seeing a spike in spoof calls, speak to your provider and see what they can do. 'For example, EE offers Scam Guard that uses AI to filter out and label suspicious communications for a fee. 'They should be offering these services as standard, but it might still be worth paying for the service if you receive scam calls on a regular basis.'
