‘10k unrecognised schools operating in Bihar, Jharkhand'
Over 10,000 unrecognised school are operational in Jharkhand and Bihar, with over 1.6 million students enrolled in those schools, in violation of the Right to Education Act, data from the minutes of a recent Project Approval Board (PAB) meeting of the education ministry has shown.
With 5,879 such schools, Jharkhand has the highest number of unrecognised schools in the country with an enrolment of 837,897 students and 46,421 teachers, the data showed, while Bihar has 4,915 such schools with an enrolment of 775,704 students and 42,377 teachers.
The observation came during PAB meetings for the approval of budget and plans under Samagra Shiksha scheme for 2025-26 with officials from all states between March and April 2025.
During the meeting, the ministry flagged that unrecognised schools violate section 19 of the RTE Act, 2009, which mandates pre-existing schools to meet prescribed norms within three years of the Act's commencement. Unrecognised schools are private, unaided institutions operating without formal government recognition and regulatory frameworks.
'The Act also mandates that if such schools fail to fulfil the norms, the recognition shall be withdrawn, and the school shall cease to function,' the minutes of the meetings uploaded on ministry's website recently said.
Further, the ministry has both states to 'take action and issue suitable instructions to the concerned authorities to recognise these unrecognised schools or to take appropriate action as deemed fit at the earliest.'
While the ministry used data from the Unified District Information System for Education (UDISE)+ 2023-24 report, these records are not publicly available in the report which was released in January this year.
While officials in the education ministry did not respond to HT's request for comment, an official in Jharkhand said that directions for appropriate action have already been issued to the schools.
'These [Unrecognised] schools started functioning before the implementation of RTE Act 2009. The state government has already issued directions for recognition of such schools. We have formed district-level recognition committees for recognition of such schools,' Sachidanand Diyendu Tigga, administrative officer at Jharkhand education project council, said.
According to the minutes of the PAB meetings, the ministry has also flagged 'large variation' in reporting of data about out-of-school children (OoSC) by Bihar and Jharkhand on the education ministry's Project Appraisal, Budgeting, Achievements and Data Handling System (PRABANDH) portal and the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) survey.
The ministry advised both the states to 'monitor the data uploaded on the portal by responsible officer under the supervision of the State Project Director (SPD).'
'We will look into discrepancies in the number of OoSCs. We are running the campaign 'back to school' to enroll those students who are not going to the schools,' Tigga said.
HT reached out to officials from the Bihar Education Project Council, but was yet to receive any response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Coimbatore man gets double life term, 16 years of RI for raping elderly Dalit woman in 2022
The Special Court for the trial of cases registered under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in Coimbatore on Tuesday awarded 16 years of rigorous imprisonment (RI) and double life imprisonment to a 42-year-old man from Kinathukadavu in the district for raping an elderly Dalit woman in 2022. Judge K. Vivekananthan awarded the punishment to M. Velusamy, a daily wage labourer from a village near Kinathukadavu. Velusamy, who belongs to a dominant caste, was arrested for raping a 65-year-old Dalit woman from the village on June 26, 2022. He committed the crime when the woman went out in search of fodder for goats. As per the First Information Report (FIR), Velusamy also assaulted the woman when she resisted the rape attempt. While Velusamy escaped after the crime, the woman managed to walk to the nearest bus stop, where she fainted. After identifying the woman in unconscious state, a villager informed her grandson, who rushed her to the Primary Health Centre (PHC) at Kinathukadavu. Sensing the gravity of the crime and the health condition of the woman, the PHC authorities referred her to the District Headquarters Hospital in Pollachi. S. Amutha, the then inspector of the All Women Police Station (AWPS), Perur, reached the hospital after being alerted about the crime and recorded the woman's statement. The court found Velusamy guilty and awarded him seven years of rigorous imprisonment for offence under Section 325 (punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt) of the Indian Penal Code. He was awarded another seven years of RI for offences under Section 325 IPC read with 3 (2) (Va) of SC/ST) of SC/ST Act. He was sentenced to undergo two years of RI for 506 (i) (criminal intimidation). The court awarded life imprisonment to the accused for offence under Section 376 (1) of IPC and another life term for offence under Section 376 (1) read with 3(2) (v) of SC/ST Act. The convict was ordered to undergo the two life terms concurrently, after undergoing the 16 years of rigorous imprisonment for other offences consecutively. He was slapped with a total fine of ₹32,000.
Indian Express
30 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Daily subject-wise quiz: Polity and Governance MCQs on public servant, Governor of State and more (Week 113)
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative of daily subject-wise quizzes. These quizzes are designed to help you revise some of the most important topics from the static part of the syllabus. Attempt today's subject quiz on Polity and Governance to check your progress. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for May 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at Consider the following statements: 1. The President of India appoints him and has a special procedure for removal (like a Supreme Court Judge). 2. His salary and expenses are charged (not voted) to the Consolidated Fund of India. 3. He is not allowed to hold any other Government office after his term expires. The above mentioned statements refer to: (a) Attorney General of India (b) Comptroller and Auditor General of India (c) Chief Economic Advisor (d) National Security Advisor Explanation — The Constitution enables the independent and unbiased nature of audit by the CAG by providing for: (i) His appointment by the President of India (ii) Special procedure for removal (like a Supreme Court Judge) (iii) Salary and expenses Charged (not Voted) to the Consolidated Fund of India (iv) Disallowing his holding any other Government office after his term expires. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer. (Source: With reference to the number of Lok Sabha seats fixed at various censuses, consider the following pairs: 1. 1951 Census – 494 seats 2. 1971 Census – 522 seats 3. 2001 Census – 543 seats How many of the pairs given above are correctly marked? (a) Only one (b) Only two (c) All three (d) None Explanation — The number of constituencies in Parliament and state assemblies is changed to reflect the most recent population figures, ensuring that the number of Indians represented by an MP/MLA remains fairly constant. (The notion of 'one citizen, one vote, one value' established by Article 81.) — According to the 1971 Census, the number of Lok Sabha seats was fixed at 543, implying that each MP represented around one million Indians. (The number of Lok Sabha seats was previously fixed at 494 and 522 following the censuses of 1951 and 1961, respectively.) — The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, passed by the Emergency government to manage India's population, froze the number of Lok Sabha seats until the first Census after 2000. — In 2002, the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government extended the freeze until at least 2026. Therefore, option (a) is the correct answer. According to the Lokayukta Act, the 'public servant' is defined as any person who is or has been a chairperson, member, officer, or employee: 1. in any autonomous body established by an Act of Parliament 2. in a body which is wholly financed by the Central Government 3. as a Judges 4. in a body which is partially financed or controlled by the Central Government Select the correct answer using the codes given below: (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 2 and 4 only (c) 1, 2 and 3 (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4 Explanation — According to the Lokayukta Act, 'It shall apply to public servants in and outside India'. Section 14 of the Act defines 'public servant' as 'any person who is or has been a chairperson, member, officer, or employee in any autonomous body established by an Act of Parliament, wholly or partly financed by the Central Government or controlled by it.' While judges are not explicitly mentioned, sub-section (f) includes them. — The Lokpal is an independent statutory body under the aegis of the executive. — The Lokpal panel, chaired by former Supreme Court judge A.M. Khanwilkar, ruled on January 27 that it has the authority to consider corruption accusations against former judges under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 (Lokpal Act). Admitting its January 27 ruling could have created a new path for complaints against judges, without following the previously established process for such matters. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer. If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant. Which of the following is not computed while calculating 60 days? 1. When the House is prorogued 2. When the House is adjourned for more than four consecutive days Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Explanation — 'If for a period of sixty days a member of either House of Parliament is without permission of the House absent from all meetings thereof, the House may declare his seat vacant: Provided that in computing the said period of sixty days no account shall be taken of any period during which the House is prorogued or is adjourned for more than four consecutive days.' — In other words, the 60-day period pertains only to the House's sittings, not all of the days, and does not include any instances where the House was adjourned for longer than four days. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer. Which of the following statements about the Governor of an Indian State is correct? (a) The Governor must be a citizen of India and should have completed the age of 30 years. (b) The Constitution lays down provisions for the manner in which the Governor and the state must engage. (c) There is an impeachment process for removing the Governor. (d) The qualifications and conditions of the office are mentioned in the constitution. Explanation — The Article 153 of the Constitution says 'There shall be a Governor for each State.' A few years after the commencement of the Constitution, an amendment in 1956 laid down that 'nothing in this article shall prevent the appointment of the same person as Governor for two or more States'. — Article 155 says that the 'Governor of a State shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal'. Under Article 156, 'the Governor shall hold office during the pleasure of the President', but his normal term of office will be five years. If the President withdraws her pleasure before the completion of five years, the Governor has to step down. — Since the President acts on the aid and advice of the Prime Minister and the Union Council of Ministers, in effect, the Governor is appointed and removed by the central government. There is no impeachment process for removing the Governor. — Article 157 lays down the qualifications of the Governor, The Governor must be a citizen of India and should have completed the age of 35 years. — Article 158 lays down the conditions of his office, The Governor should not be a member of Parliament or a state legislature, and must not hold any other office of profit. — The Governor enjoys certain powers under the Constitution — such as giving or withholding assent to a Bill passed by the state legislature; determining the time needed for a party to prove its majority in the state Assembly; or, in cases such as a hung verdict in an election, which party must be called first to prove its majority — which make his position very significant. — The Constitution lays down no provisions for the manner in which the Governor and the state must engage publicly when there is a difference of opinion and there is no provision for impeaching the Governor. Therefore, option (d) is the correct answer. Consider the following with reference to the Constitution of India: 1. On November 26, 1949, the Constituent Assembly of India adopted the Constitution of India. 2. The Constitution of India came into effect on January 26, 1950, which we celebrate as Republic Day. 3. The Constituent Assembly met for the first time on December 9, 1946. 4. In 2015, the Government of India declared December 9 as Constitution Day. How many statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 and 2 only (b) 1, 2 and 3 only (c) 3 and 4 only (d) 1, 2, 3 and 4 Explanation: — The Constituent Assembly met for the first time on December 9, 1946. — On November 26, 1949, the Constituent Assembly of India adopted the Constitution of India. It came into effect on January 26, 1950, which we celebrate as Republic Day. In 2015, the Government of India declared November 26 — hitherto known as National Law Day — as Constitution Day. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer. Which of the following are Constitutional Bodies of India? 1. Special officer for Linguistic Minorities 2. National Commission for Minorities 3. National Commission for Backward Classes 4. National Commission for Scheduled Tribes 5. National Commission for Scheduled Castes Select the correct code: (a) 1, 2, 4 and 5 only (b) 1, 3, 4 and 5 only (c) 3, 4 and 5 only (d) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 Explanation: — Constitutional bodies are institutions or authorities whose powers, duties, and structures are explicitly defined in the Constitution. Their roles extend beyond mere administrative functions, as they are designed to serve as checks and balances on governmental power. — Apart from constitutional bodies, there are statutory bodies that play a vital role in strengthening our democracy. Statutory bodies are institutions established by an act of Parliament or state legislatures, deriving their authority from legislation rather than directly from the Constitution. — The National Commission for Minorities was set up as a statutory body with the enactment of the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992 by the Parliament. Therefore, option (b) is the correct answer. With reference to Lily Thomas vs Union Of India & Ors., consider the following statements: this case the Supreme Court declared sub-section (4) of Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which allowed convicted members of legislative bodies a 3 month time period for appeal against the conviction and sentencing, as ultra vires the Constitution. 2. The Court ruled that Members of Parliament and State Legislatures convicted of crimes where they had been awarded a minimum sentence of 2 years imprisonment would cease to be members of the house to which they were elected from the date of sentencing. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 Explanation: — As per Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act of 1951, conviction of a lawmaker for an offence with a two-year sentence or more leads to disqualification from the House. — Section 8(4) of the RPA said that the disqualification takes effect only 'after three months have elapsed' from the date of conviction. Within that period, the convicted lawmaker could have filed an appeal against the sentence before a higher court. — However, this provision was struck down as 'unconstitutional' in the Supreme Court's landmark 2013 ruling in 'Lily Thomas v Union of India'. — On July 10, 2013, a bench of Justices AK Patnaik and SJ Mukhopadhaya of the Apex Court held that 'Parliament had no power to enact sub-section (4) of Section 8 of the Act and accordingly sub-section (4) of Section 8 of the Act is ultra vires the Constitution.' — The Court also held that if any sitting member of Parliament or State Legislature is convicted of any offence under sub-section (1), (2), and (3) of Section 8, RPA, then 'by virtue of such conviction and/or sentence' they will be disqualified. The court added that a convicted parliamentarian or legislator's membership will no longer be protected by Section 8 (4), as was previously the case. — The Court on an examination of other provisions in the Constitution that deal with disqualification of a lawmaker held that the Constitution 'expressly prohibits' Parliament to defer the date from which a disqualification would come into effect. Therefore, option (c) is the correct answer. Daily Subject-wise quiz — History, Culture, and Social Issues (Week 113) Daily subject-wise quiz — Polity and Governance (Week 112) Daily subject-wise quiz — Science and Technology (Week 112) Daily subject-wise quiz — Economy (Week 112) Daily subject-wise quiz — Environment and Geography (Week 112) Daily subject-wise quiz – International Relations (Week 112) Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Delhi High Court Allows Family Of Minor Sex Abuse Survivor To Close Case
New Delhi: The Delhi High Court quashed a Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act case after the survivor and her family requested the court to close the case as they were seeking a marriage prospect for the girl and now wish to move on. While quashing the case, the court has directed the accused to do community service for a month at Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital, while also asking him to pay Rs 50,000 towards "Army Welfare Fund Battle Casualties". The court noted that ordinarily, allegations of this nature, particularly those involving the sexual harassment of a minor, would not merit quashing. The accused, along with another minor boy (recognised as child in conflict with the law), had blackmailed the minor girl with her private pictures, which she had shared with the accused during their relationship in school. The accused, who was her senior in school, had allegedly extorted money from the girl. It was alleged that after the accused shared her pictures with another schoolmate of hers, he (child in conflict with law) hacked her Instagram and uploaded her private pictures on her account. The court noted that the allegations against the accused are serious, involving the harassment of a minor girl through exploitation. "The facts narrated disclose a pattern emblematic of the darker undercurrents of the social media age, where technology is misused to exert control, induce fear, and compromise dignity. Considering this, at the outset, the Court was not inclined to quash the FIR in a perfunctory manner. However, after a detailed and careful interaction with the complainant and her mother, it emerged that they have consciously chosen to move on from the incident," the order read. The high court noted that the survivor's parents said that the complainant is currently exploring matrimonial prospects, and that the pendency of a criminal case may pose as a serious impediment to her future opportunities and personal relationships. "Her mother specifically submitted that ongoing criminal proceedings of this nature are likely to create social stigma and could undermine the family's efforts to secure a suitable match for the complainant," the order read. A bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula quashed the case, stating that, "It is true that while offences under Sections 354, 354C, 384 of the IPC and Section 12 of the POCSO Act are classified as non-compoundable, those under Sections 506 and 509 IPC are compoundable with the permission of the Court, being offences affecting an identifiable individual." "However, the law is equally cognizant of the victim's right to privacy, dignity, and closure. In appropriate cases, the Court, while exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 of the BNSS (earlier Section 482 CrPC), may quash proceedings involving non-compoundable offences where the parties have voluntarily and meaningfully settled the dispute, and where the continuation of the prosecution would serve no useful purpose and would instead prolong trauma," the order read. The FIR was registered for the offences under Sections 354, 354C, 506, 509, 384 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. A settlement deed was entered into between the parties, as per which the complainant voluntarily resolved all her disputes with the accused and agreed to give no-objection to the quashing of the FIR. It was recorded that she had neither received any monetary compensation from the accused, nor intended to claim any.
