
US used about a quarter of its high-end missile interceptors in Israel-Iran war, exposing supply gap
Using so many THAAD interceptors in such a short period exposed a gap in the US missile defense network and depleted a costly asset at a moment when American public support for Israeli defense has reached historic lows.
Former US defense officials and missile experts told CNN that the rapid drawdown has also raised concerns about America's global security posture and ability to regenerate supplies at speed.
Last year, the US produced only 11 new THAAD interceptors and is expected to receive just 12 more this fiscal year, according to the 2026 budget estimates from the Department of Defense.
A Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptor is launched during a successful test in this undated handout photo provided by the US Department of Defense. THAAD systems are capable of intercepting and countering ballistic missiles.
U.S. Department of Defense/Missile Defense Agency/Reuters/FILE
In response to questions regarding the US's THAAD stockpile and the expenditure of interceptors during the 12-day conflict, Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson said the US military 'is the strongest it has even been and has everything it needs to conduct any mission anywhere, anytime, all around the world. If you need further proof, look no further than Operation Midnight Hammer and the total obliteration of Iran's nuclear capabilities.'
CNN reported that an early intelligence assessment determined the US' strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities last month did not destroy the core components of the country's nuclear program and likely only set it back by months. The US administration dismissed the assessment, and the CIA later said it had evidence Iran's nuclear program was 'severely damaged.'
A defense official declined to provide information on the THAAD inventory due to operational security concerns, but said the Defense Department 'remains postured to respond to any threat.'
The number of THAADs spent in the 12-day war was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Despite the heavy use of THAADs during the 12-day war to help fend off Tehran's assault last month, dozens of Iranian missiles still struck Israel.
THAAD is a mobile system that can engage and destroy short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missiles both inside and outside of the Earth's atmosphere during their final phase of flight. Each battery is operated by 95 American soldiers, armed with six launchers, and 48 interceptors. The interceptors are manufactured by Lockheed Martin and cost roughly $12.7 million, according to the 2025 Missile Defense Agency budget.
The US plans to acquire 37 THAAD interceptors next year, according to the 2026 Department of defense budget estimates, financed partially by the latest addition to President Donald Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill.' A defense official said the 2026 budget 'prioritizes funding in the defense industrial base, a core strategic asset that provides and sustains our military's technology, equipment, and supplies.'
'The budget includes an additional $1.3 billion for industrial based supply chain improvements, and an additional $2.5 billion for missiles and munitions production expansion,' the official said. 'The Department's role is to ensure that the President is armed with the best possible military options for any scenario – and all options remain on the table.'
But experts and former defense officials warn that supplies need to be ramped up significantly to deal with the shortfall.
'It is important to recognize the level of commitment and the level of expenditure here in defense of Israel is significant,' said a missile defense expert who has been tracking the US government's expenditure.
'The reports about THAAD expenditure are concerning. This is not the sort of thing that the US can afford to continue to do on and on,' he added. 'It was a major commitment to our Israeli ally, but missile defense interceptor capacity is definitely a concern, and THAAD is a very scarce resource.'
A senior retired US army officer who asked not to be named said around 25% of THAAD's total inventory was used by US forces in Israel participating in the war effort. 'The (Department of Defense) is looking at wartime stockage levels of critical munitions and attempting to significantly increase annual production capacity, an effort that is long overdue,' the source said.
US Air Force aerial porters load Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) support equipment being sent to Israel onto a C-17 Globemaster III on Oct. 16, 2024.
Airman 1st Class Zeeshan Naeem/U.S. Air Force
US interceptor stockpile concerns preceded the 12-day war, according to four former senior US defense officials who say that the problem is most acute in inventories of high-end interceptors that are a key part of deterrence against China.
'What I can say without giving any numbers is I was surprised at how low some of the levels of readiness were,' said one former defense official who left his post in the last year.
'Stockpiles are dropping. We need more. We need them faster than they are being built,' said the same ex-official.
'This is a concern. It was a concern during the Biden administration. I'm sure it's a concern now during the Trump administration,' one former senior Biden defense official said.
'Air defense is relevant in all of the major theaters right now. And there's not enough systems. There's not enough interceptors. There's not enough production and there are not enough people working on it,' said Mara Karlin, former US Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy, Plans, and Capabilities under Biden.
'You have the challenge of something being both incredibly relevant and also there's a dearth of them,' she added.
There are nine active THAAD batteries globally, according to manufacturer Lockheed Martin. The US military has seven of those and plans to have an eighth active by 2025, according to the Congressional Research Service. Data available in 2019 showed that five of the US' THAADs were stationed at bases in Texas, one in Guam and one in South Korea; by last year, the Pentagon had moved two of those batteries to the Middle East to protect Israel.
Two others were delivered to the United Arab Emirates and have been used to intercept Houthi militant ballistic missiles.
Missile shortages and damage in Israel
While most of Iran's missiles were downed by Israeli and US air defenses, experts, open-source data and video from the ground reviewed by CNN showed that dozens did manage to get through. Tehran's success rate rose as the war raged on, amounting to some of the worst damage Israel has seen in decades.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said Iran fired over 500 long-range ballistic missiles, and it was able to intercept around 86% of those – with 36 Iranian missiles striking built-up areas.
Major cities like Tel Aviv suffered extensive damage, whole apartment buildings were destroyed, sensitive military sites targeted, parts of the power grid were taken out and 29 people were killed. Israel's tax authority estimated in late June that the war would cost the country at least $1.8 billion in damage, but with claims still yet to be filed that number was expected to rise.
Analysis conducted by DC-based think tank Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) estimated that THAADs – alongside Israel's Arrow-2 and Arrow-3 interceptors – downed 201 of Iran's 574 missiles, with 57 hitting populated areas. The report estimated that the US' THAAD system accounted for almost half of all interceptions, indicating that Israel's Arrow interceptor stockpiles were insufficient. Israel's Iron Dome system was designed to deflect shorter-range rockets than those being fired by Iran.
'After burning through a large portion of their available interceptors, the United States and Israel both face an urgent need to replenish stockpiles and sharply increase production rates,' Ari Cicurel, author of the report, wrote, estimating that it would take three to eight years to replenish at current production rates.
According to data compiled by JINSA, interception rates lagged as the war wore on. Only 8% of Iranian missiles penetrated defenses in the first week of the war. That doubled to 16% in the second half of the conflict and eventually culminated at 25% on the final day of the war before the ceasefire.
Analysts say there are several possible reasons for the trend, including an Iranian shift of focus from military targets to populated urban areas, where interception is less robust. Iran also fired more sophisticated missiles as the war progressed.
Ultra-Orthodox Jewish men inspect the damage at the site of an Iranian missile strike in Bnei Brak, east of Tel Aviv, on June 16, 2025. Iran unleashed a barrage of missile strikes on Israeli cities after Israel struck military targets deep inside Iran.
John Wessels/AFP/Getty Images
'(Iran) increasingly employed more advanced systems,' said Mora Deitch, head of the data analytics center at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies (INSS). 'These included newer missiles with multiple warheads or decoys, which may individually cause less damage but can overwhelm and saturate air defense systems.'
Deitch also suggests that Israel may have deliberately relaxed its interception rate.
'Israel's air defense policy may have evolved over time to accommodate a protracted engagement with Iran,' said Deitch. 'What appears as a decline in interception effectiveness might instead reflect a deliberate shift in strategy rather than a technological shortfall.'
Still missile defense analysts say they saw clear signs of air defense depletion. 'The presence of the THAAD battery in the first place suggests that the Israelis don't have a super deep interceptor magazine,' said Sam Lair, research associate at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS).
Lair published analysis of interceptors seen in a series of social media video taken by a Jordanian photographer, Zaid Abbadi, from his rooftop in an Amman suburb as the missiles flew overhead. Lair counted 39 THAAD among 82 advanced interceptors in the sample, which consisted of sporadically recorded night-time recording.
CNN was able to verify the THAAD tally from the videos. Over half a dozen experts say the number represents a very conservative baseline. Drawing on calculations about publicly available data on batteries, interceptor reloads, and the number of Iranian ballistic missiles fired, experts believe that the US military fired at least 80 THAAD interceptors.
'The 12-day war in June of this year essentially saw the first significant expenditure of THAAD interceptors,' said Timur Kadyshev, a senior researcher at the Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg.
'Israel was relatively successful in defending (with the US assistance) against unsophisticated Iranian missiles – at the cost of depleting available arsenals of interceptors.'
US Army soldiers demonstrate how they prepare the THAAD missile defense system at Fort Bliss, Texas, on Sept. 20, 2023.
Cpl. David Poleski/U.S. Army
The problem for the US is especially acute in the Indo-Pacific where China has tried to keep the US navy at arm's length, experts say.
'From a narrowly military standpoint, the Chinese are absolutely the winners in that these last almost two years in the Middle East have seen the US expend pretty substantial amounts of capabilities that the American defense industrial base will find pretty hard to replace,' said Sidharth Kaushal, senior research fellow at Royal United Services Institute.
Ex-defense officials said dwindling defensive capabilities in the Indo-Pacific was a growing concern for the former administration of President Joe Biden as they used the US stockpile to battle Yemen's Houthi rebels.
'God forbid there should be a conflict in the Pacific, for example, then it really will put a huge strain our missile capacity and the ability for our military to have the munitions necessary to keep up,' said one former senior Biden administration defense official with direct knowledge of the US campaign against the Houthis.
'You have to make choices,' said Jennifer Kavanagh, senior fellow and director of military analysis at Defense Priorities. 'The Biden administration also should have thought about these trade-offs, but they were able to shrug them off because it was early in these wars… stockpiles were still deep enough that they could turn a blind eye to it.'
'But the Trump administration now is getting to a point where they're not going to be able to ignore the trade-offs.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
an hour ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Algeria Reaffirms Full Support for Lebanon
By Ahmad El-Assasy Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune has reiterated Algeria's unwavering solidarity with the people of Lebanon under all circumstances. His statement came after receiving the Lebanese Army Commander, General Joseph Aoun, in Algiers—marking a significant diplomatic encounter aimed at deepening bilateral ties. During the joint press conference, President Tebboune described the meeting as "constructive and of great interest", highlighting Algeria's commitment to enhancing cooperation with Lebanon. 'We consider this visit a milestone in reinforcing the strong and renewed fraternal relations between Algeria and Lebanon. It is a valuable opportunity to expand and deepen our cooperation,' Tebboune stated. The two sides agreed to expedite preparations for the first session of the Algerian-Lebanese Joint Committee, which Tebboune described as a 'new starting point' for bilateral collaboration. President Tebboune reaffirmed Algeria's 'firm and constant' support for Lebanon's sovereignty, peace, and stability. He emphasized Algeria's role at the United Nations Security Council in condemning Israeli violations of Lebanese territory and expressed backing for the renewal of the mandate of UN peacekeeping forces in southern Lebanon. The talks also addressed major regional issues. Both leaders expressed grave concern over the deteriorating humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the ongoing Israeli military campaign. 'We underscored the urgent need to stop the genocide and starvation tactics against our people in Gaza, and to foil any plans for forced displacement,' President Tebboune said. In addition, the two leaders voiced alarm over recent developments in Syria, particularly foreign interventions and repeated assaults on the country's sovereignty. To navigate these critical regional challenges, Tebboune stressed the importance of activating the long-dormant political consultation mechanism between the two nations. 'Unfortunately, this mechanism has not been convened since it was established in 2002. We now reaffirm our commitment to resuming this framework to foster mutual dialogue and political coordination,' he concluded. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters Arts & Culture "Jurassic World Rebirth" Gets Streaming Date News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier News Ayat Khaddoura's Final Video Captures Bombardment of Beit Lahia Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Egyptian Pound Undervalued by 30%, Says Goldman Sachs Arts & Culture South Korean Actress Kang Seo-ha Dies at 31 after Cancer Battle Arts & Culture Lebanese Media: Fayrouz Collapses after Death of Ziad Rahbani Sports Get to Know 2025 WWE Evolution Results


Al-Ahram Weekly
3 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Israel military intercepts Houthi missile fired from Yemen - Region
Sirens sounded in several Israeli cities, including Jerusalem, on Tuesday as the military said it intercepted a missile launched from Yemen, with Houthi rebels later claiming the attack. "Following the sirens that sounded a short while ago in several areas in Israel, a missile launched from Yemen was intercepted by the Israeli air force", the military said in a statement. The Houthis later claimed the attack, saying they had fired a missile at Ben Gurion airport near Tel Aviv. Yemen's Houthi rebels have launched repeated missile and drone attacks against Israel since the war in Gaza began on 7 October 2023. The Houthis, who say they are acting in solidarity with Palestinians, paused their attacks during a two-month ceasefire in Gaza that ended in March, but renewed them after Israel resumed major operations. Israel has carried out several retaliatory strikes in Yemen, targeting Houthi-held ports and the airport in the rebel-held capital Sanaa. * This story was edited by Ahram Online. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Daily News Egypt
5 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Israel and Syria II: When Realpolitik Meets Fragile Transitions
In continuation of the previous analysis, there is no inconsistency in Israel's stance toward developments in Syria. From the outset of the Syrian crisis and the potential fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime, Tel Aviv has closely scrutinized the new ruling authority in Damascus. Although the regime emerged from a background marked by jihadism and associations with terrorism, Israel has consistently approached these designations with calculated pragmatism. What matters most to Israeli policymakers are actions and outcomes on the ground. As such, Israel has shown no objection to engaging with a regime that may be labeled as 'terrorist,' provided it safeguards Israeli interests and security—and as long as its militancy is directed elsewhere. It is worth noting that this understanding was part of early negotiations between Israel, the United States, and Türkiye prior to Ahmad Al-Sharaa replacing Bashar al-Assad. This context perhaps explains Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's lack of opposition to lifting U.S. sanctions on the new regime—viewing Al-Sharaa as someone who understands his limits and what is expected of him. From the outset, Netanyahu made it clear that the Druze minority in Syria enjoys Israel's full support and protection, and any violations against them would be deemed unacceptable. His justification lies in Israel's historic and social ties to the Druze communities inside Israel and the Golan Heights. For perspective, over 30% of Israel's military is composed of Druze recruits. Any persecution of the Druze in Syria would therefore pose not only a political embarrassment but also a serious security and military concern for Israel. Meanwhile, Netanyahu continues to battle internal political crises that threaten his entire political trajectory. Although his position somewhat improved following military strikes on Iran, he may still need to show moderate flexibility to broaden international support regarding the ongoing crises in Gaza and Lebanon. At such a volatile time, opening a new front with Syria could be politically unwise. Hence, the Israeli response—targeting the Syrian Army General Command headquarters in Damascus, just meters from the presidential palace—served as a calculated deterrent. Within minutes, Ahmad Al-Sharaa announced an agreement with Druze leaders in Suweida, vowing to prosecute those responsible for the violations that occurred during the two-day crisis. As the regional situation grows more complex, various countries are positioning themselves according to their own agendas. Qatar and Türkiye continue to support the new regime and wish to preserve its stability. Conversely, countries like China and Russia, with vested interests in Syria, are waiting for clarity to formulate their strategic vision—one that may not align with the ambitions of Doha and Ankara. Iran, on the other hand, is seeking to regain lost ground after the collapse of Assad's rule forced its militias and IRGC members to flee Syria for Iraq. Tehran may seek to capitalize on the conflict in Suweida to revive illicit trade routes—whether through Captagon trafficking or arms smuggling via Iraq. As noted, Netanyahu is handling the post-Assad phase with realism. He views the current Syrian leadership as a one-man show led by Abu Mohammad Al-Julani, who has declared himself president and appointed government officials—many of whom are former jihadist commanders from Idlib. The same applies to the army, police, education system, and other state structures. There is no issue, from Netanyahu's perspective, in token representation of other minorities to soften the regime's image, as long as the overwhelming Sunni majority—which shares Al-Julani's ideology—remains dominant. This Sunni majority, having endured decades of brutal suppression at the hands of the Alawite minority and the Ba'ath Party under Assad father and son, is now driven by a clear ambition to end minority rule, disarm them, seize their assets, and reduce them to protectorates under a Sunni jihadist state. Julani is pursuing this vision through systematic violence and terror, targeting minorities with deliberate massacres. The lack of formal investigations, accountability, or even transparent reports—despite Al-Sharaa's repeated promises—speaks volumes about the intent behind these crimes. Beyond the specific commitment to the Druze in southern Syria, Israel sees a grave and tangible threat in the emergence of a new regime grounded in jihadist and ISIS-like principles. The deployment of elite Syrian military units—known as the 'Red Gangs'—to the Druze city of Suweida is seen as a major escalation. These specialized forces, commanded directly by Ahmad Al-Sharaa, are the military backbone of the new regime. Regional intelligence sources indicate that the Red Gangs are tasked with high-risk operations, including deep infiltration missions and complex urban warfare scenarios. In this fluid political context, Syria under Al-Sharaa could quickly descend into chaos. Without a strong central authority, the likelihood of another civil war is high. Moreover, hastily crafted solutions—designed merely to appease Tel Aviv and preserve the regime—may paradoxically accelerate the collapse. The agreement announced shortly after the Israeli strike on the Republican Palace and Army HQ in Damascus, which called for the withdrawal of Syrian forces from Suweida and the handover of local security to the Druze community, amounted to a near-official declaration of autonomy. What complicates matters further is that Druze religious leadership is now demanding the reopening of roads to Kurdish-controlled areas in northern and eastern Syria. This points to a potential redrawing of Syria's sectarian and ethnic map, with the Suweida deal encouraging other groups to seek similar autonomy—a fast track to full-scale civil conflict. Although Israel remains the dominant power in the Syrian equation and the final decision-maker in most developments, the current trajectory presents a serious challenge to Tel Aviv. The uncontrolled situation could lead to the emergence of a Hamas-style or Hezbollah-like entity—this time on Israel's Syrian border. If Israel fails to act decisively, it could face catastrophic scenarios akin to those of October 7, 2023, or find itself dragged into a prolonged war of attrition with radical Islamist factions in Syria. This may also trigger a strategic reassessment in Washington and among key regional actors who had previously invested in or backed figures like Al-Sharaa or Julani as potential models for post-conflict governance across other conflict zones in the Middle East—such as Yemen, Libya, and Sudan. All the above are not mere speculations, but critical facts that must be taken into account in understanding what lies ahead. Dr. Hatem Sadek: Professor at Helwan University