GAA should 'change' Casement plans, says DUP minister
The minister in charge of sport in Northern Ireland has said plans for a new Casement Park stadium in west Belfast may have to be scaled back due to the funding shortfall.
Communities Minister Gordon Lyons said the £50m offered on Wednesday by the UK government still left a "significant gap".
In a statement to BBC News NI, he put the onus on the GAA to find more money or "change their plans to fit the funding".
The price-tag for the planned 34,500-capacity stadium is about £100m more than is currently available.
The GAA president, Jarlath Burns, has welcomed the £50m offered by the government but revealed the cost of rebuilding the derelict stadium is now "well over £270m".
Mr Burns told Irish state broadcaster RTÉ on Wednesday: "The cost goes up by about £140,000 every month if we don't do anything because of the rising cost of infrastructure and building.
"Time literally is money here."
The GAA president is looking to the Stormont executive to help plug the funding gap.
He said: "The executive now have to meet, and it's between really the two government parties to decide how they are going to make up the deficit that still exists between Casement Park not being built - and Casement Park being built."
The statement from Lyons put the focus on the GAA itself.
He said: "Additional money coming to Northern Ireland for sport must be allocated on a fair and equitable basis, a principle first agreed as part of the 2011 executive agreement and one I remain firmly committed to in the interests of fairness to all.
"It will be up to the GAA to consider what additional contribution they are prepared to make or how they will change their plans to fit the funding that is available.
"I look forward to engaging with the representatives of the GAA, football and rugby."
Casement Park is expected to be among the topics discussed when ministers from the UK government sit down with their counterparts from the Stormont Executive in Belfast later.
Although the stadium is not officially on the agenda of the East-West Council, it is sure to be discussed.
This is only the second meeting of the council, a body set up last year to improve links between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK after lobbying from the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) ahead of the restoration of devolution.
The funding currently available for the Casement Park redevelopment includes £15m from the GAA, about £43m from the Irish government and £62.5m from Stormont.
Given that the Stormont funding pledge is more than a decade old, there have been calls for inflation to be taken into account which would take the total close to £100m.
Mr Burns has asked Stormont to consider an "inflationary uplift".
The football authorities in Northern Ireland will be watching closely what happens next.
The Irish Football Association has called for at least £50m to be given to the sport in line with the extra UK money pledged for the Casement Park redevelopment.
Chief executive Patrick Nelson said that "parity" between major sports is required.
The GAA want a modern Casement Park stadium capable of hosting Ulster finals, as well as being the home for Antrim county.
Casement to get £50m from government in Spending Review
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Foreign Buyers in $10 Billion Scramble for UK Takeover Targets
Foreign buyers are feverishly snapping up UK companies at a time when London is struggling to maintain the size of its stock market and attract new listings. Almost $10 billion worth of deals targeting UK firms emerged on Monday alone this week, when US buyout firm Advent confirmed a £3.7 billion ($5 billion) takeover proposal for Spectris Plc, a maker of precision and testing equipment and software, and Qualcomm Inc. agreed a roughly $2.4 billion deal for London-listed semiconductor company Alphawave IP Group Plc. Both transactions carried premiums comfortably above 80%.
Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Live: FTSE 100 to Fall, Pound Slides After Israel Hits Iran's Nuclear Sites
The battle to acquire care home landlord Assura goes on, with Primary Health Properties setting out the attractions of its bid this morning. Primary Health, a UK-listed peer of Assura, has made a bid rivalling KKR, the private equity firm which nudged up the value of its offer earlier in the week. Primary Health said it won't reduce the value of its offer if Assura declares a special dividend, and lowered the acceptance conditions. It added it disagrees with Assura's statement about the financial risks of its offer and that it has held talks with a number of possible joint venture partners.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How Crime-As-A-Service Turned Hacking Into A Subscription Business
Recent cyberattacks on major UK retailers like Marks and Spencer cost hundreds of millions, ... More revealing how criminals now bypass advanced security systems by targeting employees instead of technology. A number of devastating and widely reported cyber attacks against UK retailers in recent weeks have once again exposed the fact that the impact of cybercrime on our lives is growing. As of writing, Marks and Spencer hasn't processed online orders for several weeks, following an attack in April estimated to have cost it $400 million. And the Co-Op group of over 2,500 stores is recovering from an attack in which customer data was stolen, and shelves were left bare. There are a few reasons retailers are often easy prey for cybercriminals. They handle lots of sensitive customer data, and they're very sensitive to supply chain disruption, meaning their operations can be brought to a costly halt by disrupting suppliers. On top of that, their infrastructure sprawls across online retail, mobile apps, and the point-of-sale terminals, tills and tablets of bricks 'n' mortar, giving criminals lots of potential ways in. With politicians raising fears that the escalation of this activity could result in serious threats to the food supply chain, it's becoming urgent to understand the factors behind the rise in these attacks. One thing that's becoming increasingly clear is that cybersecurity is no longer simply about making sure IT departments keep our firewalls and anti-malware up-to-date. I believe that these attacks tell us that cybersecurity is becoming less about technology and more about people. And this means that the way we defend ourselves has to change, too. Not too long ago, at least a small amount of technical know-how was needed by anyone who wanted to launch a cyberattack and disrupt the operations of a business. Today, though, an underground economy exists where anyone with the funds can access tools and expertise that can bring businesses to the ground. Referred to by security experts as crime-as-a-service, this involves the developers of hacker tools and apps charging via a subscription model, like any other software developer. Effectively, this means that just about anyone sitting behind a VPN can carry out a crime anonymously anywhere in the world. It's a 'democratization' of cybercrime. The motivation is usually money. Two of the most common attacks are ransomware attacks, where data is encrypted and a ransom is paid to have it returned, and denial-of-service attacks, which flood systems with data, causing them to stop working properly. The increasing accessibility of these tools is a factor in the growing number of attacks. The hacker group suspected of carrying out the Marks and Spencer attack is reported to have used a CaaS platform known as DragonForce. But another factor is a change in strategy. Increasingly, rather than targeting technology, criminals are striking directly at the weakest link in the cybersecurity chain, which is usually us humans. Although the details haven't been released and investigations are still ongoing, it's strongly suspected that the Marks and Spencer cyber attack was carried out through social engineering. With modern cloud security infrastructure being relatively robust, humans, who can be lazy, forgetful and tired, are generally the weakest link. Why would a hacker spend the vast amount of computing power and resources it would take to brute-force into a system and steal or encrypt data when they can just trick or bribe a human into letting them in? Surveys suggest that email and social media phishing were a factor in more than half of 2024's ransomware attacks and that 67% of people believe the rise of generative AI has increased their fear of ransomware. As well as human incompetence and our trusting nature, cybercriminals are increasingly exploiting our greed. In fact, 53 percent of organizations reported cybercrime by insiders in 2024. One high-profile recent example is the $20 million attempted extortion of cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase, where support staff are accused of taking bribes in exchange for giving criminals access. Criminals believe that retailers are big, rich targets that move slowly to respond to threats and are likely to comply with ransom demands rather than suffer business disruption. By targeting people with permission to access their systems, then all that IT spending on cyber security infrastructure—firewalls, secure email gateways, network security, access control, security tools—becomes irrelevant, and their criminal activities become a lot simpler. So, how can businesses, and we as professionals, employees and individuals, most effectively respond to this change? The first step could be to think about adopting a more human-centric security strategy. This means developing a culture of cyber-awareness that's active at all levels, from the boardroom to the shop floor. By understanding what criminals look for, how they try to gain access, and what's at stake if they succeed, everyone's awareness increases. Particular attention should be paid to ensuring everyone understands the growing threat of generative AI-powered deepfake crime. When it comes to this, as well as understanding the wider picture of where threats might exist in an organization, it's human skills that will be most valuable. This means that effectively communicating the importance of cyber vigilance, achieving buy-in, and understanding what makes us vulnerable to bribery and corruption are critical skills in the cybersecurity toolbox. Critically, when implementing these changes, the focus should be on limiting opportunities for threat actors to cause damage rather than monitoring the activities of individuals in a way that damages trust. Balancing this also requires skilled human judgment. Make no mistake, with 43% of UK companies reporting an attempted cyber attack last year, the threat is greater than ever, and the penalties for making mistakes are severe. But by switching to understanding, predicting and improving the behavior of humans rather than just technology, all businesses can reduce their chances of becoming victims.
