logo
More headache for Starmer as UK's inflation jumps amid rising cost of living debate

More headache for Starmer as UK's inflation jumps amid rising cost of living debate

First Post16-07-2025
The unexpected rise in UK inflation to an 18-month high has intensified pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer read more
The UK's inflation rose unexpectedly in June to 3.6 per cent, marking the highest annual rate since January 2024, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The rise was attributed mainly to high food and motor fuel costs, with analysts having predicted inflation would remain unchanged from May's rate of 3.4 per cent.
ONS acting chief economist Richard Heys said that fuel prices fell less sharply this year compared to June 2023, contributing to the inflationary pressure. He also noted that food price inflation rose for the third consecutive month, reaching its highest level since February 2024.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Economic woes pile up for Starmer's government
The inflation data followed another worrying signal: the UK economy contracted for a second month in May. This dual blow has amplified the challenges facing Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is now contending with both economic stagnation and intensifying political pressure.
Finance Minister Rachel Reeves acknowledged the strain households are under, saying that 'there is more to do' to support people struggling with the cost of living. However, critics argue that government measures have not kept pace with the financial realities facing many households, especially the least well-off.
Living standards stagnate despite rising wages
While the government points to wage growth — hovering around 5 percent—as a sign of improvement, new analysis suggests that many Britons are seeing little benefit. Bloomberg reported that discretionary incomes fell by 4.2 per cent in April and remained flat in May, making this period the worst for household finances since the energy price shock in 2022.
Data from Retail Economics showed that incomes have dropped 7.5 per cent since Labour came to power in July 2024, with lower-income groups hardest hit. Nicholas Found, head of commercial content at the firm, told Bloomberg that unavoidable costs such as council tax, rail fares and utility bills have eaten into earnings, negating recent wage increases.
Labour's tax policy adds fuel to the fire
The government's stance on income tax thresholds has further fuelled discontent. Prime Minister Starmer has not ruled out extending the freeze on tax brackets — a policy initiated under the previous Conservative administration and scheduled to last through 2028.
According to the Resolution Foundation, this fiscal drag is likely to wipe out much of the wage growth for middle-income earners, and could even result in a decline in real take-home pay once local levies like council tax are factored in. These policies have sparked criticism from voters and analysts alike, who view them as regressive during a period of widespread financial strain, the Bloomberg report said.
Reform UK capitalises on discontent
As economic conditions tighten, Labour is facing growing political backlash. Populist party Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, has overtaken Labour in some opinion polls by promising tax relief and more direct support for working-class voters. The surge in support for Reform reflects the fragility of Labour's mandate and the growing frustration with mainstream policy responses.
Despite the government's insistence that rising wages mean Britons are better off, polling and spending data suggest otherwise. Lancaster University's Work Foundation found that one in six workers are struggling to pay monthly bills, and fewer than half believe wage growth is keeping up with the cost of living. The same survey found that nearly 10 per cent more people now hold second jobs compared to a year ago, reaching record highs, as families turn to gig work and side jobs to bridge income gaps, Bloomberg reported.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Bank of England faces a tightrope on interest rates
While the inflation rise could normally signal a need to hold or raise interest rates, economic sluggishness may force the Bank of England to ease policy anyway. Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics, suggested that the Bank may still cut rates by 25 basis points in August, given the broader weakness in growth. However, she also warned that the latest inflation figures will likely prompt a slower, more cautious rate-cutting cycle, AFP said.
Policymakers are especially wary of 'second-round' inflationary effects, where higher wages drive further price increases, a cycle that could be difficult to break.
A political and economic crossroads
The unexpected rise in inflation has only intensified the economic and political challenges facing Starmer's government. While officials continue to highlight wage growth as a sign of progress, many households are experiencing deteriorating living standards, rising taxes and increased debt.
With Reform UK gaining momentum and household budgets under siege, the Starmer administration finds itself at a precarious juncture. The path forward will require not only sound economic management, but a convincing narrative that connects macroeconomic gains with real improvements in daily life. Until then, the pressure will likely keep mounting—from the public, the opposition and the markets alike.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Explosive! FBI 'Blocked' Trump's Name In Epstein Docs? Musk Claims 3 Democrats On 'Sealed' List
Explosive! FBI 'Blocked' Trump's Name In Epstein Docs? Musk Claims 3 Democrats On 'Sealed' List

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Explosive! FBI 'Blocked' Trump's Name In Epstein Docs? Musk Claims 3 Democrats On 'Sealed' List

A stunning Bloomberg report has revealed that the FBI redacted Donald Trump's name from the Epstein files, citing privacy exemptions due to his status as a private citizen during the original investigation. Dozens of other high-profile names were also blacked out. Elon Musk later claimed the list contains major Democratic figures and donors as well, suggesting this is why the documents remain sealed. Attorney General Pam Bondi reportedly warned Trump in May about his name appearing in the files. Despite public pressure, the DOJ and FBI declared in July that there was 'no basis' for further release of Epstein-related materials. Read More

Trump to replace White House Rose Garden lawn with concrete; netizens call it 'embarrassing'
Trump to replace White House Rose Garden lawn with concrete; netizens call it 'embarrassing'

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump to replace White House Rose Garden lawn with concrete; netizens call it 'embarrassing'

President Donald Trump is marching ahead with his renovation ideas for sections of the White House, including the famed Rose Garden. According to a USA Today report, the president's renovations include a 90,000 square foot ballroom worth $200 million, new flag poles, and paving the Rose Garden with concrete. The Rose Garden's renovation has become a talking point for many of Trump's critics, who see it as an attempt to destroy the heritage of the residence. Donald Trump's idea for the Rose Garden has been slammed on social media. Photographer: Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg(Bloomberg) Also read: Trump's East Wing ballroom could cost $200 million; first white house photos out All about Donald Trump's White House Rose Garden renovation The US President has set his sights on revamping the iconic White House garden. Interestingly, the previous renovation of the space also occurred during Trump's first term. According to a Daily Beast report, the changes in 2020 consisted of the relocation of crabapple trees that were planted during the Kennedy administration and the addition of pink and white roses. The construction of an ADA-compliant limestone path around the outside of the lawn was also undertaken. Historian Michael Beschloss called the move an 'evisceration' that could make 'decades of American history… disappear,' as per The Daily Beast. Trump's present idea for the White House's Rose Garden renovation includes replacing much of the lawn with concrete pavers. The reasoning behind the move, as Trump explained during an interview with Fox News in March, was to cater to the needs of female guests who wore high heels. 'What was happening is, that's supposed to have events. Every event you have, it's soaking wet,' he said about the historic 7,500 square foot area near the South Lawn, adding, 'It's soaking wet... and the women with the high heels, it's just too much.' Also read: Fox Nation's Riddle reveals Jimmy Hoffa's lake house: Inside the quiet hideaway tied to his final day Trump criticized over White House Rose Garden renovation After photos of the Rose Garden's now paved lawn started circulating online, users slammed the Trump administration for the renovation move. One user promised to vote for any Democrat who would restore the Rose Garden to its earlier look. Another called the change 'embarrassing.' The Rose Garden Rose Garden or West Garden area was as a colonial-style garden in 1903 by First Lady Edith Roosevelt. First Lady Ellen Wilson, in 1913, transformed the garden with the assistance of George Burnap. A more open design was created by Jacqueline Kennedy in the 1960s. FAQs What happened to the White House Rose Garden? It is undergoing renovations. Who planted the Rose Garden at the White House? A colonial-style garden was planted by First Lady Edith Roosevelt. It was later transformed by First Lady Ellen Wilson in 1913. Is the White House Rose Garden open to the public? It is open to the public one weekend during the spring and fall.

Why voting rights at 16 is the way forward
Why voting rights at 16 is the way forward

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Why voting rights at 16 is the way forward

The United Kingdom has decided to permit 16-year-olds to vote in general elections. Incidentally, they can already vote in elections to the devolved parliaments in Scotland and Wales. That's one of the interesting quirks about Britain. And there's no doubt this will happen. It's a Labour manifesto promise and Prime Minister Keir Starmer has the numbers to push it through. Now, what it does is create a rather interesting situation for British 16-year-olds. In addition to voting in national elections, they can also marry with parental consent, enter into a civil partnership, consent to lawful sexual intercourse, leave home without their parent or guardians' permission, join a trade union, pay taxes and work as a waiter or waitress. They also have to pay full train fares. But there are also things they can't do. For instance, they can't buy a lottery ticket, drive a car on their own, purchase alcohol from an off licence or drink a pint of beer in a pub. Paradoxically, they can't stand for elections. So, they can't vote for themselves. If this creates a confusing picture, you would not be the first to say so. That seems to be the response of the opposition Conservatives. However, the essential question is: Are 16-year-olds mature enough to decide who should rule the country? You'll notice I haven't qualified that question by including the adverb intelligently. Do people in their 20s and 30s or 50s and 60s decide intelligently? Or do they do so emotionally? Or just out of habit and prejudice? If it's ok for them, why not 16-year-olds? That still leaves the core question: Are they mature enough to vote? Some clearly are. The BBC interviewed Alex Nurton, the chair of the UK Youth Parliament's Vote at 16 Campaign, and, frankly, he was better informed and certainly more thoughtful than most adults I know. Leave aside granting him the right to vote, he could even be given the right to rule! But are people like him an exception? I tend to think so. Perhaps because I'm more than half a century older, I'm inclined to believe 16-year-olds are still in the process of making up their minds. They're feeling their way. Learning through experience what could be right or what might turn out to be wrong. That was certainly true of me in the early '70s. If I was eligible, would I have been able to sensibly choose between Indira Gandhi's Congress and the opposition's Grand Alliance? Or would I have been swayed by my parents' opinion and, as young people often do, make it my own? Of course, there are young people who think for themselves. I wouldn't deny that. But I suspect the majority accept the view of the adults around them and hold on till they realise they disagree or just grow beyond it. Now, should you be voting when that's how you approach politics? It's easy to say no because we assume a vote is cast only after carefully considering the choices on offer. But think again. Is that really what adults do? Aren't we influenced by others just as 16-year-olds might be? Are we any more committed to or convinced of the person we vote for than a 16-year-old would be? I don't think so. In fact, in 1989, when India gave the vote to 18-year-olds, these very issues and concerns were debated. Time has proved the doubters wrong. Wouldn't you say that's likely to happen again? The truth is — and it's probably difficult for the elderly to accept — young people today are far more astute and intelligent than we were at their age. Actually, that was also true of our grandparents and us and their grandparents and them. Every generation is brighter than its predecessor. Just watch a four-year-old with an iPhone and you'll know I'm right. So I applaud the Brits for what they intend to do. Is it time for us to consider something similar? Karan Thapar is the author of Devil's Advocate: The Untold Story. The views expressed are personal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store