Rebels in Indonesia's Papua say they killed 17 people this week
JAKARTA (Reuters) - Rebels in Indonesia's Papua region said on Thursday they have killed more than 17 people since the weekend, claiming that they were soldiers in disguise as gold miners, and police said the insurgents were holding two hostages.
A low-level but increasingly deadly battle for independence has simmered between security forces and rebels in resource-rich Papua ever since it was controversially brought under Indonesian control in a vote overseen by the United Nations in 1969.
Sebby Sambom, a Papuan rebel spokesperson, said in a statement on Thursday the rebels had killed more than 17 people since April 6, including five on Wednesday, and claimed they were military members disguised as gold miners.
"If the Indonesian government military wants to chase us, please come to Dekai town, we are in the town," Sebby said, referring to a town in Yahukimo district, where the incident took place.
Faizal Ramadhani, a senior police official who is the chief of the peace task force in Papua, confirmed the rebel attack to Reuters on Thursday. He said police have yet to confirm a death toll as officers are still on the way to the area.
Indonesia's national military denied the people killed by rebels were their officers, adding this was a hoax, its spokesperson was quoted by state news agency Antara as saying.
Separately, police said in a statement on Thursday that 35 people in the area were evacuated to another district, while two residents are allegedly still being held hostage by the rebels.
Rebels in Papua have in recent years managed to acquire better weapons, taken in raids on army posts or sourced from the black market. They have also abducted foreigners, including a New Zealand pilot who was released last year after being held for 19 months.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Paraguay president's X account likely hacked in Bitcoin scheme
ASUNCION (Reuters) -Paraguay's government on Monday said that President Santiago Pena's X account had likely been hacked after the leader appeared to promote trading of cryptocurrency Bitcoin. "The president's official X account has presented irregular activity which suggests possible unauthorized entry," the government said in a statement. A post on Pena's account in English, with a Spanish-language statement purporting to be from the government, had declared that the Latin American country had made Bitcoin legal tender and that it would roll out a $5 million Bitcoin-backed reserve fund. The government asked citizens to ignore posts from the account until official confirmation was made available. Paraguay's national cybersecurity team was working with X to investigate the situation, the government added. X did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
British girl who took life was radicalised by U.S. neo-Nazis, inquest says
By Michael Holden LONDON (Reuters) -A British teenage girl, who had said she wanted to blow up a synagogue and became fixated with Adolf Hitler, had been sucked into far-right extremism by two American neo-Nazis, a British coroner said on Monday. Rhianan Rudd, who was 16, took her own life in May 2022 at a children's home having been investigated by police and Britain's domestic security service MI5 over extremist views. Two years earlier, Rudd's mother had referred her daughter to the counter-radicalisation scheme, Prevent. She is believed to be the youngest girl to be charged with terrorism offences in Britain after she was arrested when 14, though the case against her was later dropped. At an inquest into her death, the Chief Coroner of England and Wales Alexia Durran said she had been initially radicalised by her mother's former partner, a U.S. neo-Nazi who had convictions for violence. She was further drawn into extremism by U.S. white supremacist Chris Cook, who was jailed in 2023 for terrorism over plans to attack power grids, Durran also said. Rudd, who had autism, became obsessed with fascism, even carving a swastika into her forehead, and had downloaded material about making bombs and 3D guns, Durran said. Durran concluded that both Mallaburn and Cook were each "a significant radicalising influence on Rhianan" who had "played a material role in introducing and encouraging Rhianan's interest in extreme right-wing materials". LEARNING FROM PAIN Rudd's mother Emily Carter said she believed that the police and MI5's prolonged investigation had played a role in her daughter's death. "Whilst nothing can ever bring Rhianan back, I urge all the authorities that came into contact with her to learn from what happened so that no other family has to experience the pain we have endured," Carter said in a statement. The charges against Rudd were not dropped until August 2021, four months after social workers believed she might have been a victim of sexual exploitation. However, giving her ruling at Chesterfield Coroners' Court in central England, Durran rejected the argument that the state had played a role in her death, saying it had been appropriate to investigate and prosecute her. "I am satisfied that the missed opportunities that occurred in this case were not systemic," she said. British authorities have become very concerned about the online radicalisation of young people. MI5's Director General Ken McCallum said last year that 13% of all those they were investigating were under 18, a threefold increase in the last three years. Britain's Crown Prosecution Service offered condolences to Rudd's family. "This is a tragic case," added Nick Price, CPS director of legal services. We do not prosecute young or vulnerable people lightly. Terrorism offences are extremely serious, and these are decisions our specialist prosecutors take great care over."
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
‘Iced coffee killer' breaks silence 8 years after she's convicted of poisoning her best friend's drink
Indonesian convicted murderer and Australian permanent resident Jessica Kumala Wongso has appeared in a shocking new documentary. In it, she was dubbed the 'smiling iced coffee killer' and accused of 'brazenly' murdering her friend and fellow Indonesian Wayan Mirna Salihin in a glitzy cafe in Jakarta in 2016. Advertisement The new documentary entitled 'Chilling interview: Why Jessica Wongso murdered her best friend with poisoned coffee' aired on 7News Spotlight and has already racked up over two million views. According to the documentary, Wongso, who is currently on parole, 'still hasn't got her story straight' – despite having spent eight years in an Indonesian prison for the murder. Wongso was found guilty in 2016 by a Jakarta court of adding cyanide to an iced Vietnamese coffee that she bought for her friend Salihin, causing her to collapse and convulse in front of horrified patrons at the cafe. 8 Convicted murderer Jessica Kumala Wongso appeared in a new documentary about her infamous 2016 case where she poisoned a friend in a coffee shop in Indonesia. 7 News Spotlight Advertisement Salihin, who was just 27-years-old, was rushed to a nearby hospital where she was pronounced dead, and the Indonesian prosecution alleged that Wongso, who had previously studied at the Billy Blue College of Design in Sydney with Salihin, had been jealous of her friend who had just got married. Wongso has always denied the charges against her, and pleaded innocent at her trial, before she was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison. She was released on parole last year having served just eight years of her sentence – and is currently filing a final appeal in a last-ditch bid to clear her name. 8 Wongso was found guilty of giving Wayan Mirna Salihin a coffee laced with cyanide in a Jakarta cafe. 7 News Spotlight Advertisement During the 44 minute sit-down, Spotlight journalist Liam Bartlett asked Wongso a series of tough questions about the murder, appearing both disappointed and shocked by some of her answers, including that Wongso and Salihin 'were not close at all' and were only acquaintances because they 'came from the same country.' Simon Butt, a professor of Indonesian law at the University of Sydney, told that the language used in the interview and its largely unsympathetic portrayal of Wongso was likely due to her ongoing legal status as a convicted murderer. 'Of course, legally, a program like this can proceed on the assumption that she was guilty of the murder. She was found to be so by successive Indonesian courts,' he said. 8 Surveillance footage from the coffee shop in 2016. 7 News Spotlight Advertisement 8 Prosecutors in Indonesia claimed that Wongso poisoned her friend because she was jealous of her recently getting married. 7 News Spotlight Yet he added that the documentary had a missed opportunity to shed greater light on her case, which gripped Indonesia back in 2016 and prompted widespread speculation by the public about Wongso's possible guilt or innocence. 'The intriguing part of her story is that, despite her conviction, there remains very strong doubts about whether she did in fact kill her friend,' Butt said. Butt argued that the Spotlight interview did not fully explain some of the nuances of Wongso's case. 'The program was one-sided, swallowing the very problematic decision, and appeals, whole. 'The program did not mention very problematic aspects of her conviction, including that no autopsy was conducted and there were serious problems with the handling of the coffee sample from the cafe. 'There was no cyanide found at the scene. Whether Salihin died of cyanide poisoning, and even whether the coffee itself had cyanide in it was, in my view, never established beyond reasonable doubt.' Advertisement Butt added that, as Wongso's defense lawyers continually stated, Sahilin could have died of natural causes, but the lack of a full and comprehensive autopsy means that this has never been fully established. 'These issues were not pursued in the program,' he added. 'That said, Wongso didn't help herself by agreeing to the interview before her final appeal has been concluded.' Under Indonesian law, a judicial review is usually only successful if there is compelling new evidence presented in a case that was not previously heard at the original trial. Advertisement Another one of the main issues with the Spotlight interview was the fact that Wongso repeatedly refused to answer or elaborate on questions put to her by Bartlett – and did not appear to emphatically deny guilt. 8 Wongso appearing in Central Jakarta District Court for her trial on Oct. 5, 2016. AP Photo/Tatan Syuflana Butt said however that Wongso told Bartlett that she could not protest her innocence as she remains on parole until 2032. 'If she did that, her parole might be revoked. Yet the journalist continually asked her to explain the way she acted and reacted at various times, including during her trial, and obviously drew implications from her failure to defend herself in her answers,' Butt said. Advertisement 'He put her in an impossible situation, over and over, asking her questions that an innocent person would be able to answer, and then appearing suspicious that her responses were strange or evasive.' 8 Wongso surrounded by her lawyers at her sentencing on Oct. 27, 2016. AP Photo/Tatan Syuflana One example was when Wongso was asked why she contacted Salihn's sister with a press story about the coffee poisoning and asked about the results of toxicology tests. 'He obviously thought this was somehow suspicious,' Butt said. Advertisement 'But if she did kill Salihin, one would not expect her to reveal the way she did it, especially considering police did not initially treat it as a murder. She could not make these points in the interview because she could not claim innocence.' A spokesperson for Spotlight told that they refute Butt's claims and added their interview was fair and balanced. 8 An Indonesian legal experts claimed that the lack of an autopsy has cast doubt on Wongso's conviction. 7 News Spotlight 'While we respect Professor Butt's right to an opinion, he appears to have confused our program with the Netflix documentary,' a spokesperon said. 'Our interview with convicted killer Jessica Wongso was thorough, comprehensive, and entirely balanced – covering all key aspects of the case. 'Jessica agreed to the interview on the advice of her own legal team, and we offered her lawyer to remain in the room for the duration of questioning. 'On no occasion did Jessica complain or indicate in any way, either during or following the interview, that we had placed her, as the Professor puts it, in an 'impossible situation.'' 8 Wongso is currently out on parole. 7 News Spotlight Ranto Sibarani, a lawyer based in the city of Medan in Indonesia, said that people needed to look at the facts of the case rather than conjecture. 'It is quite clear based on the evidence and the verdict of the three judges that Jessica was found guilty of murdering Mirna using cyanide,' Sibarani said. 'She has also shown herself to be extremely clever, as no one has been able to find the cyanide that she used, or the trousers that she was wearing at the time, which she admitted she threw away. 'Many people were suspicious of Wongso rubbing her hands on her trousers after Salihin collapsed in the coffee shop, all of which was caught on CCTV. 'Some suspected that cyanide residue on her hands was causing them to itch although, in the new documentary, Wongso denied this. 'She said instead that she had asked her helper to throw the trousers away as they had a rip in them which could not be repaired.' Talking of the new documentary, Sibarani said that he would never advise a client to speak to the media before all their legal appeals were exhausted. 'Particularly not one where they criticized the sentence or the legal proceedings,' he said.
