
Dublin property tax set to rise by up to one third, as councillors vote on hikes
homeowners face a hike of up to one-third in their
local property tax
(LPT) bills next year, if councillors follow through on an agreed increase in the tax rate today.
City councillors are expected to vote for the first rise in property tax rates since the charge was introduced in 2013. The change in the city rate, coupled with the upcoming national LPT revaluation, means most homeowners can expect to pay between 22 per cent and 34 per cent more in their bills next year.
Fine Gael
and
Fianna Fáil
city councillors have consistently voted for the lowest possible annual LPT charge, but following last year's local elections agreed to increases from 2026 to secure the support of the Green Party and Labour for a power pact on the council.
David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city
Listen |
36:51
Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil would not agree to increase the LPT in advance of last November's election, but acceded to the increase from 2026 and for each subsequent year until the next local elections in 2029.
READ MORE
LPT, which is based on the value of a property, has a base rate that can be raised or lowered by 15 per cent by councillors each year. Since the introduction of the tax in 2013, Dublin city councillors have always voted for the maximum discount. The three other Dublin local authorities also typically apply varying discounts, but outside the capital, most councils raise the charge by 15 per cent each year.
If the discount is no longer applied, Dubliners' bills would increase by 15 per cent. However, this move coincides with a national property tax revaluation this November, which comes into force next year, and will mean increased charges for each of the 20 'valuation bands'.
The last revaluation was in 2021 and properties in the capital have since increased by an average of about 20 per cent. However, to avoid large hikes in the charge, the value of properties in each band has been increased.
The first band will now extend from zero to €240,000, rather than €200,000, with other bands also increasing. This means that 96 per cent of properties will stay in their existing band, but homeowners will face increased charges.
A property valued between €420,001 to €525,000 will attract a charge of €428, up from €344.25 from this year's equivalent, also an increase of just over 24 per cent.
However, homeowners with higher value properties can expect steeper increases. Houses which will be valued from €1,470,001 to €1,575,000 will have a €1,797 charge, up from €1,382.95, a 30 per cent increase. At the top of the scale, a homeowner in band 19 will get a bill for €3,110, an increase of more than 34 per cent.
The rate increase will provide an additional €16.4 million in funds for the council, one-third of which will go towards improving the lives of those living in council housing, said Labour Cllr Darragh Moriarty, by replacing 'single-glazed windows, draughty doors and measures to tackle damp and mould'.
Sinn Féin's Daithí Doolan said his party would continue to propose the maximum cut in the charge. 'Dubliners are unfairly punished by the extremely high price of housing in the capital,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Times
43 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Number of people seeking asylum in Ireland who can access labour market to ‘reduce significantly', analysis finds
Officials believe the number of people seeking asylum in Ireland who can access the labour market will 'reduce significantly' in the coming years. Currently, people seeking international protection can apply for work permits if they have not received a decision on their status within six monthsThey can apply for the permit five months into the asylum process. However, a Department of Justice analysis shows that legislation on labour market access 'is currently under review'. It outlines that under a new international protection Bill, which is needed to bring Irish law up to date and in line with a new European Union migration pact, most international protection applicants (IPAs) would have a first-instance decision 'within five months'. This, according to the document, means 'that the number eligible for labour market access will reduce significantly'. Once someone receives a first-instance decision, they can appeal it. But sources in the non-governmental organisation (NGO) sector are concerned that people seeking asylum will not be able to access the labour market while awaiting an appeal, under the circumstances sketched out in the document. [ Court ruling would give newly arrived asylum seekers more rights than homeless people, Minister claims Opens in new window ] The analysis is contained within a new National Asylum and Migration Management Strategy, published this week by the Department of Justice. The strategy is produced as part of Ireland's decision to opt into the EU migration pact. It also outlines that Government is to set up a new monitoring body – the Chief Inspector of Asylum Border Procedures – which will have responsibility for covering how Ireland implements screening procedures. The new office will ensure EU and international law are complied with, as well as the EU charter of fundamental rights during screenings of people from outside of Ireland and the bloc. It will also oversee the application of a new border procedure which is envisaged under the pact. The office will be charged with investigating any allegations of breaches, with provision made for inspections, investigations and dealing with complaints, according to the document. An advisory board is to be appointed which will have a membership from relevant bodies, including the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission, Tusla and the Health Information and Quality Authority. The review reiterates plans contained in an earlier document, published in March , on how Ireland plans to implement measures associated with the pact. These measures include methods to more tightly monitor those seeking asylum here or who have been given an order to leave the jurisdiction. [ Irish tech worker detained by immigration agents in US for 100 days: 'I didn't know when I was getting home' Opens in new window ] Currently, Ireland only uses detention of such individuals in very limited circumstances. It outlines that the department is 'evaluating the feasibility of using technological alternatives to detention'. These could include enabling online check-ins which capture the geographic location of a person. Other measures under consideration include IPAs being subject to regular reporting requirements, or those who are subject to return decisions being required to report more frequently to the Garda or an immigration officer. Such individuals may be required to remain in a certain geographic area, while those seeking international protection might only be granted access to services away from their assigned accommodation under limited circumstances. It also shows that travel or ID documents may be seized or held by the State.


Irish Times
43 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Liffey Swim in danger of not going ahead this year because of legal dispute, court hears
A High Court judge has implored organisations involved in a dispute over the right to run the annual Dublin city Liffey Swim to resolve their differences, warning that the event is at risk of not going ahead this year. At the conclusion of a hearing into Leinster Open Sea CLG's application for temporary injunctive relief against Swim Ireland, Mr Justice Rory Mulcahy said it was 'disappointing' the dispute had not been resolved. The judge, who earlier on Friday had encouraged the parties to mediate, said the fact the dispute has put at risk the event's 2025 edition should have motivated the parties to come to a resolution. The Liffey Swim, described by the judge as 'an Irish institution', has been held annually since 1920. READ MORE Leinster Open Sea CLG, a volunteer sponsorship-funded body which organises about 30 sea races every year in partnership with local clubs, wants the court to restrain the Irish Amateur Swimming Association CLG, trading as the State-funded national governing body for swimming Swim Ireland, from holding both the Liffey Swim and the Dún Laoghaire Harbour Swim. The court heard previously that last year, as a result of the dispute, two separate Liffey swims were held and Dublin City Council – which grants permission for the event to go ahead – does not want the same thing happening this year. [ 'An amazing feeling': Sixteen-year-old wins women's Liffey Swim Opens in new window ] Mr Justice Mulcahy reserved his judgment in the application for interim relief, stating that regardless of the court's decision, the immediate future of the Liffey Swim looked in doubt. He said he found this 'personally' very disappointing. It is Leinster Open Sea's case that it has always owned and operated the Liffey Swim and the Dún Laoghaire Harbour Swim, albeit under the guise of different entities – previously as unincorporated associations, and now as a company limited by guarantee. Michael O'Doherty BL, for Leinster Open Sea, said Swim Ireland has asserted that it owns the rights to run the swims, but is silent on the basis of that ownership. Swim Ireland knows the local authorities will side with it in granting permission to hold the swim events, by virtue of its status as the national governing body for swimming, Mr O'Doherty said. Mr O'Doherty said Swim Ireland is in a 'position of power', and is happy for the dispute to remain unresolved and to maintain the status quo. Mr O'Doherty said that for this reason, his clients are forced to bring an application to restrain Swim Ireland from holding the events. [ In pictures: Swim Ireland 104th Liffey Swim Opens in new window ] Mr O'Doherty added that if the court found in favour of Swim Ireland, Leinster Open Sea would likely go out of business. His clients, Mr O'Doherty said, rely on income generated by the two swim events. He added that Swim Ireland did not stand to lose anything if it does not run the races, and pointed out that it ran its Liffey Swim at a loss last year. Peter Bland SC, for Swim Ireland, said Leinster Open Sea's application 'falls at the first hurdle', stating it has brought proceedings as Leinster Open Sea, the unincorporated association, and not Leinster Open Sea CLG, a company limited by guarantee. An unincorporated association is a nonentity in a legal sense, and cannot sue or be sued. Mr O'Doherty asked the court to amend the title of the proceedings to specify that 'Leinster Open Sea CLG' are taking the proceedings, describing the omission as a bona fide mistake. Mr Bland also submitted that Leinster Open Sea delayed in bringing the proceedings, and breached the confidentiality of previous mediation discussions. Counsel submitted that there was no basis in which the application could be granted. Mr Justice Mulcahy said he would deliver his judgment in the application for interlocutory reliefs next week. He implored the parties to seek a resolution to the dispute.

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Over 250 unsafe baby carriers, slings, and walkers removed from sale over non-compliance
LAST UPDATE | 36 mins ago OVER 250 BABY products, including baby carriers and slings, have been removed from online marketplaces such as Amazon and Shein following a Europe-wide operation involving Irish consumer protection officials. The authorities, including Ireland's Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), examined some 1,741 listings as part of a major sweep of baby products for sale on online marketplaces. Authorities went on to send 252 takedown orders to providers of online marketplaces regarding dangerous products offered on their interfaces. The sweep followed the introduction of new product safety legislation in December 2024. Officers analysed the listings for compliance with minimum product safety information rules, which require clear details of the manufacturer and EU responsible person to be displayed. The CCPC said this information is 'crucial for the protection of babies and children from dangerous or faulty products'. Following the sweeps conducted in April and May of this year, 252 takedown orders were sent to the online marketplaces, regarding listings that failed to meet minimum safety and compliance information requirements or featured products that had already been recalled from the market. Advertisement Safety officers from Ireland's CCPC issued 72 of the EU's 252 takedown orders, which targeted baby carriers, slings, and baby walkers. All 72 listings were removed at the CCPC's request from sites including Amazon, Shein, Etsy, eBay, Fruugo and Joom. Of the 252 takedown orders, 155 related to 'very large online platforms' such as Aliexpress, Amazon, Shein, Temu and Zalando. The remaining 97 were sent to other, smaller platforms. Brian McHugh, chair of the CCPC, noted that many parents turn to online marketplaces for convenience when buying baby products and added that they 'deserve to know that those products are safe'. He said the CCPC's product safety officers issue recalls for tens of thousands of items every year and that traceability is 'critically important'. 'Online marketplaces have a duty to be transparent about what they're selling and provide contact details in the event a product is unsafe,' said McHugh. He added that the online marketplaces 'co-operated when we contacted them' and that the 'listings were taken down promptly'. 'The work of our officers, in collaboration with colleagues across the EU, has stopped hundreds of potentially unsafe products being offered for sale to Irish consumers,' said McHugh. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal