Seventy Nations Briefed on Operation Sindoor: Here's How India Made Pakistan Bite the Dust
Led by Lt Gen DS Rana, director general of the Defence Intelligence Agency, the briefing presented a comprehensive account of India's evolving response to threats, especially those finding safe haven in Pakistan.
Held at the Indian Army's Manekshaw Centre, the briefing laid out the contours of a 'new normal' in India's response to terrorist threats, backed by intelligence, precision and indigenous capabilities.
The government emphasised that briefing 70 nations was a gesture of openness and accountability. It invited the international community to view India's actions in the light of facts, not propaganda.
The briefing was also contextualised with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent national address, which signaled that India's responses to terrorism will now be strong, swift and unequivocal.
The main points conveyed during the briefing are as follows:
1. India's New Security Posture: India conveyed that it has adopted a firm and proactive approach to terrorism, making it clear that future attacks will draw calibrated and decisive responses. This marks a 'new normal' in India's national security doctrine.
2. Overview of Operation Sindoor: The diplomats were informed that 'Operation Sindoor' was a precise, intelligence-driven response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. It demonstrated India's readiness to act across domains and borders when national security is compromised.
3. Target Selection and Intelligence Coordination: From a pool of 21 possible sites, nine confirmed terror-linked targets were selected for the operation. These were chosen after cross-verification using multi-agency intelligence inputs to ensure credibility and avoid civilian harm.
4. Execution and Jointness: The operation showcased high levels of coordination between the Indian Army, the Air Force and intelligence agencies. The armed forces executed the mission with speed and precision, reflecting enhanced jointness and inter-service cooperation.
5. Use of Indigenous Capabilities: India highlighted the use of indigenous weapons and systems during the operation, underlining the effectiveness of locally developed kinetic force multipliers.
6. Technological Superiority in Non-Kinetic Domains: Diplomats were briefed on India's growing edge in space-based surveillance, cyber operations and electronic warfare. These technologies played a crucial role in the operation and demonstrated India's advanced capabilities in modern warfare.
7. Counter-Misinformation Strategy: The briefing included a segment on how India effectively countered Pakistan's misinformation campaign. India provided evidence of deliberate false narratives and detailed the swift measures taken to neutralise their impact diplomatically and digitally.
8. Regional Security and Stability: India emphasised that its actions are guided by the principle of self-defence and regional peace. It pointed out that terrorist networks operating with state support in the neighbourhood remain a threat not just to India but to regional stability as a whole.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
16 BSF personnel awarded gallantry medals for Operation Sindoor
Sixteen Border Security Force (BSF) personnel have been awarded gallantry medals for their exceptional bravery during Operation Sindoor, in which they shot down enemy drones, rescued injured comrades, supplied ammunition under fire, destroyed Pakistani posts and surveillance equipment along the border. Among the awardees are five personnel deployed at the sensitive Kharkhola border outpost in Jammu. (BSF Facebook photo) The citation shared by the government showed the acts of the personnel during Operation Sindoor - India's successful response to the Pakistan-sponsored April 23 terror attack in Pahalgam. Among the awardees are five personnel deployed at the sensitive Kharkhola border outpost in Jammu. According to the citation, six personnel—Assistant Commandant Abhishek Srivastav, Head Constable Brij Mohan Singh, and Constables Bhupendra Bajpai, Rajan Kumar, Basavaraja Shivappa Sunkada, and Depeswar Barman—displayed exemplary courage under direct enemy assault. After the Indian Army launched Operation Sindoor, Pakistani forces positioned barely 200 meters from the Kharkhola post initiated heavy shelling using flat and high-trajectory weapons, followed by a drone attack. 'In the early hours of May 10, 2025, multiple Pakistani drones were spotted in the area. Upon hearing the humming sound, the troops took defensive positions. Under the command of Sub-Inspector Mohd Imtiyaz, they successfully neutralised one drone. However, a mortar shell—likely dropped by another drone—exploded just outside their bunker, causing serious injuries to Head Constable Brij Mohan Singh and four constables,' the citation stated. Also Read: Op Sindoor success to feature in I-Day event Despite their injuries, the personnel continued to engage the enemy. Assistant Commandant Srivastav, a young probationary officer, rushed to their aid and successfully evacuated them under intense enemy fire. The BSF has also named a post in Jammu under the name of Sub-Inspector Imitiyaz, who was killed in action that morning. Apart from Singh, another constable, Deepak Chimngakham, was also killed in action at the border during the Indo-Pak hostilities. Another medal recipient, assistant sub-inspector Udai Vir Singh, was posted at the Jabowal border outpost in the Jammu sector when it came under heavy assault from Pakistani forces. 'Amid intense enemy fire, ASI Singh destroyed a Pakistani surveillance camera, denying them real-time monitoring of Indian positions. Even after sustaining a life-threatening shrapnel wound to his upper lip from heavy machine gun fire, he refused evacuation and continued to engage the enemy, ultimately neutralising their HMG nest,' the citation read. 'His actions ensured uninterrupted domination by Indian forces and inspired fellow troops.' Assistant Sub-Inspector Rajappa B.T. and Constable Manohar Xalxo were also honoured for their bravery in resupplying ammunition to frontline troops at Karotana Khurd, Karotana Forward, and Suchetagarh border outposts. These posts had come under intense 82mm mortar and machine gun fire from Pakistan. 'On May 10 at 0740 hrs, BOP Karotana Khurd reported a critical shortage of AGS ammunition. ASI Rajappa and CT Xalxo were tasked with the replenishment mission. While executing it, a mortar shell exploded near their magazine. ASI Rajappa sustained fatal splinter injuries, and CT Xalxo was wounded in his right hand. Despite their injuries, both completed the mission successfully,' the citation stated. Assistant Commandant Alok Negi was recognised for leading his troops during a prolonged engagement at the forward defence line at Mukhyari between May 7 and 10. His leadership ensured operational dominance and sustained retaliatory strikes for over 48 hours, using mortars and other heavy weapons. Apart from securing the border, BSF troops during Operation Sindoor bombed terror launchpads such as Looni and Dhandhar in Pakistan, destroyed posts of Pakistan Rangers, and also neutralised terrorists infiltrating into India using cover fire by Pak Rangers. In an official statement, the BSF said, 'This Independence Day, 16 brave Seema Praharis are being awarded Gallantry Medals for their conspicuous bravery and unmatched valour. Their resolute and steadfast actions during Operation Sindoor are a testament to the nation's faith and trust reposed in India's First Line of Defence.' In response to India's Operation Sindoor, Pakistan launched drones and loitering munitions against Indian military installations and civilian infrastructure, but failed to inflict any damage as the threats were thwarted by India's robust multi-layered air defence network.
Hans India
29 minutes ago
- Hans India
Three Gujarat sarpanches invited as special guests for Independence Day celebrations in New Delhi
Three of Gujarat's model villages earned national recognition and their sarpanches were invited as special guests to the Independence Day celebrations in New Delhi on August 15, which will be led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The sarpanches of Bhimasar in Kutch, Akhod in Bharuch, and Sultanpur in Navsari - villages honoured as 'Model Villages of Rural Development' and 'ODF Plus Model Villages' - have redefined rural governance by blending urban-level facilities with community-led initiatives. Bhimasar's woman sarpanch, Daiben Humble, has transformed her village into a clean, green, and self-sustaining community with door-to-door waste collection, a full sewage system, and the 'Green Bhimasar Project', which encourages every family to plant 10 trees. She also developed the 200-acre 'Vraj Bhumi Farm' to grow fodder for cattle and generate local employment, and has won 13 national awards for her visionary leadership. In Sultanpur, sarpanch Shashikant Patel has strengthened both infrastructure and social welfare, introducing a Rs 5,000 grant for families on the birth of a girl child, rewarding households with the best kitchen gardens, and installing Braille signage in public toilets - the first such initiative in Gujarat. The village has achieved 100 per cent compliance with Swachh Bharat Mission norms. Akhod's sarpanch, Narendra Singh Solanki, has championed water conservation and cleanliness through a nano effluent treatment plant that recycles wastewater for agriculture, deepened existing ponds, and constructed new ones. The village also ensures piped water to every household and meets all ODF Plus standards. In Gujarat, the sarpanch plays a central role in rural governance, acting as the elected head of the gram panchayat and the bridge between villagers and government authorities. Their responsibilities range from implementing state and central welfare schemes to ensuring basic infrastructure like roads, water supply, sanitation, and waste management. They oversee education and health initiatives, promote women's empowerment, manage village funds, and encourage community participation in development projects. In many cases, Gujarat's sarpanches have gone beyond routine duties, introducing innovations in cleanliness, renewable energy, water conservation, and social welfare, turning their villages into models of sustainable, inclusive growth.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US declines to comment on Pakistan F-16 losses during Operation Sindoor despite IAF Chief's claims
The United States government is silent on whether Pakistan lost F-16 fighter jets during Operation Sindoor. This is unlike previous instances where the US confirmed the status of Pakistan's F-16 fleet. India claims to have shot down Pakistani aircraft and damaged an F-16 hangar. Pakistan denies these claims and suggests a third-party review. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US contractors have access to Pakistani F-16's Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads IAF claims F-16 damage at Jacobabad during airfield strikes Air-to-air claims and Pakistan's rebuttal No response from US to formal information requests The United States government has declined to comment on whether Pakistan lost any of its US-supplied F-16 fighter jets during Operation Sindoor , the 88-hour conflict between India and Pakistan from May 7 to May 10. Responding to NDTV 's queries, the US State Department stated, "We refer you to the Government of Pakistan to discuss its F-16s."This position contrasts with previous disclosures highlighted in an NDTV report, which cited a 2019 article by Foreign Policy magazine. At the time, shortly after India's Balakot air strikes, the magazine reported that two senior US defence officials with direct knowledge of the situation had said all of Pakistan's F-16s were accounted for. The clarification followed India's claim that it had shot down a Pakistani F-16 fleet is governed by detailed end-use agreements with the United States. Under these agreements, American contractors—known as Technical Support Teams (TSTs)—are deployed in Pakistan around the clock to monitor the aircraft. These teams are contractually obligated to ensure that the aircraft are used in compliance with the agreements and to maintain full knowledge of the operational status of each presence of these oversight mechanisms has typically allowed the US to confirm or deny reports of losses, making its silence in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor believes several F-16s may have been lost during the operation, either destroyed on the ground or shot down in aerial combat. On Saturday, Indian Air Force Chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh said that Shahbaz Jacobabad airfield , which houses an F-16 hangar, was among the major Pakistani air bases targeted."One half of the hangar is gone. And I'm sure there were some aircraft inside which have got damaged there," he to the Air Chief, the IAF carried out strikes on three critical airfield hangars: a UAV hangar at Sukkur, an AEW&C facility at Bholari, and the F-16 hangar at Jacobabad. He said indications pointed to at least one AEW&C aircraft and several F-16s under maintenance being present at the time of the air base is home to Pakistan's 39 Tactical Wing and is located west of Indian Air Force also claims to have shot down six Pakistani aircraft during the operation—five fighters and one larger platform, possibly an electronic intelligence (ELINT) or AEW&C aircraft. The IAF has not disclosed the exact types of fighter jets it believes were shot meanwhile, has rejected India's claims. Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif challenged India to allow a third-party review of both sides' air force inventories. "If the truth is in question, let both sides open their aircraft inventories to independent verification – though we suspect this would lay bare the reality India seeks to obscure," he said. India has not responded to this also submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the US Department of Defense, asking similar questions to those recently posed to the State Department. The Pentagon replied that the FOIA does not require agencies to 'compile information, conduct research, answer questions, or create new documents in response to FOIA requests.' Subsequent queries to the Pentagon and the office of the Secretary of Defense received no response.
