logo
Kendall defends welfare reform plan after Government forced to ditch key parts

Kendall defends welfare reform plan after Government forced to ditch key parts

Yahoo7 days ago
Liz Kendall insisted the Government's welfare reforms were in 'the right place' now after she was forced to scrap most of the planned changes in the face of a Labour revolt.
The Work and Pensions Secretary acknowledged it had been a 'bumpy ride' but the review into the personal independence payment (Pip) would now be able to take a proper look at the system in conjunction with disabled people.
Ms Kendall insisted the reforms had not been motivated by the Treasury's desire to cut spending but were driven by a desire to end a situation where people became dependent on benefits rather than working.
The Universal Credit Bill cleared the Commons after elements to restrict eligibility to Pip were scrapped, with any changes postponed until after a review led by disability minister Sir Stephen Timms.
Ms Kendall said: 'I know, always, how anxious people are when they hear about proposed changes in the benefits system.
'I think we've ended up in the right place now and I think we have a really positive story going forward about how we will work with disabled people, the organisations that represent them and other experts to make sure we get a system that's fit for the future.'
She denied the proposals were motivated by the almost £5 billion they were due to save.
Ms Kendall said: 'I've never started with pound signs or spreadsheets. I've always started with what I believe can help people with long-term health conditions and disabled people build a better life for themselves and our reforms are based on helping those who can work to do so, instead of writing them off and then denying them any support.'
She told MPs on the Work and Pensions Committee her department 'ends up picking up the pieces of the problems that are deep-rooted from many other government areas'.
She said: 'Poor health, poor opportunities, low skills, not enough jobs – those are the problems we have to tackle together.'
Her department was 'at the sharp end of it' and after 'admittedly, a bumpy ride over the welfare legislation' the Government has to 'start shifting resources into the things that really help create better lives for people'.
'We are spending, I believe, too much on the costs of failure and not enough on the better health, better jobs, better skills that we need,' she said.
'That is extremely difficult to shift, because people rely on those benefits, and they've built their lives around them.'
But, she added: 'Benefits alone is not the solution to a better life.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Business Leaders Are Helping To Build Government Trust With AI
Why Business Leaders Are Helping To Build Government Trust With AI

Forbes

time32 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Why Business Leaders Are Helping To Build Government Trust With AI

Mark Halberstein: 20+ years in tech, travel, real estate, finance, hospitality and AI. Founder of Simplenight, MBA, investment expert. Many governments have a serious trust problem. In the United States alone, public trust in the government has been low for decades—and as of 2024, only 22% of Americans claimed they trusted the government to do what is right 'just about always' (2%) or 'most of the time' (21%). But I believe this data has implications that extend beyond politics. The reality is that once citizens lose faith in institutions, this loss of trust can have a domino effect: Markets suffer, social stability erodes and business confidence wavers. But here's what many people might be missing (or dismissing): AI agents, the new buzzword on the Silicon Valley block, aren't just transforming customer service in the private sector. Their practical use cases can include modernization at the governmental institution level—and the potential they offer runs deeper than what it seems to the naked eye. The Real Cost Of The Trust Deficit When zooming in on the numbers, the data tells a striking story. In a 2022 study by McKinsey, citizens ranked state and federal government services beneath most private sector services, including their experiences with airlines, banking and car insurance. The truth is, people have come to expect Amazon-level services, but what they inevitably get is a dissatisfactory experience due to various factors such as lack of support, efficiency, helpfulness or even accessibility. The gap between expectation and reality continues to grow, driven by consistent innovation and improvements in the private sector that are disproportionate to change at the institutional level. If you think about it, there are a lot of hidden costs and risks to this discrepancy: A lack of efficiency within governmental processes can cause a ripple effect of negative impact for businesses. Delayed permits risk stalling construction projects. Benefits backlogs can keep potential workers sidelined for extended periods of time. Immigration bottlenecks can thwart talent acquisition and team growth. In this climate, I believe the difference between a good and a smart business leader lies in their ability to recognize that supporting government service improvements can offer a real competitive advantage. The AI Agent Advantage Here's where it gets interesting. Today's AI agents aren't the rule-based chatbots of yesterday. They're quickly evolving into sophisticated systems that can mimic reason and empathy and adapt in real time, thanks to the large language model (LLM) gold rush. They're also starting to deliver impact in areas where the government has struggled for decades: genuine human connection at scale. And I am not just stating hypotheticals here—there are real-life use cases for AI agents actively being tested as we speak. The U.K. government's "Humphrey" AI suite, for example, is supporting employees by allowing them to focus on what humans do best—building relationships and solving complex problems. Early results have shown that government teams have been able to save one hour of admin tasks per hour-long meeting with this system, which signals the potential for massive efficiency gains while maintaining the human touch. The Executive Perspective There are a number of ways that next-gen business leaders can lean into this potential opportunity: • Partner with governments on AI initiatives to help shape favorable regulatory environments. • Invest in startups and ventures that spearhead empathy-driven design for governmental use cases. • Advocate for digital transformation in your local jurisdiction. By helping your government serve citizens better, you can help create a positive feedback loop where your effort input leads to more engaged communities, more efficient regulatory processes and a more robust environment for your enterprise to thrive and evolve. You can also allocate internal resources to governmental support by creating dedicated government relations roles focused specifically on digital transformation opportunities. Companies like Amazon and Microsoft have already committed billions to government AI partnerships—not as corporate social responsibility or charity, but as strategic investments with a long-term impact expectation. Considering The Risks It would be naive to assume that innovation at this scale comes without challenges. The list of concerns—including privacy, algorithmic bias and the risk of over-automation—are real and tangible. They are surmountable, but I believe the best way to tackle them is through systematic, scalable approaches that focus on sustainability and long-term building. It's also important to operate with the understanding that AI augments human empathy rather than replacing it. I expect the most successful implementations we will see in the next few months will be those that combine tech with genuine human judgment and relationship-building, creating experiences that feel both efficient and authentic. Here are three specific risk categories to keep an eye on: 1. Regulatory Backlash: Poorly implemented AI systems can create a negative loop of more restrictive policies that could stifle innovation down the line. 2. Public Relations Disasters: Biased algorithms can damage the reputation of both the government and the businesses involved, exacerbating lack of trust from the citizens. 3. Competitive Disadvantage: Companies that fail (or are slow) to adapt to AI-enhanced government expectations could ultimately be outrun in the race. I've found that the best way to mitigate these risks is to proactively plan for them. Establish an AI ethics board with experts dedicated to government relationships; invest in bias detection infrastructure; and maintain transparent communication about AI deployment across your media. By spearheading and serving by example when it comes to responsible AI standards, you can position your company to have a competitive advantage when greater regulation inevitably arrives. Making The Most Of Timing This transformation is happening faster than most executives realize. The Capgemini Research Institute reports that about 64% of public-sector organizations worldwide are already exploring or deploying generative AI, and 90% plan to pilot or implement advanced 'agentic' AI systems in the next two to three years. I believe that in less than a year, the ability to drive AI conversations with the government will no longer be a competitive advantage—it will be table stakes. By beginning your efforts now, while the technology is still evolving and implementation is in its early stages, your company can help shape the standards and expectations of business-government relations for the next decade. Here's the bottom line: Governmental institutions are overdue for a modernization push due to large-scale public dissatisfaction, and empathetic AI agents are a major business opportunity. Companies that help close the trust gap between citizens and institutions can help ensure their organizations can operate in more stable, predictable environments. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?

South Africa to Amend Budget Process After Political Wrangling
South Africa to Amend Budget Process After Political Wrangling

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

South Africa to Amend Budget Process After Political Wrangling

South Africa's National Treasury plans to revamp its 2026 budget-preparation process after political wrangling saw this year's proposal altered twice. 'South Africa's current budget process has not kept pace with the country's evolving fiscal, institutional, and political realities' the Treasury said in a statement on Wednesday. 'A comprehensive budget reform will be implemented for the 2026 budget that aims to clarify trade-offs, reduce waste, and prioritize high-impact programs.'

Trump Makes a Deal With Japan
Trump Makes a Deal With Japan

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump Makes a Deal With Japan

Good morning. Donald Trump gets his deal with Japan. The AI boom is driving a surge in electricity demand. And tariffs are changing how China views investment in Europe. Listen to the day's top stories. Donald Trump and Japan reached a trade deal that'll impose 15% tariffs on imports to the US, including cars, while also creating a $550 billion fund to make investments in America. Trump had previously threatened the country with a 25% tariff.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store