Emily Maitlis' serial stalker jailed again for sending letters to presenter and family
A man who harassed and stalked former BBC Newsnight presenter Emily Maitlis has been jailed for five years after breaching his restraining order by sending the broadcaster and her parents letters from prison.
Edward Vines was 'distraught' that his friendship with Ms Maitlis ended three months after he told her he loved her while they were at university in Cambridge together.
Vines, who refused to attend his sentencing hearing at Nottingham Crown Court on Thursday, sent envelopes, sometimes containing more than one letter, addressed to Ms Maitlis and her relatives.
These letters were intercepted by prison staff at HMP Lowdham Grange in Nottinghamshire, where he was serving a sentence for previous harassment.
The 55-year-old, who represented himself in the trial, denied three counts of breaching a restraining order and one count of attempting to breach a restraining order between May 2023 and February 2024 but was convicted of all offences by a jury in May.
He addressed more than 20 letters to Ms Maitlis and her family over a 10-month period and phoned his brother in July 2023, asking him to contact her mother Marion Maitlis.
The court heard that Vines has 13 previous convictions for 28 offences dating back to 2002 'almost all of which concern harassment or breach of a restraining order' relating to Ms Maitlis.
In a short victim personal statement read to the court by prosecutor Fergus Malone, Ms Maitlis said his offending since has made Ms Maitlis feel 'vulnerable and worried'.
The News Agents podcast presenter wrote: 'For over 30 years I have been living with the consequences of the persistent and unwanted attention of this individual.
'I feel especially vulnerable and worried when the matter comes to trial. The idea that he might be bailed is deeply worrying and I would be very concerned for my safety and the safety of my family.'
Ms Maitlis also described her husband finding Vines on their doorstep, her children needing to be escorted to the school bus, and 'upsetting interactions' with her 92-year-old mother.
Part of an interview she did with Radio 5 Live in 2018 was also read to the court, in which she described feeling 'paranoia' and said the harassment feels like a 'chronic illness'.
Sentencing Vines in his absence, Judge Mark Watson said: 'It is a tragedy that I once again have to deal with Edward Vines for breaking the restraining order imposed to stop him having contact with Emily Maitlis and her family.
'He has shown complete contempt for this order. His contact with her is harassment of her whatever the content of his letters may be.
'In this case she (Ms Maitlis) has been fearful for three decades. In 2018 she described the effects of the fear she felt as a result of Edward Vines's behaviour. It was described by her as like a chronic illness.
'Because of the history of this case, I regard each single letter as a very serious breach. These were also letters that did not get through. They were not threatening or meant as abusive.
'I do accept that because of his mental health issues there is some reduction to his culpability. He was, however, capable of making rational decisions.
'He is a very bright and articulate man – he could have been many things. His obsession with Emily Maitlis has tortured him without release.
'He has wasted more than two decades of his life and regrettably he is set to waste more of it in custody.'
The judge added that Vines's imprisonment is the 'only thing stopping him from contacting the Maitlis family directly'.
Mr Malone told the jury during the trial that Vines wrote a letter addressed to Ms Maitlis, who co-hosts The News Agents podcast, which said: 'I took the audacity of writing to you despite the restraining order because I'm still distraught about what took place between us in 1990.
'I regularly suffer depression over it and have for 30 years. I admit I'm not sure why I suffer so, but suffer I do.'
The restraining order was put in place on September 5 2022 when Vines was convicted of eight counts of breaching a restraining order and he was jailed for eight years.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Woman arrested after child hit by car in Market Bosworth
A woman has been arrested after a child was struck by a car in said they were called to Station Road in Market Bosworth at 15:16 BST on Thursday .Officers confirmed a boy was taken to hospital but his injuries were not believed to be life-threatening or life-changing. His age has not been shared.A 45-year-old woman has been arrested on suspicion of failing to stop at the scene of a collision and failing to provide a specimen and is in custody.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ronald Clarke obituary
In 1976, Ronald Clarke, who has died from cancer aged 84, published a paper entitled Crime As Opportunity. Written with three colleagues at the Home Office research unit, it overturned the conventional view that crime is simply caused by 'criminals' and laid the groundwork for what would become known as situational crime prevention. The concept – that opportunity makes the thief – was hardly new, but Ron's practical application of the idea was revolutionary. Rather than focusing on the offender, he turned attention to the offence – why, where, how and when – and how links in the chain which led to crime could be removed. As with treating different illnesses, the cures were specific to their contexts: putting high value items behind the shop counter; installing window locks or better car security; improving sightlines; making stolen items traceable; or introducing cash boxes which sprayed indelible dye over money and thieves. All these remedies worked far more effectively than relying on arrests after the event. These insights were reinforced in 1988 when, with his Home Office colleague Pat Mayhew, Ron investigated the steep decline in suicides in England and Wales between 1963 and 1975. The falls were happening as traditional coal gas containing carbon monoxide was replaced by North Sea gas, which is mostly methane. This could mean only one thing: when attempted suicides failed, many people did not try again. This prompted a raft of measures such as limiting the sale of over-the-counter drugs such as paracetamol. Ron and his followers went on to show that improved home security did not simply displace crime to neighbouring houses; on the contrary, it created a 'halo effect', lowering crime rates in the broader area. His ideas helped explain why crime levels in general surged until the 1990s before falling across the industrialised world, in step with improved security. He also anticipated shifts in criminal behaviour: as physical crimes declined, cybercrime and fraud rose, often committed by different types of people. The burglar did not become the hacker; rather, new crimes attracted new actors. His work drew little support from mainstream criminology, since it defied traditional beliefs that crime is mostly caused by a discrete class of inherently deviant individuals. He established that our immediate circumstances dictate our actions much more than our predispositions. Some people would always behave badly, but the ebb and flow of crime is dictated by how many others found it easy to break the rules. Thus to a large degree we can predict and design out many types of crime, and to some extent even suicide. (Suicide had itself ceased to be a crime in England and Wales in 1961, and in Northern Ireland in 1966. It was never a crime in Scotland.) The starting point for his work had been medical, with an MA in clinical psychology (1965) at the Maudsley hospital in south-east London. For his PhD, Ron moved to social problems, investigating why Britain's network of training schools for delinquent boys had such high rates of absconding. He gave the boys batteries of psychological tests but found little difference between those who fled and those who did not. Instead he discovered hotspots of absconding at some of the detention centres. It was this insight that would inspire his later work. In 1968 Ron became a research officer at the Home Office, where, together with his colleague Derek Cornish, he set out to identify which rehabilitative methods were most effective in reforming young offenders. The answer, surprisingly, was none. Their randomised trial showed no difference in recidivism between the different correctional approaches. In fact boys who went through any form of rehabilitation were just as likely to reoffend as boys who had no therapy at all. At first this led to disillusionment with randomised trials, but increasingly Ron came to realise that criminology often used self-serving methodologies, and that the dominant sociological explanations were largely without foundation. These heretical views did little to endear him to his peers as he rose through the ranks at the Home Office, eventually supervising research in an era when the department was by far the country's largest employer of criminologists. Ron's scepticism of conventional wisdom extended to crime statistics themselves. Under his leadership, the British Crime Survey was launched in the early 1980s. It revealed that actual victimisation rates were often double those reported to police, and that official crime figures sometimes moved in opposite directions from lived experiences. Today, the renamed Crime Survey for England and Wales is regarded by the Office for National Statistics as the most reliable indicator of crime trends, while police figures have lost their designation as official statistics. In 1984 Ron was recruited to the US, joining Temple University in Philadelphia, and in 1987 went to Rutgers University, New Jersey, as dean of the school of criminal justice. Although he published prodigiously, as Ronald V Clarke, and was feted by a growing and increasingly international band of scholars, he always felt marginalised by mainstream criminology, with its focus on offenders rather than exploring ways to cut offending. He found his natural home in the emerging discipline of crime science – a new practical and cross-disciplinary approach that I had conceived out of frustration with ideological and theory-driven criminology. Ron's work had helped inspire the notion in the late 1990s, together with that of Prof Ken Pease, who had been working along similar lines, and later the Metropolitan police commissioner John Stevens and Gloria Laycock, Ron's successor at the Home Office. In 2001 crime science in turn found its first academic home in the Jill Dando Institute at University College London. Ron was a visiting professor there, and thereafter preferred to call himself a crime scientist rather than a criminologist. He had already stepped down as head of department at Rutgers in 1998, but continued teaching, research and advising the police. In 2002 he helped create the US-based Center for Problem-Oriented Policing, providing guidance to officers for cutting crime, and was its associate director until his death. When in his last years he eased away from full-time work he pursued bird photography with the same intensity he had once brought to research, and turned his attention to encouraging students to tackle wildlife crime. Born in Tanganyika (now Tanzania), Ron was the middle of three children to a German mother, Barbara Gemuseus, a missionary dentist, and a British father, Henry Clarke, a highway engineer. At first he was more fluent in Swahili than English. After the family moved to Britain in the 1950s he went to Teignmouth grammar school, Devon, and took a psychology degree at the University of Bristol (1959-62). There he met Sheelagh Carter, a teacher. They married in 1966, and she survives him, along with their children, Henry, George and Marianne. Ronald Victor Gemuseus Clarke, crime scientist, born 24 April 1941; died 28 May 2025
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mayor of seaside town condemns his OWN council over plans to charge residents £70 to park outside their own homes
The mayor of a seaside town has condemned his own council over proposals to charge residents £70 to park outside their own homes. George Farquhar claimed he knew nothing about the contentious plans which are in response to visitors to Bournemouth parking across driveways, on pavements, grass verges and even roundabouts. The Liberal Democrat-led Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council argue that pirate parkers are happy to pay the existing £35 maximum fine so sterner measures are needed. Miles of road are set to be littered with new meters under the scheme, including the residential areas of Sandbanks, Canford Cliffs, Branksome Chine, Westcliff, Boscombe and Southbourne. But this means home owners will pick up the slack, paying £70 per car on their own streets. Mr Farquhar, who is originally from Dunfermline, Scotland is leading the fight to stop the parking scheme in its tracks. He said: 'This time next year we could all be paying between £70 to £252 for a pay-to-park permit. 'We only heard about this consultation a day before it was made public. As such we have had no approach made for our feedback on parking issues in the neighbourhood or how to tackle them. 'Since I moved from a Permit Zone in north London in 2011, I know the drawbacks, and I have been against parking permits here in Bournemouth, ever since I moved.' The mayor insisted that neither the fines nor the new permits would put tourists off parking the car in disruptive places. 'Inconsiderate and illegal parking has occurred every hot summer weekend since I moved here and tickets are always issued,' he said. '1000 plus tickets were issued last weekend, but not one of those 1000 plus parking tickets would or has deterred inconsiderate or illegal parking on hot weekends. '£35 for a car-load of folk with beach gear is a bargain. To introduce permit parking would not change that selfish behaviour one iota. 'The fee for a parking ticket is the same if it is on a double yellow, across a driveway, on top of a roundabout, or on a piece of street with a permit scheme in place. 'However a Pay-to-Park street is a very lucrative revenue stream with the added bonus that it is low cost to administrate. A lucrative revenue stream all year round is the aim, nothing more, and it must be resisted.' He added: 'The sun will continue to shine on just a few weekends every year, and a 1000 plus tickets will be issued to those who park inconsiderately or illegally regardless. The mayor insisted that neither the fines nor the new permits would put the thousands of tourists, pictured on Bournemouth beach, off parking the car in disruptive places Miles of road are to be littered with new meters under the scheme, including the residential areas of Sandbanks, Canford Cliffs, Branksome Chine, Westcliff, Boscombe and Southbourne 'But a permit parking scheme will have to be paid for by us residents every day of the year.' The move has also sparked outrage among locals, who say they are being punished for people's bad behaviour, and businesses who fear the scheme will drive visitors away. Peter Schroeder, the chairman of the Branksome Park Residents Association, called the plans 'stupid'. He said: 'This proposal comes from the same council that is selling off key car parks. It is hypocrisy. 'We say no to residents paying to park their own cars on their own streets. We already have some of the highest council tax charges in the area. 'Charging residents and their guests and tradespeople doing work in houses and flats it a stupid idea. 'The council should give much stiffer penalties to those who do illegally park. £50 is probably nothing to them. If it was £1,000 they would think twice.' Councillor Richard Herrett, portfolio holder for destination, leisure and commercial operations at BCP Council, said the extra revenue will pay for more tow-trucks to take away more illegally parked cars. He said: 'We welcome more than 10 million visitors annually to our seafront. 'We know at busy times we have a significant issue with illegal or inconsiderate parking. This significantly impacts road safety and can affect the quality of life for local residents. 'These proposals to extend seafront paid-for parking could generate revenue for additional parking enforcement and give us the ability to better enforce illegal parking across a wider area including increasing the number of vehicles which could be towed away in the worst parking instances.'
