Why Trump attacked Iran after seeking two weeks to decide? Report says Iran's Fordow nuclear site showed...
Israel-Iran war: Earlier this week, US President Donald Trump said he would decide within 'two weeks' whether or not to attack Iran, but two days later, American bombers launched attacks at Iranian nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, effectively marking the US' entry into the Israel-Iran war.
But what prompted Trump to attack the Iranian nuclear sites at such short notice? What changed between June 20 and June 22, which prompted the US to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities? Why Trump attacked Iran after seeking 'two weeks' to decide?
According to a report by India Today, citing high-resolution satellite imagery its Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) obtained from US firm Maxar Technologies, 'unusual ground activities' were allegedly witnessed at the Fordow nuclear enrichment site on June 19 and June 20.
A fleet of 16 cargo trucks were positioned along the access road leading to the tunnel entrance of the facility on June 19, while June 20 satellite images showed the trucks had been repositioned approximately one-kilometer northwest along the access road, the report said.
More trucks and bulldozers were seen near the entrance of Fordow's main facility in subsequent images, it said. Experts have analyzed satellite imagery from the Fordow nuclear site since Israel attacked it on June, but these reveal no suspicious activity. However, the latest images, the report claims, showed 'unusual' activity on the ground. US bombs Iranian nuclear sites
On Sunday morning, US B-2 Stealth bombers dropped GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker buster bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, purportedly destroying the sites. The bunker busters, each weighing about 13,600 kilos, are capable of penetrating up to an estimated 200 feet of reinforced concrete.
The US attack came just two days after Donald Trump sought two weeks time to decide whether the US would join Israel in its war against Iran. But analysts believe that US action may have been prompted because Iran was preparing to shift its nuclear assets, including enriched Uranium, to secret locations from its nuclear facilities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
3 minutes ago
- Hans India
US tariffs: India set to bounce back bolstered by strategic reforms, robust domestic demand
New Delhi: As India-US trade talks stall, the resilience of India's economy is a cornerstone of its ability to weather these tariff pressures with minimal disruption as over the past decade, the country has transformed into a diversified economic powerhouse, bolstered by strategic reforms and robust domestic demand. According to BJP national spokesperson Tuhin Sinha, the trade talks, initially aimed at fostering mutual economic benefits, descended into a stalemate as the US pressed India with ambitious and arguably unrealistic demands. "Trump's administration sought extensive market access for American agricultural products, pharmaceuticals, and technology services, while imposing steep tariffs on Indian exports such as steel, aluminium, textiles, and IT services. These tariffs, coupled with demands that threatened India's domestic stakeholders, were met with resolute resistance from India, under the steadfast leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi," he emphasised in an opinion piece that appeared in NDTV. He further stated that committed to protecting the interests of farmers, fisheries, and Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), India refused to yield, prioritising its economic sovereignty. "This principled stance, as noted by economists Stuart and Linda Stern in their 2023 book India's Economic Ascendancy: Navigating Global Trade Challenges, has not only safeguarded India's core sectors but positioned it to emerge stronger from the ongoing tariff chaos," Sinha wrote. A SBI Research report last week said that imposition of a 25 per cent penalty on goods trade with India, with a proposition of an additional 25 per cent on the world's largest democracy, can be a bad policy decision for the US and its people. India - strategically protecting its sovereignty - must continue to protect its farmers from likelihood of predatory practices of select global conglomerates who may vie for a lucrative "Desi" pie without investing in sustainable market infrastructure creation, anchoring agri value chain financing and being a partner in welfare schemes that upend 'Ease of Living' for our farming community, the report stressed. According to Sinha, this tariff crisis presents India with a strategic opportunity to accelerate its pursuit of technological autonomy and expand its global market reach. "The Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India) initiative, another visionary policy spearheaded by PM Modi, has driven investments in indigenous technologies, particularly in critical areas like semiconductors, 5G infrastructure, and renewable energy," he emphasised. The Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme has attracted global tech giants like Apple, Samsung, and Foxconn, boosting electronics exports by 22 per cent in 2024, according to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology. The tariff crisis has also reshaped the geopolitical landscape, creating opportunities for India to assert its global influence. "By standing firm against coercive trade tactics, India has bolstered its reputation as a principled and independent power. This stance has opened the door to fresh alignments, particularly within the Russia-India-China (RIC) framework," said Sinha. Prime Minister Modi's proposed visit to Beijing for the 2025 SCO Summit and his recent call with Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva signal India's intent to deepen ties with BRICS partners. "These diplomatic engagements, as noted by the Ministry of External Affairs (2025), reflect India's strategic balancing act, leveraging the tariff dispute to enhance its geopolitical leverage. The potential revival of RIC cooperation, alongside strengthened BRICS collaboration, positions India as a pivotal player in a multipolar world. By fostering these partnerships, India is not only countering US pressure but also shaping a new global order that prioritises mutual cooperation over unilateral demands," Sinha highlighted.
NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
"Perfect Time To...": Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Fallon Slam Trump's India Tariffs
Late-night show hosts Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Fallon have slammed US President Donald Trump for imposing a 50 per cent tariff on India. Mr Trump has imposed a 50 per cent tariff on Indian goods, including 25 per cent that kicked in on Thursday and another 25 per cent due to come into effect on August 28 as a penalty for buying Russian oil. During his "The Late Show", Mr Colbert said President Trump's tariffs on India will raise the price of items like gauze, bandages, and wading. "Yeah, yeah. Perfect time to introduce my new product, Steve's wad. What's in them? What do you care? You're bleeding. It's a wad," he joked during the show on Thursday. "I hope you remembered to set your clocks back to 'more expensive,'" he said after Mr Trump's sweeping new tariffs on more than 90 countries around the world came into effect Calling Mr Trump's tariffs"huge", he said the US administration has raised the import taxes to the highest level since the Great Depression in 1929. "Never a great sign to be compared to the worst thing ever," Mr Colbert said. He said that another country Mr Trump is "punishing" is Brazil, which is also facing a 50 per cent tariff. It is "bad news for meat-based Americans", Mr Colbert said. Jimmy Fallon Slams Trump's India Tariffs Jimmy Fallon also slammed Donald Trump's tariffs on India. "Well, guys, today more of President Trump's tariffs went into effect for more than 90 countries, including Canada, Brazil and India. The only places Trump didn't charge are North Korea and Epstein Island," he said Thursday. Mr Fallon's remarks came amid the Trump administration facing backlash over handling the case of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. "Meanwhile, 50 per cent of tariffs on Brazil will dramatically raise the price of bananas, mangos and pineapples. Edible Arrangements was like, 'As long as you don't raise the price of cantaloupe and long toothpicks, we're good,'" Mr Fallon added. "Even toilet paper will get more expensive. You know it's bad when people come out of the bathroom like, 'Hey, where's that long CVS receipt?'" he said.
New Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan
YEREVAN: The streets were almost deserted in Yerevan Saturday because of the summer heat, but at shaded parks and fountains, Armenians struggled to make sense of what the accord signed a day earlier in Washington means for them. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met Friday and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. 'Acceptable' "It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice," said Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia hasn't achieved much with this draft agreement, but it's a step in the right direction. "We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan," he said. "This accord is a good opportunity for peace." Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact "acceptable", provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. "If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement," she added. 'Endless concessions' But Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. "We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another," she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region." Anahit also criticizes Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for "making decisions for everyone" and for his "endless concessions to Azerbaijan". "We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us," she fumes. Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement "is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia." "We can't trust Azerbaijan," Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having "turned his back" on Russia and Iran. "It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize." 'More stability... in the short term' According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed "to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity." For Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specializing in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement "certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come." But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, "I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term," she said.
