logo
Swiss Watch Giant Navigates Trump's Tariff Uncertainty

Swiss Watch Giant Navigates Trump's Tariff Uncertainty

Swiss watchmaker Swatch Group's chief executive Nick Hayek has a tariff problem. And the clock is ticking.
US President Donald Trump unleashed a 39 percent tariff on most Swiss-made products last week, which will come into effect on Thursday. The country - known for its luxury timepieces, chocolate and secretive banks - is racing to gain a reprieve.
Trump's tariffs - aimed, he says, at erasing global trade imbalances - have rattled companies around the world and sparked scrambles to shift supply chains and sales channels by many brands - few more recognizable than Swatch, which became famous for its plastic watches.
The United States is the largest export market for Swiss watches.
Shares in Swiss watch and luxury firms, including Swatch, slid nearly 5 percent on Monday on news of the tariffs before paring back losses.
Swatch Group - the biggest Swiss watchmaker by sales volume - is trying to adapt, Hayek told Reuters. The company has front-loaded shipments to the United States, is tapping US shoppers as they travel abroad, and has also raised its prices.
Part of the challenge for the industry is that Swiss watches need to be 60 percent made in the country, making it hard to shift production elsewhere.
'We produce everything in Switzerland, not in China. And we have a high cost. And when you add a 39 percent tariff, we cannot absorb that. So prices will go up for sure,' Hayek said on Monday, without giving specifics on the potential rise.
Swatch Group, which also owns Swiss luxury watch brands such as Omega, Tissot and Longines, already raised prices by 5 percent following Trump's first tariff announcement in April.
Hayek explained that the firm had started to ship extra inventory to the United States earlier in the year when Trump's initial salvo of global tariffs hit. Swiss watchmakers more broadly saw a spike in exports in April, trade data show.
'We shipped much more products to the United States, so this means there is not an immediate impact on us,' he said, adding that Swatch has at least three to six months of US stock in warehouses and stores, giving a short-term buffer from tariffs.
The firm plans to ship 'a little bit more' inventory over the next few days before the tariffs take effect.
Hayek said demand for its watches remained strong in the United States, for now.
Jean-Philippe Bertschy, an analyst at Bank Vontobel, a Zurich-based private bank, said higher inventory levels built up by watchmakers would give them breathing space only for the short term. Super premium watches could more easily pass on extra costs than mid-market and entry level ones, he said.
'The industry will be hoping and praying that the tariffs can be negotiated down to something like the 15 percent that Europe has,' Bertschy said. 'If the 39 percent tariff remained, it would be devastating for the industry.'
The watchmaking industry is Switzerland's third-largest export sector, behind chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and sales of machinery. It made up 9 percent of Swiss exports in 2024.
Swatch Group is the third-biggest Swiss watchmaker by revenue, after Rolex and Richemont, which makes IWC, Jaeger-LeCoultre and Cartier watches.
For watchmakers, a silver lining was the flexibility of sales channels for their portable products, which meant Swatch could target US shoppers while they are overseas in tourist hot spots. 'Customers are mobile,' Hayek said.
When China imposed luxury taxes, that simply drove Chinese consumers to shop in Macau and Hong Kong, he said.
'There are many possibilities for Americans. They travel all over the world,' said Hayek, pointing to options like shops aboard cruise ships. 'They continue to buy even if you have to increase the prices in the United States.' 'What Counts Is What Trump Is Saying'
Nonetheless, Swatch is keen for the Swiss government to quickly strike a deal to avert the threatened 39 percent tariff.
Hayek called on Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter to travel quickly to the United States to resolve the issue.
The tariff rate - one of the highest tariffs globally - could hit other Swiss luxury brands such as Rolex and Patek Philippe.
'The 'Swiss-made' label is part of our DNA. The history and expertise of our industry are unique worldwide,' Yves Bugmann, president of the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry, said. 'It is therefore inconceivable to abandon or dilute the label.'
The United States is the biggest foreign market for Swiss watches overall, accounting for 16.8 percent of exports worth about 4.4 billion Swiss francs ($5.44 billion), federation data show.
Bugmann said that the Swiss watchmaking sector had been investing in training in the United States as well as retail networks and services, adding the tariffs marked a 'serious blow' that would indirectly hurt the US economy.
Underscoring the volatile outlook, Georges Mari, co-owner of Zurich-based investment firm Rossier, Mari & Associates, which holds shares in Swatch, said it is 'impossible' to forecast the impact on the industry.
'Tariffs can change at any moment due to the unpredictability of the Trump administration,' Mari said. The US market generated 18 percent of Swatch Group's sales in 2024, according to broker Jefferies.
Switzerland's government said it was ready to make a 'more attractive offer' in trade talks with Washington, after it held an extraordinary cabinet meeting on Monday to discuss its response to the tariff.
Swatch Group CEO Hayek said it wasn't yet 'doomsday' and hoped an agreement could be struck - though that was very much in the hands of the US president.
'What counts on the US side is what Mr. Trump is saying,' he said. 'Nobody else.'
By John Revill, Helen Reid; Editors: Kirsten Donovan, Adam Jourdan and Joe Bavier
Learn more:
Swiss Luxury Watchmakers' Shares Drop After Trump Tariff Shock
The sector is already under pressure from a stronger franc and falling global demand.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man Who Vowed on TikTok to Kill Trump Will Plead Guilty, Court Records Show
Man Who Vowed on TikTok to Kill Trump Will Plead Guilty, Court Records Show

New York Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Times

Man Who Vowed on TikTok to Kill Trump Will Plead Guilty, Court Records Show

A Pennsylvania man who the federal authorities said vowed on TikTok before President Trump's inauguration in January to kill him to stave off a 'literal oligarchy' has agreed to plead guilty to making the threats, according to court documents. The man, Jacob Buckley, 22, of Port Matilda, Pa., is facing a maximum sentence of five years in prison in connection with the remarks, part of a cycle of threats and political violence in the United States punctuated by the July 2024 attempted assassination of Mr. Trump at a campaign rally in Butler, Pa. In a plea agreement filed on Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Williamsport, Pa., Mr. Buckley accepted responsibility for his social media posts, which the authorities said had violated a federal law that makes it illegal to threaten the president, president-elect or vice president. Responding to a TikTok stream on Jan. 16, Mr. Buckley wrote a series of violent posts that referred to Mr. Trump's pending inauguration on Jan. 20, the authorities said. 'Bro we going into a literal oligarchy in 4 days and im going to kill Trump,' Mr. Buckley wrote, according to a charging document. Twice that day, Mr. Buckley threatened to assassinate Mr. Trump and also target Mr. Trump's supporters, the authorities said. Prosecutors said that Mr. Buckley wrote: 'I hate MAGA republicans bro on god I'll kill all of them.' Mr. Buckley's sentencing has not been scheduled. A lawyer for Mr. Buckley did not immediately respond on Wednesday to a request for comment. Neither did the White House. The threats attributed to Mr. Buckley reflected the intense climate of political violence and tribalism in the United States in which both Republicans and Democrats have been targeted. While holding a campaign rally in Butler in July 2024, Mr. Trump was grazed on his right ear by gunfire from a would-be assassin, who killed a bystander and injured two others before the Secret Service shot and killed him. Since then, several people have been charged with threatening Mr. Trump. In April, another Pennsylvania man was arrested after saying he had planned to assassinate Mr. Trump, Elon Musk and other government officials in comments that he posted on YouTube, the authorities said. Democrats have also been confronted by hostile actors. In 2022, an intruder broke into the San Francisco home of Nancy Pelosi, the former speaker of the House, and beat her husband, Paul Pelosi, with a hammer. The attacker, David DePape, was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. In 2017, Representative Steve Scalise, Republican of Louisiana, who is now the House majority leader, was gravely wounded at a congressional baseball game practice session in the Washington, D.C., area by a lone gunman who was said to be distraught over Mr. Trump's election in 2016.

The House Dems bracing for redistricting sacrifices
The House Dems bracing for redistricting sacrifices

Politico

timea few seconds ago

  • Politico

The House Dems bracing for redistricting sacrifices

TEAM PLAYERS: Two of California's safest House Democrats say they're preparing to take one for the team — accepting slightly more competitive districts as part of the state's quest to find five new blue seats. Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to counter President Donald Trump's effort to increase the number of GOP seats in Texas with a midcycle gerrymandering of his own. State lawmakers could vote soon after they return from recess on Aug. 18 to hold a November special election asking Californians for the power to redraw congressional districts ahead of the midterms. But decreasing the number of Republican seats means some deep-blue California districts will take on a slightly more purple tinge. San Diego Reps. Scott Peters and Sara Jacobs — both of whom represent overwhelmingly Democratic areas — are among the members who would likely see an increase in Republican voters if lines are redrawn. Both told Playbook they would prefer to avoid the sudden redistricting, but that Trump's Texas push warrants it. 'This is bigger than me and my seat,' Jacobs said. 'This is about the survival of democracy and our country. I don't think any of us want to go forward with this, but it's the only way to respond to what they're doing in Texas.' Peters said he actually agrees with Northern California Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley's crusade to outlaw redistricting outside the typical 10-year time span. But, he added, 'We're not the ones who picked this fight.' Asked how much their districts could change, Jacobs and Peters said the proposed new boundaries remain in flux. Former Vice President Kamala Harris last year won Jacobs' district by more than 23 percentage points and Peters' by nearly 30 points, according to California Target Book. Drawing more Republicans into these kinds of deep-blue districts would allow Democrats to eliminate some red areas without giving Republicans an advantage in existing purple districts. Peters said competitive races early in his congressional career — including a very close 2014 contest against now-Assemblymember Carl DeMaio — have prepared him for the moment. 'Since Trump's been on the ballot, I haven't had hard races,' he said. 'But I know how to run a tough race. We'll be ready for what comes.' IT'S WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY FUNDING FREEZE: UCLA is at risk of losing more than half a billion dollars in federal research funds as the Trump administration continues to pressure the school to address allegations of antisemitism on campus, our Nicole Norman reports. The $584 million in frozen funds that UCLA officials announced today is the first official tally of what is at stake for the school. The sum is far more than what was initially estimated when the Department of Justice announced last week it was investigating the school for violations of civil rights laws stemming from allegations it has failed to protect Jewish students and faculty from antisemitism. In a school-wide letter sent this morning and shared with POLITICO, UCLA Chancellor Julio Frenk confirmed the grant money, which is meant to fund hundreds of research projects in a wide array of fields, is 'suspended and at risk.' 'If these funds remain suspended,' he wrote, 'it will be devastating for UCLA and for Americans across the nation.' IN OTHER NEWS CARUSO CASH: Rick Caruso today announced his Los Angeles wildfire recovery nonprofit will launch a $1 million initiative to help small businesses rebuild. The Banc of California will donate the money for the fund, which will provide grants of up to $50,000 for businesses in Altadena, Pacific Palisades and Malibu, according to the announcement. Caruso's 2026 political ambitions have been the subject of intense speculation. The billionaire developer — who spent more than $100 million in his unsuccessful campaign for Los Angeles mayor against Karen Bass in 2022 — could make another run to lead his city or jump into the wide-open gubernatorial race. Continuing his wildfire relief work seems to add a point to the mayoral column, although supporters have been encouraging him to weigh a bid for the state's top office after Harris announced she won't become a candidate. TOGETHER IN TAHOE: Sen. Adam Schiff today hosted Nevada and California leaders at the Tahoe Summit, an annual gathering dedicated to preserving the landmark lake. Schiff welcomed Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis and Nevada Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen — as well as actor Jeremy Renner, who lives in the area — to Valhalla Tahoe on the California side of the lake. The group honored late Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who helped start the summit in 1997. Many of the speakers also highlighted the need for federal resources to protect Lake Tahoe, and Cortez Masto pointed to the Trump administration's Forest Service cuts as a particular concern. 'Our federal partners are so important,' she said. 'And right now, unfortunately, they're being thinned out.' WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — Prominent anti-gerrymandering organization Common Cause is debating whether to modify its position opposing all partisan redistricting as California Democrats decide how to respond to redrawn maps in Texas. (The Christian Science Monitor) — Trump signed an executive order naming himself the chair of a White House task force on the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles. (The Los Angeles Times) AROUND THE STATE — The Santa Ana Unified School District and Orange County School of the Arts say they've reached an $8.55 million settlement, ending a yearslong battle over special education funding. (The Orange County Register) — Stanford University is laying off at least 363 employees this fall as it makes $140 million in budget cuts. (The Mercury News) — The state's Office of the Inspector General in a review found that the way the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation handles investigations into use-of-force complaints against officers was 'inadequate.' (The Sacramento Bee) — compiled by Juliann Ventura

Trump administration reverses Biden approval of major wind farm in Idaho
Trump administration reverses Biden approval of major wind farm in Idaho

Washington Post

timea few seconds ago

  • Washington Post

Trump administration reverses Biden approval of major wind farm in Idaho

SEATTLE — The Trump administration on Wednesday canceled a major wind farm development in Idaho, a project approved late in former President Joe Biden's term that had drawn criticism for its proximity to a historic site where Japanese Americans were incarcerated during World War II. The Bureau of Land Management in December signed off on a scaled-down plan for the Lava Ridge Wind Project northeast of Twin Falls, with 241 wind turbines instead of 400. But the development had been on hold since the first day of President Donald Trump's second term, when he issued an executive order halting the permitting of wind power projects across the country and telling the Interior Department to review the Lava Ridge decision.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store