Valley Fever is ready to slam California again with record-breaking cases: Here's what you need to know
The lung infections are caused by a fungus that grows in western soil, resulting in serious or long-term lung problems and potentially death if it is not treated and spreads to the brain. It results in thousands of cases every year in the U.S. and hundreds of deaths.
The Golden State, where Valley Fever was first discovered, is consistently the state with the most infections. After a record year, early state data shows it's on track for what is looking to be another big one. There are already more than 3,100 confirmed cases across the state.
That's more than there were at the same time last year and nearly double the amount in 2023.
'There is no question that the number of cases of coccidioidomycosis is enormously higher than before,' Dr. Royce Johnson, chief of the division of infectious disease and director of the Valley Fever Institute at Kern Medical in California, recently told NBC News. 'If you want to see me, right now you'd have to wait until July, and that goes for my colleagues, too.'
The majority of this year's cases are in Kern, Los Angeles, Monterey and Fresno counties. A significant oil-producing area, wildfire-stricken Kern has often been the epicenter of outbreaks — but there are new areas of concern. Cases in the East Bay's Contra Costa County have more than tripled since 2023. Merced has also seen cases steadily increase and San Bernardino has seen 60 more than last year.
'It appears to be spreading out,' Gail Sondermeyer Cooksey, an epidemiologist at the California Department of Public Health, told the network.
How do exposures occur?
Valley Fever, officially called coccidioidomycosis, was first discovered in Southern California's San Joaquin Valley.
The lung infection is caused by the fungus Coccidioides that grows in soil in western parts of the U.S., with the majority of cases reported in California and Arizona.
Valley Fever is caused by breathing in infectious spores, although some who are exposed are never infected. The spores can be kicked up during wind events, or through agricultural work and construction.
While people can get Valley Fever at any time of the year, they are more likely to be infected during late summer and fall. Cases typically peak between September and November, due to a delay from infection to reporting.
What's the concern?
Symptoms can include fatigue, cough, fever, headache, shortness of breath, night sweats, muscle aches, joint pain and a red rash on the upper body or legs. As many as 10 percent of those who are infected will develop serious or long-term problems in their lungs.
Another 1 percent will see it spread to their skin, bones, joints or brain.
Those older than 60 are more likely to be infected, as well as people who have weakened immune systems, are pregnant, have diabetes and people who are Black or Filipino.
People who work outdoors are also at a higher risk.
The climate connection
Researchers have found that cases of the disease spike in California during a shift from drought to heavy rainfall.
California specifically has seen rapid shifts from extreme drought to long-lasting atmospheric river events in recent years.
Wet winters can provide the ideal conditions for Valley Fever infections, as the summer dries out the land and breaks down the fungus into infectious spores.
After flooding and mudslides in March, the state is in for a hot and dry summer, according to federal forecasters.
'As climate change alters the timing and intensity of precipitation in California, we see longer high-risk periods for Coccidioides exposure,' Simon Camponuri, a PhD candidate at U.C. Berkeley, said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
NASA astronaut reveals exactly how much they get PAID in blunt three–word statement
It's the job that puts the average 9–5 to shame. But while being an astronaut is a career many dream of, you might wonder how well it pays. Compared to office workers – who may complain about their commute – these highly–trained individuals are regularly launched into space at 17,500mph. While Earth-based employees might not rate their office canteen or grumble about the lack of toilets in the workplace, astronauts live off dehydrated food packets and must use specially–designed bathrooms. There's also the constant battle against weightlessness, and many experience muscle loss during missions. So you'd be forgiven for thinking that astronauts get paid a hefty wage for their daredevil profession. However, one NASA employee has revealed it's not the most lucrative career. When asked about how much she got paid Nicole Stott, a retired astronaut, engineer and aquanaut, gave a blunt three–word response. 'Not a lot', she replied, when asked by LAD Bible. 'Government civil servant. You don't become an astronaut to get paid a lot of money.' Throughout her career, Ms Stott flew on two expeditions and spent over 100 days in space. She launched the STS–128 mission to the International Space Station (ISS) in 2009 and spent three months there. She was the 10th woman to perform a spacewalk and the first person to operate the ISS robotic arm to capture a free–flying cargo vehicle. According to NASA, the annual salary for astronauts is $152,258 (£112,347) per year, but this can vary depending on education and experience level. Earlier this year, it emerged that NASA astronauts Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore - who were stuck on the ISS for nine months - would likely receive a tiny payout for the inconvenience. Former NASA astronaut Cady Coleman told the Washingtonian that astronauts only receive their basic salary without overtime benefits for 'incidentals' - a small amount they are 'legally obligated to pay you'. 'For me it was around $4 (£2.95) a day,' she said. Ms Coleman received approximately $636 (£469) in incidental pay for her 159-day mission between 2010 and 2011. Ms Williams and Mr Wilmore, with salaries ranging between $125,133 (£92,293) and $162,672 (£119,980) per year, could earn little more than $1,000 (£737) in 'incidental' cash on top of their basic salary, based on those figures. Meanwhile Neil Armstrong was paid a salary of $27,401 (£20,209) and was the highest paid of those aboard the Apollo 11 flight in 1969, according to the Boston Herald. To become an astronaut they must go through extensive training. Positions are highly competitive with only a few available to those who have the right experience and meet NASA's physical and mental qualifications. NASA selects a new astronaut class typically once every two years, selecting around 0.08 per cent of all applicants into their training program. Ms Stott also answered other questions about her job– including whether or not it's possible to have sex in space. In response, the former astronaut said: 'Probably. I don't think there's anything that would physically prevent you from having sex in space. 'I don't know that anybody has while they were there, I did not. And but just like, you know, I think about floating and swimming in a pool, you can have sex there. 'And if somebody wants to have sex in space, I think they'll figure out how to have sex in space.' HOW DO ASTRONAUTS EAT IN SPACE AND HOW IS FOOD STORED? Astronauts eat three meals a day: breakfast, lunch and dinner. Calorie requirements differ for astronauts. For instance, a small woman would require only about 1,900 calories a day, while a large man would require about 3,200 calories. An astronaut can choose from many types of foods such as fruits, nuts, peanut butter, chicken, beef, seafood, candy, brownies, etc. Available drinks include coffee, tea, orange juice, fruit punches and lemonade. No alcohol is allowed to be consumed on the space station. Condiments, such as ketchup, mustard and mayonnaise, are provided. Salt and pepper are available but only in a liquid form because astronauts can't sprinkle salt and pepper on their food in space. The salt and pepper would simply float away. There is a danger they could clog air vents, contaminate equipment or get stuck in an astronaut's eyes, mouth or nose. Preparation varies with the food type. Some foods can be eaten in their natural forms, such as brownies and fruit. Other foods require adding water, such as macaroni and cheese or spaghetti. An oven is provided in the space station to heat foods to the proper temperature. There are no refrigerators in space, so space food must be stored and prepared properly to avoid spoilage, especially on longer missions.
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Beauty product used by millions is making people's eyes CHANGE COLOUR, alarming reports reveal
Health experts have warned women using lash serums that promise longer, darker lashes that the trending beauty product could also cost them their eye-colour. For those avoiding the expense of eyelash extensions, eyelash serums that promote hassle-free growth may seem like a safer, less expensive option. But experts warn many of these products contain powerful pharmaceutical drugs that could cause burning, irritation and even permanently change a person's eye colour from blue to brown. It comes as lash serums have taken the beauty world by storm, promising darker, longer and fuller lashes at home. Over two decades ago a type of prostaglandin analogues (PGAs)—called bimatoprost—was approved by officials to treat glaucoma and ocular hypertension—eye conditions that cause pressure to build up inside the eye, eventually leading to vision loss. As well as treating the conditions with less side effects than earlier treatments, doctors noticed that patients eyelashes were also growing longer, thicker and darker. Whilst it is not yet fully understood how the drug stimulates lash growth, researchers have speculated that it extends the active growth phase, where lashes grow to their full length fuelled by blood supply from the root of the hair follicle. In 2008 the drug—sold under the brand name Latisse—was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat eyelash hypotrichosis, an eye disease which affects the density of a patient's lashes. Extensive research showed that the active ingredient was effective at making lashes longer after just 16 weeks of daily use, making it an attractive commodity for beauty product manufacturers. In the UK, whilst bimatoprost remains a prescription-only medication, manufacturers have harnessed the power of other PGAs to boost lash growth. However these powerful ingredients also come with serious cosmetic side effects including fat loss around the eyes, creating a hollow sunken look, unwanted hair growth where the serum spreads, drooping of the upper eyelid which may require surgery and permanent iris darkening—turning blue eyes brown. A shocking investigation carried out by government officials revealed that almost one in four lash serums sold in the UK contain harmful PGAs which can cause skin darkening and irritation within just a few weeks of use. In the US, the FDA has previously issued urgent warnings stating that any cosmetic product containing these potentially harmful ingredients under growth claims should be treated as a drug and not a beauty product. Experts are now sounding the alarm stating that consumers may be unaware they are using these powerful ingredients that have been manufactured to mimic prescription-only treatments. Even if a products claims to be PGA-free, experts advise checking the ingredient list and staying away from anything ending in -'prost' to minimise the risk of redness and irritation. Instead they suggest opting for peptide-based alternatives, which work by boosting keratin to support lash growth—though these products too are not risk-free and there is very little evidence to suggest they actually work. Dr Mahmood, a New York based plastic surgeon, is just one of the many women who has fallen victim to the promise of darker, fuller lashes in a bottle. In a video posted to Instagram, she said: 'This is the one skincare product I would never recommend to any patient.' After using a lash serum for two months, Dr Mahmood said her lashes looked the best they ever had. But after a few days she noticed that one of her eyes was bulging out of her face and was significantly bigger than the other. After two MRI scans and further tests, doctors discovered that the lash serum had caused the muscles in her upper eyelid to thin, causing the area to droop. To compensate for this loss of vision, Dr Mahmood's other eye had started to bulge, resulting in two surgeries to restore her vision and lift her eyelid. 'It's pretty clear prostaglandins are bad, especially when it comes to eyelash serums,' she told her 25,800 followers.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Booze up: is gen-Z's ‘sensible' relationship with alcohol moving towards hedonism?
Gen-Z have long been hailed as 'generation sensible' – dozens of articles have charted how they drink less alcohol, exercise more, eat healthier and have ditched night clubs for book clubs. But could that be about to change? Recent data has shown the proportion of gen Z – those born roughly between 1997 and 2012 – who are of legal drinking age and have consumed alcohol in the past six months has risen by 7% between 2024 and 2025. Alcopops are apparently all the rage among gen-Z customers, with booming sales of Smirnoff Ice, Bacardi Breezers and BuzzBallz, while last year's 'brat summer' was said to herald the end of the clean living era. The reality, experts say, is more complicated than that. 'We're seeing a generational recalibration, not a simple return to hedonism,' said Ivo Vlaev, a professor of behavioural science at Warwick University. 'This isn't a simple return to the past – it's a complex blend of coping, compensation, identity expression and socioeconomic constraint. The behaviours may look familiar, but the psychology behind them has evolved.' He said the fact that gen-Z came of age during a pandemic, climate crisis and increased concerns over the cost of living was a recipe for 'psychological whiplash'. Key factors at play included a rebound from the restrictions of the Covid era with young people now 'reasserting agency through social behaviours'. Vlaev said research showed that 'when autonomy is suppressed, people later overcompensate with behaviours that signal freedom or control'. There was also an element of 'self-soothing' as a result of rising levels of anxiety, depression and loneliness, as well as the glamorisation of certain drinks and behaviours on TikTok. Financial concerns may have also pushed the younger generation towards 'present-biased decision-making'. 'When the future feels unstable, people are less likely to invest in long-term health and more likely to seek short-term mood boosts, like alcohol or late nights out,' he said. Vlaev also said an element of 'wellness culture' fatigue had probably set in. 'Some gen-Zers are pushing back against the pressure to optimise every aspect of life,' he said. Richard Halstead, chief operation officer of consumer research at drinks market analysis company IWSR, said: 'From a consumer research and data point of view, it does seem there is some pushback on this idea that we're all perfect, having perfect pictures taken of us on Instagram and we're all super in control of our lives. 'Every cultural move has a countercultural move associated with it.' He said gen Z's attitudes towards drinking and socialising was more nuanced than is often portrayed in the media – gen Z were not 'puritans' who abstain from alcohol, but nor did they like booze as much as previous generations. 'The idea that gen Z do not drink at all or that they have turned their backs on alcohol is not supported by data,' he said. 'The idea that they have a different relationship with alcohol compared to previous generations is supported by data.' He said that, for instance, gen-Z were more likely to drink a wider variety of alcohols, and drink out in bars and restaurants. 'Their pattern of behaviour is actually going out for a reason, as opposed to just meeting for a pint in the pub because the pub's there and you've got nothing better to do,' he said. Dr Laura Tinner, a research fellow at the Centre for Public Health at the University of Bristol, said people shouldn't underestimate the power of the alcohol companies themselves, keen to capture a younger audience they feared they were losing. 'It's not necessarily that there has been a swing in the pendulum or a return to previous drinking behaviours, it's more that alcohol companies are continually trying to target young people with their products,' she said. 'They are using the current revival and zeitgeist around 00s and 90s culture to design their products to target young people.' There was also a suggestion that gen-Z were simply older – they are now roughly between the ages of 13 and 28 – so those at the older end of the group were more likely to have access to well paid jobs and disposable income. 'I think we're seeing some tailwinds develop,' said Halstead. 'They're getting older so some are probably in better paying, stable jobs and they've got more opportunity perhaps to do things that people with a bit more money like to do, which is go out and buy a drink and not worry too much about how much it costs you.' What many researchers were interested in was whether the characteristics that make gen Z different from their predecessors will stay with them as they age, with evidence suggesting generations become more and more similar as they get older. 'We've always had a question about whether or not the decline [in drinking alcohol] will persist into adulthood,' said Dr Laura Fenton, a research associate at the University of Sheffield who specialises in youth drinking cultures. 'What makes gen-Z slightly distinct as a generation is their attitude towards risk. They've engaged in fewer [risky pursuits] proportionally compared to people their age 20 years ago – and that extends to sex, it extends to driving, it extends to smoking and drug use,' she said. 'I think the question really is, is their approach to risk going to stay intact?'
