logo
Can Tim Cook stop Apple going the same way as Nokia?

Can Tim Cook stop Apple going the same way as Nokia?

Mint2 days ago

A YEAR AGO, when Apple used a jamboree at its home in Silicon Valley to unveil its artificial-intelligence (AI) strategy, grandly known as Apple Intelligence, it was a banner occasion. The following day the firm's value soared by more than $200bn—one of the biggest single-day leaps of any company in American history. The excitement was fuelled by hopes that generative AI would enable Apple to transform the iPhone into a digital assistant—in effect, Siri with a brain—helping to resuscitate flagging phone sales. Twelve months later, that excitement has turned into almost existential dread.
It is not just that many of last year's promises have turned out to be vapourware. Siri's overhaul has been indefinitely postponed, and Apple Intelligence is no match for other voice-activated AI assistants, such as Google's Gemini. Meanwhile Apple's vulnerabilities in China have been exposed by President Donald Trump's trade war. Moreover, it faces new legal and regulatory challenges to the two biggest parts of its high-margin services business.
Its shares, down by almost a fifth this year, have lagged behind its big-tech peers, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft (see chart 1). But those are not the most alarming comparisons. In a new book, 'Apple in China", Patrick McGee draws an ominous parallel between Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, and Jack Welch, boss of General Electric from 1981 to 2001. Like Welch, Mr Cook has made a fortune for investors—when Apple's market value first exceeded $3trn, in 2022, it had risen by an average of more than $700m per day since he took over from Steve Jobs in 2011. But Mr McGee raises the possibility that, as at GE, Apple's success may obscure serious vulnerabilities. If that is the case, what can Mr Cook do to avoid the sort of fate that befell GE, Nokia and other great companies that suddenly lost their way?
The answer is unlikely to emerge during Apple's annual Worldwide Developers Conference that starts on June 9th. Amid reports of upheaval among executives, it is expected to return to its unflashy roots of announcing software updates for its phones and computers, rather than revealing a refreshed approach to AI.
Many would prefer to see Mr Cook work on a new hardware strategy instead. Craig Moffett of MoffettNathanson, an equity-research firm, notes that the greatest moments in Apple's history have come from the reinvention of what techies call 'form factors": the Mac reimagined desktop computing, the iPod transformed personal-music habits and the iPhone popularised touchscreen smartphones. AI looks like it will be another such pivot point. (Eddy Cue, Apple's head of services, recently admitted that AI could make the iPhone irrelevant in ten years.)
For now, Apple's rivals have been faster to explore new opportunities. Meta and Google are pinning hopes on AI-infused smart glasses, as are Chinese tech firms such as Xiaomi and Baidu. OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT, recently announced a $6.4bn deal to buy a firm created by Jony Ive, Apple's former chief designer, to build an AI device. As yet there is only hype to go on, but it has put Apple's lack of AI innovation in the spotlight.
Apple's response may seem like dogged incrementalism. Next year it is expected to unveil a foldable phone, following a path blazed previously by the likes of Samsung and Motorola. But Richard Windsor of Radio Free Mobile, a tech-research firm, thinks Apple may still have an ace up its sleeve. If smart glasses take off, its investment in the Vision Pro virtual-reality headset, though so far an expensive flop, may be an insurance policy. It could provide Apple with enough expertise in headgear and eyewear to shift quickly to glasses. If so, the company will avoid 'doing a Nokia", he says.
Likewise, Apple might make use of this moment of soul-searching to rethink other shibboleths of Mr Cook's tenure, such as the obsession with privacy and the high walls it puts around its family of products. As Ben Thompson of Stratechery, a newsletter, points out, sanctifying the privacy of its users' data has been an easy virtue for Apple to uphold because until recently it did not have much of an advertising business. Yet in the AI era, it has drawbacks.
First, Apple's reluctance to scrape customers' individual information makes it harder to train personalised AI models. Apple uses what it calls 'differential privacy" based on aggregate insights, rather than the rich, granular data hoovered up by firms such as Google. Second, privacy has encouraged it to prioritise AI that runs on its own devices, rather than investing in cloud infrastructure. Chatbots have advanced more rapidly in the cloud because the models can be bigger (awkwardly, this led Apple to offer some users of Apple Intelligence an opt-in to ChatGPT).
In order to overcome its AI deficiencies, it could splash out on buying a builder of cloud-based large language models (LLMs). But it has left it quite late. OpenAI's deal with Mr Ive makes it less likely to ally with Apple. Anthropic is close to Amazon, which has a big stake in the maker of the Claude family of LLMs. Other options are either Chinese or too small for a company of Apple's heft.
Alternatively, it could relax its 'walled garden" ethos of seamless integration, and partner with a variety of third-party LLMs, as Motorola, owned by the Chinese firm Lenovo, has done. Third-party voice-activated chatbots could quickly solve its Siri problem, giving renewed reason for people to upgrade their phones.
The likelihood is that Mr Cook will do nothing radical. As Mr Moffett puts it, his tenure has been marked by the steady ascendancy of 'process over product". Instead of flashy innovations, his hallmark has been metronomic reliability, especially with regards to financial performance. Nor has he any hope of swiftly extricating Apple from China. As Mr McGee points out, even if Apple's final assembly moves to India and elsewhere, the supply chain's roots remain deeply embedded in the Middle Kingdom.
Yet this is no time for complacency. Whatever the ups and downs of AI—as Google has recently shown, yesterday's losers can quickly become today's winners—nothing turns investors off quicker than a profits shock. That is what makes the threats to Apple's services business so serious (see chart 2).
The most striking risk is that the judge who declared Google a monopolist may order it to suspend payments to Apple that make Google's search engine the default on the iPhone. The payments, which are partly for exclusivity and partly a revenue-sharing arrangement, generate about $20bn a year for Apple (last year its services revenue was $96bn). David Vogt of UBS Investment Bank says that, if the judge imposes a ban on the exclusivity part of the payments, it could cut Google's revenues by about $10bn. 'I'm getting calls every day of, 'What will the market do to Apple stock if that happens?'" he says. Google has vowed to appeal.
Another looming threat is to app-store revenues, which are under scrutiny as a result of the EU's Digital Markets Act, as well as from an antitrust lawsuit brought by Epic, a gaming firm, against Apple in America. Bank of America estimates that app-store commissions generate $31bn a year of high-margin services revenue for Apple. If app developers steer customers away from Apple's app store as a result of the rulings, it could clobber the lucrative cash cow.
Services have been the brightest spot of Mr Cook's tenure in recent years, helping to mitigate stagnation in iPhone sales. It will certainly be a blow if the line of business suffers. But if it prompts Mr Cook to tear up his own rule book on AI and everything else, it may be worth it in the end.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Qcomm cos on govt radar; Tata upskills in Taiwan
Qcomm cos on govt radar; Tata upskills in Taiwan

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Qcomm cos on govt radar; Tata upskills in Taiwan

Qcomm cos on govt radar; Tata upskills in Taiwan Also in the letter: Govt may increase scrutiny on quick commerce firms following hygiene, food safety issues Taking charge: Second strike: Last year, a raid by the Telangana food safety commissioner also flagged lapses at Blinkit warehouses. In response, the FSSAI urged state authorities to step up inspections of quick commerce facilities. The agency also amended norms, mandating that rapid delivery platforms supply products with at least 30% of their shelf life remaining or a minimum of 45 days before expiry. In addition to concerns about food safety, quick commerce firms have also faced scrutiny over the use of manipulative design tactics, known as dark patterns. Also Read: Rapid expansion: Tata Electronics sends hundreds of staff to Taiwan for semicon training Driving the news: Now hiring: Talent hunt: To build its talent pipeline, Tata Electronics is recruiting top executives from chipmakers such as Intel and GlobalFoundries, while also training less experienced employees. Fresh graduates and professionals with some industry exposure are being sent to Taiwan as part of this programme. Sponsor ETtech Top 5 & Morning Dispatch! Why it matters: The opportunity: Reach a highly engaged audience of decision-makers. Boost your brand's visibility among the tech-savvy community. Custom sponsorship options to align with your brand's goals. What's next: Flexiloans raises another Rs 375 crore from Fundamentum, Accion and others The details: The round was led by existing investors, including Nandan Nilekani's Fundamentum, US-based impact investor Accion, American asset management firm Nuveen, and Denmark-based asset management company Maj Invest. British International Investment (BII), the UK's development finance institution, joined in as a new investor. Tell me more: Founder's take: Wealthtech startup PowerUp Money raises $7 million: Garuda Aerospace raises $1 million: Other Top Stories By Our Reporters Byju's US assets Epic and Tynker sold for a song: Meesho converts to public entity in run-up to IPO: OpenAI's ChatGPT down; users report issues in loading prompts: Global Picks We Are Reading Happy Wednesday! The government may increase surveillance on quick commerce dark stores because of increasing hygiene concerns. This and more in today's ETtech Morning Dispatch.■ ETtech Done Deals■ Byju's US fire sale■ Meesho converts to public entityThe government is likely to increase oversight of quick commerce companies' dark stores following a spate of complaints about food safety violations at facilities run by leading told us that the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) will lead the effort, with plans for surprise inspections at dark stores and other storage facilities across the FSSAI, which falls under the health ministry, sets standards for the manufacture, storage, distribution, sale and import of food HSBC Global ReasearchThe move follows recent action by the Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which suspended the licences of Blinkit and Zepto's dark stores in Mumbai and Pune after uncovering multiple hygiene breaches and violations of food safety executives and brand founders told ET that the fast and largely 'unchecked' growth of quick commerce platforms, which pushed both marketplaces and brands to scale at breakneck speed, may be at the root of the Electronics is ramping up preparations for its semiconductor fabrication (fab) and assembly and test (OSAT) facility by sending scores of employees to Taiwan for told us that the electronics arm of the Tata Group has sent 'a couple of hundred' employees to its technology partner Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC) for hands-on training in the specialised skills needed to operate the upcoming fab in training is being conducted in a phased and structured manner, as PSMC can accommodate only a limited number of trainees at a Rs 91,000-crore fab in Dholera is expected to generate over 20,000 direct and indirect skilled jobs. Tata Electronics has started hiring in batches of 75, according to a person familiar with the matter."Different batches focus on distinct operations like equipment, yield engineering, process technology and another on quality engineering, which is generally a smaller group that doesn't need as many people,' the person Top 5 and Morning Dispatch are must-reads for India's tech and business leaders, including startup founders, investors, policy makers, industry insiders and Reach out to us at spotlightpartner@ to explore sponsorship opportunities.(L-R) Manish Lunia, Deepak Jain, Ritesh Jain, founders, FlexiloansNon-banking finance company Flexiloans has raised Rs 375 crore in a mix of primary and secondary capital to drive its expansion raise follows a Rs 290 crore infusion in October 2024 . That round had valued the company at $140 million, ET reported at the time. The current raise includes a significant secondary ended FY24 with revenue of Rs 263 crore and a net profit of Rs 3 crore. The company is yet to file its FY25 financials.'Through this round, we have given exits to the high networth individuals who had invested in the company in 2017. Most of our existing institutional investors have doubled down in the company,' said Deepak Jain, a cofounder of wealthtech startup PowerUp Money has raised $7.1 million in its first major institutional funding round, led by early-stage investors Accel, Blume Ventures, and Kae Capital. This round also included participation from 8i Ventures and in April by Prateek Jindal, a former cofounder at Uni Cards, the startup offers direct mutual fund investments to retail startup Garuda Aerospace, backed by former Indian cricket team captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni, has raised $1 million in a funding round from the Narotam Sekhsaria Family Office (NSFO). The company plans to use the funds to scale up manufacturing capacity from 8,000 drones annually to 12,000-15,000 US assets of troubled edtech company Byju's, coding platform Tynker and kids learning platform Epic, have been sold for a fraction of what the company paid for them. A US bankruptcy court approved both sales during a hearing on May 20, as reported by EdWeek Market board of ecommerce marketplace Meesho has approved its conversion into a public entity in anticipation of a planned initial public offering (IPO), as stated in its filings with the Registrar of Companies (RoC).OpenAI's chatbot ChatGPT experienced an outage , with thousands of users encountering difficulties in loading and accessing results for their prompts. The company acknowledged the outage and stated that both ChatGPT and the image generation AI tool, Sora, have been affected.■ Trump's Tech Bros: Can Tim Cook save Apple from the trade war? ( FT ■ Tesla's Robotaxis are rolling out soon—with one big unanswered question ( Wired ■ Google's AI search features are killing traffic to publishers ( TechCrunch

Treasury secretary Bessent seen in race to succeed US Fed's Powell
Treasury secretary Bessent seen in race to succeed US Fed's Powell

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Treasury secretary Bessent seen in race to succeed US Fed's Powell

A growing chorus of advisers inside and outside the Trump administration are pushing another name to serve as the next chair of the Federal Reserve: Treasury secretary Scott Bessent. US President Donald Trump said Friday he would name a successor "very soon" to replace Jerome Powell, whose term as Fed chair ends in May 2026. The small list of candidates under consideration has included Kevin Warsh, a former Fed official whom Trump interviewed for the Treasury secretary role in Nov, according to people familiar with the matter. But Bessent - who is leading Trump's effort to kickstart the US economy with sweeping changes to trade, taxes and regulation - is also now one of the contenders for the job, said the people, who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Formal interviews for the position have not begun, two of the people said. "I have the best job in Washington," Bessent said in response to a request for comment. "The President will decide who's best for the economy and the American people." A senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, disputed the reporting without providing further specifics. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court rules
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court rules

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court rules

A federal appeals court has allowed President Trump's tariffs to remain in effect while it reviews a lower court decision that blocked them. The court will consider whether Trump exceeded his authority by imposing the tariffs under an emergency economic powers act. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump 's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play Federal Circuit said the litigation raised issues of "exceptional importance" warranting the court to take the rare step of having the 11-member court hear the appeal, rather than have it go before a three-judge panel first. It scheduled arguments for July tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store