Nvidia takes EU antitrust regulators to court for probing AI startup Run:ai bid
BRUSSELS, Feb 24 (Reuters) - U.S. chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab has sued EU antitrust regulators for accepting an Italian request last year to scrutinise its acquisition of AI startup Run:ai, saying they had flouted an earlier court ruling restricting their merger powers on minor deals.
While the case does not have any impact on the Run:ai deal which was eventually approved by the EU competition watchdog in December last year, a ruling favouring Nvidia may further curb the regulator's merger power.
Businesses have been concerned in recent years with the European Commission flexing a rarely-used power called Article 22 to assess small deals even though these are below the EU's merger revenue threshold.
The EU executive says it is concerned about killer acquisitions in which big companies buy startups to shut them down, but companies criticise such moves as regulatory over-reach.
Europe's highest court, however, in a landmark ruling in September last year said the Commission cannot encourage or accept referrals of deals without a European dimension from national enforcers when the latter do not have the powers to examine such deals under their own national laws.
Nvidia cited the ruling in its lawsuit filed with the Luxembourg-based General Court, Europe's second-highest, according to a filing on the court website.
"The decision unlawfully accepted a referral request from the Italian Autorità Garante della Concorrenza (AGCM), regarding a transaction that fell below the EU Merger Regulation and member state merger control thresholds, based on the AGCM's exercise of loosely defined, ex post, discretionary call-in powers," Nvidia said.
It said regulators' decision to take up the Italian request breaches principles of institutional balance, legal certainty, proportionality and equal treatment.
The case is T-15/25 Nvidia v Commission.
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Meta to pay nearly $15 billion for Scale AI stake, The Information reports
June 10 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab has agreed to take a 49% stake in artificial intelligence startup Scale AI for $14.8 billion, The Information reported on Tuesday, citing two people familiar with the matter. Founded in 2016, Scale AI provides vast amounts of labeled data or curated training data, which is crucial for developing sophisticated tools such as OpenAI's ChatGPT. The deal, which has not been finalized yet, appears to be beneficial for Scale AI's investors, including Accel, Index Ventures, Founders Fund and Greenoaks Capital, as well as its current and former employees, the report said. Meta, Scale AI and the startup's investors did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. As part of the deal, Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang will take a top position inside Meta, leading a new "superintelligence" lab, according to the report. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been actively recruiting top AI researchers to boost the company's AI efforts, the report said. The company is fighting the perception that it may have fallen behind in the AI race after its initial set of Llama 4 large language models released in April fell short of performance expectations. Meta delayed the release of its flagship "Behemoth" AI model due to concerns about its capabilities, the Wall Street Journal reported last month. The company is also facing antitrust concerns related to its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. According to The Information report, the structure for the potential deal with Scale AI could be designed to avoid more regulatory scrutiny. Scale AI was valued at $13.8 billion in a funding round last spring. It generated about $870 million in revenue in 2024 and expects more than $2 billion this year, the report said. The company counts AI firms OpenAI and Cohere as well as tech giants Microsoft, Meta and Cisco Systems among its customers, according to its website.
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
What is natural language processing?
0 This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community. The term natural language processing, or NLP, describes a computer's ability to understand, interpret, or generate human language. It is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) which uses algorithm-backed machine learning (ML) to recognise both the written and spoken word. Testament to its utility, in 2023 the market size of NLP in finance was valued at $5.5 billion. It is projected to swell to $40 billion by 2032, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 25%. In this instalment of Finextra's Explainer series, we look at the capabilities of NLP, the various types and benefits, as well as the potential applications within financial services. Three kinds of NLP There are three main families of NLP technology: Rules-based NLP This uses pre-defined rules to analyse and process text. The rules are created by humans and designed to handle specific structures and patterns in language. Rules-based NLP is best deployed in controlled domains – such as legal documents or technical manuals. It is not so reliable when applied to more dynamic or creative works. Statistical NLP Instead of pre-defined rules, statistical NLP uses ML to spot patterns and relationships in datasets – enabling automated extraction and classification of linguistic elements. This makes statistical NLP useful for spell checkers, text summaries, and chatbots, though it can struggle with the context-dependent nuances of language. Deep learning NLP This method leans on a specific type of ML – artificial neural networks – to understand language. The benefit of neural networks is that they are adaptive, enabling tasks like text classification, translation, and question answering, with great accuracy. Deep learning NLP is useful for sentiment analysis, machine translation, speech recognition, text generation, and even interpreting the emotional tone of text. The benefits The benefits of NLP are so numerous that the technology is already being rolled out by several industries. Generally speaking, NLP has the ability to: Enhance human-computer interaction – meaning humans need not study complex computer languages to get the output from machines they require. This democratises information technology (IT) Automate repetitive tasks – by automating document handling or data entry, staff are freed up to focus on more complex, revenue-driving tasks Improve data analysis and insights – NLP can rapidly extract valuable information from unstructured datasets, like customer reviews. These learnings can then be leveraged to, for instance, create new products or improve customer experiences Enhance searches – alongside search engines, NLP technology can better understand the intent behind users' queries and therefore extend more relevant results and boost satisfaction The applications Here are some examples of the ways these benefits can be exploited by the financial services industry: Speech recognition – improving security through identity checks for in-bound customer calls Chatbots – helping to triage customer queries at the front office Fraud detection – examining transaction references and other communications to identify suspicious patterns or fraud schemes Market analysis – trawling traditional media, social media, or call transcripts to gauge sentiment; foresee market movements; and inform investment decisions Document processing – automating regulatory obligations like Know Your Customer (KYC) processes, by extracting key data from unstructured files Legal analysis – interpreting contracts to save on legal costs and human resources In today's fast-paced, digital zeitgeist, the financial services industry has moved from measuring time in weeks and days to seconds. Indeed, a mere nanosecond can be the difference between catching and missing a fraudulent transaction, or executing and losing a vital trade. NLP enables institutions to greatly accelerate the mining of information, from multiple mediums, and use it to the advantage of the business and its customers. Countless banks are already deploying NLP technology to this effect. HSBC, for example, recently launched AI Markets – a digital service that leverages NLP to support institutional investors. The proprietary NLP engine generates bespoke financial market analytics, with access to the bank's real-time and historic cross-asset data sets. The challenges When implementing and deploying NLP technology, banks should be aware of the challenges that surround it. One of the most widely covered issues is that some NLP tools carry the biases of their programmers or the datasets used to train them. This means that NLP has the potential to reinforce societal biases when applied. Systems must be created that offer a fair service to all customers. As with all languages, meaning is delivered not just by words themselves, but by the tone and context. NLP technologies must be advanced enough to catch these nuances and ensure an accurate output is rendered. To make matters even more challenging, languages and dialects are constantly shifting – with new accents and vocabularies constantly entering the vernacular. NLP models must have the flexibility to shoulder these dynamics and deliver a consistently reliable service to companies. Integrating NLP with next-generation tech Thanks to the ability of NLP technology to automate routine tasks, interpret sprawling datasets, and offer actionable insights to product teams, it is poised for massive growth in financial services. Indeed, its place in banks' back offices will only become more embedded, as efficiencies are driven, data analysis is enhanced, customer experiences become hyper-personalised, and algorithmic trading becomes commonplace. Eventually, NLP will be integrated with other next-generation technologies, like quantum computing and generative AI (GenAI), to unlock seismic opportunities across an institution's every business line. At each stage of development, it is incumbent on those deploying the technology to spot and restrain data bias, develop an intimate understanding of how the models make decisions, and ensure information accuracy remains as clear as glacial runoff.
Finextra
an hour ago
- Finextra
Begin with the end in mind
The work on implementing the Trust Infrastructure in Europe is now going into high gear. Today's Open Wallet Foundation and Findynet meetings and last weeks FIDES Plugfest - just to mention a few - show that the progress is real. The benefits for Society at large, every citizen and organisation have from the outset made it clear that remaining issues must be ironed out fast. Can anything be even nearly as important than the leaps on offer: in productivity, security, service levels, privacy, ethical and productive AI, fight against cyber crime and the Single Market. Anything coming near? If not - now is the time for public-private action of never-before seen magnitude. So what should I think about at work - in any organisation? 1. What are the business events where I need verified data? Securely in the same way from all public and private sectors sources - without need for technical integrations and contracts. 2. What data do I need to send to the public sector, customers, suppliers, staff and owners? Where do I obtain it? Securely in the same way to all needing it - without need for technical integrations and contracts. 3. Which de-facto EUDI-interoperable agent (wallet) should I choose (72 listed in Open Wallet Foundation - tens for organisations) in my roles as (i) holder (asking for data), (ii) issuer (issuing data) or (iii) verifier (getting data from holder wallets) ? Many organisation wallets can serve all three roles. 4. Do I need to integrate the chosen agent/wallet to my CRM systems? Smaller organisations do not need it upfront and smaller volumes can be handled by back-offices - at least to begin with. If it is a must - how soon can it be done? Need for reprioritisation is obvious. Even if the integration of standardised wallets will be a routine. 5. How much work is needed to change my receiving and sending data processes? How much can sending and receiving batches be improved by getting identity wallet support? How much batches can stay where they are and be replaced by a credential in structured form? 6. Should I join industry or service specific groups looking after rulebooks in sometimes needed ecosystems building on the Trust Infrastrucure? 7. What are the things and applications that my organisation is controlling? When is the time right to provide them with empowering and controlling identity wallets? Now is the time to begin with the end (all have wallets for all verified data) - not the time for sitting on hands. Especially not in public sector organisations.
