Charles Roven Reflects On Career & Collaborations, Says ‘Road House 2' Likely Starting In September
Veteran producer Charles Roven was here in Taormina this week to pick up an Achievement Award from the festival ahead of a special screening of Zack Snyder's Man of Steel which had originally played the event a dozen years ago.
Roven, whose long list of credits also includes Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy and the filmmaker's Oscar winning 2023 Oppenheimer, as well as Patty Jenkins' Wonder Woman, Terry Gilliam's 12 Monkeys and David O. Russell's American Hustle, got his producing start with Shirley Muldowney biopic Heart Like a Wheel in 1983 and tells us about that experience below in a quick-take reflection on a decades-spanning career, and shares insight into the state of the business.
More from Deadline
Da'Vine Joy Randolph On Emerging Industry "Sisterhood" & Power Of Sharing Info On Salary Talks - Taormina
Michael Douglas, In Taormina To Receive Career Honor, Apologizes For U.S. Role In Ongoing Global Conflicts: "This Is The Worst Time That I Can Ever Remember"
'Thena': First Look At Peter Gold's Gritty Debut Ahead Of Taormina Premiere
Next up on Roven's producing slate is Chris Pratt-starrer Mercy, due in January 2026 via MGM, and Guy Ritchie's Road House 2 with Jake Gyllenhaal which Roven said, 'should be starting in September.'
(The Q&A below has been edited and condensed for clarity.)
Oppenheimer
CHARLES ROVEN: I've had a lot of people tell me that. It fills me with a lot of joy to have been part of making that movie and seeing it come to fruition… From beginning to end, my involvement with that movie was like it was just meant to be.
ROVEN: I'm interested to see what James (Gunn) does. I've known James for a long time. We started working together on the live action Scooby Doo movies. He's a very talented man, and I know he's in the process of trying to reboot the DC Universe to his own vision. And you know, the truth is going to be in the pudding pretty soon (when Gunn's Superman releases next month).
I wish him the best, and I wish Warner Bros the best. I've done many movies with them. It'll be interesting to see what happens when they break the company apart.
DEADLINE: Were you surprised by the news earlier this week that Warner Bros Discovery will split into two entities.
ROVEN: Not really, because I've known for a while, just tracking the business, that the cable companies, while they have a certain level of value… they do some content creation, but not a lot of content creation. They have a lot of revenue that's generated by, you know, the downstream of those, of other things that are created for HBO Max or Warner Bros, or that ultimately come to them. So it may be a good thing.
DEADLINE: How are you feeling about the theatrical business in general these days?
ROVEN: I've seen theatrical ebb and flow, really, over the course of, I think I came into the business, I put the shingle up 'producer,' like in the 70s. The theatrical business was not doing well then, and they were just suffering from big losses on big tentpoles that didn't make any money. And then they started making some, what you would call today an independent movie, and the business came back. And then, of course home entertainment… But then, boom, the theatrical business came back. And then we had COVID, which really hurt the theatrical business — maybe more than that disease needed to because, to be honest, I never heard of anybody getting COVID in a movie theater… So I'm glad that at least, in '23 Barbenheimer helped the business, and I'm really glad to see that now in '25 after a rocky start, there's a lot of box office coming back and it makes me very happy — and the box office is happening both domestically and around the world. I couldn't be happier, and I believe that the theatrical experience is one that people desire.
I'm not saying that streaming isn't good for the business. Creating content is what our business is all about, but I think they can both thrive, and they both should thrive, and one of the things that I'm watching thrive right now is what Amazon is doing, both with their Amazon Prime, but with moving MGM forward. And now, not only have they done an expansion of their theatrical business since Courtenay (Valenti) took over, but also they're moving back into international distribution.
(WATCH) Charles Roven's acceptance speech at Taormina Film Festival He is the recipient of the Taormina Achievement Producer Award pic.twitter.com/O0BlRS9z4w
— Deadline (@DEADLINE) June 11, 2025
DEADLINE: What would you say has been the most pivotal point in your career?
ROVEN: Certainly the first movie. I watched Shirley Muldowney, who was the first woman to ever win a world championship in car racing, and she did it in drag racing, and she did it by actually beating her boyfriend. And I got in my car, I drove down to Pomona. She was packing up all her stuff. I was in my mid 20s, and I said, 'Hi, I'm Chuck Roven, and I'm a film producer and I'd like to option the rights to your life story.' She goes, 'Honey, I just kicked my ex-boyfriend's ass, but I'll tell you, he was also my sponsor. Now I have no money for a ride, so if you can get me money for a ride, you can have the rights to my life.' And I managed her for 10 years…The first one's always memorable.
And, of course, making movies with Chris (Nolan) and Emma (Thomas), the success we've had together is pretty remarkable. Also working with Terry Gilliam on 12 Monkeys. That was my first really big hit, and it was a very special experience. David Russell, working with him has been a special experience. James Gunn, I've been lucky. Zack Snyder, we've done some pretty good things together. Patty Jenkins, the first Wonder Woman — obviously, something that took a while to get made, but turned out great. When I think about Christian Bale, I've done three Batmans, American Hustle. I'm hoping to make another movie with him. He's just amazing. Yeah, I've been really fortunate working with some really, really, very, very talented people in front of the camera, behind the camera.
Best of Deadline
Use The Schwartz!: 'Spaceballs' Movie Photos & Posters
2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
One of the year's best spy thriller movies is finally streaming — and it's perfect for ‘Jason Bourne' fans
I feel like 2025 has been a pretty great year for spy movies. We got the seriously excellent 'Black Bag' in March, and the popcorn thrills of 'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning' are still delighting audiences in the theatre. But good things often come in threes, and this is no exception. 'The Amateur,' a gripping little action-thriller which arrived in cinemas back in April, perhaps didn't get the love it deserves. The critical reception was mixed, but I'm here to argue its merits now that it's finally arrived on premium video-on-demand via platforms including Apple and Amazon. Starring 'Mr. Robot' lead and Oscar-winner Rami Malek, it's an engaging spy flick very much in the mold of the 'Jason Bourne' franchise. However, don't worry: It's a cut above Bourne's most recent secret agent efforts. Plus, it includes one of my favourite action scenes of the year — though sadly, it was completely spoiled in the various trailers, so preview watcher beware! If you're looking to inject a dose of excitement into your weekend or just want to absorb yourself in a thrilling revenge mission, look to 'The Amateur." Based on the Robert Littell novel of the same name, which was previously adapted into a Canadian movie in 1981, 'The Amateur' opens as many action-thrillers do with CIA decoder Charlie Heller (Rami Malek) living a seemingly perfect life with his wife, Sarah (Rachel Brosnahan). When Sarah travels to London, she is murdered in a terrorist attack. Using his own computer wizardry, Charlie identifies those responsible, but is rebuffed by his superiors, and stunned when they refuse to take immediate action. Blackmailing his bosses, he demands to be given expert training at a military base and given a license to hunt down the four assailants himself. New to the spy game, Charlie finds himself in way over his head as he travels across the globe to find the men who killed his wife. But while he's no sharpshooter, his knack for outsmarting his enemies soon becomes his greatest weapon on his revenge mission. Conceptually, 'The Amateur' isn't breaking new ground. Anybody who has seen 2017's 'American Assassin' might get a sense of deja vu about the whole 'man trains as a spy to get revenge for the murder of his girlfriend' narrative, and that's just one example of the trope. It's been used in the genre for decades. But it's a rich well for storytelling that spy media returns to so often for a reason. It's effortlessly compelling. It's very easy to immediately get onboard with Charlie's mission and want to see those responsible for the attack brought to justice. Or at least, what Charlie perceives to be rightful justice. Some critics were scornful of the movie's cold tone, but I found it fitting for both Charlie's detached headspace in the wake of his wife's death and the morally grey world in which he operates. Even his mentor figure, Henderson (Laurence Fishburne), is far from a wisecracking sidekick. It's not a movie full of levity, and it doesn't have to be either. It's very focused, much like Charlie. While the portion that sees Charlie trained up to be at least vaguely competent in the field does drag a little, once he flies off to Paris to begin his quest, the pacing quickens, and it doesn't let up from there. I said there was no levity, but there is an almost comedic element to his first attempted hit as he bumbles his way through his first stab at things. As the movie progresses, Charlie becomes more and more skilled in the role, and by the time he confronts one of his wife's killers at a rooftop pool in Madrid, he's ruthless. It's this scene, which sees him execute a well-staged plan that marks the movie's high point, and it's a shame its culmination is so thoroughly spoiled in the trailer. The focus on brains instead of brawn is probably my favorite aspect of 'The Amateur.' Charlie quickly realizes he can't outmuscle his enemies, or outgun them, but he can outmanoeuvre them. This leads to several thrilling sequences when you think Charlie has been backed into a corner, only for him to reveal he was pulling the puppet strings all along. While the overarching international conspiracy plot does require viewers to suspend their disbelief quite often, the gritty and grounded tone reminds me of the 'Jason Bourne' franchise more than the slightly cheesy suave spy escapade you might find in the 'James Bond' movies. As somebody who's always preferred the former (yes, even as a Brit), that's a win in my books. 'The Amateur' was no flop with critics, but it wasn't a darling either. It currently holds a 61% score on Rotten Tomatoes, enough for a fresh rating, but only just. The site's 'Critics Consensus' reads, 'Rami Malek is a compellingly unconventional action hero in the otherwise formulaic The Amateur, which dispenses justice with solid execution but a curious lack of emotional stakes. However, chalk this one up as another case where viewers were impressed than the critics. 'The Amateur' holds an 88% score on the RT Popcornmeter. Some of the user's recent reviews describe it as 'perfect,' 'thrilling' and 'entertaining'. I certainly wouldn't go as far as to label it flawless, but I certainly agree with the latter two statements. If you enjoy a good spy movie or just can't get enough of action-thrillers (which seem to be all the rage in the streaming world these days), consider giving 'The Amateur' a watch. With a strong leading performance from Malek and some highly suspenseful scenes, it's pretty darn gripping. Not totally sold on "The Amateur"? Here's a roundup of all the top new movies arriving on streaming this week, which offers plenty of extra choices with flicks to suit every mood and taste in cinema.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni to ‘March Forward' With Blake Lively Legal Battle After $400 Million Defamation Suit Thrown Out: Facts Are ‘on Our Side'
Justin Baldoni plans to keep at his legal battle with 'It Ends With Us' co-star Blake Lively after a judge dismissed his $400 million defamation lawsuit against her and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. 'Ms. Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling,' Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman said in a statement to Variety. 'While the court dismissed the defamation related claims, the court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations. This case is about false accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation and a nonexistent smear campaign, which Ms. Lively's own team conveniently describes as 'untraceable' because they cannot prove what never happened.' More from Variety Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Defamation Suit Against Blake Lively Judge Rules Blake Lively's Emotional Distress Claims Against Justin Baldoni Are Officially Dead Blake Lively Abandons Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress Freedman's statement continued, 'Most importantly, Ms. Lively's own claims are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking. We are grateful for the organic show of support from the public and for the dedication of the Internet sleuth community who continue to cover the case with discernment and integrity.' On Monday, a judge tossed out the entire lawsuit filed by Baldoni that accused Lively and Reynolds of extortion and other claims. Judge Lewis J. Liman, who found that Lively's accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected and therefore immune from suit, allowed Baldoni to amend and refile a couple of allegations regarding interference with contracts. Baldoni's lawsuit against The New York Times, which Baldoni claimed had conspired with Lively and Reynolds to destroy his career with false allegations, was also dismissed. 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the court saw right through it,' Lively's lawyers said on June 9 after the dismissal. 'We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni […] and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' Lively has sued Baldoni in federal court for sexual harassment and retaliation, alleging the director and producers of 'It Ends With Us' launched a smear campaign against her after she complained about the conditions on the film's set. A trial on Lively's complaint against Baldoni and his company, Wayfarer Studios, has been set for March 2026. Best of Variety 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Defamation Suit Against Blake Lively
A judge on Monday dismissed Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation claim against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, finding that her accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected and therefore immune from suit. Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed Baldoni's entire lawsuit — which also alleged extortion and other claims — but allowed him to amend and refile a couple of allegations regarding interference with contracts. More from Variety Judge Rules Blake Lively's Emotional Distress Claims Against Justin Baldoni Are Officially Dead Blake Lively Abandons Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress Taylor Swift Excluded From Baldoni-Lively Narrative, as Subpoena Is Withdrawn 'Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times,' Lively's lawyers said in a statement. 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' Lively has sued Baldoni in federal court for sexual harassment and retaliation, alleging that he and the producers of 'It Ends With Us' launched a smear campaign against her after she complained about conditions on the set of the film. Baldoni brought the defamation claim against the New York Times, Lively, Reynolds, and their publicist, alleging that they had conspired to destroy his career with false allegations. In his ruling on Monday, Liman found that initial claims — first made in a complaint to the California Civil Rights Department and shared with the Times — were covered by the litigation privilege, which immunizes legal claims from defamation actions. The Times' reporting on the claims was also protected under the 'fair report' privilege, which allows media outlets to cover legal proceedings without incurring defamation liability. Best of Variety 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week Emmy Predictions: Animated Program — Can Netflix Score Big With 'Arcane,' 'Devil May Cry' and the Final Season of 'Big Mouth?'
