A ‘click-to-cancel' rule, intended to make canceling subscriptions easier, is blocked
The Federal Trade Commission's proposed changes, adopted in October, required businesses to obtain a customer's consent before charging for memberships, auto-renewals and programs linked to free trial offers.
The FTC said at the time that businesses must also disclose when free trials or other promotional offers will end and let customers cancel recurring subscriptions as easily as they started them.
The administration of President Joe Biden included the FTC's proposal as part of its 'Time is Money' initiative, a governmentwide effort that was announced last year with the aim of cracking down on consumer-related hassles.
The FTC rule was set to go into effect on Monday, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit said this week that the FTC made a procedural error by failing to come up with a preliminary regulatory analysis, which is required for rules whose annual impact on the U.S. economy is more than $100 million.
The FTC argued that it did not have to come up with a preliminary regulatory analysis because it initially determined that the rule's impact on the national economy would be less than $100 million. An administrative law judge decided that the economic impact would be more than the $100 million threshold.
The court decided to vacate, or set aside, the rule.
'While we certainly do not endorse the use of unfair and deceptive practices in negative option marketing, the procedural deficiencies of the Commission's rulemaking process are fatal here,' the court wrote.
The FTC declined to comment on Wednesday.
trial involving Amazon's Prime program. The trial stems from a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit that accused Amazon of enrolling consumers in its Prime program without their consent and making it difficult for them to cancel their subscriptions.
The trial is expected to take place next year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
2024 book review: Trump, Biden, Harris and a turbulent election full of what-ifs
Donald Trump is on a roll. The 'big, beautiful bill' is law. Ice, his paramilitary immigration force, rivals foreign armies for size and funding. Democrats stand demoralized and divided. 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America, by Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf, is a book for these times: aptly named, deeply sourced. Kamala Harris declined to speak. Joe Biden criticized his successor in a brief phone call, then balked. Trump talked, of course. 'If that didn't happen … I think I would've won, but it might have been a little bit closer,' he says of the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, which set the race alight. Yet 2024 is about more than the horse race. It also chronicles how the elites unintentionally made Trump's restoration possible, despite a torrent of criminal charges against him, 34 resulting in convictions, and civil lawsuits that saw him fined hundreds of millions of dollars. 'Trump always drew his strength from decades of pent-up frustration with the American democratic system's failures to address the hardships and problems the people experienced in their daily lives,' Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf write. 'In 2024, [Trump's] supporters saw institutions stacked against them … leading them to identify viscerally with his legal ordeal, even though they had not experienced anything like it before.' Dawsey is a Pulitzer prize winner, working political investigations and enterprise for the Wall Street Journal. Pager covers the White House for the New York Times. Arnsdorf was part of the Washington Post team that won a Pulitzer for coverage of the assassination attempt. Dawsey and Pager are Post alumni. With Arnsdorf, they capture the aspirations and delusions of Trump and the pretenders to his Republican throne, of Biden and Harris too. 'In the weeks after the election, Biden repeatedly told allies that he could have won if he'd stayed in the race,' 2024 reports, 'even as he publicly questioned whether he could have served another four years.' Really? Biden's approval rating fell below 50% in August 2021 and never recovered. From October 2023, he trailed Trump. A year out, the authors reveal, Barack Obama warned his former vice-president's staff: 'Your campaign is a mess.' Biden's aides privately derided Obama as 'a prick'. 'They thought he and his inner circle had constantly disrespected and mistreated Biden, despite his loyal service as vice-president.' As for Harris, Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf report that she 'knew that the race would be close, but she really thought she would win'. Despite that, David Plouffe, a senior Harris adviser, admitted post-election that internal polls never showed her leading. 'I think it surprised people because there were these public polls that came out in late September, early October, showing us with leads that we never saw,' he said. Harris's debate win never moved the needle. Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf contend that the outcome was not foreordained. Rather, they raise a series of plausible-enough 'what-ifs'. One is: 'If the Democrats got clobbered, as expected, in the 2022 midterms, and Joe Biden never ran for re-election.' Except, by early 2022, according to This Shall Not Pass, a campaign book published that year, Biden saw himself as a cross between FDR and Obama. A telephone conversation between Biden and Abigail Spanberger, a moderate congresswoman now the Democratic candidate for governor in Virginia, captures Biden's self-perception. 'This is President Roosevelt,' Biden begins, before thanking Spanberger for her sense of humor. She replies: 'I'm glad you have a sense of humor, Mr President.' Back to 2024. Biden bristled at being challenged. Pushback risked being equated with disloyalty. His closest advisers were either family members or dependent on him for their livelihoods. He lacked social peers with incomes and personages of their own. Mike Donilon, a longtime aide, tells the authors: 'It was an act of insanity by the Democratic leadership to have forced Biden out. 'Tell me why you walked away from a guy with 81m votes … A native of [swing-state] Pennsylvania. Why do that?' Because Biden's debate performance was a gobsmacking disaster. He also found navigating the stairs of Air Force One difficult and needed prompts to find the podium. In May 2025, Biden announced that he had been diagnosed with stage-four prostate cancer – a disclosure that came after 2024 went to press. The authors of 2024 pose Republican hypotheticals too. One: 'If Trump never got indicted, or if Republicans didn't respond by rallying to him, or if the prosecutions were more successful.' Ron DeSantis, Florida's governor, demonstrated a lack of nerve. Glaringly, he failed to use the initial E Jean Carroll trial, over the writer's allegation that Trump sexually assaulted her, to bolster his presidential ambitions. DeSantis didn't dispatch his wife, Casey DeSantis, to Manhattan to offer daily thoughts and prayers for the plaintiff, or for Melania Trump. If you want to be the man, first you've got to beat the man. Another hypothetical: 'If Trump and Biden didn't agree to an early debate …' That question hangs over everything. Trump's pronouncements leave Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf anxious. After the 2022 midterms, he mused about terminating the constitution. Later, on the campaign trail, he spoke openly of being a 'dictator for a day'. When he was back in the West Wing, reporters asked: 'Are you a dictator on day one?' 'No,' he replied. 'I can't imagine even being called that.' Dawsey, Pager and Arnsdorf then catalog Trump's unilateral actions on that first day, including stripping political opponents of security clearances. Later that month, he commenced his vendetta against law firms he deemed to be enemies. In February, Trump barred the Associated Press from the White House press pool unless the news agency referred to the Gulf of Mexico as the 'Gulf of America'. 2024 contains no mention of Hungary's Viktor Orbán. Perhaps it should have made space. Hungary's leader is an autocrat in all but name, an elected leader who has removed freedoms regardless. Republicans adore him. 2024 is published in the US by Penguin Random House
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Click to cancel subscription rule blocked in federal court
A new law requiring businesses to make it easy for consumers to cancel their subscriptions has been blocked by a federal appeals court. The 'click to cancel' rule, proposed by the The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), was set to go into effect on Monday. The law would have required businesses to obtain a consumer's consent before charging for memberships, auto-renewals and programs linked to free trial offers. Businesses would also have had to disclose when free trials or other promotional offers end and let customers cancel recurring subscriptions as easily as they started them. Joe Biden 's administration incorporated the FTC's proposal under its 'Time Is Money' initiative that sought to improve protections for consumers. The court which struck down the law said the FTC had not followed the required process for rules whose annual impact on the US economy is more than $100 million. The FTC claimed that it did not have to come up with the preliminary regulatory analysis because it initially determined that the rule's impact on the national economy would be less than $100 million. However, an administrative law judge decided that the economic impact would exceed the threshold. 'While we certainly do not endorse the use of unfair and deceptive practices in negative option marketing, the procedural deficiencies of the Commission's rule-making process are fatal here,' the court said. The FTC is currently moving forward with its preparations for a trial involving Amazon's Prime program over subscription issues. The trial comes after the agency filed a lawsuit against Amazon accusing it of enrolling consumers in its Prime program without their consent and making it difficult for them to cancel their subscriptions. The trial is expected to take place next year. The FTC is also taking on Mark Zuckerberg's Meta empire, accusing it of committing anti-trust violations when it bought up rivals as a way to preserve its power and increase its bottom line. If the judge rules against Zuckerberg, the 40-year-old could see his $1.3 trillion business empire broken into pieces. In a frantic attempt to save his corporation, Zuckerberg has turned to the President, visiting the White House three times. The tech tycoon and his aides met with Trump, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles and other administration officials as part of his lobbying campaign, the Wall Street Journal reported.
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
US online spending surges $24.1 billion as steep discounts boost sales, Adobe says
July 12 (Reuters) - Online spending soared $24.1 billion across U.S. retailers during the stretch from July 8 to 11 – dubbed "Black Friday in Summer", outpacing Adobe Analytics' prior forecast, as eager shoppers rushed to snap up deep discounts on back-to-school essentials. Retailers recorded online sales growth of 30.3% during events that included Amazon Prime Day, Adobe said on Saturday, compared with its projections of 28.4%. Online retail sales in the U.S. rose 11% to $14.2 billion a year ago. The Prime Day event has also been cemented as a "back-to-school" shopping moment, as consumers jumped on early deals to stock up on essentials and get ahead of the back-to-school rush, Adobe said. Several major retailers including e-commerce giant (AMZN.O), opens new tab, Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab, Target (TGT.N), opens new tab as well as Best Buy (BBY.N), opens new tab have been launching deal events with strong discounts, encouraging shoppers to trade up on expensive items they might normally pass on. extended its sales window to 96 hours, up from the typical 48, featuring aggressive promotions on categories ranging from apparel to electronics. A wave of enticing deals comes at a time when heightened trade tensions amid the Trump administration's volatile tariff policies have rattled consumers and businesses, and as the new August 1 deadline for countries to renegotiate trade agreements with the United States looms. According to the report, shopping on mobile was the dominant transaction channel during the Prime Day event, driving 53.2% of online sales, above Adobe's forecast of 52.5%. According to Adobe, overall discounts across U.S. retailers were between 11% and 24%, compared with the prior forecast range of 10% to 24%. Apparel had the biggest deals at 24%, compared with 20% last year, while electronics were at 23%, similar to last year.
