A meteor may have led to the formation of the Grand Canyon, new study says
While many Americans are familiar with the Grand Canyon's beauty and uniqueness, they may not be aware of the story behind its formation.
The Colorado River may have etched the canyon one mile deep, as rocky debris transported in floods did most of the carving, according to the Grand Canyon Conservancy.
But what caused the flooding?
A study published in Geology on Tuesday tied another Arizona landmark, the Meteor Crater, to the formation of the Grand Canyon.
A meteor may have led to the formation of the Grand Canyon, a new study has found (Daniel Slim/AFP via Getty Images)
The study hypothesized the Meteor Crater, which was formed 56,000 years ago, triggered landslides in the Grand Canyon that blocked the Colorado River and formed a paleolake — a lake that has existed in the past— in the canyon.
Geologists have long wondered how and when driftwood found in Stanton's Cave in the Grand Canyon got there, as the mouth of the cave is 150 feet above the river. There are also lake sediments found in the cave.
"It would have required a 10-times bigger flood level than any flood that has happened in the past several thousand years,' one of the study's authors, University of New Mexico Distinguished Professor Emeritus Karl Karlstrom, said in a press release Tuesday.
He continued: 'Or maybe they are very old deposits left as the river carved down, or maybe they floated in from a paleolake caused by a downstream lava dam or landslide dam? We needed to know the age of the cave deposits.'
A study published Tuesday tied the Meteor Crater to the formation of the Grand Canyon (Daniel Slim/AFP via Getty Images)
The study hypothesized the Meteor Crater, which was formed 56,000 years ago, triggered landslides in the Grand Canyon that blocked the Colorado River and formed a paleolake, in other words, a former lake, in the canyon ()
The study found the driftwood to be 56,000 years old, the same geologic age as the asteroid impact and the landslide dam.
Researchers suggested because the landslide appears to have the same age as Meteor Crater, the asteroid impact blast caused the landslide.
The paleolake formed from the landslide, which dammed the Colorado River. Caves, such as Stanton's Cave, were flooded by the paleolake.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Support for NASA returning to the moon and going to Mars is surging
A recent poll conducted by CBS News provides an encouraging look into public support for the Artemis program to return astronauts to the moon and eventually send humans to Mars. Sixty-seven percent of respondents favor a return to the moon and just 33 percent oppose one. On Mars, sixty-five percent favor sending astronauts to the red planet with 35 percent in opposition. Support for sending astronauts back to the moon tracks favorably among all age groups, with 71 percent of 18 to 29-year-olds in favor. The current favorable view of the Artemis program contrasts with what people thought of the Apollo program to land men on the moon while it was ongoing. As space historian Roger Launius pointed out, most Americans, with the exception of one poll taken in July 1969, took a dim view of going to the moon. 'Consistently throughout the decade, 45-60 percent of Americans believed that the government was spending too much on space, indicative of a lack of commitment to the spaceflight agenda,' Launius wrote. Incidentally, the CBS News poll shows that now Americans believe that the Apollo program was worth the effort, 77 to 23 percent. The findings were consistent with those taken on the 50th and 40th anniversaries of the first moon landing. The fact that support for going back to the moon and on to Mars is uniform across all age groups jumps out. In times past, some have suggested that supporters for sending astronauts beyond low Earth orbit mainly consisted of boomers nostalgic for the glories of the Apollo program. If that was ever the case, it isn't any longer. Laura Seward Forczyk, a space career consultant, video blogger and author of ' Rise of the Space Age Millennials,' likely spoke for a lot of younger people on X when she posted, 'I hope to live to see humans walking on another world again. Artemis III can't come soon enough.' Her sentiment expresses a desire for something beautiful and glorious in a world often ugly and dispiriting. Come to think of it, that was the Apollo 11 moon landing in the midst of the turmoil of the 1960s. A lot of famous space influencers, such as former NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine, billionaire private space traveler Jared Isaacman, video blogger Eliana Sheriff and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk were not alive when men first walked on the moon. One word of caution should be made about how poll results can often be influenced by question-wording. In 2023, the Pew organization released a poll suggesting that returning to the moon and on to Mars were of lower priority than things like asteroid detection and measuring climate change. Nevertheless, when combining the answers 'top priority' and 'important but lower priority' space exploration still enjoyed healthy support, with 57 percent favoring a return to the moon and 56 percent going to Mars. People are looking forward to witnessing the first footsteps on the moon in over 50 years and the first ever on Mars. Donald Trump was the latest president of the United States to make that promise when he started the Artemis program during his first term. Now, he has to deliver. Unfortunately, President Trump is in serious danger of blowing it. Over six months into his second administration, America still does not have a permanent NASA administrator, thanks to Trump's capricious, last-minute withdrawal of Isaacman's nomination. The White House and the Congress are wrangling over NASA science funding and how long the space agency should retain the Orion Space Launch System architecture for returning to the moon. Trump needs to move quickly to nominate a permanent head of NASA. He could change his mind again about Isaacman, though he may be loath to admit to making a mistake. The White House also needs to reestablish the National Space Council as a center for the formulation of space policy. The council performed great service during the first Trump administration. It can do so again. Finally, Trump and Musk should resolve their feud. The most powerful man in the world and the world's richest man work better together than at cross purposes. Trump has won some great domestic and foreign policy victories. It will be a pity if his legacy is one of letting China get back to the moon before we do. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond ' and, most recently, ' Why is America Going Back to the Moon? ' He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner.
Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Healthy Living Helps the Aging Brain
A new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association makes a compelling case that a healthy lifestyle does an aging brain good. That might sound obvious. Eat well, exercise, challenge yourself mentally, have an active social life and you'll be better off for it. Yet researchers are just starting to offer concrete data to support the theory that making conscientious lifestyle changes can lower the risk of dementia, which is estimated to affect some 6 million Americans.
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Dangerous waters: What to know about the flesh-eating bacteria and brain-eating amoebas
For most people, swimming in a lake or river is the best way to cool off on a hot summer's day. But there are more than frogs and fish in those waters – microscopic pathogens that can cause serious illness, and in extreme cases, even death, are lurking below the surface. Two waterborne pathogens have been increasing in freshwater lakes and brackish waters across the U.S. in recent years, due to the warming trends of climate change, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The culprits are the rare "flesh-eating" bacteria (scientific name Vibrio vulnificus) and the "brain-eating" amoeba (scientific name Naegleria fowleri). In early July, a boy died from the brain-eating amoeba, after swimming in a South Carolina lake. Four other people have died after contracting the rare flesh-eating bacteria in Florida this year, state health officials confirmed. How do these pathogens enter the body? The brain-eating amoeba and flesh-eating-bacteria are known to thrive in warm water environments. The brain-eating amoebas are more commonly found in warm freshwater lakes and rivers, while the flesh-eating bacteria are primarily found in warm brackish water, which is a mix of fresh and salt water. How both pathogens can enter the body during water activities: Why is it called a brain-eating amoeba? The amoeba is often referred to as brain-eating because it can cause an deadly infection called Primary Amebic Meningoencephalitis (PAM) that destroys brain tissue. The brain-eating amoeba usually kills fewer than 10 Americans each year. In particular, only four survivors have been identified out of 167 instances that have been recorded in the U.S. between 1962 and 2024, according to the CDC. Why is it called a flesh-eating bacteria? The bacteria is often referred to as fleshing-eating because it can cause necrotizing fasciitis, which destroys muscle tissue, skin tissue and skin. It can enter through a cut, but it cannot penetrate unharmed skin. The bacteria can also enter your body when you eat uncooked or undercooked shellfish. The flesh-eating bacteria is rare, but it can be life-threatening. Without treatment, death can occur in just a few days. An average of 150 to 200 cases are reported each year, with most of them in Gulf Coast states, according to the CDC. Take these precautions during water activities Swimmers, particularly those in southern states and warm coastal waters, should expect a minimal risk of contracting a pathogen in warm freshwater lakes, rivers, brackish waters and hot springs. How to lower your risks: Medical experts always recommend keeping a close eye on children when they play or swim in the water. While it's uncommon for adults to swallow water while swimming, children are far more prone to do so, according to VCU Health. Researchers are unsure why boys appear to be most at risk of being infected. It may be because they are more prone to play in the sediment at the bottom of lakes or jump and dive into the water, according to the CDC. Progression of infection: Know the symptoms Because of the life-threatening results, it is important to be know of symptoms and significance of seeking immediate medical assistance following any exposure. Here is a comparison of symptoms of the flesh-eating bacteria vs. the brain-eating amoeba: CONTRIBUTING Julie Garisto, T. Sudore and C.A. Bridges/USA TODAY NETWORK, Christopher Cann and George Petras/USA TODAY SOURCE Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Health, Cleveland Clinic, WebMD, VCU Health, The Florida Department of Health, and USA TODAY research
