logo
Shifting Sands: UAE's Business Evolution Amid US Uncertainty

Shifting Sands: UAE's Business Evolution Amid US Uncertainty

Forbes03-07-2025
Forced or organically, the world continues to evolve beyond the United States. It's not the United States is less important – it's just that our constant policy swings from Republican to Democrat Administration's and back have pushed the rest of the world to plan for a less US-centric world, to develop their own markets and trade partnerships, and invest in the industries of the future.
At the recent Make it in the Emirates conference in Abu Dhabi, the ambivalence of the world towards the United States was on clear display. On the one hand, UAE officials – from government leaders to investment funds and corporate leaders, were bullish on the United States after the successful visit by President Trump's to the region a few weeks ago. The UAE announced a $10 billion collaboration on artificial intelligence with the United States - officially to build modern AI chips and create joint research facilities. In reality, the UAE will be building data centers for US companies, subsidizing the energy costs of AI, and will receive tech transfer in return. But both sides hope that it leads to greater research collaboration down the line.
On the other hand, the 500 exhibitors at the event – manufacturers of everything from autos to food products, were not talking about US markets. They were talking about expansion towards Asia – (South Asia, East Asia and Australia), and towards Eastern Europe, Turkey and the Central Asian republics. The most common refrain was that the United States might changes the rules in the middle of the game – and that's if they even get visas to do business.
Financiers line up to support UAE Manufacturing
Alongside manufacturers, the banking and financial sectors had a strong presence, including home-grown fintech's providing a range of services to consumers and business. These were not just government-backed entities, but also consumer-facing fintechs, vendor financing arms and family offices.
An interesting startup that has been rapidly growing in the UAE is amana, a fintech company with over 350,000 users and rapid recent growth. Founded in 2022 by Zaid Aboujeh and Karim Farra, a Wharton MBA and YPO member, amana is an online platform for trading stocks, crypto and other assets. When US tariffs were announced, traders flocked to its site to quickly adjust their portfolios; benefiting from the ability to balance their portfolios across multiple assets, including crypto, in one platform – an opportunity not available historically to many in the region. With uncertainty in the mainstream economy, it's not a surprise that crypto trading has been a key growth driver this year as well. amana has over 450 coins available for trading and investing - with 68% of amana's active traders engaging in crypto alongside other assets, while 20% trade only crypto.
In a region that has long limited access to capital to the connected, elite and certain national groups– amana and others are democratizing market access and providing services for a rapidly growing financial ecosystem. The UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other countries in the region have two advantages that fintech's like amana can take advantage of – a strong digital public infrastructure where most residents are connected electronically, and a large population from South Asia that is very comfortable with online banking and fintech services. Beyond that, amana says that 20% of its usage last year came from Lebanon, and future growth will come from large, emerging markets in the region, including Egypt, Bahrain, Qatar and Jordan.
The Founders of amana
There are other signs that the UAE and other nations are clearly taking advantage of US policy fluctuations to build their own competitive advantages. Dubai and Abu Dhabi have both greatly expanded their free trade zones to attract businesses from other nations hit by the Trump tariffs. If a company can legitimately establish itself in the UAE, it can bypass harsh Trump tariffs and access UAE government-backed financing for business creation, expansion and manufacturing. For most businesses seeking access to global markets, this is really a win-win.
As immigration policies tighten in the United States, many highly skilled professionals are exploring opportunities in the Gulf. Countries like the UAE are actively attracting global talent through strategic initiatives such as their AI partnership with the US – designed to support advanced research in state-of-the-art facilities. For many researchers, especially in nearby hubs like Bangalore, the Gulf offers both proximity and access to cutting-edge infrastructure without the barriers often faced when seeking entry into the US.
The growth of startups like amana, the investments in the manufacturing and tech sectors, alongside free trade zones and an improved financial ecosystem suggest a country, and region, committed to growth. Similar growth is occurring across the GCC, including Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The implications for the United States may not be much at first glance. The Trump Administration has backed off on tariffs just as fast as its announced them in many cases. As a result, the UAE and other nations may not have time to launch all of these efforts to take advantage of US policy – there may be a completely different policy in place in 4 months and certainly again in 3 years. But that uncertainty makes the investment all the more critical for them and concerning to the United States.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla 確認解散 Dojo AI 超級電腦團隊,集中火力推 AI5/AI6 晶片
Tesla 確認解散 Dojo AI 超級電腦團隊,集中火力推 AI5/AI6 晶片

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla 確認解散 Dojo AI 超級電腦團隊,集中火力推 AI5/AI6 晶片

L'amministratore delegato di Tesla Elon Musk sale su un'auto Tesla mentre lascia un hotel a Pechino, in Cina, il 31 maggio 2023. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang Elon Musk 在 X 發文確認 Bloomberg 早前爆料指 Tesla 已經解散內部 Dojo AI 超級電腦團隊的消息,同時解釋指因為 AI5、AI6 推理晶片的表現已經足夠好,而且易於訓練,所以不必要分散公司資源到開發設計不一樣的晶片。就如早前 Elon Musk 自己所透露,AI5 和 AI6 晶片會分別由 TSMC 和 Samsung 生產,後者更會有深度合作。 Dojo 曾被視為 Tesla 全自動駕駛(FSD)及 Optimus 人形機械人背後的關鍵運算平台,負責從海量車載影像數據中進行模型訓練。原 Dojo AI 團隊成員在離開 Tesla 後,已經有 20 名核心工程師迅速成立 DensityAI,包括帶領項目的資深工程主管 Peter Bannon,主打 AI 數據中心服務。 廣告 廣告 更多內容: Tesla Disbands Dojo Supercomputer Team, Unwinding Key AI Effort 廣告 廣告 Former Tesla Executives Create Data Center Firm DensityAI Elon Musk 帶錢解救 Samsung 晶片落後困局?Tesla 165 億美元 8 年長約是台積電不會做的讓步 緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠,追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台! 🎉📱 Tech Facebook: 廣告 廣告 🎉📱 Tech Instagram: 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群: 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道: 🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道:

The world's biggest company got caught in the middle of Trump's AI war with China
The world's biggest company got caught in the middle of Trump's AI war with China

CNN

time26 minutes ago

  • CNN

The world's biggest company got caught in the middle of Trump's AI war with China

Nvidia, the world's most valuable company, has found itself caught in the middle of President Donald Trump's historic trade war with China. The result: an extraordinary concession from a $4.5 trillion corporation that will give the United States a percentage of every high-end AI chip sold in China. The deal, which AMD also signed for some of its chips, could split the difference between two competing Trump administration goals: maintain America's AI dominance while securing a critical trade agreement with China. It could also give the White House billions of dollars to spend as it wishes. Nvidia and AMD have agreed to pay the US government 15% of their revenues from semiconductor sales to China in exchange for licenses to export their technology there. The White House in April blocked the export of certain AI chips to China, including Nvidia's H20 chips and AMD's MI308 chips. The deal with the Trump administration allows the companies to obtain export licenses to restart sales of those chips in China, a US official told CNN. The Financial Times first reported the story Sunday. Nvidia previewed the deal last month, when it said it would resume sales of the H20 chip to China after the Trump administration expressed openness to allowing the export of certain AI chips again. But the 15% payment was a surprise. Trump said Nvidia was initially asked to pay a 20% cut, but they negotiated the rate down to 15%. The deal came together after Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang met with President Donald Trump on Wednesday, the official said. Although the export licenses were granted Friday, no shipments have yet been made. 'We follow rules the US government sets for our participation in worldwide markets,' a Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement. 'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide.' AMD has not responded to CNN's request for comment. Governments, including the United States, have taken control of companies in the past when they were considered to be of strategic importance to national security. During the financial crisis in 2009, the United States took control of General Motors and Chrysler, and the proceeds of those stakes went directly into the US Treasury after the government sold them for a profit. But it's not clear that the US government has ever demanded a percentage of a company's business without taking an equity stake – or if it's even legal to do so. The US Constitution forbids taxes on exports. To get around that, the deal's terms have been structured as a voluntary agreement, so it won't be considered a tax or a tariff, a US official said. Instead, Nvidia and AMD will voluntarily send funds to the US government. The companies will have no say whatsoever on how the US government deploys that money after it is sent. 'It's hard to identify any historical precedent for this sort of arrangement,' said Sarah Kreps, law professor and director of the Tech Policy Institute at Cornell University's Brooks School of Public Policy. In recent years, the US government has sought to restrict China's access to advanced American technology in an effort to slow its progress on AI and let the United States get farther ahead. But the White House's reversal on export controls may be an acknowledgement that China is advancing in AI regardless, so American companies might as well be allowed to benefit. It could also give the White House another way to raise revenue for the US government, along with tariffs. 'It seems like there's been some vacillation within the administration about and toward China, and I think that reflects the internal divide within the administration between the China hawks and the economic pragmatists,' Kreps said. 'It seems like increasingly, the economic pragmatists are holding sway.' That approach would align with arguments from Nvidia's Huang, who has said that restricting sales of American AI chips is bad for US national security. Chinese developers could simply undermine US leadership by creating their own alternatives if they can't buy American technology, according to Huang, who has met with Trump repeatedly in recent months. The White House agrees with Huang, believing it's better to have China locked into a US-made chip sold through legitimate channels than to force China to the black market, a US official said. China has been able to subvert existing channels to obtain restricted chips anyway. Big questions remain about where the 15% commission idea emerged and what it could mean for national security. A US official said that the payment allows the administration to maintain control of the export process and bring in revenue for the US government in the process. Still, it's not clear that the penalty for Nvidia and AMD will effectively limit the flow of the chips or erase any potential national security issues. 'If there's a legitimate national security concern about exporting these chips to China, then I don't see how the payments to the US government address those risks. In fact, they don't at all,' said Scott Kennedy, senior adviser and trustee chair in Chinese business and economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'And if there's not a sufficient national security risk or they can be adequately mitigated … then the US government should just get out of the way and expect nothing in return.' Nvidia released the H20 chip last year as a way to maintain access to the Chinese market — which made up 13% of the company's sales in 2024 — in the face of US export controls imposed by the Biden administration. But the chips are widely believed to have contributed to DeepSeek, an advanced Chinese AI model that shook Silicon Valley upon its release earlier this year, raising concerns that China was further ahead on AI than previously understood. After the Trump administration barred H20 sales to China in April, Nvidia said it took billions of dollars in charges and lost revenue because of the export controls in the first quarter and projected a similar outcome in the second quarter. So, even if it has to fork over 15% of those sales to the White House, resuming shipments of the H20 to China could mean billions more dollars in revenue for Nvidia — which became the first publicly traded company to top $4 trillion in valuation last month. Shares of Nvidia (NVDA) rose as much as 0.5% on Monday. Trump on Monday called Nvidia's H20 chip 'obsolete,' saying that China 'already has it in a different form.' But some experts disagree with Trump's characterization of the chips. 'These H20s are still state of the art,' CSIS's Kennedy said. Although they're less advanced, in some ways, than other Nvidia chips, 'they also come with elements that make them extremely sophisticated and valuable,' including their memory capabilities. 'I think suggestions that they are obsolete understate the value to user,' he said. Nvidia likely reasoned that there is enough Chinese demand for the chips to make the 15% commission to the White House a worthwhile trade-off for its business, according to Kreps. 'You have to do a calculation based on what was lost from the export controls,' she said. Trump on Monday left open the possibility that Nvidia could export its super high-end Blackwell chips for a higher price. The Trump administration had closed the door on the export of that technology to China — even after reversing course on the H20. However, Trump on Monday said that he'd consider allowing Nvidia to sell the Blackwell chip. 'The Blackwell is superduper advanced. I wouldn't make a deal with that, although it's possible,' Trump said. 'I'd make a deal a somewhat enhanced in a negative way. Blackwell, in other words, take 30% to 50% off of it, but that's the latest and the greatest in the world. Nobody has it. They won't have it for five years.' Trump said Huang will return to the White House in the future to discuss selling an 'unenhanced' version of Blackwell. 'I think he's coming to see me again about that, but that will be a unenhanced version of the big one,' Trump said. 'You know, we will sometimes sell fighter jets to a country and we'll give them 20% less than we have.' Questions from Beijing about the security of American AI chips also raise uncertainty about just how successful Trump's commission policy could be. China could choose not to buy US tech firm Nvidia's H20 chips, the social media account Yuyuan Tantian, which is affiliated with state broadcaster CCTV, said on Sunday. It claimed that the chips could have 'backdoors' that impact their function and security, following previous similar claims from China's cybersecurity administration. Nvidia has repeatedly denied that its products have backdoors. However, that statement could be less an indication that China won't buy American chips and more a signal to Chinese tech companies to continue innovating in semiconductors even if US shipments do resume, Kennedy said. For the Trump administration, the cost-benefit analysis is that it opens up the flow of mid-tier chips to China while giving the administration a key bargaining chip in its ongoing trade talks, a US official said. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called Nvidia export controls a 'negotiating chip' in the larger US-China trade talks. But China knows that, and its posturing over supposed security concerns with the H20 chip this weekend suggests that it won't be won over so easily — even if it wants the chips for its market.

China and Russia have the leverage to disrupt Trump's dealmaking
China and Russia have the leverage to disrupt Trump's dealmaking

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

China and Russia have the leverage to disrupt Trump's dealmaking

President Trump is planning to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin potentially this week in the Alaska. The topic is the war in Ukraine and Trump's intention to end the killing there. Obviously, despite what Trump promised during the election, 24 hours was not enough time to reach an agreement. Trump sending his ubiquitous envoy Steve Witkoff to Moscow last week suggests this was the president's initiative and not Putin's. Perhaps Trump did not want his 10-day demand to Putin to end the war to expire without some measure of success. In any event, one can only speculate why Putin accepted the meeting — and it does not appear Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will be part of that meeting, although Trump would be obliged to see him separately. Why Putin agreed has several possible explanations. He may need to end the sanctions for economic reasons. His offensive may have gained his objectives in Ukraine. Or Putin may conclude that as the 2014-2015 Minsk Agreements failed to provide security for Ukraine, a cease-fire will allow him to use what Lenin called 'other means' to gain control of his neighbor. So far, the administration has not claimed that Trump's submarine deployments to 'appropriate places' was a deciding factor in convincing or coercing Putin to meet. U.S. submarines have been operating in proximity to the former Soviet Union and now Russia since the Cold War began. On a few occasions, operations were inside Soviet territorial waters. Trump did threaten North Korea's Kim Jong Un with 'fire and fury,' claiming his button — meaning the nuclear trigger — was bigger than Kim's. After this clash of rhetoric, both met twice. But nothing occurred other than Trump's claim that he 'fell in love' with the ' Little Rocket Man.' Did U.S. submarines have the same effect on Putin? At Trump's disposal as commander in chief is the U.S. Navy's fleet of 68 nuclear submarines. Fourteen are Ohio class armed with 7,500 mile range Trident ballistic missiles. Four are able to carry up to 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles with a 1,000 mile range. Fifty are attack boats carrying torpedoes and cruise missiles. How two submarines could get Putin's attention is not clear. Russia has complained mightily when Tomahawk-armed U.S. warships sailed within 1,000 miles of Putin's physical location. But there is no obvious advantage in using Ohio class submarines as a signal, given the range of its Trident missiles. Missile and attack submarines could deploy in proximity to major Russian naval bases in the Kola peninsula in the Arctic or Petropavlovsk in the Pacific. But presumably, U.S. submarines are already there. The Baltic is too confined and shallow for nuclear submarine operations. The Mediterranean Sea is more suitable but gives no strategic advantage. The Black Sea is closed to all submarines not belonging to the littoral states; and the transit of surface warships is restricted by the Montreux Convention. So did the submarines make a difference? Who knows? Sanctions have not seemed to affect Putin's behavior. Russia has deftly shifted selling about half its oil exports to China and India. Trump has imposed sanctions on India but not China yet. Putin knows that Trump-imposed secondary sanctions on China is a double-edged sword. China has not been impressed by Trump's ' liberation day ' threat of tariffs and secondary sanctions. Why? The reason is due to which nation is more dependent on the other — China on the U.S. or the U.S. on China. China has withheld certain rare earth elements from the U.S. on which U.S. companies depend. China has additional assets to leverage. And why would China not seek to poach U.S. exports to other markets? India has less clout than China. A tariff war will drive India closer to China and away from the Quad, which comprises the U.S., Japan, Australia and India. None of this will be in American interests. And there is a worse case. Suppose China and India do cut off energy imports from Russia. Where will they turn? The U.S. cannot make up the difference yet. Increases in demand could drive the price of oil through the proverbial roof, causing a recession or worse. Does Trump understand these realities? Or does he not care? So what leverage does Trump have over Putin, and Putin over Trump? Putin knows Trump wants to end the war. Is Putin seeking a 2025 version of the infamous 1938 Munich Agreement in which United Kingdom Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain sought 'peace for our time' or a real solution? Knowing Putin, you have the answer. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He and former United Kingdom Defense Chief David Richards are the authors of a forthcoming book on preventing strategic catastrophe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store