India's diplomacy with EU, US: Pushback in recent years, challenges over the past decades
While India's response on Monday was its first after Trump announced a 25% tariff on Indian goods, plus a 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia, New Delhi has a record of pushing back against the Americans and the Europeans whenever its vital national interests have been at stake.
Randhir Jaiswal, official spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs, said that the targeting of India by the US and European Union (EU) was 'unjustified and unreasonable', and that India would take 'all necessary measures' to safeguard its 'national interests and economic security'.
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has been vocal in articulating India's stand on the global stage over the past three years. Consider:
🔴 In March 2022, speaking in the presence of then British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, Jaishankar said that the talk of sanctions 'looks like a campaign', and that Europe was in fact, buying more oil from Russia than before the war in Ukraine.
He pointed out that Europe had bought 15% more oil and gas from Russia in that month than in the previous month.
'If you look at the major buyers of oil and gas from Russia, I think you'll find most of them are in Europe. We ourselves get the bulk of our energy supplies from the Middle East, about 7.5-8 per cent of our oil from the US in the past, maybe less than per cent from Russia,' he said.
🔴 In April 2022, Jaishankar said in Washington DC that India bought less oil from Russia in a month than what Europe did in less than a day. 'If you are looking at energy purchases from Russia…your attention should be focused on Europe. We do buy some energy, which is necessary for our energy security. But I suspect looking at the figures, probably our total purchases for the month would be less than what Europe does in an afternoon,' he said.
🔴 In June 2022, speaking in Slovakia, Jaishankar said 'Europe has to grow out of the mindset that Europe's problems are the world's problems but the world's problems are not Europe's problems.'
🔴 In December 2022, Jaishankar said that New Delhi's purchases were a sixth of Europe's in the nine months since the war in Ukraine began. Speaking with then German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, he said, 'I understand that Europe has a point of view [on Ukraine] and Europe will make the choices it will make… But for Europe to make choices which prioritise its energy needs, and then ask India to do something else…
'Bear in mind, today, Europe is buying a lot [of crude] from the Middle East. The Middle East was traditionally a supplier for an economy like India. So it puts pressure on prices in the Middle East as well….'
The Minister also pointed out that 'between February 24 and November 17, the European Union has imported more fossil fuel from Russia than the next 10 countries combined', and that 'oil import in the European Union is like six times what India has imported. …The European Union imported 50 billion euros worth [of gas].'
🔴 In May this year, the Minister observed that India was looking for partners, 'not preachers', and some of Europe is 'still struggling with that problem'.
'…We look for partners, we don't look for preachers, particularly preachers who don't practise at home what they preach abroad…,' he said.
While Jaishankar's words probably did not win him many friends in Europe, it was interpreted in India as an assertion of the country's 'strategic autonomy'.
The relationship between India and the United States has faced several challenges over the decades.
🔴 The cyclical up-down in ties can be traced back more than half a century to the time when President Richard Nixon backed Pakistan during the 1971 war. The Seventh Fleet of the US Navy had moved into the Bay of Bengal, but India's friendship treaty with the Soviet Union deterred the Americans from entering the war directly.
🔴 The US and much of the West imposed sanctions on India after the nuclear tests in Pokhran in May 1998. India navigated its way out of the crisis by engaging with the US — talks between Jaswant Singh and then US Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott ultimately led to the Indo-US nuclear deal a decade later in 2008.
🔴 In December 2013, Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade was detained and searched following allegations that she was not paying her help enough. The incident infuriated Indian diplomats, and the government took steps to make a point — removing security barricades around the US embassy in New Delhi, and scrutinising diplomatic privileges for American diplomats in India.
Jaishankar was India's ambassador to the US at the time, and he played a key role in securing the release of Khobragade. But the ties with the US suffered a severe setback in the last six months of the UPA II government. It took a call between US President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in May 2014 to bring ties back on track.
As Trump ratchets up the rhetoric against India, New Delhi has held up the mirror to the double standards of his administration.
Standing its ground against the President's bullying tactics and negotiating a trade deal with the US without ceding too much ground — this will be the test of India's resilience and strategic autonomy.
Over the last quarter century, India and the US have built what President Obama described as the defining partnership of the 21st century.
However, Trump's words and actions appear to bear out the truth of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger's words — that to be an enemy of the US is dangerous, but to be a friend could be fatal.
Dealing with Trump is arguably the biggest challenge for Indian diplomacy since 1998.
Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Niti Aayog withdraws paper on GM crop imports, signals govt's hard line on biosafety
The Niti Aayog has withdrawn a working paper that proposed allowing imports of genetically modified (GM) soybean and corn from the United States, signalling the government's firm position against opening India's market to transgenic food products over biosafety concerns, as per move comes despite US pressure in trade talks to ease what it sees as a non-tariff barrier, and despite Niti Aayog's own assessment that such imports could be allowed without harming domestic paper, Promoting India-US agricultural trade under the new US trade regime, was released in May and co-authored by Ramesh Chand, a Niti Aayog member, and senior adviser Raka Saxena. It suggested that GM corn could be imported for ethanol blending and for by-products such as Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles. 'US corn is cheaper and can be used to meet India's biofuel targets without disrupting local food and feed markets,' the authors the paper carried a disclaimer that the views were personal, its removal from the think tank's website reflects the government's reluctance to shift policy on GM food crops. At present, India permits commercial cultivation of only one GM crop — transgenic cotton, which is a non-food commodity. The government's position aligns with the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch (SJM), an affiliate of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, which has consistently opposed both the cultivation and import of GM food products. The SJM has, in the past, found common cause with several left-leaning farm groups on this issue. The withdrawn paper had also suggested a 'dual-track' approach to agricultural trade negotiations with the US, pushing for selective imports of non-sensitive items that do not compete with local production, such as almonds, pistachios, and enjoys a surplus in agricultural trade with the US, a gap that has widened over the years. Between 2004 and 2024, India's farm exports to the US grew nearly fivefold, from $1.18 billion to $5.75 billion. Imports from the US rose faster, from $291 million to $2.22 billion over the same period.
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Resign from Lok Sabha if have no faith in Election Commission of India: BJP to Rahul
The BJP on Saturday (August 9, 2025) said Congress leader Rahul Gandhi must resign on "moral grounds" from the membership of the Lok Sabha if he does not have faith in the Election Commission, and flayed him for not submitting a written declaration on his "vote theft" claim. BJP national spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia also asked Congress Parliamentary Party chairperson Sonia Gandhi and party MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra to resign as members of the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha if they do not have any faith in the polls. "You (Rahul Gandhi) make baseless allegations before the media and then refuse to give proof and a written declaration when the constitutional body asks for it," Mr. Bhatia said at a press conference at the BJP headquarters in New Delhi. Reading out excerpts of a past Supreme Court judgement, the BJP spokesperson said the apex court had observed that there was no doubt about the bona fides of the Election Commission and that it was a matter of record that the poll body had built a reputation as an impartial body over the years. "Rahul Gandhi, if you don't trust the election commission and the observations made by the Supreme Court, do one thing: first, you resign from the Lok Sabha membership. Priyanka Gandhi, you also resign. Sonia Gandhi, you also resign at least on moral grounds because you are raising questions on the same Election Commission," Mr. Bhatia said. "Then, you go to the Supreme Court, the high court and people," he said. Mr. Bhatia also demanded that the Chief Ministers of Congress-ruled Karnataka, Telangana and Himachal Pradesh must also resign, for their top leaders had no faith in the ECI. "Whatever suits you, you accept. Whatever is inconvenient, you reject and cast aspersions on the Election Commission. This will not work," Mr. Bhatia said. Mr. Gandhi on Friday (August 8, 2025) asserted that he had taken the oath inside Parliament on the Constitution, as a response to the EC demanding from him an affidavit under oath over his "vote chori" claim. Addressing the Vote Adhikar Rally in Bengaluru, he also said the Karnataka government should probe the inclusion of fake voters in the State during the 2024 Lok Sabha election. "The ECI asks me to file an affidavit and give information under oath. I have taken oath inside Parliament, in front of the Constitution, on the Constitution," he said. Mr. Bhatia termed Mr. Gandhi's "vote theft" claim a lie: "'Rahul aka 'arajak tatva' (anarchic element) has now become Rahul aka 'vidhwansak' (destroyer). He wants to destroy the Constitution of India and Indian democracy." He also accused the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha of being "immature" and starting a war against constitutional institutions by threatening ECI officials.
India.com
20 minutes ago
- India.com
SEBI Proposes Easier Norms For Resident Indian Participation In FPIs
New Delhi: The Securities Exchange Board of India has proposed easier norms for resident Indians and mutual funds to invest in foreign funds. The regulator proposed to enable retail schemes based in IFSCs in India with resident Indian non-individuals as sponsors or managers to register as FPIs. The investment limit is capped at 10 per cent of the targeted corpus, in line with IFSC rules, a release from SEBI said. The suggestion is to replace the sponsor and manager with a fund management entity or associate for IFSC FPIs. SEBI has also proposed allowing Indian mutual funds to invest in overseas funds with India exposure. These proposals aim to increase investment options for Indian investors to diversify their portfolios. If implemented, these reforms could bridge the gap between India's domestic savings pool and international opportunities. Currently, only certain institutional investors meeting SEBI's criteria can register as FPIs to invest in foreign securities. The proposed changes focus on retail-oriented investment schemes set up in IFS, which would allow a broader range of India-based entities to channel domestic capital into foreign assets through a regulated framework. At present, non-resident Indians (NRI), overseas citizens of India (OCI) or resident Indians are not eligible to register as FPIs. However, NRIs, OCIs or resident Indian individuals are permitted to be constituents of FPIs, subject to certain conditions in terms of limits on contribution and control of the FPIs. The Reserve Bank of India's liberalised remittance scheme permits individuals to remit up to Rs 2.5 lakh annually for overseas investments. Retail investors depend on indirect channels and FoF opportunities in global mutual funds for foreign market exposure. IFSC is a special economic zone (SEZ) acting as a global financial hub within India, allowing institutions to conduct international financial transactions and operations. The capital market regulator has sought public feedback on its proposals till August 29.
