Man fatally wounded during shooting in Inkster, police seeking tips from public
Detective from Inkster Police Department and Michigan State Police are investigating the incident, which happened in the 3100 block of Hickory Street. When Inkster police arrived after the 3:56 p.m. call, they found man with multiple gunshot wounds.
The victim was pronounced dead at the scene.
His identity was not released.
"Authorities are working to determine the circumstances surrounding the shooting and identify those responsible," the Inkster report said.
Michigan State Police said its Second District Special Investigation Section is assisting, along with MSP canine units, aviation, evidence technicians and crime scene reconstruction.
Police ask that anyone with information to share on the incident contact Inkster Police Department at 313-563-9850. Callers may remain anonymous.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
3 minutes ago
- CBS News
MBTA to crack down on fare evasion around Boston starting in September
The MBTA announced that it will begin cracking down on fare evasion starting in September. Specially trained MBTA employees called the "fare engagement representatives" will be located on trains and at T stations throughout service areas to make sure that fares are being paid. "Our riders deserve a safe and reliable mass transportation system that is available for them when they need it. With strong support, we are making significant progress, but to sustain it, we owe it to our riders and the public at large to do our part and collect all appropriate fare revenue," MBTA general manager and CEO Phillip Eng said in a statement. The company said that the staff members will begin by giving riders an official warning if they haven't paid their fare. This requires a rider to give a form of physical or verbal identification. They will then be issued a formal written warning. After that, citations will be issued, starting at $50. "If a rider refuses to cooperate with MBTA personnel, provide identification, or provide their contact information, they may be asked to exit the station at that time," The MBTA said in a press release. Citations can also be issued if someone is using another person's reduced fare card. However, if someone thinks they were unfairly given a citation, they can appeal here. Riders can pay for the train and buses with their phone, a contactless card, cash, a ticket, or a CharlieCard. The MBTA said that the representatives will be placed throughout the system based on rider patterns so that they can "avoid a disproportionate presence in any one community." They will be wearing a distinctive blue shirt with a yellow MBTA identifier on it and khaki pants. All representatives will have access to Google Translate or speak another language. They have also received training on accessibility, de-escalation, youth engagement, and more. The team members were first introduced in October of 2024 to answer questions and visually check if fares were being paid. The program will officially roll out on September 8. Future advancements of the program will see the staff on buses, Green Line and Mattapan trolleys. For more information about fare checks, click here.
CBS News
3 minutes ago
- CBS News
3 men shot, critically hurt while sitting inside vehicle in Englewood neighborhood
Three men were shot while sitting inside a vehicle on the city's South Side Thursday morning. It happened around 10:41 a.m. in the 7200 block of South Vincennes Avenue. Chicago police said the victims, ages 18, 22, and 23, were inside the vehicle when another unknown vehicle pulled up. At least two gunmen got out and shot at the victims. The 18-year-old and the 22-year-old suffered a gunshot wound in the abdomen. The 23-year-old was also shot in the abdomen and the foot. All three self-transported to St. Bernard's Hospital initially in critical condition. Police said their conditions were stabilized. As of Thursday, no arrests were made. Area One detectives are investigating.
Forbes
3 minutes ago
- Forbes
Medical Marijuana Users Shouldn't Lose Their Second Amendment Rights, Court Rules
A federal appeals court has handed medical marijuana patients a major victory, ruling that the government hasn't shown that banning them from owning guns lines up with America's long-standing traditions of firearm regulation. In a ruling issued this week, a three-judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals set aside a lower court's dismissal and said the plaintiffs had plausibly claimed a violation of their Second Amendment rights. The dispute focuses on federal provisions that ban 'unlawful drug users' of controlled substances, including marijuana, from possessing or purchasing guns. Florida law allows medical marijuana, but the drug remains illegal under federal law. Marijuana Users Are Not Criminals Two residents, Vera Cooper and Nicole Hansell, who use marijuana for health reasons, were denied gun purchases after disclosing their use, while a retired police officer, Neill Franklin, owns a firearm but has avoided joining the medical program despite being eligible, fearing prosecution. The Justice Department argued that marijuana users are comparable to felons or dangerous people historically barred from having guns. The district court agreed, pointing to traditions of disarming felons, alcoholics, and the mentally ill. The appeals court, however, disagreed, finding no basis, at least at this stage, for treating medical marijuana patients as criminals or dangerous. 'Viewing these allegations in the light most favorable to Cooper and Hansell, it appears they use rational thought in making their decision to use marijuana… Cooper's and Hansell's mental state is a far cry from that of addicts and alcoholics whose actions are controlled by their need to use,' the court wrote. The court further noted that the complaint described conduct that, at most, could constitute a federal misdemeanor, and did not include any allegations of addiction, impairment, or other criminal activity. The judges made clear, however, that the law still stands, but the plaintiffs can continue to fight their case, while the Justice Department may still try to prove later that some marijuana users pose risks similar to intoxicated or dangerous people historically barred from having guns. 'The Federal Government has failed, at the motion to dismiss stage, to establish that disarming Appellants is consistent with this Nation's history and tradition of firearm regulation,' the court said. A Long Trend The ruling aligns with recent decisions by other federal appeals courts and adds momentum to a case challenging whether medical marijuana users can be barred under federal law from owning or buying firearms. Last year, a U.S. appeals court said a Texas woman who owned a gun and used marijuana could not be prosecuted under federal law, ruling it unconstitutional to disarm her based on past drug use. The panel said that while restrictions may apply to people who are actively intoxicated, taking away firearms from a sober, non-violent person for past or occasional use does not align with historical gun laws. In 2023, a federal judge in the Western District of Oklahoma also struck down the long-standing federal ban on marijuana users possessing firearms, calling the prohibition unconstitutional. Courts, therefore, have questioned whether automatically banning marijuana users fits with the country's long-standing tradition of firearm regulation, emphasizing that using medical marijuana doesn't automatically make someone a danger and shouldn't strip them of their Second Amendment rights without cause.
