Twix ad banned for encouraging unsafe driving
A TV ad for chocolate bar Twix has been banned for encouraging unsafe driving.
The advert shows a man with flowing hair involved in a car chase and crash that results in his and an identical, caramel-coloured car sandwiched on top of each other, like a Twix.
Five complaints issued against the advert said it encouraged dangerous driving and was irresponsible.
Mars-Wrigley, who own Twix, argued that the ad had a "cinematic presentation" and was set in a "world that was absurd, fantastical and removed from reality", which Clearcast, the non-governmental organisation that approves adverts before broadcast, echoed.
But the watchdog the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled the ad "must not appear again" in its current form because it "condoned unsafe driving".
While the ASA acknowledged that the stunt performed highlighted the fantastical nature of the advert, it took issue with the first half of the video that showed driving "that appeared likely to breach the legal requirements of the Highway Code".
It said there was an "emphasis on speed" including with "fast paced beat and music" in the car chase, noting the "visible skid marks" left on the road.
Mars defended the advert, saying "the cars were shot driving at lawful speeds and any emulation would only reflect the legal and safe driving presented".
The sweet giant, who also own M&Ms, Celebrations and Maltesers, added that Twix is known for its absurd and playful humour, which was reflected in the advert.
The final scene shows a Twix bar falling through the sunroofs of the two cars, before they drive off - still attached - and with the tagline "two is more than one".
For its part, Clearcast told the ASA that the style of the video made it clear it wasn't meant to be emulated nor did it suggest "safe driving was boring."
In the ASA's ruling, it said it told Mars "not to condone or encourage irresponsible driving that was likely to breach the legal requirements of the Highway Code in their ads."
Mars phases out controversial colour additive in Skittles
Man who found smooth Mars bar gets £2 compensation
Steven Bartlett nutrition adverts banned for being misleading
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vogue
an hour ago
- Vogue
Hat Trick: On the Endurance of the Bucket Hat
One of my cardinal rules is to never begin a piece of writing by talking about how difficult it was to begin the piece of writing. Leave that to the bad wedding speeches. But when Vogue asked me if I would write an article about bucket hats, I had no choice. I wanted to do it, but I couldn't muster a single thought on the subject. I mean, it's a hat. What more is there to say? Of all the hats, the bucket hat in particular was completely meaningless to me. I tried to spark something by researching the history. I learned that the bucket hat was originally created for Irish fishermen and became fashionable in the 1980s when it gained a foothold in the hip-hop scene, finding fans among LL Cool J and Run-D.M.C. That was what I had. One sentence, for an entire article on bucket hats. As I was thinking of a good reason I could tell Vogue why I wouldn't be able to do it, they followed up on their original email, telling me they would be sending me different bucket hats for the article: two hats from Prada, two from Tory Burch, and two from The North Face. Maybe the reason bucket hats were so meaningless to me was because I never tried the right one. Maybe I needed a bucket hat from Prada. I immediately emailed them back, saying I'd love to do the article along with my address for the hats. It was about to be summer, and I wasn't going to pass up six designer hats just because I couldn't write more than a sentence about them. A few email exchanges later, I realized the hats would need to be returned after the article. So not only would I not be keeping any hats, I was also on the hook for returning them—a task I am even more incapable of.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Germany's Largest Companies 2025: Automakers Fall As Tariffs Threaten Europe's Largest Economy
Mercedes-Benz withdrew its financial guidance for the rest of this year as a result of uncertainty surrounding Trump's tariffs. Getty Images Germany has the third-largest Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the world, behind only the U.S. and China but its momentum has stalled in recent years. Its $4.5 trillion GDP is expected to contract in 2025 for the third year in a row by a modest 0.3%, and its renowned auto industry is going through a rough patch. The nation's presence on Forbes' annual Global 2000 list ranking the world's 2,000 largest public companies dipped slightly to 49 companies after putting 50 on the list a year ago. Automakers Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Daimler Truck and Porsche SE, the holding company which owns large stakes in Porsche and Volkswagen, all fell more than 10 spots on the list. Germany's highest-ranked company is Munich-based insurer and financial services firm Allianz, which moved up six slots to No. 25 on the overall list. Allianz's asset management operations include a majority stake in Pimco, the American fixed income manager co-founded by bond billionaire Bill Gross. Allianz bought 70% of the business in 2000 for $3.3 billion, but Pimco still operates independently and manages $2 trillion in assets. Overall, Allianz is the only company headquartered in Germany that's in the top 100 worldwide in each of the four metrics tracked by the Global 2000: sales, profit, assets and market value. Its $167 billion in 12-month revenues is 13% higher than a year ago, and its net profit has grown 9% to $10.6 billion. Six other companies based in Germany made the top 100 of the Global 2000—Deutsch Telekom, Volkswagen, Siemens, Mercedes-Benz, Munich Reinsurance and BMW—but it's been a challenging year for the carmakers. Mercedes-Benz and BMW have both posted revenue and profit declines since last year, while Volkswagen's revenue inched up 0.7% to $351 billion but saw profit shrink 29% to $11.6 billion. The market values for all three fell by more than 15%. These declines were largely driven last year by weakening demand for cars in China, but tariffs have now thrown an even bigger wrench into these businesses. In March, Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff on all imported cars in an effort to pressure foreign carmakers to move more manufacturing to the U.S. Although most of the reciprocal tariffs announced on 'Liberation Day' on April 2 have been paused to give nations time to negotiate deals with the U.S., these auto tariffs remain in effect. Mercedes-Benz withdrew its guidance for the rest of 2025, citing volatility caused by the tariffs, and Volkswagen lowered its profit margin expectations to between 5% and 6%. Other parts of Germany's economy have been bolstered by a stimulus plan announced in March, promoted by newly-elected chancellor Friedrich Merz. The country has pledged to establish a new $570 million infrastructure fund to finance construction and special projects for the next 10 years and loosened its borrowing caps. The plan triggered a rally for electric utilities stocks like which rose 103 spots to No. 176 on the Global 2000, RWE, which moved up 59 slots to 278th, and EnBW, up 268 spots from 714th to 446th. All three have recorded significant profit growth since last year. Defense firm Rheinmetall, which makes tanks and weapons and has tripled in value in the last year thanks to the European Union's pledge to increase defense spending, also moved up 393 spots to No. 935 on the list. Another beneficiary of that trend is MTU Aero Engines, which makes engines for aircraft and surged onto the list for the first time at No. 1,356. Its stock has nearly doubled since the start of 2024, and annual sales are up 38% to $8 billion.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
David Walliams ‘shocks' audience with two Nazi salutes at Would I Lie to You? recording
David Walliams has sparked outcry after 'giving two Nazi salutes' during a recording of BBC series Would I Lie To You?'s Christmas special. The former Little Britain star, who quit ITV series Britain's Got Talent when he was caught making lewd comments about contestants, is said to have shocked host Rob Brydon, his fellow celebrity panellists as well as audience members with the gesture. Walliams reportedly gave the offensive salutes while filming the 2025 Christmas special earlier this week. It's believed they occurred after an anecdote that was shared by Call the Midwife star Helen George, who was a contestant on Walliams' team, led by captain Lee Mack. Multiple outlets report that the incident occurred after George claimed she once sprained her wrist 'from waving too much during the Strictly tour'; the actor toured with the BBC dancing competition in 2016 after competing on the series the previous year. When George tried to convince David Mitchell's opposing team that her statement was true, she was asked to give an example of the wave, with her rival contestants asking her 'to make a grander gesture'. According to an audience member present at the filming, this was when Walliams joined in, allegedly proceeding to do a Nazi salute, which went down 'awkwardly'. Team captain Mack was reportedly left 'distinctly unimpressed' by Walliams' actions. The outlet reports that Brydon immediately 'reprimanded' Walliams – but later on in the round, the controversial star and children's author 'made the gesture a second time'. Journalist Sebastian Topan who was in the audience, told the outlet: 'There were gasps from the audience and the other panellists all looked very uncomfortable,' with another writing on X/Twitter after the recording: 'I didn't have David Walliams doing a Nazi salute at the Would I Lie To You? Christmas taping on my 2025 bingo card.' Topan continued: "I think Rob Brydon wanted to get past it as quickly as he could. David Walliams' teammates looked unsure what to do and were not laughing. 'It was like an elephant in the room after that as the incident was early on in the recording and so the remainder of the show felt weird." A BBC spokesperson told The Independent: 'The use of such an offensive gesture is completely unacceptable and we apologise to all at the recording for the offence caused.' The Independent has also contacted Walliams for comment. A spokesperson for Banijay UK, which oversees the game show's production company Zeppotron, said: 'Any attempt at humour regarding this deeply offensive gesture, whether broadcast or not, is completely unacceptable in any context. 'It was immediately acknowledged during the recording that this segment would not be broadcast under any circumstances and we apologise to those who were at the recording for any offence caused.' Walliams was a judge on Britain's Got Talent from 2012 up until his departure in 2022, when it emerged that he had made sexually explicit and derogatory remarks about some of the contestants during a recording at the London Palladium in January 2020. Walliams's comments were picked up by the microphones on the desk and were seemingly not intended to be heard publicly – and he sued FremantleMedia, the production company that makes BGT, for the leaking of his private remarks. The matter was settled in November 2023. He decided to leave the show after issuing an apology. When the recording of his inappropriate comments was made public in 2022, Walliams told The Independent: 'I would like to apologise to the people I made disrespectful comments about during breaks in filming for Britain's Got Talent in 2020. These were private conversations and – like most conversations with friends – were never intended to be shared. Nevertheless, I am sorry.' Fremantle, while announcing it had reached a settlement with Walliams, issued its own apology, stating: 'We are sincerely sorry that his private conversations when a judge on Britain's Got Talent were published, and the great distress this caused David. 'We have reviewed our production practices on the show to ensure they fully respect the expectations of our talent whilst satisfying the requirements of the show. We have enjoyed a great relationship with David over many years. 'We thank David for being an important part of the Britain's Got Talent family and the enduring success of the show and hope to have opportunities to work with him in the future. We are pleased that we have achieved an amicable resolution of this dispute with David.'
