RDDT DEADLINE: ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Reddit, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important August 18 Deadline in Securities Class Action
SO WHAT: If you purchased Reddit securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement.
WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Reddit class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=40507 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 18, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation.
WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.
DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google search; (2) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (3) defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (4) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner Reddit was unable to overcome in the short term; and (5) defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for its outlook on user rates and advertising revenues. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
To join the Reddit class action, go to https://rosenlegal.com/submit-form/?case_id=40507 or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information.
No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff.
Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm, on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm or on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rosenlawfirm/.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
-------------------------------
Contact Information:
Laurence Rosen, Esq.
Phillip Kim, Esq.
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.
275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212) 686-1060
Toll Free: (866) 767-3653
Fax: (212) 202-3827
[email protected]
www.rosenlegal.com
To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/261687
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Harvard pours $117m into Bitcoin ETF, topping its stakes in Google and Nvidia
Bitcoin is back in school early this year. Harvard University's endowment has disclosed a $116.7 million position in BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust, giving it more exposure to the top-ranked cryptocurrency than its stakes in Nvidia and Google's parent company Alphabet. The 1.9 million IBIT shares were purchased in the second quarter, according to a Friday filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Invest in Gold Priority Gold: Up to $15k in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase American Hartford Gold: #1 Precious Metals Dealer in the Nation Thor Metals Group: Best Overall Gold IRA Spot Bitcoin funds have attracted more than $54 billion in net inflows since their US approval in early 2024, with IBIT leading the pack and becoming one of the fastest-growing ETFs in history. Bloomberg Intelligence senior ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said Harvard is now IBIT's 29th-largest holder out of roughly 1,300. 'Endowments are the hardest institution to hook — they rarely bite on ETFs,' he wrote on X, calling the buy 'sizable' in ETF terms but small relative to Harvard's $53.2 billion endowment. Harvard's Ivy League peer, Brown University, also reported IBIT holdings in its latest filing, with 212,500 shares worth over $13 million, nearly doubling its position from March. While direct public equities make up only a small portion of Harvard's portfolio, the IBIT purchase marks a notable tilt toward alternative assets. In the same quarter, Harvard disclosed a more than $100 million stake in the SPDR Gold Trust while cutting positions in several major tech stocks. Crypto market movers Bitcoin has gained 0.6% in the past 24 hours and is trading at $117,300. Ethereum is up 7.7% in the same period to $4,195. What we're reading XRP price jumps 11% as SEC and Ripple formally dismiss appeals — DL News Trump-Linked World Liberty Pitches a $1.5 Billion Crypto Vehicle — Bloomberg Custodia Has a Patent for Bank Stablecoins: Can It Box Out Big Banks? — Unchained Why ETHZilla is skipping Michael Saylor's favourite crypto treasury ploy: Leverage — DL News Kyle Baird is DL News' Weekend Editor. Got a tip? Email at kbaird@
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
I'm experimenting with AI in my 70s. I've had to adapt to new technologies my entire career — those who embrace change survive.
When ChatGPT was released in 2022, former attorney Orrin Onken was already a retired man. Learning to use AI tools for tasks like fact-finding has made his retirement easier. As a keen adopter of new tech, Onken said workers should embrace the changes wrought by AI. One day in the early nineties, I read a Time Magazine article about this thing called the internet. It seemed to show a lot of potential, so I bought a book about it — that's what you did back then when you wanted to learn something. Before long, I was on a dial-up connection, meeting people from across the planet on the web. I didn't work in tech. I practiced law for most of my career, but I've been an early adopter of new technology throughout my life. I retired in 2020, after 30 years of working in law, so I was comfortably out of the workforce when ChatGPT was released in 2022. At the time, some people were aghast and predicted an imminent robot uprising. Meanwhile, I was eager to start experimenting with it. I now use AI nearly every day as my assistant and advisor, but I don't have to integrate it into a workplace. Some professionals are nervous that this latest technological revolution will upend their careers, but my years in the workforce taught me that those who embrace change survive. I was never one to shy away from technological advancements When I entered the legal profession in 1982, typewriters were on the verge of being phased out, and I was part of a wave of young lawyers who, unlike the partners we worked for, knew how to use a keyboard. The advancements kept coming. Word processors became document assembly systems. Law books and law libraries became vestiges of a bygone era. At every juncture, a change would be too much for some of the older attorneys, and they'd retire. Being mid-career, I didn't have that option. I tried to embrace change faster than my competitors and reap the advantages of beating them to the punch. I once taught myself about databases and built my own. It was time-consuming but paid off handsomely in the end. By my retirement, I had automated my timekeeping, accounting, case tracking, and document creation. When creating simpler estate plans after talking with clients, I could sometimes finish the documents faster than the client could make it to the parking lot. AI tools have made my retirement easier My attraction to new workplace tech didn't go away just because I retired. When I first got ChatGPT, I played around with it like a new toy, but I didn't have much use for it. As chatbots became more common and were built into my browsers, I began using them instead of Google or Wikipedia. AI was faster and more seamless than other tools. Today, on my browser and phone, I have ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and NotebookLM. Claude, an AI assistant built by Anthropic, is my favorite. When I need to find facts to use in my debates with other retired men at the park, Claude gets them from Wikipedia for me. I was taking one of those guys to the Veterans Affairs hospital the other day, and Claude found out for me whether the hospital had WiFi for guests. Before AI, I used search engines for those things. Now I skip the lists of sponsored links and the clickbait articles behind them. Claude cites its sources, and they aren't always the greatest, but if something is mission-critical, I'll double-check what the LLM is saying. I often ask Claude questions about my health. Its conclusions about causes for my symptoms aren't always right, but given the scheduling issues, policies, and preconditions of the US healthcare system, I still find it a helpful first port of call. I know turning to the internet for medical advice comes with risks, but I find it comforting and another arrow in my quiver of managing health as an older person. Claude's availability and bedside manner appeal to me, despite the varied accuracy. Claude's always ready to chat, with no appointments necessary. The chatbot never becomes impatient, condescending, or snippy. If Claude advises me to check with my human doctors, I do it. The first thing I tell them is what Claude said. So far, their reactions have been bemused but appreciative, rather than resistant. I've seen many waves of new technology, and I'm not worried about this one Today, there are those who see AI as the beginning of the end for humanity, but among my retired buddies at the park, who've seen previous tech breakthroughs come and go, there's been a collective shrug. Some take it up. Others, set in their ways, carry on without it. Some worry their children and grandchildren will have employment opportunities taken away by AI, but most are just thankful that, being out of the workforce, it won't happen to them. There's already been much talk of AI replacing entry-level white collar jobs. I spent a career writing briefs that AI could now write as well as most recent law school graduates. It summarizes material well, but I'm not sure it's sophisticated enough to appeal to the emotions of a judge. I foresee lawyers being able to use AI tools to save time on research and writing, but I think handholding clients and appearing in court will go on as usual. I'm a little jealous of the still-practicing lawyers who get to integrate this new technology into their practices. I enjoyed those kinds of challenges when I was in their shoes, and I feel I'm missing out on the exciting ways that AI will impact the practice I spent my career in. Changes will be wrought by AI, but it won't be the first or last time that technological change has transformed our workplaces. As a retiree, AI doesn't threaten my livelihood or my lifestyle; it makes life easier. For people still on the front lines, as frightening as the changes may be, I think those who learn AI, embrace it, and integrate it into their careers will do just fine. Do you have a story to share about using AI in retirement? Contact the editor, Charissa Cheong, at ccheong@ Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT If Universal Basic Income Could Replace Social Security: Here's What It Said
It's a straightforward thought, and, at first glance, it seems reasonable: replace Social Security with a universal basic income (UBI). It not only could help lower-income retirees live more comfortably in their later years and erase retirement fears, but also could lift lower-income Americans out of poverty for life. Read Next: Check Out: But would it work? GOBankingRates asked ChatGPT if universal basic income could replace Social Security, and here's what it said. First Thoughts From ChatGPT When asked the straightforward question, with no background in the prompt, 'Could universal basic income ever replace Social Security?' ChatGPT offered a simple, well-organized answer. 'That's a big, fascinating question — and the short answer is: not easily, and not anytime soon,' it said. However, it added, 'UBI isn't a miracle cure or a looming catastrophe — it's a tool with real potential, if designed carefully and funded wisely.' It went on to explain why. Explore More: Social Security vs. UBI, According to ChatGPT First, ChatGPT succinctly explained the differences between the programs. 'Social Security is a targeted social insurance program, funded by payroll taxes, that provides retirement, disability and survivor benefits,' it said. On the other hand, UBI is a universal cash transfer, where 'everyone gets the same amount, regardless of income or work history.' Replacing Social Security with UBI would require a paradigm shift. 'Replacing Social Security with UBI would mean shifting from an earned benefit model to a universal entitlement, which is a huge philosophical and political leap,' ChatGPT said. Expert Thoughts Forbes writer Cornelia Walther, Ph.D., an AI researcher, explored how technology could assist in UBI distribution. Yet, she acknowledged in a recent article that UBI acceptance requires 'a foundational human shift.' 'It requires a societal commitment to move beyond paradigms of scarcity and competition,' she wrote. Will People Stop Working With UBI? ChatGPT was then asked this question: 'If there is a universal basic income, will people want to work less?' ChatGPT responded that there have been many studies done with UBI pilots and similar programs, which largely showed that 'most people don't stop working, but some do adjust how they work.' ChatGPT cited several real-world examples from Finland, Canada, California and Alaska, with the takeaway, 'The evidence shows reductions are modest and often socially beneficial.' Expert Thoughts The world's largest study to date, funded partially by Sam Altman, conducted by OpenResearch and reported by the National Bureau of Economic Research, contradicted previous findings. In the study, 1,000 low-income individuals received $1,000 per month for three years. A control group of 2,000 people received $50 per study found that labor market participation decreased by 2 percentage points and participants worked roughly 1.3 to 1.4 fewer hours per week. Partners of participants also reduced their work time similarly. Participants actually earned $1,500 less each year, after accounting for the UBI deposits. Unemployment lasted 1.1 months longer for those receiving the $1,000 monthly check, which seemed to contradict prior research. Nevertheless, the bulk of research, as ChatGPT accurately cited, showed increases in life satisfaction and overall health. The Costs ChatGPT dug into the numbers to address the next challenge: costs and how to pay for UBI. 'Social Security is expensive already, but UBI would dwarf its cost,' it said. Citing figures from the Social Security Administration, it said that Social Security outlays for Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Insurance would total roughly $1.5 trillion in 2025. 'Unless UBI replaced all major welfare programs, the U.S. would need massive new taxes or deficit spending,' ChatGPT said. Expert Thoughts Teddy Ganea, a writer at The Stanford Review, shared that it's entirely possible to implement a UBI of $18,000 per year, at minimum, that could 'end poverty overnight.' The program would phase out gradually for higher-income individuals. Ganea explained that a UBI that provides roughly $9,000 on average in assistance to the 75% of Americans who made less than $75,000 in 2024 would cost less than the $2.5 trillion currently spent on programs like Medicaid and welfare. The cost would even leave enough to 'bolster underfunded programs like Social Security or education,' Ganea wrote. Bottom Line In the ultimate irony, just as ChatGPT shared reasons UBI is impractical, Ganea pointed to the same generative AI as a catalyst for UBI. 'Maybe ChatGPT's greatest achievement won't be in automating coding or customer service,' Ganea wrote. 'Perhaps it will be that, in stoking fears of automation, it paved the way for UBI.' More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm an Economist: Here's When Tariff Price Hikes Will Start Hitting Your Wallet 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth 10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT If Universal Basic Income Could Replace Social Security: Here's What It Said Sign in to access your portfolio
