Promoted after defeat: Why Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir was promoted to Field Marshal despite losing to India, and what it means
Pakistan promoted its Army Chief,
General Asim Munir
, to the rare rank of Field Marshal on Tuesday. This five-star rank is the highest military honour in Pakistan and has been awarded only once before. Munir's promotion has drawn attention because it came after military setbacks against India, including
Operation Sindoor
and air strikes on Pakistani bases, which questioned his leadership.
Why Asim Munir got promotion despite military defeat?
The promotion is seen as a strategic move to protect Munir from internal challenges within Pakistan's military. The rank of Field Marshal is traditionally awarded after a military victory, but this time it appears to serve a political purpose.
Tilak Devasher, an expert on Pakistan, said, 'Field Marshal rank is usually conferred after a military victory. This may be the first time it has been awarded after a defeat—it seems intended to mask that defeat.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Bo Derek's Probably The Most Gorgeous 68-Year-Old.
Paperela
Undo
By elevating Munir, Pakistan's civilian government and military establishment aim to strengthen his position and reduce the risk of any court martial or rival power moves against him.
What does becoming a Field Marshal mean?
The rank of Field Marshal is mostly symbolic and follows British military traditions, which Pakistan inherited. A Field Marshal remains on the active list for life but does not hold an official command role after retirement. The rank comes with special privileges such as wearing a unique uniform, using a special baton during salutes, and displaying five stars on official vehicles.
Live Events
MORE STORIES FOR YOU
✕
«
Back to recommendation stories
I don't want to see these stories because
They are not relevant to me
They disrupt the reading flow
Others
SUBMIT
Munir will keep his current role as Army Chief despite the promotion, which is unusual since the previous Field Marshal in Pakistan's history did not remain in active military command after promotion.
History of Field Marshals in Pakistan
Before Munir, only one other Pakistani officer has held the rank of Field Marshal—General Ayub Khan. Ayub Khan became Field Marshal after taking power in a military coup in 1958. He then became the country's president and awarded himself the rank in 1959.
Unlike Munir, Ayub Khan did not continue leading the army after his promotion and focused on running the country. Munir's case is different because he was promoted by the civilian government and will remain the serving Army Chief until his retirement in 2027.
General Asim Munir's promotion to Field Marshal reflects Pakistan's efforts to solidify his leadership despite military setbacks. The move signals a political strategy to protect Munir and maintain stability within the country's military hierarchy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Germany to boost military by up to 60,000 troops under new NATO targets
Germany will need up to 60,000 additional troops under new NATO targets for weapons and personnel, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Thursday, as the alliance beefs up its forces to respond to what it sees as an increased threat by Russia. "We are stepping up to our responsibility as Europe's largest economy," the minister told reporters ahead of a meeting with his NATO counterparts in Brussels that was set to approve the new targets. The fresh demands are tailored to the alliance's defence plans, thousands of pages of secret documents drawn up for the first time since the end of the Cold War, that detail how allied forces would respond to a Russian attack on NATO. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Fastest Selling Plots of Mysore from 40L | 40+ Amenities PurpleBrick Learn More Undo Translating these plans into the military tools needed, NATO found severe shortfalls in various areas - ranging from large formations of combat-ready ground troops to long-range weapons, sufficient ammunition stockpiles and secure communications. Pointing to the secret nature of the targets, NATO chief Mark Rutte only gave a rough outline of the gaps the alliance seeks to plug. Live Events "We have to invest in our air defence systems, we have to invest in our long-range missiles, we have to invest in our maneuverable land-formations, command and control systems - all of this has to happen," he told reporters, adding that all this would require huge investments. HUGE CHALLENGE FOR BERLIN In total, the Bundeswehr, Germany's armed forces, will need roughly 50,000 to 60,000 additional active soldiers over all branches of the military, according to Pistorius, which would put the future strength of the German forces at between 250,000 and 260,000 troops. Last week, Reuters reported that NATO will ask Germany to provide seven more army brigades alone, or some 40,000 troops. Sources, who all spoke on condition of anonymity, put the target for the total number of brigades that NATO allies will have to provide in future to between 120 and 130. Recruiting tens of thousands of extra troops will be a big challenge for Berlin, however, and likely spark a fresh debate on whether conscription - suspended in 2011 - should be reintroduced. The Bundeswehr has not yet met a target of 203,000 troops set in 2018, and is currently short-staffed by some 20,000 regular troops, according to defence ministry data. Pistorius said the government would be faced with the question whether the voluntary military service it aims to introduce will be sufficient to fill the Bundeswehr's ranks. Still, he warned that the military currently could not absorb a bigger number of conscripts due to a lack of barracks and trainers. "Until we have such capacities, we'll have a voluntary service - and maybe beyond that if we are an attractive employer and win enough young men and women for the military who agree to serve for a longer time." In a major shift, Germany recently loosened its debt brake to enable a surge in defence and backed Rutte's plan to hike NATO's spending target to 5% of GDP.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
'There's nothing there in the file': Did Jeffrey Epstein die by suicide? What FBI deputy said
The rumours around Jeffrey Epstein 's death have finally come to a full stop as FBI deputy director Dan Bongino gave some insightful information on this. In an interview with Fox News, Bongino confirmed on Wednesday that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide and there could be no other cause that was possible. Regarding the Epstein investigation, Bongino explained that surveillance footage, though not of optimal quality, documented the final hours. "The video does show in that specific block, that he goes in, made a phone call; you'll see 12 hours of guards going in basically check on him, come back. You'll see nobody really comes out of that bay in that area than him. There's no one in there." "There's nothing there in the file at all that indicates anything other than in fact a suicide," Bongino added. The American financier passed away in 2019 while facing sex trafficking charges. Bongino outlined the FBI's renewed focus on various investigations, including the origins of COVID-19. He stated firmly that the public would receive answers about the pandemic's beginnings, noting "I ordered that case immediately to be looked into again. We have a great investigator on it." Discussing the Mar-a-Lago raid, Bongino indicated significant findings: "We found some troubling, really troubling items in there that we actioned immediately, to say the least." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo He acknowledged apparent differences in how classified documents cases involving Hillary Clinton and former President Joe Biden were handled. The Deputy Director confirmed ongoing investigations into several high-profile matters, including the discovery of cocaine at the White House in 2023, the 2022 Dobbs decision leak, actions against pro-life protesters, and the handling of parents at school board meetings. Emphasising the significance of these investigations, Bongino stated: "I get a kick out of it on social media. People are like, 'this case isn't a big deal. I don't care.' Well, I don't care that you don't care. I care." He particularly stressed the importance of resolving the White House cocaine incident, committing to finding answers with his team.
Hans India
23 minutes ago
- Hans India
Everyone should support whatever is in the national interest: Salman Khurshid
New Delhi: Senior Congress leader and former External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid, who was part of an all-party parliamentary delegation on an 'Operation Sindoor' diplomatic outreach mission, has said that anything done in the national interest should be supported by all, regardless of political affiliations. In an interview with IANS, Khurshid addressed criticism from within his party regarding the ongoing diplomatic initiative and emphasised the importance of unity when representing the country abroad. He said that if you have to go outside the country and speak for your nation, is it easy or difficult? And if someone is doing so, why should there be any objection? His remarks come shortly after his post on social media platform X on Monday, where he expressed dismay over domestic political divisions while he was abroad on a mission against terrorism. "When on a mission to carry India's message to the world in the fight against terrorism, it's distressing that people at home are calculating political allegiances. Is it so difficult to be patriotic?' he had posted during the delegation's visit to Kuala Lumpur. Excerpts from the interview: IANS: You were part of the all-party delegation. How successful do you consider the outreach? Salman Khurshid: I consider it very successful. The goal was to engage with multiple countries and urge them to go beyond expressing sympathy - to take concrete steps against terrorism. Terrorism affects not only India but also many other nations. We emphasised the need for global cooperation in fighting this menace, and the response was encouraging. IANS: What would you like to say about your post on X where you asked, "Is it so difficult to be patriotic?" What were you referring to? Salman Khurshid: That's exactly what I'm asking. And I'm not getting an answer. If someone has to go abroad and speak for the country, is that difficult or easy? If someone is doing it, why should there be a problem? I don't think it's a bad thing—I think it's a good thing. So, whatever is in the interest of the country, I believe everyone should support it. IANS: Despite calling the outreach a success, your own party has raised questions. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh said, "While terrorists are roaming freely, so are our MPs." How do you respond? Salman Khurshid: Jairam Ramesh is right - we were indeed travelling. But if we hadn't been travelling, we would have been sitting idle. I've already communicated our efforts and achievements to both my party and the government. Let me be clear: I was sent by the Congress; I didn't go on my own. I'm grateful for the opportunity and hopeful that the party will recognise the value of our work. IANS: You praised the abrogation of Article 370 during your speech in Indonesia. What do you want to say about this? Salman Khurshid: Why are you asking me about that? I don't live in Jammu and Kashmir, though I do visit occasionally. Whether it was right or wrong is a matter of ongoing public debate. However, there is a real issue of statehood, and elected representatives are demanding its restoration. If we can be united in supporting that demand, it would be better for everyone. IANS: What is your view on Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi's 'Narendra Surrender' remark? Salman Khurshid: Rahul Gandhi is absolutely right, and I support him. I am a member of the Congress party and take leadership directions from him. If others want to interpret my loyalty or position differently, they may do so. But I'm clear on where I stand. IANS: The BJP claims that Rahul Gandhi's "Narendra Surrender" comment is being used by Pakistani media to further anti-India propaganda. They argue that even Pakistan hasn't used such harsh terms. What's your take? Salman Khurshid: Frankly, I don't care what Pakistan says. I oppose everything they've done to promote terrorism. My only interest is in ensuring India gives a strong and clear message to Pakistan so that such behaviour is never repeated. I don't watch Pakistani TV—there are enough Indian news channels to keep me informed.
