Republican-led committee rejects Epstein associate's request for immunity as condition of testimony
A U.S. Republican-led congressional committee on Tuesday rejected a request by a longtime associate of the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for immunity from future prosecution as a condition for testifying to the panel in the midst of a political storm surrounding President Donald Trump.
Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted in New York in 2021 of helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls and is serving a 20-year sentence in Florida, has been subpoenaed to testify privately to the U.S. House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
The committee has aimed to conduct a deposition of Maxwell, a British socialite who was the wealthy financier's longtime girlfriend, on Aug. 11 at the prison where she's being held in Tallahassee.
"Ms. Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity," Maxwell's lawyer David Markus told Rep. James Comer, who chairs the House committee, in a letter.
In an emailed statement, a committee spokesperson said: "The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony."
Markus also had laid down additional conditions for a deposition, including conducting it somewhere other than the prison and being provided with the committee's questions in advance. Maxwell, Markus said, would testify to the committee in a public setting if she were to be granted clemency.
Maxwell is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn her conviction. Trump has said he was not considering a presidential pardon for her.
WATCH | Trump says no thought given to a Maxwell pardon:
Trump says he 'hasn't thought about' pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell
4 days ago
Trump says Epstein 'stole' young women from his club
Questions over Trump's past relationship with Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking minors, and his administration's handling of records related to the case have dogged the president for weeks, including during a weekend visit to Scotland.
Trump knew Epstein socially in the 1990s and early 2000s, and has said that he cut off ties with Epstein years before his death.
He told reporters Tuesday that Epstein "stole" young women who worked at Trump's club, Mar-a-Lago, including Virginia Giuffre, one of the disgraced financier's most well-known accusers.
Aboard Air Force One from Scotland, Trump said he was upset that Epstein was "taking people that worked for me." The women, he said, were "taken out of the spa, hired by him — in other words, gone."
"I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people,' " Trump said.
When it happened again, Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. Asked if Giuffre was one of the employees poached by Epstein, Trump first said he didn't know, but then said "he stole her."
The White House initially said Epstein was banned for acting like a "creep."
Giuffre, who took her own life earlier this year, claimed that Maxwell spotted her working as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, when she was a teenager, and hired her as Epstein's masseuse, which led to sexual abuse.
Although Giuffre's allegations did not become part of criminal prosecutions against Epstein, she is central to conspiracy theories about the case. She accused Epstein of pressuring her into having sex with powerful men, including Prince Andrew.
Democrats and Trump supporters want documents released
Democrats in Congress and some of Trump's core supporters have demanded the release of documents involving Epstein and Maxwell.
Epstein served a 13-month jail sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a Florida state felony prostitution charge.
Democrats on Tuesday sought more information about the matter.
Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat, and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse wrote to the Justice Department, asking for a copy of the transcript of a recent conversation a department official had with Maxwell.
In addition, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer called on the FBI to conduct a "counterintelligence threat assessment" to determine the risk to U.S. national security if a foreign entity were to gain access to the Epstein files.
"Could our adversaries use that information to blackmail someone like the president or other senior leaders in government?" Schumer asked.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
18 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Judge strikes down key parts of Florida law that led to removal of books from school libraries
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — A federal judge has struck down key parts of a Florida law that helped parents get books they found objectionable removed from public school libraries and classrooms. It is a victory for publishers and authors who had sued after their books were removed. U.S. District Judge Carlos Mendoza in Orlando said in Wednesday's ruling that the statute's prohibition on material that described sexual conduct was overbroad. Mendoza, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, also said that the state's interpretation of the 2023 law was unconstitutional. Among the books that had been removed from central Florida schools were classics like Margaret Atwood's 'The Handmaid's Tale,' Richard Wright's 'Native Son' and Kurt Vonnegut's 'Slaughterhouse-Five.' 'Historically, librarians curate their collections based on their sound discretion not based on decrees from on high,' the judge said. 'There is also evidence that the statute has swept up more non-obscene books than just the ones referenced here.' After the Republican-controlled Florida Legislature passed the law, school officials worried that any sexual content was questionable, a belief that was enforced by new state training that urged librarians to err on the side of caution. Last year, Florida led the nation with 4,500 removals of school books. Under the judge's ruling, schools should revert back to a U.S. Supreme Court precedent in which the test is whether an average person would find the work prurient as a whole; whether it depicts sexual content in an offensive way; and whether the work lacks literary, artistic, political or scientific value. Weekly A weekly look at what's happening in Winnipeg's arts and entertainment scene. The lawsuit was brought by some of the nation's largest book publishers and some of the authors whose books had been removed from central Florida school libraries, as well as the parents of schoolchildren who tried to access books that were removed. The author plaintiffs included Angie Thomas, author of 'The Hate U Give'; Jodi Picoult, author of 'My Sister's Keeper'; John Green, author of 'The Fault in Our Stars'; and Julia Alvarez, author of 'How the Garcia Girls Lost Their Accents.' The publisher plaintiffs included Penguin Random House, Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Macmillan Publishing and Simon and Schuster.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Trump wants Putin summit to ‘set the table' for future Zelenskyy meeting
U.S. President Donald Trump said Thursday he wants Friday's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin to 'set the table' for a future meeting between the two leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which Trump is aiming to hold 'shortly.' All eyes will be on whether Trump and Putin's meeting in Alaska can lead to an end to the war in Ukraine. Canada and Europe have been pushing to ensure Ukraine is represented in any peace talks and that the country's territorial integrity is respected. Trump has been lowering expectations for Friday's summit ever since it was announced last week, including the prospect of reaching any kind of ceasefire or lasting peace deal with Putin. He said Thursday he is already looking toward a second meeting that includes Zelenskyy. 'I would say that tomorrow, all I want to do is set the table for the next meeting, which should happen shortly … I'd like to see it actually happen, maybe in Alaska,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. Story continues below advertisement 'I think it's going to be a good meeting, but the more important meeting will be the second one we're planning. We're going to have a meeting with President Putin, President Zelenskyy, myself, and maybe some European leaders. Maybe not. We'll see.' Trump repeated his claim that he will know 'within the first two minutes, three minutes, four minutes, five minutes' if the meeting with Putin will be constructive or not. He also vowed to stand firm against Putin's demands. 'If If I weren't president, he would much rather take over all of Ukraine,' he said. 'But I am president, and he's not going to mess around with me.' 2:49 Trump warns 'severe consequences' if Putin doesn't end war in Ukraine Russia currently controls around a fifth of Ukraine's territory, and Zelenskyy and the Europeans worry that a deal set by Trump and Putin could cement those gains. Story continues below advertisement Trump has acknowledged the possibility of 'land-swapping' under a future deal, but has also promised to get some territory back for Ukraine. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Following a meeting Thursday with top government officials on the summit, Putin said in a short video released by the Kremlin that the Trump administration was making 'quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities' and to 'reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved.' Putin also suggested that 'long-term conditions of peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole,' could be reached under an agreement with the U.S. on nuclear arms control. Earlier Thursday, Trump told Fox News in a radio interview there was a 25 per cent chance that the summit will fail, but also floated the idea of including Zelenskyy in a second meeting if Friday's talks are successful. He said in the interview and to reporters in the Oval Office he would be willing to stay in Alaska longer if that second meeting can come together quickly. 'I think President Putin will make peace, I think President Zelenskyy will make peace,' Trump said at the White House. 'We'll see if they get along.' Zelenskyy has said he is willing to meet with Putin if he shows signs that Russia is serious about ending its invasion. Yet he has also pointed out that fighting and Russian bombings in Ukraine continue, and current intelligence suggests Moscow isn't preparing to wind down its military operations. Story continues below advertisement 'So far, there is no indication whatsoever that the Russians have received signals to prepare for a post-war situation,' Zelenskyy said in a social media update on Monday. 'If someone is preparing for peace, this is not what he does.' 2:09 Zelenskyy rejects territorial concessions as Trump and Putin plan Alaska summit Prime Minister Mark Carney has joined European leaders in advancing Ukraine's interests ahead of the U.S.-Russia summit while also praising Trump for leading efforts to end the three-and-a-half-year war. A Wednesday statement from the Prime Minister's Office after Carney participated in a virtual summit hosted by leaders of Germany, France and the United Kingdom — which included Zelenskyy and U.S. Vice-President JD Vance — said the leaders agreed to 'shared principles, including that decisions on the future of Ukraine must be made by Ukrainians.' The leaders also agreed that any future peace deal must ensure Ukraine's long-term security and uphold that 'international borders cannot be changed by force.' Story continues below advertisement Carney reaffirmed those points in direct calls with Zelenskyy and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer earlier this week. Trump briefed Zelenskyy, Carney and European leaders on the upcoming summit with Putin in a call on Wednesday. He has promised to brief them again following the meeting. The Ukrainian Canadian Congress said Thursday that it will also be watching Friday's meeting closely. 'What is lawfully Ukraine's is not for the Russians to take, nor for anyone to give away,' the group said in a statement. 'The Ukrainian people deserve our full and unequivocal support.' —with files from Reuters
Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
ELDER: Gerrymandering: Obama then vs. Obama now
Former President Barack Obama speaks at the Obama Foundation Democracy Forum, Dec. 5, 2024, in Chicago. Photo by Erin Hooley / AP Former president Barack Obama railed against Texas for attempting a mid-decade redistricting to create more Republican U.S. House seats. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account On social media, Obama said: 'We can't lose focus on what matters — right now, Republicans in Texas are trying to gerrymander district lines to unfairly win five seats in next year's midterm elections. This is a power grab that undermines our democracy.' Obama, in 2022, wrote: 'Three years ago, I helped @EricHolder launch @AllOnTheLine, a people-powered campaign to fight gerrymandering and advocate for fair redistricting. All On The Line is driven by the core belief that voters should choose their representatives — not the other way around.' That 'voters should choose their representatives — not the other way around' reflects quite a change in thinking from a politician who skillfully used gerrymandering to protect his Illinois State Senate seat. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In 2012, the left-leaning ProPublica wrote: 'Obama's Gerrymander — President Obama may have propelled his political career forward by gerrymandering a Chicago district to include rich supporters.' Illinois state senator Obama decided to primary Democratic Illinois U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush, a former Black Panther. Rush painted Obama as a born-and-raised-in-Hawaii, carpetbagging lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, by way of Harvard Law, who attended prep school and did not have a clue about the life of a typical black person. It worked. Obama not only lost the primary but also performed poorly with black voters. So, what did Obama do? He examined the election results and proceeded to gerrymander his state Senate seat to guard against losing it. He reduced the number of those who voted against him and increased the number of those who did. In short, Obama rejected the notion that 'voters should choose their representatives — not the other way around.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The change in his state Senate seat before and after the gerrymander was remarkable. New Yorker reporter Ryan Lizza interviewed John Corrigan, an Illinois Democrat who worked with Obama to redraw the seat. Corrigan called it 'a radical change.' Lizza wrote: 'Corrigan remembers two things about the district that he and Obama drew. First, it retained Obama's Hyde Park base — he had managed to beat Rush in Hyde Park — then swooped upward along the lakefront and toward downtown. By the end of the final redistricting process, his new district bore little resemblance to his old one. … Obama's new district was wealthier, whiter, more Jewish, less blue-collar and better educated. It also included one of the highest concentrations of Republicans in Chicago.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Again, Obama in 2001 gerrymandered his State Senate district to make it less black, more white, more Jewish and more affluent? Presumably, this did not come up during the 2024 presidential campaign, when Obama lectured 'the brothers' about their reluctance to vote for Kamala Harris. When asked about his newly designed state Senate seat, Obama was dismissive: 'The system of redistricting in the U.S. tends to allow representatives to choose people instead of people choosing representatives. It's just politics.' Obama is not the only one to flip-flop on gerrymandering. Common Cause, a left-leaning 'good government' non-profit, worked in California to take redistricting away from politicians. Its website brags: 'In 2008, California Common Cause led a coalition that drafted and passed the historic Voters First Act, which took a significant step toward ending gerrymandering in California. This ballot initiative stripped California legislators of the power to draw state legislative districts and created the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). … The CRC is now a national model for redistricting reform.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But Common Cause appears to be waffling. Texas is attempting a mid-decade redistricting, something unusual but legal under Texas law. In response, California Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to defy the state law that took redistricting away from the politicians. Newsom said: 'If we don't put a stake into the heart of (the Trump) administration, there may not be an election in 2028. They're not screwing around. We can't afford to screw around either. We have got to fight fire with fire.' What does Common Cause now say? A representative says the organization is 'swamped' and could 'circle back at a later time.' Call it the Obama Gerrymander Rule: When Democrats do it, 'it's just politics.' When Republicans do it, it becomes 'a power grab that undermines our democracy.' Toronto & GTA Sunshine Girls Columnists Toronto & GTA World
