logo
Deal Maker Trump Puts Up A Magnificent Show Of His Craft In Arabian Gulf

Deal Maker Trump Puts Up A Magnificent Show Of His Craft In Arabian Gulf

Arabian Post18-05-2025

By K Raveendran
Donald Trump's Gulf tour has marked a defining chapter in his post-presidential brand of deal diplomacy, delivering a staggering $2 trillion in agreements that stretch across Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar. This campaign stands in sharp contrast to the flagging results of his so-called trade mark tariff war, which—despite dominating headlines—yielded few tangible gains and inflicted considerable economic uncertainty globally. The deals secured in the Gulf region do not merely reflect economic exchanges; they signal a recalibration of regional alliances, global energy markets, and the enduring influence of Trump-style realpolitik in an increasingly multipolar world.
The sheer scale of these agreements reaffirms Trump's core identity as a businessman first and foremost. His approach—transactional, results-driven, and focused on mutual benefit—has evidently resonated with the Gulf monarchies. In Saudi Arabia, Trump negotiated a comprehensive framework involving defence, infrastructure, and technology investments. Sources indicate the Saudis have pledged upwards of $800 billion across various American sectors, with a large chunk earmarked for joint ventures in cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and next-generation defence systems. This aligns with Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 strategy, which seeks to diversify the kingdom's economy and reduce dependence on oil. Trump, ever the opportunist, positioned American firms as ideal partners in this transformation.
Meanwhile, Qatar, long seen as the outlier in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) due to its often-independent foreign policy, made an unexpected pivot by agreeing to a $400 billion deal with American firms. The agreements cover everything from liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply chains to a new transport corridor involving American engineering giants. This move is emblematic of Qatar's desire to solidify ties with the U.S. while hedging against regional isolation, particularly in the aftermath of the GCC blockade that had once put the tiny emirate at odds with its neighbours. Trump's negotiations, deftly conducted, turned that vulnerability into leverage.
See also Conflict With India Seriously Endangers Pakistan's Energy Security
The UAE's commitments, perhaps the most headline-grabbing, include a promise to invest $1.4 trillion in the United States over the next ten years. The investments span clean energy, real estate, defence, and emerging technologies. In return, American oil companies will be granted expanded upstream access in UAE oil and gas fields—a concession that effectively gives Washington influence over Gulf energy output at a critical time when energy prices remain volatile. This is a strategic masterstroke. It allows Trump to influence global oil prices without directly engaging OPEC or rehashing old shale production battles, offering him a soft power victory on the global stage.
Trump's success in securing lower oil prices, albeit indirectly, is particularly noteworthy. During his presidency, he repeatedly clashed with OPEC over production cuts that drove up global prices. This time, however, rather than confront the cartel head-on, he subtly shifted the playing field. By gaining a foothold in Gulf upstream operations and pushing for energy investment in the U.S., he has created market incentives for increased output and diversified supply chains. This undermines OPEC's ability to control prices while bolstering U.S. energy independence—a win-win scenario by Trump's reckoning.
But beyond economics, there's a deeper geopolitical shift underway. Trump has recalibrated the United States' traditional role in the Middle East. Instead of being a policeman or a moral arbiter, the U.S.—under his stewardship—is a business partner and a facilitator of growth. The Gulf monarchies, particularly under leaders like Mohammed bin Salman and Mohammed bin Zayed, have shown a clear preference for this model. They seek modernization, security guarantees, and high-tech partnerships, not lectures on human rights or democracy. Trump, unlike his predecessors, offers this pragmatic approach without the encumbrance of ideological baggage.
His Gulf tour also effectively sidelines competitors like China and Russia. While both have made inroads into the Middle East, the depth and breadth of American integration—across sectors from defence to data infrastructure—means that the U.S. retains a unique advantage. China might fund ports and trade routes under its Belt and Road Initiative, but it lacks the cultural and technological appeal of American firms. Russia can sell arms, but it cannot deliver the kind of system-wide transformation that Gulf countries crave. Trump's deals, therefore, serve as a counterbalance to these ambitions, reinforcing American soft power in a region increasingly characterized by hard economic choices.
Critics will argue that Trump's style lacks the finesse of diplomacy and risks reducing international relations to mere financial transactions. But in the calculus of Gulf rulers, this might be a strength, not a flaw. The clarity of Trump's approach—the promise of mutual profit without political interference—stands in stark contrast to the often convoluted strategies of the State Department. Where traditional diplomacy fails to deliver, Trump's model fills the void. And for now, it is working.
The global order is in flux, and the old rules no longer apply. Trade wars, sanctions, and military interventions have given way to subtler forms of influence. In this context, Trump's Gulf tour represents a new template for geopolitical engagement—one driven by capital flows, strategic investments, and economic interdependence. While critics may decry its transactional nature, its effectiveness is undeniable. The $2 trillion in deals is not just a number—it is a symbol of influence, of partnership, and of a future where economics dictate diplomacy. (IPA Service)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US sanctions four ICC judges over Israel and Afghanistan investigations
US sanctions four ICC judges over Israel and Afghanistan investigations

Middle East Eye

timean hour ago

  • Middle East Eye

US sanctions four ICC judges over Israel and Afghanistan investigations

The administration of US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued sanctions on four judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over investigations into the US and its ally Israel. The sanctions build on the designation of ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan in February, carried out under an executive order issued shortly after Trump assumed office. "This is an escalation in a series of attacks by the US government against this global judicial institution, which was created to end impunity for the worst crimes," said Meg Satterthwaite, the UN's special rapporteur on the independence of judges, speaking to Middle East Eye. "It is shocking to see a country that has for decades championed the rule of law using a tool usually reserved for corrupt or criminal actors against judges of this global judicial body." The sanctioned judges, all women, are: ICC Second Vice-President Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou (Benin), Solomy Balungi Bossa (Uganda), Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza (Peru) and Beti Hohler (Slovenia). New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Gansou and Hohler have been sanctioned in connection with their decision as pre-trial judges to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant in November over charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Gaza. The US and Israel are not state parties to the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the ICC in The Hague in 2002. Both states have opposed the court's investigation into the situation in Palestine, launched by the ICC's previous prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, in 2021. 'It is shocking to see a country that has for decades championed the rule of law using a tool usually reserved for corrupt or criminal actors against judges of this global judicial body' - Meg Satterthwaite, UN rapporteur The court's jurisdiction was based on the accession of the state of Palestine to the Rome Statute in 2015. Accordingly, the court can investigate Israeli individuals for crimes committed in occupied Palestine, which includes the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. However, Israel and the US have challenged the court's jurisdiction, saying they do not recognise Palestine as a state, and that Israel is best placed to investigate itself under the principle of complementarity as set out in Article 17 of the Rome Statute. Trump's order of 6 February reiterated this view and described the arrest warrants as an abuse of power, an allegation refuted by the ICC. The ICC is the only permanent international court tasked with the prosecution of individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. 'President Trump's sanctions on ICC judges aim to deter the ICC from seeking accountability amid grave crimes committed in Israel and Palestine and as Israeli atrocities mount in Gaza, including with US complicity,' Liz Evenson, international justice director at Human Rights Watch, told MEE. Under Netanyahu's government, Israel has faced accusations of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. The US is the largest supplier of arms to Israel and has backed its offensive in Gaza since October 2023, triggering accusations of aiding and abetting alleged crimes. Israel's war on Gaza has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, forcibly displaced most of the 2.1 million population and made the enclave largely uninhabitable. Obstruction of justice Experts who spoke with MEE in the aftermath of Trump's order have suggested that the ICC should bring charges of obstruction of justice against the US president and any individuals behind the sanctions, based on Article 70 of the Rome Statute. The article prohibits offences against the administration of justice, including: "Impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court for the purpose of forcing or persuading the official not to perform, or to perform improperly, his or her duties; and retaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official." UN rapporteur urges EU to use legal powers to protect ICC from Trump sanctions Read More » The ICC has jurisdiction over Article 70 offences, irrespective of the nationality or location of the accused individuals. The Slovenian foreign ministry reacted to the sanctioning of Hohler, saying it will support her in carrying out her mandate. It also said it would propose the activation of the EU Blocking Statute. The statute primarily focuses on shielding EU operators, such as the Netherlands-based ICC, from certain US sanctions considered to have extraterritorial reach, like those against Cuba and Iran. Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot has also said his government would ask the EU to activate the statute. "While this would be the first time the blocking statute is applied in defense of the ICC, Belgium believes it is essential to protect the Court's independence and its crucial role in delivering justice for the gravest crimes," he said on Friday. The pre-trial chamber that issued the Netanyahu and Gallant decision included Gansou and Hohler, as well as French national Nicolas Guillou. It remains unclear why Guillou has been excluded from the sanctions. Legal scholar Kevin Jon Heller, who is Khan's war crimes advisor, argued that the US has sanctioned individuals who are perceived to be nationals of weaker states. 'The US seems to have sanctioned only the judges who come from smaller and less powerful states,' Heller said. The two other judges, Bossa and Ibanez Carranza, have been sanctioned for being part of the 2020 appeals chamber that authorised the ICC's investigation into crimes committed in Afghanistan since 2003. This included actions by the Taliban, Afghan National Security Forces, and US military and CIA personnel. Heller pointed out that Canadian judge Kimberly Prost was part of the same panel as the Ugandan judge Bossa and the Peruvian judge Ibanez Carranza, but she has been excluded from sanctions. 'The US seems to have sanctioned only the judges who come from smaller and less powerful states' - Kevin Jon Heller, legal advisor to Karim Khan 'That supports the 'weak state' explanation, because Judge Prost (Canada) was part of the same AC and is still an ICC judge,' he wrote on X. In response to the ICC's decision to investigate crimes in Afghanistan, the previous Trump administration imposed sanctions on ICC officials, including then-prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, and revoked her US visa. But since 2021, the ICC has shifted its strategy under current prosecutor Khan, deprioritising investigations into alleged crimes by US forces - a move widely denounced by human rights groups. Khan stated that the focus would instead be on crimes committed by the Taliban and the Islamic State - Khorasan Province, citing resource constraints and the need to concentrate on those most responsible for the gravest crimes. In January 2025, Khan applied for arrest warrants for two Taliban leaders for the crime against humanity of persecution on the grounds of gender. No applications for arrest warrants for US nationals have been made by the prosecutor. What is the impact of sanctions? The sanctions will have a wide-ranging financial impact on the affected judges, particularly on any property in the US and any transactions involving US citizens. 'As a result of today's sanctions-related actions, all property and interests in property of the sanctioned persons described above that are in the United States or in possession or control of U.S. persons are blocked and must be reported to the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC),' the State Department said. The three ICC judges who issued the historic Netanyahu arrest warrant Read More » 'Additionally, all individuals or entities that are owned, either directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.' The ICC denounced the sanctions, saying they aim at hindering its efforts to bring justice to victims of atrocities worldwide. 'These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe,' a statement by the ICC read, saying the sanctions will affect all situations being investigated by the court beyond Palestine. 'These sanctions are not only directed at designated individuals, they also target all those who support the Court, including nationals and corporate entities of States Parties.' Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said the Netherlands 'disapproves' of the sanctions and stands behind the court and its officials. However, he has yet to announce specific measures to protect the sanctioned officials. MEE has reached out to the Dutch and Slovenian foreign ministries for comment.

UAE shoppers want 1-click, biometric checkouts for safer online payments: Visa
UAE shoppers want 1-click, biometric checkouts for safer online payments: Visa

Arabian Business

time2 hours ago

  • Arabian Business

UAE shoppers want 1-click, biometric checkouts for safer online payments: Visa

Consumers across the UAE are calling for more secure and seamless online shopping experiences, according to Visa's latest Checkout Friction Report. Despite the rapid growth of ecommerce and digital adoption in the region, key challenges at the checkout stage continue to hinder consumer satisfaction and business performance. Based on a survey of more than 2,000 online shoppers across the GCC, the report shows that security concerns and complex payment steps are the top barriers to smooth transactions. Online shopping in the UAE In the UAE, 40 per cent of shoppers cite fear of fraud as their biggest concern, while 37 per cent are frustrated by the need to repeatedly enter card details. Shopping frequency is high, with one in three UAE consumers buying groceries online multiple times a week, and categories like fashion, entertainment, and electronics seeing regular purchases monthly. However, friction during checkout can lead to abandoned carts and lost revenue for retailers. Visa's research underscores a growing preference for advanced payment technologies. A significant 67 per cent of UAE shoppers said they would adopt biometric authentication like fingerprint or face ID to check out online. Additionally, 65 per cent support a unified registration process for digital payments across websites. The report also highlights that 82 per cent of consumers would shop online more frequently if one-click checkout options were widely available, and 66 per cent are likely to use Visa's 'Click to Pay with Biometrics' feature. This solution simplifies online shopping by eliminating manual card entry, using secure device-based biometric authentication to speed up and protect the transaction process. Salima Gutieva, Visa's VP and Country Manager for UAE, said: 'Challenges in the online checkout process have direct implications for businesses, resulting in lost revenue, and hampering both customer acquisition and retention. 'Today's consumers expect – and deserve – a more seamless and secure eCommerce experience. That's why Visa is working with partners to enable solutions like Click to Pay, which leverages biometrics and tokenisation to eliminate key pain points and deliver a more convenient shopping experience.

US job growth slows in May; unemployment rate steady
US job growth slows in May; unemployment rate steady

Gulf Today

time2 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

US job growth slows in May; unemployment rate steady

US job growth slowed in May amid headwinds from tariff uncertainty, while the unemployment rate held steady at 4.2 per cent, potentially giving the Federal Reserve cover to delay resuming interest rate cuts for a while. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 139,000 jobs last month after rising by a downwardly revised 147,000 in April, the labour Department's Bureau of labour Statistics said in its closely watched employment report on Friday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 130,000 jobs added after a previously reported 177,000 rise in April. Estimates ranged from 75,000 to 190,000 jobs. The unemployment rate remained at 4.2 per cent for the third straight month. The economy needs to create roughly 100,000 jobs per month to keep up with growth in the working age population. That number could decline as President Donald Trump has revoked the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of migrants amid an immigration crackdown. Much of the job growth this year reflects worker hoarding by businesses amid Trump's flip-flopping on tariffs, which economists say has hampered companies' ability to plan ahead. Opposition to Trump's tax-cut and spending bill from hardline conservative Republicans in the US Senate and billionaire Elon Musk adds another layer of uncertainty for businesses. Employers' reluctance to lay off workers potentially keeps the US central bank on the sidelines until the end of the year. Financial markets expect the Fed will leave its benchmark overnight interest rate unchanged in the 4.25 per cent-4.50 per cent range this month, before resuming policy easing in September. US Treasury yields rose after data on Friday showed that employers added more jobs than economists had expected in May, while average hourly earnings also rose more than was forecast. Employers added 139,000 jobs last month, above estimates for a 130,000 increase. Average hourly earnings increased 0.4 per cent in May, above expectations for a 0.3 per cent increase. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.2 per cent, as expected. The yield on benchmark US 10-year notes was last up 5.1 basis points on the day at 4.446 per cent. Interest rate sensitive two-year note yields rose 3.8 basis points to 3.962 per cent. US stock index futures extended gains on Friday after a stronger-than-expected jobs report calmed worries over the health of the labour market in the wake of President Donald Trump's tariff war. A labour Department report showed nonfarm payrolls increased 139,000 in May, compared with estimates for a rise of 130,000, according to economists polled by Reuters. The unemployment rate stood at 4.2 per cent, in-line with a forecast of 4.2 per cent. At 08:30 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were up 232 points, or 0.57 per cent, S&P 500 E-minis were up 36.25 points, or 0.63 per cent, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 142.75 points, or 0.66 per cent Meanwhile the dollar was headed for a weekly loss on Friday, undermined by signs of fragility in the US economy and little progress on trade negotiations between Washington and its partners, ahead of a critical jobs report. The US nonfarm payrolls report expected later on will draw greater scrutiny after a slew of weaker-than-expected economic data this week underscored that President Donald Trump's tariffs were taking a toll on the economy. Analysts say the data so far has indicated that the US economy faces a period of increasing price pressures and slowing growth, which could complicate Federal Reserve monetary policy, even as Trump has been critical of the institution's cautious stance. Against a basket of currencies, the dollar edged up to 98.9, and was headed for a weekly loss of 0.5 per cent. The euro was taking a breather after hitting a 1-1/2-month top on Thursday following hawkish remarks from the European Central Bank. It last bought roughly $1.1423, down just 0.18 per cent on the day. Traders have pushed back expectations on the timing of the next rate cut, but continue to anticipate a 25-basis point reduction by year-end. Deutsche Bank's Mark Wall said he still expects 50 basis points worth of ECB rate cuts, adding 'it is still too early to judge the impact of the trade war, and the path of the trade war is in any case still inherently unpredictable.' Reflecting a struggling economy, data showed that German exports and industrial output fell more than expected in April. Most currencies had surged against the dollar late on Thursday, helped by news that Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on a call for more than an hour, before paring some of their gains. Investors remain worried about US trade negotiations and the lack of progress in hashing out deals ahead of an early July deadline. The highly anticipated call between Trump and Xi also provided little clarity and the spotlight on it was quickly stolen by a public fallout between Trump and Elon Musk. Elsewhere, cryptocurrency dogecoin, often supported by Musk, was a touch firmer after falling to a one-month low on Thursday. US equity funds saw outflows for a third straight week through June 4, as concerns lingered over uncertainty surrounding US trade policies, while investors remained cautious ahead of a key jobs report due Friday. Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store