AI is changing our world. At what point will it change our reality?
A Pakistani crowd set fire to a Hindu temple. Chinese researchers experimented with a bat in a wet lab. An election worker donning a gay pride pin shredded election ballots. Palestinians are gratefully accepting U.S. aid in Gaza.
All these events were caught on video, yet none is real. These videos are a result of a Time magazine analysis of Google's new Veo 3 artificial intelligence video model, a powerful new AI tool making 8-second videos that are uncomfortably realistic.
AI videos have existed for years now, but this is on an entirely new plane, one that proves we've climbed out of the uncanny valley and summited a higher, scarier peak. While these videos are still clockable as AI, the technology will only get better, making it even more difficult to determine what's real and what's fake.
In an age where misinformation already runs rampant, the line separating fact from fiction has become a blur. Advancements in AI will only erase it further by proliferating false realities until we find ourselves in a post-truth society.
Post-truth refers to a situation where facts are no longer important in contemporary political and public debate. The concept is not so much used to suggest that the truth does not exist, but that facts have become secondary to our political point of view, according to ScienceDirect.
By the time our social media feeds are littered with AI videos of political candidates saying things they never said and fake news moments pushing agendas to sway public opinion, it will be far too late. By then, the truth, the facts and reality itself will become secondary, a problem we're already seeing in education.
Opinion: As a college professor, I see how AI is stripping away the humanity in education
A generation of critical nonthinkers
A New York article recently dug into AI's place in education and how many students are relying on AI to do all of their schoolwork. Capitalism has turned higher education into a means to an end, the latter being a high-paying job (hopefully). Students have no desire to pursue knowledge; they're fine with letting AI work and think for them.
A generation averse to critical thought is primed to fall for AI trickery. It's scary to think that higher education, a place once conducive to the development of critical thought, problem-solving skills and creativity, is being infiltrated by a singular mechanism that undoes its very foundation.
And what's to say of these students when they exit the four-year microcosm that is college after cheating their way through? Will pre-med students turn to ChatGPT to diagnose patients? Will future lawyers use AI to summarize cases and form arguments?
Opinion: Is it me or ChatGPT? As AI grows smarter, I have a down-to-earth worry ‒ my job.
AI not only invades political and educational spaces, but it chips away at our humanity in our most isolated, insular and vulnerable moments.
AI therapy gaslights
ChatGPT and other dedicated AI therapy chatbots have become a low-cost, accessible option for those seeking mental health assistance as our culture wrestles with loneliness and isolation. But computerized AI is not meant to offer meaningful support for the minutiae of human emotion. Behavior that rests on AI's unfounded ability to grasp our humanity leads to outcomes that range from futile to detrimental.
A 14-year-old boy died by suicide after becoming emotionally dependent on an AI chatbot. ChatGPT convinced a man with past mental health diagnoses that he had fallen in love with an AI entity named Juliet. When confronted with the truth, he became violent, resulting in his being killed by police. His father used ChatGPT to write his obituary.
Cases like these seem to be more common, paired with less deadly but equally unnerving impacts of AI use, like falling down rabbit holes of spiritual mania and unfounded clairvoyance.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store.
These scenarios all share similarities in that victims are gaslit to believe AI is a sentient being that understands them on a deeper level. They fall prey to confirmation bias and the spiritual psychosis that follows. The false reality spewed by AI becomes their all-encompassing truth.
The way AI is discussed makes it seem like this is a necessary outcome, that there is nothing anyone can do to stop people from falling down AI's deadly rabbit hole of misinformation. Technological determinism posits that advancements in technology, including advancements in AI, are an inevitable process independent of human or societal interference.
But who exactly benefits from leaving such a dangerous tool of misinformation unchecked? What is gained from blurring the line between fact and fiction? We aren't hapless figures in a false simulation, despite efforts to make that our new reality.
Kofi Mframa is a columnist and digital producer for USA Today and the USA TODAY Network.
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Nvidia's China return buys time for Beijing to boost its chip drive
As semiconductors have become a geopolitical hot potato over the past few years, it's no surprise that Nvidia , the leader in artificial intelligence-related chips, has been caught up in escalating tensions between the U.S. and China. When Nvidia returned to the China market last week , seemingly with the blessing of Washington, it sparked debate over the strategic implications for the U.S.' dominance in AI and China's own focus on boosting its domestic chip and tech industry. For the U.S., Nvidia's return could help cement American strength in AI globally, experts told CNBC. For China, it could buy the country time as it continues on its own path to build Nvidia rivals and keep pace with AI software development. It's a tricky relationship, underscoring the strategic importance of the graphics processing units (GPUs) that Nvidia designs and that currently underpin the world's AI. "The relationship is symbiotic but I do believe China needs the U.S. technology more at this moment in time," Daniel Newman, CEO of Futurum, told CNBC's "The China Connection" last week. Nvidia's warnings Earlier this year, the U.S. government restricted exports of Nvidia's H20 chip to China. The product, a less-advanced version of Nvidia's leading hardware, had been created to comply with previous U.S. export restrictions. Washington has expressed concerned that these chips could be used in areas such as advancing the Chinese military and China's own AI industry. Nvidia took a $4.5 billion writedown on the unsold inventory and warned the China restrictions could impact billions of dollars of potential sales. Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia, has been critical of export curbs . He has said it would be a "tremendous loss" for Nvidia not to participate in China and that rival Huawei would be able to fulfil the needs of the country in its absence. Huang has argued that the restrictions could boost China's domestic semiconductor industry and that it risks eroding America's technological edge. That message appears to have got through to the White House. Nvidia said last week that it received backing from the U.S. government to resume sales of H20 in China. How the move will benefit the U.S. From a business perspective, Nvidia is expected to gain. But for Washington, the move is more strategic. "We want to keep having the Chinese use the American technology stack, because they still rely upon it," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC last week. Nvidia has managed to gain a formidable position in the market for semiconductors required to train and run AI applications, not just because of its hardware but also because of the popularity of its software platform known as CUDA, that developers build on. This creates an "ecosystem" around Nvidia's products which has proven sticky for its users. The return of the H20 to the world's second-largest economy will "buy China time" to boost its domestic industry, according to Pranay Kotasthane, deputy director at the Takshashila Institution. "But it will also buy the U.S. companies some respite. China is Nvidia's largest market and is home to 50 per cent of AI developers according to Jensen Huang. If that path is completely closed, American firms like Nvidia will find it difficult to raise revenues and re-invest them in the next round of research and development," Kotasthane said. "It might be justifiable to restrain access to the most advanced chips but to expand the scope of the restrictions doesn't make strategic sense." China domestic chips in focus Huawei has been China's leading player in developing AI-focused chips. The country's technology companies are using some of Huawei's hardware but the firm has yet to overtake the dominance of Nvidia's latest chips. One possible outcome is that U.S. export curbs will accelerate China's domestic efforts. China has been looking to boost its domestic semiconductor industry with a particular focus on AI chips. There are a whole host of startups working on new products in the country. Nvidia's return to China could slowdown that progress. "If Nvidia's chips are made available to Chinese firms, it could weaken momentum behind domestic chip projects, cut off capital, and delay progress in domestic Chinese hardware. This retains U.S. tech influence over global AI rails," Tejas Dessai, director of research at Global X ETFs, told CNBC by email. Ultimately, it all goes back to Nvidia's software which keeps developers locked into its hardware. "Chinese model developers still prefer to use Nvidia hardware, because the domestic alternative AI stack, particularly the software development environment from Huawei is still difficult to use and lacks the depth and flexibility of Nvidia's offering," Paul Triolo, a partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, told CNBC by email. Can China catch up to Nvidia? Still, China's direction of travel and its quest for domestic providers of AI chips is unlikely to change. "Eventually Chinese AI model developers will have to transitions to a domestic AI stack," Triolo said. Nvidia's chips have proved very effective at training huge AI models that require massive amounts of data to be processed. The actual running of those AI model in products like chatbots is known as inferencing. This process may require a different type of chip, which Chinese tech giants as well as startups are working on. "In chips, China's opportunity could come when the focus shifts to inference. That's when demand for lower cost, efficient processors could scale, and we believe custom chip programs from big Chinese tech companies could ultimately serve that demand," Dessai of Global X ETFs said.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
It's way past time for Mayor Adams to lift the NYPD bans on facial-ID tech
New York City's bans on facial-recognition tech have got to go. The charges that were dropped against Zuhdi Ahmed prove that. Ahmed was a pro-Palestinian protester accused of throwing a rock at a pro-Israel counter-demonstrator. Yet a judge ruled that he can't be charged because cops used prohibited AI facial-recognition tech (a tip provided by a FDNY fire marshal in response to a Crimestoppers post) to nail him. Let's be clear: There's nothing wrong with such tools in the pursuit of justice. In this case, FDNY fire investigators did what they always do — they shared crimefighting information with their colleagues. Yet Judge Valentina 'Let-'em-go' Morales deemed that detectives ran afoul of departmental guidelines in using information obtained by a city fire marshal who was investigating the burning of an Israeli flag at the protest and turned up publicly sourced photos of Ahmed at high school social events. Per The City, the Legal Aid Society filed suit targeting the FDNY's use of Clearview AI's facial-recognition software in previous investigations. Bad enough the NYPD is banned from using such tech; but banning its use outside the department is just bonkers, ensuring that perps who could otherwise be made to pay for their crimes simply won't. Plus, under the department's facial-recognition guidelines implemented in 2020, NYPD investigators are limited to searches of arrest and parole photos. In 2019, NYPD's facial-recognition software helped ID the mystery man who left a pair of rice-cooker bombs in the subway. The man, Larry Griffin II was ID'd before the devices were found to be fakes. Nor is this a matter of government spying or a breach of privacy: Cameras are all over the place these days, and pictures of people fill up the internet. Meanwhile, facial-recognition tech — in combination with AI — is evolving and improving as an effective investigative tool. Mayor Eric Adams needs to lift the ban pronto.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
The painful road to freedom: A North Korean escapee's story
July 21 (UPI) --The following account was presented by Jihyang Kim at a recent forum of the North Korean Young Leaders' Assembly held at the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation in Washington, D.C. The assembly is an annual event gathering young North Korean escapees to engage with the U.S. executive and congressional branches, think tanks and NGOs. My name is Jihyang Kim. I escaped from North Korea in the spring of 2012, when I was 19 years old. Today, I stand before you not only as a Fulbright scholar pursuing my master's degree in the United States, but also as a survivor -- and a witness -- of the brutal realities of life under a communist regime. I want to share with you how the ideology of communism stripped me and millions of others of our basic rights, dignity, and dreams. 1: North Korea - A life determined by the state Growing up under North Korea's totalitarian rule, I was taught that the state came before the individual, that loyalty to the regime was more important than personal dreams and that questioning the system was dangerous. As a young girl, I dreamed of becoming a novelist. I was fascinated by literature and wanted to study Japanese to read detective novels in their original language. Despite being the top student in my class, I couldn't apply for the language school because my family couldn't afford the required bribe. In North Korea, merit is meaningless without political loyalty or financial backing. This was my first clear experience of how the system worked -- not for the people, but against them. The promise of equality under communism was a lie. Instead, I saw corruption, oppression and injustice. That cognitive dissonance planted the seed of rebellion in me. I began to question the system I had been raised to worship. The second turning point came in 2009, when the North Korean regime implemented a disastrous currency reform. Overnight, our savings became worthless. I still remember seeing the old bills scattered in the market like trash. Inflation soared and food vanished. My family starved. I lie on the cold floor, too weak to move, and decided to risk everything for a chance at life. I realized if I stayed, I would die, anyway, not with dignity, but in silence. 2: China - Escaping the regime, entering another cage Crossing the border into China did not mean freedom. It meant becoming stateless -- an invisible person with no rights, no protection and no home. I was no longer hungry, but I was no longer human, either. The Chinese government does not recognize North Korean defectors as refugees, so we are hunted like criminals, deported if caught. I became one of the many North Korean women sold into forced marriages, treated as property and silenced through violence. At 19, I watched university students -- my peers-- walk past me in the streets. I didn't envy their clothes or phones. I envied their freedom to dream. I heard villagers joke about "buying" North Korean brides and brag about beating them if they tried to escape. I lived in fear, not only for myself, but for my baby. I became a mother in China, but I could not offer my son legal protection, education or safety. I was a mother in name, but powerless in reality. 3: Still trapped in the system's shadows Today, I'm grateful. I am studying in the United States, supported by countless people who believe in me. But I have not forgotten the millions still trapped under the same system that nearly destroyed me. North Korea's regime continues to control every aspect of its citizens' lives: movement, thoughts, speech, even love. In China, over 10,000 North Korean women remain trapped in forced relationships, their human rights violated daily (North Korea Human Rights Information Center, 2023). In 2017, South Korean news media reported that 20% of these women are forced into online sexual exploitation. Worse still, around 10,000 children born to these undocumented women have no legal identity. They cannot go to school, receive medical care or even prove their existence. These are not isolated tragedies. These are the long shadows cast by communist authoritarianism. 4: Why this matters People often ask me why I risked my life to escape. My answer is simple: because I wanted to live with dignity. Under communism, I was denied that right. The ideology promised equality, but delivered only fear, hunger and silence. It punished ambition, crushed individuality and destroyed families. What I experienced is not just a personal story -- it is a warning. Communism, when weaponized by dictatorship, erases the human spirit. It uses beautiful words like "justice" and "equality" to hide systems of control and cruelty. I am no longer a voiceless girl hiding in a dark room. I am here to speak for those who still cannot. I am here to tell you that the victims of communism are not just numbers in a textbook. They are children who starve, women who are sold and dreamers who are silenced. I survived. And now, I speak -- not because I am brave, but because silence is complicity. Thank you. Jihyang Kim, a North Korean escapee and Fulbright scholar, was born in Hyesan, Ryanggang Province. She escaped from North Korea in 2012, driven by the famine and skyrocketing inflation that followed the country's disastrous currency reform. After fleeing to China, where she lived as a non-person and suffered exploitation for several years, she managed to reach South Korea in 2016. Despite only having an elementary education, Jihyang excelled academically in South Korea, earning numerous awards. In college, she championed social integration between South Koreans and North Korean escapees. Jihyang is passionate about education, which she believes is the foundation for personal and community transformation. She is preparing for the opportunity to empower North Korean youth with high-quality, democratic education after reunification. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
