
Time to Bring iPhone Manufacturing Back to America, Op-Ed
Photo:
Steve Jobs the champion of the iPhone concept
By : Ya Libnan – Op-Ed series : 'Bring It Home: Rebuilding America's Manufacturing Power'
Key Points
:
Apple — the symbolic heart of American innovation that builds abroad.
President Donald Trump is once again raising the right question: Why isn't Apple — one of the richest and most powerful companies in the world — making its iPhones in the United States?
Apple has long claimed that moving iPhone manufacturing to the U.S. is impractical or too costly. But that argument doesn't hold water. What's really at stake is profit margins — not practicality. And if America is serious about rebuilding its economic backbone, it's time to stop making excuses and start making things again.
Some quoted Apple as saying that it takes around 20 hours to assemble an iPhone — but that number includes automated processes. The real manual labor? It takes
less than one hour
of human hands to put together an iPhone. Even at American wages, that labor would only add
$20 to $40
to the cost of each device.
That's a small price to pay for rebuilding an industry, restoring pride in American craftsmanship, and giving jobs to American workers.
For decades, the U.S. sent its manufacturing overseas, chasing cheap labor and bigger profits. In the process, we lost factories, skills, and the dignity of building things with our own hands. Whole towns were hollowed out. Generations grew up without ever seeing what a thriving local factory looks like.
Apple is a symbol of American innovation. But what good is innovation if it's always built somewhere else? It's time to match great ideas with great American manufacturing — and to bring back the jobs, training, and supply chains that made the U.S. an industrial powerhouse.
This isn't just about Apple — it's about the country's long-term economic strength. A nation that can't make its own goods will always be at the mercy of those who can. The more we outsource, the more we lose our leverage, our independence, and our ability to shape our future.
America should not just be a consumer of high-tech products — it should be the
maker
of them. If we don't control the production, we don't control the future.
Apple benefits enormously from being an American company. It enjoys strong legal protections, tax advantages, and a massive U.S. customer base. Yet it gives very little back in terms of jobs or industrial investment at home. That's not just a missed opportunity — it's a moral failure.
If Apple sells iPhones to American consumers, it should build them with American workers. The company can afford it. The country needs it. And the message it would send — that America can make world-class products again — is priceless.
President Trump is right to push for American-made iPhones. This is about more than one company — it's about rebuilding a national culture of production, pride, and independence.
Let Apple lead by example. Let America remember how to build. It's time to turn 'Designed in California' into
'Designed and Made in the USA.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Nahar Net
16 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Iran demands 'guarantee' US will lift sanctions in nuclear talks
by Naharnet Newsdesk 8 hours Tehran called on Washington to provide a formal guarantee that it will lift sanctions imposed on Iran in ongoing talks on the Islamic republic's nuclear program. "We want to guarantee that the sanctions are effectively lifted," foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told a news conference Monday in Tehran. "So far, the American side has not wanted to clarify this issue."


Nahar Net
17 hours ago
- Nahar Net
EU readying 'countermeasures' if tariffs deal with US crumbles
by Naharnet Newsdesk 02 June 2025, 17:04 The European Union on Monday said it is preparing "countermeasures" against the United States after the Trump administration's surprise tariffs on steel rattled global markets and complicated the ongoing wider tariff negotiations between Brussels and Washington. EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and U.S. President Donald Trump agreed last week to "accelerate talks" on a deal, but that if those trade negotiations fail "then we are also prepared to accelerate our work on the defensive side," European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill told a press conference in Brussels. "In the event that our negotiations do not lead to a balanced outcome, the EU is prepared to impose countermeasures, including in response to this latest tariff increase," Gill said. He said the EU is finalizing an "expanded list of countermeasures" that would "automatically take effect on July 14 or earlier." That's the date when a 90-day pause, intended to ease negotiations, ends in tariffs announced by the two economic powerhouses on each other. About halfway through that grace period, Trump announced a 50% tariffs on steel imports. Trump's return to the White House has come with an unrivaled barrage of tariffs, with levies threatened, added and, often, taken away. Top officials at the EU's executive commission says they're pushing hard for a trade deal to avoid a 50% tariff on imported goods. Negotiations will next continue on Wednesday in Paris in a meeting between the EU's top trade negotiator, Maroš Šefčovič, and his counterpart, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The EU could possibly buy more liquefied natural gas and defense items from the U.S., as well as lower duties on cars, but it isn't likely to budge on calls to scrap the value added tax — which is akin to a sales tax — or open up the EU to American beef. The EU has offered the U.S. a "zero for zero" outcome in which tariffs would be removed on both sides for industrial goods including autos. Trump has dismissed that but EU officials have said it's still on the table. The announcement Friday of a staggering 50% levy on steel imports stoked fear that big-ticket purchases from cars to washing machines to houses could see major price increases. But those metals are also so ubiquitous in packaging that they're likely to pack a punch across consumer products from soup to nuts.


Al Manar
20 hours ago
- Al Manar
Enrichment inside Iran Not Replaceable: Foreign Ministry
Iran made it clear on Monday that uranium enrichment inside the Islamic Republic could by no means be replaced by a proposed regional consortium that is meant to enrich uranium for civilian nuclear purposes. Speaking to reporters at a weekly presser on Monday, Esmaeil Baqaei, the spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry, emphasized that the idea of forming a consortium cannot be considered as a substitute for uranium enrichment inside Iran by any means. He noted that the proposal for a regional consortium for uranium enrichment is not a new idea. 'If some parties are proposing such a process, we welcome it and have no problem with participation either. But we emphasize that such an initiative cannot replace enrichment inside Iran,' Baqaei stressed, as quoted by Tasnim news agency. His comments came after the foreign minister of Oman paid a short visit to Tehran to relay a proposal from the US. The White House has claimed that top American negotiator Steve Witkoff has sent Iran 'a detailed and acceptable proposal' for a nuclear deal. A US official has said that one idea that was raised by Oman and adopted by the US calls for establishing a regional consortium that will enrich uranium for civilian nuclear purposes under monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the US. Iran and the US have held five rounds of talks since April 12, mediated by Oman, with the purpose of reaching a deal on Iran's nuclear program and the removal of sanctions on Tehran.