Twenty years of 'Bird of the Year' in one book
Photo:
Dave Thomas
E koekoe te tūī, e ketekete te kākā, e kūkū te kererū - The tūī chatters, the kākā cackles and the kererū coos.
That is a whakataukī (proverb) mentioning just three of the 80 birds - and one bat - included in the new
Bird of the Year
book.
Writer Ellen Rykers, the former campaign lead, told
Saturday Morning
that New Zealand's largest book publisher, Penguin Random House, had asked Forest & Bird to turn the competition into a book subject.
"At the time, I was part of the team organising
Bird of the Year
and, with my background in science writing, it just sort of seemed like a natural fit for me to take on this project," she said.
Rykers said the book was a "feast for the eyes", with more than a dozen illustrators, who were selected, "not only because they draw beautiful birds, but because they also are dedicated to supporting conservation through their work".
"Even if you don't dive into the words, it's just beautiful to look at."
Photo:
Supplied / Penguin Books New Zealand
To decide which native birds - and bat - were included, Rykers went back through the last 20 years of the
Bird of the Year
competition and chose ones that had interesting stories - whether they be related to the competition - from television host John Oliver and
rumours of Russian interference
to controversial mammalian infiltration or their histories.
"I mean, it's all fun and humorous, but there is that kind of serious undertone," she said. "More than 80 percent of our native birds are at risk or threatened with extinction, but at the end of the day, I hope that people read it and fall in love, and feel hopeful, because a lot of the stories are about people who are out there on the ground, making a difference."
Ellen Rykers
Photo:
RNZ / Nate McKinnon
Rykers added the three main things threatening our manu were predators, habitat loss and climate change.
However, she said the
Bird of the Year
competition had become a fundraiser for Forest & Bird, particularly in 2023, when the pūteketeke, also known as the Australasian crested grebe, was named the
Bird of the Century
, after a campaign by Oliver.
The competition raised
more than $1.2 million
.
"Forest & Bird didn't really have any idea, ahead of time, exactly the scale of the campaign. We knew that it would be beyond anything that we'd ever seen before and we knew that there would be sort of international aspects, but we didn't realise that he'd be paying for billboards on the busiest intersection in Tokyo and on the Champs-Élysées in Paris.
"That really propelled quite an unknown bird - an under the radar bird or an 'underbird' - into the spotlight."
A shot from US comedian John Oliver's segment on New Zealand's Bird of the Year on 5 November 2023.
Photo:
Screengrab
Rykers said it did not start out that way.
"It didn't raise any money back in 2005, when it started, but it has become a way for people to express that love for birds, by supporting them financially, as well as with their vote."
The competition had also grown considerably since then.
"I think partly it's because we're a nation of birdlovers and we have named ourselves after one of our national birds, so it's really part of our identity as New Zealanders, but we also don't like to take ourselves too seriously, so there's that cheeky quality, I think, that really appeals.
"Those two kind of things, I think, have really propelled
Bird of the Year
to become a fixture on our annual calendar."
There had been scandals in the competition - even to the origin of
Bird of the Year
, which was when RNZ's
Morning Report
had suggested getting rid of the daily bird call.
"This provoked such an outrage," Rykers said. "Michael Szabo, who was the communications manager at Forest & Bird at the time, took notice of this and he listened to all these people sending in messages about all the birds that they loved.
"He had come across this concept of a
Bird of the Year
competition working in Europe... and he thought, 'Okay, this is a great opportunity to give this a go here in New Zealand'."
Including the pekapeka-tou-roa - or the long-tailed bat - was another one.
"There was a Forest & Bird staff member, Debs Martin, who had been campaigning quietly for its inclusion for a long time.
"At the same time, a high school teacher, Peter Wills, he had the exact same idea. 'Why don't we put the pekapeka-tou-roa in
Bird of the Year
?', and so he and his students, and a bat expert took on that campaign.
"We only have a couple of native bat species, so there's never going to be a
Bat of the Year
, but they face many of the same threats that our native birds do."
There had been voting scandals - in 2015, two teenage girls tried to rig the results in favour of the kōkako. In 2018, one person voted for the shag more than 3000 times, while in 2017, fake email accounts were created to bolster support for the white-faced heron.
In 2020,
about 1500 fraudulent votes
were cast for the kiwi pukupuku, but Rykers said the first scandal actually happened in 2010.
"Somehow, it infiltrated an online community of people really passionate about the kākāriki.
"At the time, the
Bird of the Year
website was admittedly quite flimsy... and they just saw this huge explosion in votes that was someone manipulating the numbers.
"They were quite nervous about admitting that and so they didn't actually say anything until the year after."
Voting for the 2025
Bird of the Year
competition will open on 15 September.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Twenty years of 'Bird of the Year' in one book
The Australasian Crested Grebe won Bird of the Century in 2023. Photo: Dave Thomas E koekoe te tūī, e ketekete te kākā, e kūkū te kererū - The tūī chatters, the kākā cackles and the kererū coos. That is a whakataukī (proverb) mentioning just three of the 80 birds - and one bat - included in the new Bird of the Year book. Writer Ellen Rykers, the former campaign lead, told Saturday Morning that New Zealand's largest book publisher, Penguin Random House, had asked Forest & Bird to turn the competition into a book subject. "At the time, I was part of the team organising Bird of the Year and, with my background in science writing, it just sort of seemed like a natural fit for me to take on this project," she said. Rykers said the book was a "feast for the eyes", with more than a dozen illustrators, who were selected, "not only because they draw beautiful birds, but because they also are dedicated to supporting conservation through their work". "Even if you don't dive into the words, it's just beautiful to look at." Photo: Supplied / Penguin Books New Zealand To decide which native birds - and bat - were included, Rykers went back through the last 20 years of the Bird of the Year competition and chose ones that had interesting stories - whether they be related to the competition - from television host John Oliver and rumours of Russian interference to controversial mammalian infiltration or their histories. "I mean, it's all fun and humorous, but there is that kind of serious undertone," she said. "More than 80 percent of our native birds are at risk or threatened with extinction, but at the end of the day, I hope that people read it and fall in love, and feel hopeful, because a lot of the stories are about people who are out there on the ground, making a difference." Ellen Rykers Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Rykers added the three main things threatening our manu were predators, habitat loss and climate change. However, she said the Bird of the Year competition had become a fundraiser for Forest & Bird, particularly in 2023, when the pūteketeke, also known as the Australasian crested grebe, was named the Bird of the Century , after a campaign by Oliver. The competition raised more than $1.2 million . "Forest & Bird didn't really have any idea, ahead of time, exactly the scale of the campaign. We knew that it would be beyond anything that we'd ever seen before and we knew that there would be sort of international aspects, but we didn't realise that he'd be paying for billboards on the busiest intersection in Tokyo and on the Champs-Élysées in Paris. "That really propelled quite an unknown bird - an under the radar bird or an 'underbird' - into the spotlight." A shot from US comedian John Oliver's segment on New Zealand's Bird of the Year on 5 November 2023. Photo: Screengrab Rykers said it did not start out that way. "It didn't raise any money back in 2005, when it started, but it has become a way for people to express that love for birds, by supporting them financially, as well as with their vote." The competition had also grown considerably since then. "I think partly it's because we're a nation of birdlovers and we have named ourselves after one of our national birds, so it's really part of our identity as New Zealanders, but we also don't like to take ourselves too seriously, so there's that cheeky quality, I think, that really appeals. "Those two kind of things, I think, have really propelled Bird of the Year to become a fixture on our annual calendar." There had been scandals in the competition - even to the origin of Bird of the Year , which was when RNZ's Morning Report had suggested getting rid of the daily bird call. "This provoked such an outrage," Rykers said. "Michael Szabo, who was the communications manager at Forest & Bird at the time, took notice of this and he listened to all these people sending in messages about all the birds that they loved. "He had come across this concept of a Bird of the Year competition working in Europe... and he thought, 'Okay, this is a great opportunity to give this a go here in New Zealand'." Including the pekapeka-tou-roa - or the long-tailed bat - was another one. "There was a Forest & Bird staff member, Debs Martin, who had been campaigning quietly for its inclusion for a long time. "At the same time, a high school teacher, Peter Wills, he had the exact same idea. 'Why don't we put the pekapeka-tou-roa in Bird of the Year ?', and so he and his students, and a bat expert took on that campaign. "We only have a couple of native bat species, so there's never going to be a Bat of the Year , but they face many of the same threats that our native birds do." There had been voting scandals - in 2015, two teenage girls tried to rig the results in favour of the kōkako. In 2018, one person voted for the shag more than 3000 times, while in 2017, fake email accounts were created to bolster support for the white-faced heron. In 2020, about 1500 fraudulent votes were cast for the kiwi pukupuku, but Rykers said the first scandal actually happened in 2010. "Somehow, it infiltrated an online community of people really passionate about the kākāriki. "At the time, the Bird of the Year website was admittedly quite flimsy... and they just saw this huge explosion in votes that was someone manipulating the numbers. "They were quite nervous about admitting that and so they didn't actually say anything until the year after." Voting for the 2025 Bird of the Year competition will open on 15 September. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Extra firefighters called in to house fire in Palmerston North
Smoke rising above Main Street Palmerston North. Photo: Supplied Firefighters are battling a house fire in central Palmerston North. The blaze was reported at 3:53pm Sunday and the Main Street house was "well involved" in flames, when crews arrived, a Fire and Emergency spokesperson said. A third crew have been called in. Initially, two nearby houses were reportedly on fire, but firefighters investigating the second house found it was not on fire but and smoke there was caused by a pot on the stove. Photo: Supplied Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
Hawke's Bay parents' argument over whether their daughter should attend private or public school goes to court, again
By Ric Stevens, Open Justice reporter of The argument ended up in court. (file image) Photo: 123RF Primary-aged schoolgirl Bree had her heart set on going to a private school. She had visited it with her mother and even had a school badge among her prized possessions. The trouble was, her Hawke's Bay-based separated parents could not agree on which school she should go to. Her father wanted her to continue going to a local state school, where he had family ties. He was concerned about the cost of the private school, estimated to be at least $150,000 over the years she would attend, the long time it would take to do the school run every day and the "socio-economic fit" for her. Bree's mother disagreed and thought the private school would be better for their daughter. She said that she always envisaged a private school education for her "due to the opportunities it would provide". The woman secured $16,000 for the first year of fees from her parents, came up with a plan to cover the following years, and led Bree to believe she would be changing to the private school at some stage. The argument ended up in court. First, it went to the Family Court, which found in favour of the father's choice, and then the High Court on appeal. High Court Justice Christine Grice has now given her decision - upholding the Family Court's decision that Bree will stay at the state school. The published version of Justice Grice's ruling has been anonymised to comply with protections around children's identities in the Family Court. It uses the fictional name Bree for the girl. Her mother is referred to as Bridge and her father as Blue. The decision noted that the Family Court judge had already considered how Bree felt about things, particularly her wish to attend the private school. But this had been influenced by her mother. Justice Grice wrote that Bree was a happy, bright child with two loving parents. However, she was aware of the disagreement between them and the associated tensions which "may affect her negatively". A lawyer appointed to represent the child by the Family Court prepared a report and made further submissions to the High Court, which expressed concern about her exposure to guardianship disputes. "Bree disclosed during meetings that her mother had informed her about the [Family Court's] schooling decision and that her father 'was not listening to Mummy'," Justice Grice said. "[The child's lawyer] emphasises that Bree should be shielded from such adult matters and recommends that both parents immediately engage in parenting courses to address this issue." Justice Christine Grice. Photo: NZME / supplied Justice Grice said that Bridge did not engage in attempts to break the news of the Family Court decision to Bree in an "appropriate manner" and independently told her that she would be attending the local school. "This was unfortunate, and done in the face of the concerns expressed by both the lawyer for the child and the judge about having these types of discussions with the child." The lawyer's report said that Bree has settled at the local school, where the principal confirms she is happy, has made friends, and is participating in lessons at an age-appropriate level. Bree has shared positive experiences about her friendships and how she enjoyed the playground. The lawyer concluded that "it remains in Bree's welfare and best interests to continue at the local school", Justice Grice said. The judge also noted that the Family Court judge had expressed concern that Bridge had acted unilaterally in making decisions, and perceived herself as having greater authority than the father. - This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald