logo
Family hubs to be rolled out across every council in England

Family hubs to be rolled out across every council in England

Independent06-07-2025
Family hubs offering parenting support and youth services are set to be rolled out across every council in England, ministers have announced.
The Department for Education is putting £500 million targeted at disadvantaged communities into the scheme, to put a Best Start family hub in every local authority by April 2026.
The Education Secretary has said that the scheme will 'give a lifeline' to families.
Family hubs were originally rolled out across 75 local authorities at the start of 2024 by the then-Conservative government.
Officials say that the hubs will be rolled out in every local authority by April 2026, and there will be expanded so there are up to 1,000 of them by the end of 2028.
Among the services available at the locations will be birth registration, debt advice, midwifery services and support for parents who are separating or have separated.
Officials hope that the spaces will also provide families access to other services and social care.
Bridget Phillipson said: 'It's the driving mission of this government to break the link between a child's background and what they go on to achieve – our new Best Start family hubs will put the first building blocks of better life chances in place for more children.
'I saw firsthand how initiatives like Sure Start helped level the playing field in my own community, transforming the lives of children by putting in place family support in the earliest years of life, and as part of our plan for change, we're building on its legacy for the next generation of children.
'Making sure hard-working parents are able to benefit from more early help is a promise made, and promise kept – delivering a lifeline of consistent support across the nation, ensuring health, social care and education work in unison to ensure all children get the very best start in life.'
The Conservatives have said that the announcement 'brings little clarity on what's genuinely new and what simply rebrands existing services'.
Shadow education secretary Laura Trott said: 'That lack of clarity is part of a wider pattern.
'This is a Government defined by broken promises and endless U-turns.'
Charity Save The Children has said it is 'pleased' to see the Government 'making it easier for families to get the help they need'.
Dan Paskins, executive director of Policy, Advocacy and Campaigns at Save The Children UK, said: 'Focusing on family services for the under-fives will be vital in securing better outcomes for children, and we welcome the Best Start In Life announcement.
'We know from our work in local communities that bringing together parenting, healthcare and education support services in one place is an approach which works, so we are pleased to see the UK Government making it easier for families to get the help they need.
'With ministers now demonstrating an increasingly ambitious plan for children in the UK, we hope this drive for change continues when the child poverty strategy is released in autumn.
'This must include scrapping the two-child limit to Universal Credit, which is the only meaningful way to reduce the UK's record child poverty rate.'
The head of the NAHT union welcomed the move.
General secretary Paul Whiteman said: 'This is a positive step forward towards ensuring all children get the best start – and we are pleased to see tangible investment following this week's announcement of new targets for school readiness.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How ‘Amazon tax' could save your local pub and community
How ‘Amazon tax' could save your local pub and community

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

How ‘Amazon tax' could save your local pub and community

A new report by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) proposes a tax on wealthy firms, such as Amazon, to fund community regeneration and foster social cohesion. The suggestion follows summer riots, including those in Southport, which the IPPR links to community disrepair and the loss of shared physical spaces. The report highlights a significant decline in community venues across the UK, citing the closure of hundreds of pubs, youth clubs, and local authority spaces. It recommends establishing a '21st-century welfare fund' through higher levies on online retailers' warehouses or an online sales tax, targeting companies with revenues over £1 million. The IPPR argues that rebuilding local infrastructure is vital to combat division and counter the influence of the far-right, which exploits the void left by lost community solidarity.

Stonehenge Tunnel campaigners say the fight isn't over
Stonehenge Tunnel campaigners say the fight isn't over

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Stonehenge Tunnel campaigners say the fight isn't over

One year on from the scrapping of the Stonehenge tunnel, campaigners say the fight is not two-mile (3.2km) scheme along the A303 in Wiltshire had been agreed by the previous Conservative government but was scrapped by Labour after a spending people living in nearby villages like Shrewton said they considered selling their homes due to rising traffic levels caused by motorists avoiding congestion on the A303.A spokesperson for the Department for Transport said it recognised the importance of the A303 and added a new Road Safety Strategy is being developed. A year on from the decision, parish councillor Paul McKernan said he was disappointed the project had not gone ahead."We were within weeks of delivering on a 40-year gestation period for the project."To this day, people around here cannot believe it. How can they simply throw all that effort away."He expressed concern for the summer period, believing up to 12,000 vehicles could use village roads every day to avoid A303 queues. A high volume of traffic on small village roads has sparked safety concerns for those who live and work there. One property in Shrewton had its fence knocked down by a motorist passing through the homeowner said it was caused by a driver coming around an S-bend too fast and mounting the pavement before "taking out the bus stop and the fence". "Somebody is going to get badly hurt here, somebody is going to get killed," said Colin Nufer, who runs the Plume of Feathers pub in High added: "The feeling of the general populous who come in here is that the tunnel needs to come back, it needs to start again and the hope is there." But the proposed tunnel was divisive, with those against it raising concerns it would damage the World Heritage Alliance has been campaigning against the tunnel for the past 30 years. Kate Freeman from the group said the site should be untouchable. She said: "It's truly shocking that a great big gash could have been cut straight through the landscape."She said it was "very disappointing" that the scheme was scrapped due to financial concerns, rather than fears about how it would affect the World Heritage Site."We realise that we still have a mountain to climb," she for alternatives, Mrs Freeman said: "Unesco has already proposed there should be another route further south that should be investigated. Also the villages need strong traffic management. We can't carry on this way."

Liz Kendall faces fresh benefits backlash
Liz Kendall faces fresh benefits backlash

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Liz Kendall faces fresh benefits backlash

Liz Kendall is facing backlash over her planned benefit cuts after MPs warned that slashing universal credit (UC) payments would push more disabled people into poverty. On Tuesday, the influential Work and Pension Committee said it was alarmed by Ms Kendall's proposed changes to UC, which will see top-up payments to new claimants who are disabled halved from £423.27 to £217.26 a month from 2026. The committee, chaired by Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, warned that slashing the benefits risked forcing more disabled people into poverty. The reforms risk reducing payments for people with severe mental health conditions, the committee said, because their condition may not qualify for a full UC payment. Ms Abrahams said that the Government's own analysis showed that the reduction in the UC health top-up payment would push approximately 50,000 people into poverty by the end of the decade. However, Helen Whately, shadow work and pensions secretary, said: 'Politicians should be trying to get welfare spending under control, not handing out even more cash. It's a sobering fact that the British Government spends more on sickness benefits than on defence – this cannot be allowed to continue.' UC is Britain's main benefit and it replaced a myriad of other payments, such as jobseekers' allowance, child tax credits and housing benefits in 2012. Claimants who are disabled can claim a top-up payment in addition to standard UC, but the Government is hoping to change this amid fears too many people are claiming it on spurious grounds. Welfare battle Ms Kendall had been battling rebels from her own party to push through a watered-down version of her welfare reforms. Following a government policy reversal and a series of major concessions to Labour rebels, it eventually passed at the start of the month. As part of her reforms, Ms Kendall, who is the Work and Pensions Secretary, has sought to address Britain's ballooning welfare spending, which is estimated to reach £378bn by 2029-30 – almost double the £210bn paid out to claimants in 2013-14. Yet concessions made to the bill are expected to wipe out a third of the £5bn they had been expected to save taxpayers, piling further pressure on the Treasury. Ms Kendall warned earlier this month that once workers start receiving the health element of UC, only 3pc a year manage to get off the benefit again. Despite this, Ms Abrahams said: 'There are still issues with these welfare reforms, not least with the cut in financial support that newly sick and disabled people will receive.' Ms Abrahams has been a staunch critic of the Government's welfare reforms bill alongside other Labour rebels, including Meg Hillier and Rachael Maskell, who had pushed for changes to the bill. The fallout over the bill is far from over, as Ms Abrahams told Sir Kier Starmer at the Liaison Committee that the 'fear and anxiety' felt by disabled people following the Government's welfare reform bill 'cannot be underestimated'. In a tense exchange between the Left-wing MP and the Prime Minister last week, Ms Abrahams said the reforms were 'far removed from Labour values' and warned that the Government 'must do better'. A recent report from the Office for Budget Responsibility warned that the UK's national debt is on track to spiral from just under 100pc of GDP to 270pc in the next 50 years if nothing is done to reduce the benefits bill. A government spokesman said: 'Our welfare reforms will support those who can work into jobs and ensure there is always a safety net for those that need it. The impact assessment shows our reforms will lift 50,000 children out of poverty – and our additional employment support will lift even more families out of poverty. 'The reforms will rebalance universal credit rates to reduce the perverse incentives that trap people out of work, alongside genuinely helping disabled people and those with long-term health conditions into good, secure work – backed by £3.8bn in employment support over this parliament.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store