logo
Trump administration set to scrap landmark finding that regulates carbon emission

Trump administration set to scrap landmark finding that regulates carbon emission

BBC Newsa day ago
The Trump administration is set to announce a plan to scrap a landmark finding that greenhouse gases are harmful to the environment, severely curbing the federal government's ability to combat climate change. Known as the "Endangerment Finding", the 2009 order from then-President Barack Obama allowed the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to create rules to limit pollution by setting emissions standards. The US is a major contributor to global climate change, and ranks second only to China which emits more planet-warming gases like carbon dioxide – and the US still emits more per person.Experts have warned that the move could have a devastating impact on the environment.
EPA administrator Lee Zeldin is expected to formally make the announcement at an event in Indiana alongside Governor Mike Braun on Tuesday afternoon.President Donald Trump has long argued that climate regulations stifle US economic growth, and on his first day back in office in January ordered that the EPA submit recommendations "on the legality and continuing applicability" of the Endangerment Finding.The Endangerment Finding stemmed from a 2007 Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that greenhouse gases are "air pollutants" - meaning that the EPA has the authority and responsibility to regulate them under the US Clean Air Act. In 2009, the EPA made an official decision, the Endangerment Finding, which found that greenhouse gas emissions from sources such as cars, power plants and factories cause climate change and could pose a public health risk. The decision forms the core of the federal government's authority to impose limits on carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases.Speaking in an episode of the conservative "Ruthless" podcast released on Tuesday, EPA administrator Zeldin said the move was "basically driving a dagger into the heart of the climate change religion".Zeldin said that emissions standards were a "distraction" and that the policy change was "an economic issue". "Repealing it will be the largest deregulatory action in the history of America," he said. In a previous statement on reconsidering the findings in March, Zeldin said that "the Trump Administration will not sacrifice national prosperity, energy security, and the freedom of our people for an agenda that throttles our industries, our mobility, and our consumer choice while benefiting adversaries overseas."The new draft rule from the EPA will now go undergo a public comment period before being subject to an interagency review. If it is successful, the rule will immediately revoke rules governing tailpipe emissions from vehicles. What is climate change? A really simple guideThe EPA's move is likely to face legal challenges, and some experts have questioned whether the administration's decision will make it through the courts at all. But Richard Revesz, the former administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Biden administration and a law professor at New York University, told the Washington Post that the announcement will still have an impact on US climate change policies until a final decision is made in the court system. "If the endangerment finding fell, it would call into question essentially all or almost all of EPA's regulation of greenhouse gases," he said. (With additional reporting from Mark Poynting)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump appellate court nominee defends comments on 'gender roles'
Trump appellate court nominee defends comments on 'gender roles'

Reuters

time23 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump appellate court nominee defends comments on 'gender roles'

July 30 (Reuters) - A former clerk to a pair of conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices who was nominated by President Donald Trump to become a federal appeals court judge on Wednesday defended past comments criticizing "radical feminists' for trying to 'blur gender roles" and "undermine institutions like marriage." Eric Tung, a partner at the law firm Jones Day, was grilled by Democratic members of the Republican-led U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee about those and other comments as the panel weighed his nomination to become a life-tenured judge on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The panel also heard from three other judicial nominees, including Joshua Dunlap, a Maine litigator with a track record of pursuing Republican-backed court cases who is Trump's nominee to serve on the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. But the sharpest questions were directed at Tung, who Democratic Senator Alex Padilla of California said was picked by Trump because of his "extreme conservative ideology and his associations with the conservative Federalist Society." Tung, who is based in Los Angeles, is a former law clerk to both Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in 2016, and described himself as an avowed originalist and textualist, the favored legal doctrines of judicial conservatives. Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, the panel's chair, called Tung "a stand out appellate lawyer" and "a great choice to serve on the 9th Circuit." Padilla and Senator Dick Durbin, the panel's top Democrat, zeroed in on remarks attributed to Tung by Yale's student newspaper when he was an undergraduate student in 2004 criticizing a speech by the then head of the feminist organization the National Organization for Women. 'I believe in emphasizing family and what it means for a woman to be a good wife or partner," Tung was quoted as saying. 'I believe in gender roles and that women are simply better than men at some things. When these radical feminists try to blur gender roles, they undermine institutions like marriage — institutions which hold society together." Padilla, who said the White House spurned his recommendation to nominate two other Republicans to a California-based seat on the 9th Circuit vacancy instead of Tung, called those comments "reprehensible" and pressed him on whether he believed men were better than women. Tung responded that he made the comments "over 20 years ago when I was an undergraduate in college." He cited his wife's own professional and political career history as he said she "is better at many things and not just some things than I am." He told Durbin he made those remarks because he found the speaker's views "extreme" and "because I believed at the time that the relationship between men and women was complementary and that the family should be strengthened." Durbin said the quote "wasn't a youthful indiscretion." He pointed to remarks Tung drafted for a recent Federalist Society event where he said "whether there's a constitutional right to abortion, same-sex marriage, sodomy ... the answer for the originalist is simple: no." "You seem to be questioning landmark Supreme Court decisions like Lawrence v. Texas and Obergefell," Durbin said. "Let me ask you point blank. Do you believe there's a constitutional right to marriage for same-sex couples?" Tung responded that the Supreme Court in its 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges recognized a constitutional right to marry for same-sex couples, "and as a circuit judge, if I were so lucky to be confirmed, I would be bound by that precedent." He declined to address his current views on gender roles, saying it was an issue that could come before him as a judge. Read more: Republican US Senator Grassley clashes with Trump over nominations Trump names two new nominees to serve as appeals court judges

Kamala Harris announces she will not run for governor of California
Kamala Harris announces she will not run for governor of California

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Kamala Harris announces she will not run for governor of California

Kamala Harris, the former vice-president and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, announced on Wednesday that she will not run for governor of California – a highly anticipated decision that leaves the contest to lead the country's largest blue state wide open. 'After deep reflection, I've decided that I will not run for Governor in this election,' Harris said in a statement, ending months of speculation about whether she might enter the race filled with lesser-known aspirants. Harris, who previously served as California's attorney general and US senator, offered few details about her future plans but promised to share more 'in the months ahead'. 'For now, my leadership – and public service – will not be in elected office,' she said, leaving the door open for a future bid. 'I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly, and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans.' Her looming decision had in effect paralyzed the race to replace the term-limited Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, with early polling suggesting she was Californians' top choice. The Harris-less race to lead the nation's largest blue state will now take place in a political landscape dramatically reshaped by her loss to Donald Trump in November, which plunged the party into a period of paralysis and soul-searching. In the months since, the Democratic base has grown increasingly furious with its old guard, demanding fresh leadership and a more combative approach to what they view as Trump's increasingly authoritarian agenda. In a nod to the discontent roiling her party, Harris said: 'We must recognize that our politics, our government, and our institutions have too often failed the American people, culminating in this moment of crisis. As we look ahead, we must be willing to pursue change through new methods and fresh thinking – committed to our same values and principles, but not bound by the same playbook.' The crowded field of Democrats running for governor includes Xavier Becerra, the former attorney general of California who served with Harris in Biden's cabinet as the secretary of health and human services; Antonio Villaraigosa, the former Democratic mayor of Los Angeles; the state's lieutenant governor, Eleni Kounalakis, who is close friends with Harris; and the former representative Katie Porter. The most prominent Republicans in the race are Chad Bianco, the sheriff of Riverside county, and Steve Hilton, the former Fox host and former adviser to then UK prime minister David Cameron. Ric Grenell, a longtime Trump ally, has also toyed with the idea of running. Harris had maintained a relatively low profile since leaving office in January, offering few clues about her political future. In her few public remarks, she vowed to stay engaged in politics and warned that the US was witnessing a 'wholesale abandonment of America's highest ideals' by its president. On Wednesday, Harris again vowed to remain politically engaged. 'We, the People must use our power to fight for freedom, opportunity, fairness, and the dignity of all,' she said. 'I will remain in that fight.'

Trump's feud with central bank continues over interest rates
Trump's feud with central bank continues over interest rates

Channel 4

timean hour ago

  • Channel 4

Trump's feud with central bank continues over interest rates

The battle between President Trump and the Federal Reserve looks set to intensify after the US central bank said tonight it would not cut interest rates. Mr Trump has repeatedly called on the Fed to reduce rates immediately, claiming its chairman Jerome Powell is bad for the economy. Republicans are now questioning Mr Powell's handling of the renovation of Fed buildings, which have gone over budget by millions of dollars.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store