logo
Trump's tentacles reach into the AIB boardroom

Trump's tentacles reach into the AIB boardroom

Irish Times07-05-2025

The board of
AIB
finds itself on the horns of dilemma that is playing out in various guises in boardrooms across the globe. They pretty much have until Thursday to decide whether to proceed with buying back a significant chunk of the Government's remaining shareholding in the bank.
Their problem?
US president Donald Trump
.
The immediate issue is that the bank's shares are trading below the price at which it agreed to buy them from the Government. The shares are trading at just under €6.06, a not insignificant discount on the €6.26 per share price agreed in late March.
Given the amount of money involved – AIB shareholders have approved the bank spending €1.2 billion – the potential 'overpayment' is considerable. Something in the region of €40 million.
READ MORE
100 days of Trump: 'It's like The Karate Kid, tax on, tax off, tariffs on, tariffs off'
Listen |
42:49
On the plus side, the transaction will mean the Government stake in AIB falls from about 12 per cent to close to 3 per cent, bringing the bank closer to the Holy Grail of full private ownership. The shareholders – who approved the buy back at the bank's annual general meeting last week – would seem to think almost €40 million is a price worth paying for freedom, as they overwhelmingly approved the purchase.
Their approval, however, lapses on Wednesday and after that, it is back to the drawing board in terms of agreeing to a new price with the Government and seeking shareholder approval. 'The bank would face having to call an extraordinary general meeting, at a minimum of 21 days' notice, to get any new agreement over the line with shareholders.'
If the board proceeds with the purchase at above the market price, they can expect some political heat because the Government's stake in the bank – which dates back to the banking collapse of 2011 – is indirectly linked to a €500,000 cap on the salaries of senior executives and a €20,000 cap on bonuses after which a super tax of 89 per cent kicks in.
When Bank of Ireland exited State ownership, the cap on salaries was lifted but the bonus restrictions remained. AIB can expect the same treatment and the case for bonus restrictions will be hard to sustain with both banks effectively out of the hands of the State.
It is not a good look for AIB to spend €40 million of shareholders' money so that it can pay its senior bankers more. It may be an unfair and simplistic characterisation of the proposed transaction but that will not stop the Opposition parties – Sinn Féin in particular – making political capital out of it. The fact that the taxpayer is the beneficiary of the overpayment will no doubt get lost in the mix.
Leaving this aside, from the perspective of the board of AIB, the decision really comes down to one question: where does the share price go from here and when it will reach €6.26.
This is where the US president comes in. Global stock markets have been on a roller-coaster ride since Trump took office in January as they reacted to a barrage of policies announced during his first 100 days in office, the most significant of which has been sweeping tariffs on imports from the US's main trading partners.
His big set-piece policy announcement – Liberation Day on April 2nd – marked baseline 'reciprocal tariffs' of 10 per cent imposed on pretty much everywhere except Canada and Mexico. They climbed to 50 per cent depending on a somewhat whimsical formula.
The impact on global financial markets was little short of catastrophic and after several days of horrendous loses that threatened to bleed across into the market for US debt with serious consequences for the US's ability to finance itself, Trump relented and announced a 90-day pause for all countries except China to allow for negotiations.
AIB's share price hit €5.29 in the immediate aftermath before recovering. Markets have now regained their poise somewhat on the assumption that these negotiations will lead to some sort of compromise, or a series of compromises.
We are now 30 days into the 90 days pause and it's doubtful that anyone can point to a clear landing zone, within the next 60 days, that will avoid another bout of financial discombobulation.
[
AIB 'performing ahead of expectations' amid global uncertainty, says chief executive
Opens in new window
]
If anything, Trump appears as erratic and unstructured as ever and his administration compliant in equal measure. This weekend marked the announcement – it was a surprise but that is not surprising – of a call for 100 per cent tariffs on imported movies.
The idea is inherently unworkable and counter to the desire of Hollywood for Federal financial support to bring down the cost of making films in the US. It may not even come to pass. Trump's proposal – according to the Wall Street Journal – came to him while he read through news clippings on Air Force One.
Trump's supporters are once again reaching for the caged madman theory to explain the president's behaviour; this is the notion that his impulsive and combative approach is a deliberate strategy to wrong-foot his opponents and secure a beneficial outcome.
What is clear is there is no guarantee that come July 8th – if not sooner – that all hell will not break loose in financial markets because of Trump, which could leave the board of AIB looking very foolish indeed if they proceed with the buyback.
The idea that the AIB board must factor the unpredictability of the US president into a strategic decision about a share buyback is disconcerting. When you consider the same dynamic paralysing boardrooms across the world, it becomes terrifying.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Luxembourg federation embroiled in protest controversy ahead of Republic of Ireland friendly
Luxembourg federation embroiled in protest controversy ahead of Republic of Ireland friendly

Irish Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Luxembourg federation embroiled in protest controversy ahead of Republic of Ireland friendly

Luxembourg's football association – the Fédération Luxembourgeoise de Football (FLF) – has issued an apology to supporters following the approach taken by stadium stewards towards protesters demonstrating against the continued selection of Gerson Rodrigues during the country's 1-0 defeat to Slovenia on Friday. The demonstrations come ahead of the Republic of Ireland's visit to Luxembourg on Tuesday (kick-of 7.45pm Irish time). Rodrigues is serving an 18-month suspended sentence after being found guilty of assaulting his former girlfriend, the former Miss Luxembourg, Emilie Boland. In April, Rodrigues lost his appeal against the charges and subsequent fines. READ MORE Luxembourg's head coach Luc Holtz stated last week that the Portuguese-born forward was called up as he does not 'feel called to judge [the player] a second time.' Rodrigues played the full 90 minutes against Slovenia. On Sunday evening, the FLF responded to criticism from the county's sports minister Georges Mischo and the women's rights group which organised the protest at Stade de Luxembourg. 'We would like to address the selection of a player for the national team whose criminal record has sparked significant public debate,' the FLF statement said. 'Being fully aware of the controversy that such a decision could generate, it was made seriously and in accordance with the current legal and sporting framework. Nonetheless, we fully understand the sensitivities that this choice may have provoked. 'Furthermore, during the same match, banners were displayed in the stands as a form of protest. While some of them were considered to violate FIFA/UEFA regulations – which prohibit political, offensive, sexual, discriminatory, or commercial messages – an unfortunate miscommunication occurred between the General Secretariat of the FLF and the security personnel. 'This lack of co-ordination led to several banners being removed, beyond what was necessary to comply with the regulations. This regrettable situation was also publicly acknowledged by the Secretary General during the post-match press conference, where he admitted that the handling of the incident did not meet expectations,' the statement added. 'We want to be absolutely clear on this point: no instruction was given by the FLF Board of Directors to remove all messages. That was not, and never will be, our philosophy – out of respect for our loyal supporters. Dialogue, listening, and transparency remain fundamental values for our Federation. 'We sincerely apologise to all those affected. We reaffirm our commitment to ensuring full freedom of expression for all football fans and supporters of our national team, whether outside or inside a football stadium. 'We, as the Board of Directors, will draw the necessary lessons to ensure such incidents do not happen again in the future. We dare to hope that our supporters will come out in large numbers for the Luxembourg – Republic of Ireland match next Tuesday,' the FLF statement concluded. In response to the continued selection of Rodrigues, Ms Boland posted a picture of her facial injuries on Instagram over the weekend with a direct message FLF and the team's head coach: 'Dear Mr Holtz, would the decision be different if this would be your daughter? 'Gerson Rodrigues has never presented his excuses so, no, I do not believe he regrets anything that he has done.' Holtz is due to hold a prematch press conference at 3pm on Monday ahead of Tuesday's friendly against Heimir Hallgrímsson's side.

WPP chief steps down as advertising group struggles with rise of AI
WPP chief steps down as advertising group struggles with rise of AI

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

WPP chief steps down as advertising group struggles with rise of AI

WPP chief executive Mark Read is standing down from the UK's largest advertising group as it struggles with a near five-year low in its share price and an industry-wide upheaval caused by artificial intelligence. Mr Read's exit will end a more than 30-year career at WPP and leaves it looking for a new chief executive during one of the most turbulent periods for the industry. He will continue as chief executive until the end of the year while the board starts the search for a successor. Former BT boss Philip Jansen became chair of the group at the start of the year, sparking speculation about the future of Read. In an internal note to staff, Mr Read said 'there is never a perfect time to move on as CEO ... but this feels like the right time for me'. In a statement on Monday, Mr Jansen said Mr Read had 'played a central role in transforming the company into a world leader in modern marketing services'. READ MORE Read has sought to restructure and streamline the group's global operations and invest more in technology since taking over from Sir Martin Sorrell in 2018, but WPP's share price has halved during his tenure, taking its market capitalisation to about £6bn. Shares in WPP fell 1.3 per cent in early trading on Monday. People familiar with the move said it was Mr Read's decision to leave now, although he did not have a job lined up. He is expected to seek other roles in the tech, marketing or consumer industries. How to manage your pension in these volatile times Listen | 37:00 WPP last year lost its position as the world's largest ad agency by revenues to French rival Publicis, while its two largest US rivals – Omnicom and IPG – have announced plans to merge to create a single, North American advertising heavyweight. WPP is still Britain's biggest advertising group, with revenues of close to £15 billion (€18 billion) and more than 100,000 employees around the world. [ Advertising giant WPP sees 2023 revenue gains above analyst estimates Opens in new window ] Mr Read, who is 58 years old, took over from Mr Sorrell, who resigned after an inquiry into his workplace conduct. Mr Read has overseen the company as it has tried to reorientate its business to cope with the dominance of the advertising market by tech giants Meta and Alphabet. Social media and influencer content have become key marketing channels, while traditional advertising media such as TV have shrunk in importance. More recently, Read has pushed WPP to invest hundreds of millions of pounds in AI, which has threatened to shake up the advertising agency model by offering much quicker and cheaper ways to do labour-intensive creative and media planning work. More than 50,000 people now use WPP Open, its AI platform, to assist them with their work. Mr Read said in January that WPP needed to move on from a difficult period of restructuring and rebuild its network of businesses with AI at the centre. WPP last year sold its controlling stake in public relations group FGS to private equity group KKR for $767 million (€671 euro) in cash. In the internal note to staff, Read said the company 'needed to make many difficult decisions that were necessary to serve our clients better, simplify the company, build our culture and put WPP on a more solid financial footing'. He added: 'We have also lived through some of the most challenging external events of modern times, from the pandemic to the war in Ukraine, and navigated an increasingly polarised and difficult world ... However, I strongly believe that the future for WPP is a very positive one.' Media analyst Claire Enders said Read had initially been a 'steady pair of hands holding the ship together through hundreds of acquisitions and integrations', and then had overseen a 'complete simplification' as chief executive of the business. 'WPP has struggled against stronger headwinds than its peers, largely due to its UK history and listing,' she said. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

Business leaders converge on Washington to halt Trump's foreign investment tax
Business leaders converge on Washington to halt Trump's foreign investment tax

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Business leaders converge on Washington to halt Trump's foreign investment tax

Dozens of executives from some of the world's biggest companies will travel to Washington this week to push back against a plan to raise taxes on foreign investments in the US, warning it may hit millions of American jobs. The lobbying drive is targeting a provision in Donald Trump 's budget bill, which if approved by Congress would allow the US to impose additional taxes on companies and investors from countries that it deems to have punitive tax policies. Investors, US companies with foreign owners and international firms with American operations, could all be affected by Section 899 of the bill, which executives fear could cause a drop in corporate investment and a retreat from US assets. Jonathan Samford, president of the Global Business Alliance, told the Financial Times that representatives from about 70 companies would meet members of Congress this week and Section 899 would be 'a central topic'. READ MORE The threat of higher taxes has unsettled the lobby group's almost 200 foreign-owned companies in the US, which include most of the big pharma and medical device companies that have significant operations in Ireland as well as CRH, Guinness parent Diageo, Jameson parent Pernod Ricard and Kerry Group. Many of them fear a hit to the 8.4 million jobs they provide in America. 'I think there is growing momentum to get rid of this provision in the Senate,' said Mr Samford. 'Senators recognise that it's counterproductive to the economic vision for the administration, which has made a big point about trying to get more investment to the US.' A leading financial trade association is also planning for its members to travel to Washington this week to meet treasury officials and Republican members of the Senate banking committee to argue against Section 899. Beth Zorc, chief executive of the Institute of International Bankers (IIB), said: 'As passed by the US House of Representatives, Section 899 will stifle foreign direct investment, risk financial market disruptions and endanger American jobs in states and communities across the country.' The US operations of foreign banks underwrite more than 70 per cent of debt issuance for foreign companies in the US, representing almost a third of total dollar-denominated debt issuance, the IIB said. The foreign banks said they lent more than $1.3 trillion (€1.14 trillion) to US companies in 2023 and their financing of international companies supported $5.4 trillion of foreign direct investment in the US by foreign headquartered companies, generating $270 billion of revenue. The IIB, which represents some of the world's biggest banks including HSBC, BNP Paribas, Royal Bank of Canada, UBS, Bank of China and Mitsubishi UFJ Financial, as well as AIB and Bank of Ireland, is expected to push for a one-year delay to the tax rises and for a reduction in the scope of the measure. 'We encourage the Senate to address concerns about this provision and to consider modifications that will help preserve international investment in American jobs and businesses,' Ms Zorc told the FT. The measure targets countries with what the US calls 'unfair foreign taxes'. Most EU countries, the UK, Australia, Canada and others around the world would be affected, according to law firm Davis Polk. For foreign investors, Section 899 would increase taxes on dividends and interest on US stocks and some corporate bonds by five percentage points every year for four years. It would also impose taxes on the American portfolio holdings of sovereign wealth funds, which are at present exempt. Republicans in Congress have searched for ways to keep the cost of Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill down; Section 899 would raise $116 billion over the next decade, according to the non-partisan joint committee on taxation. Still, the overall bill would add $2.4 trillion to the US debt by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Jason Smith, the chairman of the tax-writing House ways and means committee, said recently that he hoped Section 899 was not imposed because other countries would change their laws in response. 'A big concern is that foreign governments, based on agreements entered by the Biden administration, are trying to suck away billions of dollars from US companies,' said Mr Smith. 'This is a way to help put them in check so that they understand that if they do that to US businesses, there will be consequences for their actions. Hopefully it'll never take effect.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store