logo
Can Tim Cook stop Apple going the same way as Nokia?

Can Tim Cook stop Apple going the same way as Nokia?

Mint5 hours ago

A YEAR AGO, when Apple used a jamboree at its home in Silicon Valley to unveil its artificial-intelligence (AI) strategy, grandly known as Apple Intelligence, it was a banner occasion. The following day the firm's value soared by more than $200bn—one of the biggest single-day leaps of any company in American history. The excitement was fuelled by hopes that generative AI would enable Apple to transform the iPhone into a digital assistant—in effect, Siri with a brain—helping to resuscitate flagging phone sales. Twelve months later, that excitement has turned into almost existential dread.
It is not just that many of last year's promises have turned out to be vapourware. Siri's overhaul has been indefinitely postponed, and Apple Intelligence is no match for other voice-activated AI assistants, such as Google's Gemini. Meanwhile Apple's vulnerabilities in China have been exposed by President Donald Trump's trade war. Moreover, it faces new legal and regulatory challenges to the two biggest parts of its high-margin services business.
Its shares, down by almost a fifth this year, have lagged behind its big-tech peers, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft (see chart 1). But those are not the most alarming comparisons. In a new book, 'Apple in China", Patrick McGee draws an ominous parallel between Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, and Jack Welch, boss of General Electric from 1981 to 2001. Like Welch, Mr Cook has made a fortune for investors—when Apple's market value first exceeded $3trn, in 2022, it had risen by an average of more than $700m per day since he took over from Steve Jobs in 2011. But Mr McGee raises the possibility that, as at GE, Apple's success may obscure serious vulnerabilities. If that is the case, what can Mr Cook do to avoid the sort of fate that befell GE, Nokia and other great companies that suddenly lost their way?
The answer is unlikely to emerge during Apple's annual Worldwide Developers Conference that starts on June 9th. Amid reports of upheaval among executives, it is expected to return to its unflashy roots of announcing software updates for its phones and computers, rather than revealing a refreshed approach to AI.
Many would prefer to see Mr Cook work on a new hardware strategy instead. Craig Moffett of MoffettNathanson, an equity-research firm, notes that the greatest moments in Apple's history have come from the reinvention of what techies call 'form factors": the Mac reimagined desktop computing, the iPod transformed personal-music habits and the iPhone popularised touchscreen smartphones. AI looks like it will be another such pivot point. (Eddy Cue, Apple's head of services, recently admitted that AI could make the iPhone irrelevant in ten years.)
For now, Apple's rivals have been faster to explore new opportunities. Meta and Google are pinning hopes on AI-infused smart glasses, as are Chinese tech firms such as Xiaomi and Baidu. OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT, recently announced a $6.4bn deal to buy a firm created by Jony Ive, Apple's former chief designer, to build an AI device. As yet there is only hype to go on, but it has put Apple's lack of AI innovation in the spotlight.
Apple's response may seem like dogged incrementalism. Next year it is expected to unveil a foldable phone, following a path blazed previously by the likes of Samsung and Motorola. But Richard Windsor of Radio Free Mobile, a tech-research firm, thinks Apple may still have an ace up its sleeve. If smart glasses take off, its investment in the Vision Pro virtual-reality headset, though so far an expensive flop, may be an insurance policy. It could provide Apple with enough expertise in headgear and eyewear to shift quickly to glasses. If so, the company will avoid 'doing a Nokia", he says.
Likewise, Apple might make use of this moment of soul-searching to rethink other shibboleths of Mr Cook's tenure, such as the obsession with privacy and the high walls it puts around its family of products. As Ben Thompson of Stratechery, a newsletter, points out, sanctifying the privacy of its users' data has been an easy virtue for Apple to uphold because until recently it did not have much of an advertising business. Yet in the AI era, it has drawbacks.
First, Apple's reluctance to scrape customers' individual information makes it harder to train personalised AI models. Apple uses what it calls 'differential privacy" based on aggregate insights, rather than the rich, granular data hoovered up by firms such as Google. Second, privacy has encouraged it to prioritise AI that runs on its own devices, rather than investing in cloud infrastructure. Chatbots have advanced more rapidly in the cloud because the models can be bigger (awkwardly, this led Apple to offer some users of Apple Intelligence an opt-in to ChatGPT).
In order to overcome its AI deficiencies, it could splash out on buying a builder of cloud-based large language models (LLMs). But it has left it quite late. OpenAI's deal with Mr Ive makes it less likely to ally with Apple. Anthropic is close to Amazon, which has a big stake in the maker of the Claude family of LLMs. Other options are either Chinese or too small for a company of Apple's heft.
Alternatively, it could relax its 'walled garden" ethos of seamless integration, and partner with a variety of third-party LLMs, as Motorola, owned by the Chinese firm Lenovo, has done. Third-party voice-activated chatbots could quickly solve its Siri problem, giving renewed reason for people to upgrade their phones.
The likelihood is that Mr Cook will do nothing radical. As Mr Moffett puts it, his tenure has been marked by the steady ascendancy of 'process over product". Instead of flashy innovations, his hallmark has been metronomic reliability, especially with regards to financial performance. Nor has he any hope of swiftly extricating Apple from China. As Mr McGee points out, even if Apple's final assembly moves to India and elsewhere, the supply chain's roots remain deeply embedded in the Middle Kingdom.
Yet this is no time for complacency. Whatever the ups and downs of AI—as Google has recently shown, yesterday's losers can quickly become today's winners—nothing turns investors off quicker than a profits shock. That is what makes the threats to Apple's services business so serious (see chart 2).
The most striking risk is that the judge who declared Google a monopolist may order it to suspend payments to Apple that make Google's search engine the default on the iPhone. The payments, which are partly for exclusivity and partly a revenue-sharing arrangement, generate about $20bn a year for Apple (last year its services revenue was $96bn). David Vogt of UBS Investment Bank says that, if the judge imposes a ban on the exclusivity part of the payments, it could cut Google's revenues by about $10bn. 'I'm getting calls every day of, 'What will the market do to Apple stock if that happens?'" he says. Google has vowed to appeal.
Another looming threat is to app-store revenues, which are under scrutiny as a result of the EU's Digital Markets Act, as well as from an antitrust lawsuit brought by Epic, a gaming firm, against Apple in America. Bank of America estimates that app-store commissions generate $31bn a year of high-margin services revenue for Apple. If app developers steer customers away from Apple's app store as a result of the rulings, it could clobber the lucrative cash cow.
Services have been the brightest spot of Mr Cook's tenure in recent years, helping to mitigate stagnation in iPhone sales. It will certainly be a blow if the line of business suffers. But if it prompts Mr Cook to tear up his own rule book on AI and everything else, it may be worth it in the end.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump's trade war is supercharging fast fashion industry
How Trump's trade war is supercharging fast fashion industry

Mint

time35 minutes ago

  • Mint

How Trump's trade war is supercharging fast fashion industry

Sydney, When US President Donald Trump introduced sweeping new tariffs on Chinese imports the goal was to bring manufacturing back to American soil and protect local jobs. However, this process of re-shoring is complex and requires years of investment and planning – far too slow for the world of ultra-fast fashion, where brands are used to reacting in weeks, not years. Many clothing companies started to move production out of China during Trump's first term. They relocated to countries such as Vietnam and Cambodia when the initial China-specific tariffs hit. This trend accelerated with the newer 'reciprocal' tariffs. Instead of re-shoring production, many fashion brands are simply sourcing from whichever country offers the lowest total cost after tariffs. The result? The ultra-fast fashion machine adapted quickly and became even more exploitative. From Guangzhou to your wardrobe in days Platforms such as Shein and Temu built their success by offering trend-driven clothing at shockingly low prices. A USD 5 dress or USD 3 top might seem like a bargain, but those prices hide a lot. Much of Shein's production takes place in the so-called 'Shein village' in Guangzhou, China, where workers often sew for 12–14 hours a day under poor conditions to keep pace with the demand for new items. When the US cracked down on Chinese imports, the intention was to make American-made goods more competitive. This included raising the tariff on Chinese goods as high as 145 per cent , and closing the 'de minimis' loophole, which had allowed imports under USD 800 to enter tariff-free. But these tariffs did not halt ultra-fast fashion. They just rerouted production to countries with lower tariffs and even lower labour costs. The Philippines, with a comparatively low tariff rate of 17 per cent, emerged as a surprising alternative. However, the country can't provide the industrial scale and infrastructure to match what China can offer. So why does Australia matter? Much of the cheap fashion previously bound for the US is now flooding other markets, including Australia. Australia still allows most low-value imports to enter tax-free, and platforms such as Shein and Temu have taken full advantage. Australian consumers are among the most frequent Shein and Temu buyers per capita globally. Just 3 per cent of clothing is made in Australia and most labels rely on offshore manufacturing. This makes Australia an ideal target market for ultra-fast fashion imports. We have high purchasing power, lenient import rules and strong demand for low-cost style, especially due to the cost-of-living crisis. The hidden costs of cheap clothes The environmental impact of fast fashion is well known. However, amid the chaos of Trump's tariff announcements, far less attention has been paid to how these policies – together with the retreat from climate commitments – worsen environmental harms, including those linked to fast fashion. The irony is that the tariffs meant to protect American workers have, in some cases, worsened conditions for workers elsewhere. Meanwhile, consumers in Australia now benefit from faster delivery of even cheaper goods as Temu, Shein and others have improved their shipping capabilities to Australia. Australian consumers send more than 200,000 tonnes of clothing to landfill each year. But the deeper problem is structural. The entire business model is built on exploitation and environmental damage. Factory workers bear the brunt of cost-cutting. In the race to stay competitive, many manufacturers reduce wages and overlook hazardous working conditions. Will ethical fashion ever compete? Fixing these problems will require a global rethink of how fashion operates. Governments have a role in regulating disclosures about supply chains and enforcing labour standards. Brands need to take responsibility for the conditions in their factories, whether directly owned or outsourced. Transparency is essential. Alternatives to fast fashion are gaining traction. Clothing rentals are emerging as a promising business model that help build a more circular fashion economy. Charity-run op shops have long been a sustainable source of second-hand clothing. Australia's new Seamless scheme seeks to make fashion brands responsible for the full life of the clothes they sell. The aim is to help people buy, wear and recycle clothes in a more sustainable way. Consumers also matter. If we continue to expect clothes to cost less than a cup of coffee, change will be slow. Recognising that a USD 5 t-shirt has hidden costs, borne by people on the factory floor and the environment, is a first step. Some ethical brands are already showing a better way and offer clothes made under fairer conditions and with sustainable materials. These clothes are not as cheap or fast, but they represent a more conscious alternative especially for consumers concerned about synthetic fibres, toxic chemicals and environmental harm. Trump reshuffled the deck, but did not change the game Trump's trade rules aim to re-balance global trade in favour of American industry, yet have cost companies more than USD 34 billion in lost sales and higher costs. This cost will eventually fall on US consumers. In ultra-fast fashion, it mostly exposed how fragile and exploitative the system already was. Today, brands such as Shein and Temu are thriving in Australia. But unless we address the systemic inequalities in fashion production and rethink the incentives that drive this market, the true cost of cheap clothing will continue to be paid by those least able to afford it. PY PY This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Apple WWDC 2025 Event Live Updates: Apple to unveil latest iOS features, updates in opening keynote
Apple WWDC 2025 Event Live Updates: Apple to unveil latest iOS features, updates in opening keynote

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Apple WWDC 2025 Event Live Updates: Apple to unveil latest iOS features, updates in opening keynote

Apple WWDC 2025 Event Live Updates: WWDC 2025, Apple's five-day annual developer conference will kick off on Monday, June 9, with a keynote from CEO Tim Cook and other company executives at Apple Park in Cupertino, California, US. Since the AI boom, developer conferences have been all about artificial intelligence. At WWDC 2024, Apple joined the AI race by introducing Apple Intelligence – its response to the rise of models and chatbots like ChatGPT. But a year later, progress has been slow, features limited, and the generative AI-revamped Siri has been delayed indefinitely. As a result, this year's WWDC is likely to see Apple pivot back to software-focused announcements, including an overhauled, unified UI design across all its devices as well as a new naming convention for iOS. We could also see Apple open up its foundational AI models for developers to build on. You can watch the livestream of the Apple WWDC 2025 keynote via YouTube at the link below: Stay tuned to our live blog for real-time updates, key announcements, and analysis from Apple WWDC 2025 as it unfolds. © IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd

Asian stocks rally as US-China trade talks spark optimism; US jobs data lifts sentiment; Hang Seng jumps 1.4%
Asian stocks rally as US-China trade talks spark optimism; US jobs data lifts sentiment; Hang Seng jumps 1.4%

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Asian stocks rally as US-China trade talks spark optimism; US jobs data lifts sentiment; Hang Seng jumps 1.4%

Asian stocks rallied on Monday, driven by hopes that renewed China-US trade talks in London could ease ongoing tensions between the two economic giants. Investor confidence was further lifted by stronger-than-expected US jobs data, helping Asian markets extend recent gains. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 rose 1.1% to 38,137.09, despite reports of a 0.2% contraction in the Japanese economy during the January-March quarter. South Korea's Kospi increased 1.9% to 2,865.52. Chinese markets advanced despite May export growth slowing to 4.8% year-on-year, compared to April's 8% increase. US-bound exports declined nearly 10% compared to the previous year. Chinese economic data also showed consumer prices decreased 0.1% in May year-on-year, marking four straight months of deflation. The Hang Seng index in Hong Kong advanced 1.4% to 24,119.64, while Shanghai's Composite Index increased 0.4% to 3,397.13. Australian markets remained closed for a public holiday. Stocks rose on Wall Street Friday after a stronger-than-expected US jobs report boosted investor confidence. All sectors in the S&P 500 gained, marking the index's second winning week in a row and bringing it close to its all-time high after recovering from a slump two months ago. The S and P 500 demonstrated widespread sector gains, securing its second consecutive winning week and approaching its historic peak. The S&P 500 climbed 1% to 6,000.36, while the Dow Jones rose 1% to 42,762.87. The Nasdaq also gained 1.2%, closing at 19,529.95. Technology shares led the upturn, with Nvidia rising 1.2% and Apple gaining 1.6%. Tesla recovered 3.7%, regaining ground after Thursday's decline following social media exchanges between Trump and Musk. US employers added a solid 139,000 jobs last month, showing the job market remains steady despite concerns over President Donald Trump's ongoing trade war. Businesses and consumers remain wary of tariffs, but the hiring data suggests resilience in the economy. Attention now shifts to London, where US and Chinese officials are meeting for another round of trade talks. The negotiations follow a recent phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, raising hopes of progress on easing trade tensions. This optimism lifted Asian markets, with gains seen in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Shanghai, Seoul, Singapore, Taipei, and Manila. Hopes that Trump may ease tariffs after securing other trade deals have helped the S&P 500 rebound sharply—recovering from a 20% drop two months ago. Meanwhile, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has lowered its forecast for US economic growth this year to 1.6%, down from 2.8% in 2024. The OECD's Tuesday forecast projected 1.6% US economic growth this year, lower than last year's 2.8%. Tariff uncertainties continue to influence Federal Reserve policy considerations. In Monday's early commodities trading, US crude oil decreased 3 cents to USD 64.55 per barrel, while Brent crude declined 5 cents to USD 66.42 per barrel. The US dollar fell to 144.42 Japanese yen from 144.85 yen, while the euro strengthened to USD 1.1422 from USD 1.1399. Market Snapshot as of 0230 GMT Tokyo (Nikkei 225): Up 1.1% at 38,137.09 Hong Kong (Hang Seng): Up 1.6% at 24,160.62 Shanghai (Composite): Up 0.4% at 3,399.65 Euro/Dollar: Up to $1.1415 from $1.1397 on Friday New York (Dow Jones): Up 1.1% at 42,762.87 (Friday close) London (FTSE 100): Up 0.3% at 8,837.91 (Friday close) Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store