Huge car brand recalls 120,000 vehicles over ‘risk of injury' – check if you're affected
The huge recall affects one of the biggest car brands in the world and thousands of drivers are expected to be affected.
3
3
Chrysler's parent company, Stellantis, issued the recall after receiving a warning from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
The NHTSA had warned that the brand's vehicles had head constraints which did not lock properly.
Also, the NHTSA warned that there was an increased risk of injury to 'seat occupants' during a crash.
Stellantis are now in the process of recalling a staggering 121,398.
The Sun has contacted both Stellantis and the NHTSA for comment.
Neither has confirmed which models will be affected by the recall now being rolled out across America.
Stellantis was formed in 2021, when the French mega-giant PSA Group merged with Fiat Chrsyler Automobiles.
Chrysler itself was founded in 1925 and has become one of the most famous American carmakers in the world.
The brand was so successful that its former head, Walter Chrysler, commissioned the iconic Chrysler Building.
Chrysler's current owner Stellantis is also the owner of Fiat, Peugeot, Citroën and Jeep.
The company reported losses of £2 billion in 2025, following Donald Trump's international tariff war.
Stellantis has claimed the US President's extortionate levies had cost it more than £260million.
It experiences a six per cent decline in shipments across the globe, after Stellantis halted production in North America in April - shortly after the tariffs were announced.
Antonio Filosa has vowed to "throw the kitchen sink" at restructuring the company though, as Chief Financial Officer Doug Ostermann told analysts that its losses could get worse before they get better.
He said: "We'll see significantly more in the second half unless things change.
"Given the current outlook, I would expect to see that figure probably double in the second half or more."
The news comes after Japanese carmaker Nissan announced plans to shut down two of its huge plants.
Nissan is closing its Civac plant in Morelos and the Cooperation Manufacturing Plant Aguascalientes - putting thousands of jobs at risk.
The car manufacturer is battling with rising costs, as well as Donald Trump's international tariff war.
As it grapples with spiralling debt, the company has announced its global restructuring plan named Re: Nissan.
A spokesperson for Nissan said: 'Under Re:Nissan, Nissan is currently reviewing the integration and closure of some of its global production sites.
"However, this process has not yet been concluded beyond the three sites that have been announced so far.
"We are committed to maintaining transparency with our stakeholders and if any decisions are made, we will provide information at the appropriate time."
3
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump pushes rate cut as Fed meets, second quarter data released
WASHINGTON, July 30 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Wednesday again called on the Federal Reserve to lower benchmark rates after data showed U.S. economic growth rebounded more than expected in the second quarter. "2Q GDP JUST OUT: 3%, WAY BETTER THAN EXPECTED! 'Too Late' MUST NOW LOWER THE RATE. No Inflation! Let people buy, and refinance, their homes!" Trump wrote on Truth Social as the central bank prepared to release its policy statement.
Geeky Gadgets
22 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
ChatGPT Agent Alternative Deep Agent : Which AI Tool is Right for You?
What if the AI tool you rely on isn't the best fit for your needs? With the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, choosing the right solution can feel like navigating a maze. Take, for instance, the growing debate between ChatGPT Agent and its rising competitor, Deep Agent. Both promise to transform workflows, but their strengths and weaknesses reveal a deeper story. While one excels at crafting polished presentations and dynamic apps, the other shines in delivering detailed insights and transparency. The question is: which one aligns with your goals? This report dives into the nuances of these two tools, offering clarity in a space where innovation often outpaces understanding. In the video below World of AI takes you through how these AI agents perform in critical areas like PowerPoint generation, AI app development, and real-time financial data aggregation. You'll also gain insights into their cost structures and overall efficiency, helping you make an informed choice. Whether you're a professional seeking high-quality visuals, a developer building engaging apps, or a financial analyst prioritizing data accuracy, this comparison highlights the trade-offs that matter most. By the end, you may find that the best tool isn't just about features—it's about how well it adapts to your unique needs. ChatGPT Agent vs Deep Agent PowerPoint Generation: Speed and Quality Matter Creating professional presentations requires a balance between speed and quality. In this domain, Deep Agent consistently delivers superior results. It produces polished, visually engaging slides that incorporate detailed research, graphs, and cohesive designs. Its ability to seamlessly integrate data into presentations ensures a professional and impactful outcome, making it a reliable choice for users seeking high-quality visuals and content. In comparison, ChatGPT Agent struggles to match this level of sophistication. While it can generate functional presentations, the slides often lack visual depth and structural coherence. The absence of detailed visual elements and limited data integration makes its output less compelling for professional or high-stakes use. For users prioritizing presentation quality, Deep Agent offers a clear advantage. AI App Development: Functionality and Engagement When it comes to developing AI-powered applications, the performance gap between the two tools becomes more pronounced. Deep Agent demonstrates remarkable versatility by creating fully functional apps with interactive features, animations, and comprehensive user experiences. For instance, it successfully developed a fitness app that included workout plans, engaging design elements, and seamless navigation, showcasing its ability to handle complex development tasks. On the other hand, ChatGPT Agent is capable of completing app development tasks but often delivers basic outputs. Its apps tend to lack advanced functionality, interactivity, and design sophistication. This limitation may pose challenges for users seeking robust and engaging app solutions. For those requiring more dynamic and user-friendly applications, Deep Agent proves to be the more capable tool. ChatGPT Agent Alternative Watch this video on YouTube. Here are more guides from our previous articles and guides related to AI task automation that you may find helpful. Real-Time Financial Data Aggregation: Depth vs. Accuracy Both tools bring unique strengths to real-time financial data aggregation, but their approaches differ significantly. ChatGPT Agent excels in providing detailed insights, including sections on top gainers, losers, key headlines, and token unlocks. It also includes source links, making sure transparency and reliability. This makes it an excellent choice for users who prioritize comprehensive and well-sourced financial information. In contrast, Deep Agent focuses on delivering precise but narrower data. While its output is accurate, it lacks the depth and breadth of insights offered by ChatGPT Agent. For users requiring extensive financial analysis or a broader scope of information, this limitation may be a deciding factor. However, for those who value accuracy over volume, Deep Agent remains a viable option. Cost and Accessibility: Evaluating Value Cost is a critical consideration when choosing an AI tool, and the pricing models of these two options differ significantly. ChatGPT Agent operates on a tiered subscription model, with the Plus plan priced at $20 per month and the Pro plan at $200 per month. However, the Plus plan offers limited access, which may restrict its usability for users with more demanding needs. In contrast, Deep Agent provides a single subscription plan priced at $10 per month, which includes access to additional tools like Chat LM and Code LM. This all-inclusive plan enhances its overall value, making it a more affordable solution for budget-conscious users. For those seeking a cost-effective option without sacrificing functionality, Deep Agent stands out as the better choice. Overall Performance: Efficiency and Versatility When evaluating overall performance, Deep Agent emerges as the more efficient and versatile option. Its ability to execute tasks faster, deliver higher-quality results, and integrate additional AI tools makes it a standout choice for a wide range of applications. While ChatGPT Agent excels in sourcing content and providing detailed insights, its limitations in execution, adaptability, and cost structure may deter some users. Ultimately, the choice between these two tools depends on your specific needs. For users prioritizing speed, quality, and affordability, Deep Agent offers a clear advantage. However, for those who require detailed content sourcing and comprehensive insights, ChatGPT Agent remains a strong contender. Media Credit: WorldofAI Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Taylor Wimpey slumps to loss on £222m fire safety hit
Taylor Wimpey has plunged to a half-year loss after taking another £222 million cost hit for removing cladding from high-rise buildings following the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy. The housebuilder reported pre-tax losses of £92.1 million for the six months to June 29 against profits of £99.7 million a year earlier. It said this was largely due to an extra £222.2 million provision for fire safety measures. The company also said full-year earnings would be lower than expected at £424 million after taking an unexpected £20 million charge for historical defective work by a former contractor. Experts at AJ Bell said the latest cladding cost has seen Taylor Wimpey's total bill swell to more than £550 million in the wake of the Grenfell fire in 2017, which killed 72 people. They estimated the cost to FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 housebuilders had now reached more than £3.5 billion. Large housebuilders agreed in 2022 to pay to fix cladding issues on their properties following public and political pressure. Taylor Wimpey's shares fell 5% on Thursday after its interim results laid bare the impact of the costs. Jennie Daly, chief executive of Taylor, said: 'The safety of our customers remains our highest priority – this principle has consistently guided our approach, and we have increased our cladding fire safety provision to reflect findings from updated fire risk assessments and investigations in the first half.' The group said it was also pushed to a loss by an £18 million payout after an investigation into information sharing in the sector by the UK competition watchdog. Taylor was one of seven builders that recently agreed to pay a record £100 million between them as part of a package of commitments to address concerns following the probe by the Competition and Markets Authority into whether they shared commercially sensitive information. In its latest results, Taylor said it saw 'softer' market conditions in the second quarter as affordability continues to hamper demand, particularly from first-time buyers. 'While affordability remains constrained, particularly amongst first-time buyers, lenders remain committed to the UK mortgage market and long-term fundamentals are positive, with significant unmet need for UK housing,' Ms Daly said.
