Liz Kendall faces fresh benefits backlash
On Tuesday, the influential Work and Pension Committee said it was alarmed by Ms Kendall's proposed changes to UC, which will see top-up payments to new claimants who are disabled halved from £423.27 to £217.26 a month from 2026.
The committee, chaired by Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, warned that slashing the benefits risked forcing more disabled people into poverty. The reforms risk reducing payments for people with severe mental health conditions, the committee said, because their condition may not qualify for a full UC payment.
Ms Abrahams said that the Government's own analysis showed that the reduction in the UC health top-up payment would push approximately 50,000 people into poverty by the end of the decade.
However, Helen Whately, shadow work and pensions secretary, said: 'Politicians should be trying to get welfare spending under control, not handing out even more cash. It's a sobering fact that the British Government spends more on sickness benefits than on defence – this cannot be allowed to continue.'
UC is Britain's main benefit and it replaced a myriad of other payments, such as jobseekers' allowance, child tax credits and housing benefits in 2012.
Claimants who are disabled can claim a top-up payment in addition to standard UC, but the Government is hoping to change this amid fears too many people are claiming it on spurious grounds.
Welfare battle
Ms Kendall had been battling rebels from her own party to push through a watered-down version of her welfare reforms. Following a government policy reversal and a series of major concessions to Labour rebels, it eventually passed at the start of the month.
As part of her reforms, Ms Kendall, who is the Work and Pensions Secretary, has sought to address Britain's ballooning welfare spending, which is estimated to reach £378bn by 2029-30 – almost double the £210bn paid out to claimants in 2013-14.
Yet concessions made to the bill are expected to wipe out a third of the £5bn they had been expected to save taxpayers, piling further pressure on the Treasury.
Ms Kendall warned earlier this month that once workers start receiving the health element of UC, only 3pc a year manage to get off the benefit again.
Despite this, Ms Abrahams said: 'There are still issues with these welfare reforms, not least with the cut in financial support that newly sick and disabled people will receive.'
Ms Abrahams has been a staunch critic of the Government's welfare reforms bill alongside other Labour rebels, including Meg Hillier and Rachael Maskell, who had pushed for changes to the bill.
The fallout over the bill is far from over, as Ms Abrahams told Sir Kier Starmer at the Liaison Committee that the 'fear and anxiety' felt by disabled people following the Government's welfare reform bill 'cannot be underestimated'.
In a tense exchange between the Left-wing MP and the Prime Minister last week, Ms Abrahams said the reforms were 'far removed from Labour values' and warned that the Government 'must do better'.
A recent report from the Office for Budget Responsibility warned that the UK's national debt is on track to spiral from just under 100pc of GDP to 270pc in the next 50 years if nothing is done to reduce the benefits bill.
A government spokesman said: 'Our welfare reforms will support those who can work into jobs and ensure there is always a safety net for those that need it. The impact assessment shows our reforms will lift 50,000 children out of poverty – and our additional employment support will lift even more families out of poverty.
'The reforms will rebalance universal credit rates to reduce the perverse incentives that trap people out of work, alongside genuinely helping disabled people and those with long-term health conditions into good, secure work – backed by £3.8bn in employment support over this parliament.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Lord Kinnock urges Rachel Reeves to launch a VAT raid
Lord Kinnock has urged Rachel Reeves to launch a VAT raid on private healthcare. The former Labour leader said the move would give the NHS 'vital funding' as it looks to slash waiting lists. It is estimated that removing the VAT exemption for private healthcare firms would raise £2 billion – if work the private sector does for the health service is exempt. The Chancellor is looking to fill a black hole of up to £30 billion in her autumn budget as economic growth remains sluggish and recent u-turns on welfare reform and winter fuel need to be paid for. Labour promised in its manifesto not to raise the headline rate of income tax, national insurance or VAT, but has applied VAT to private school fees. The party has already been accused of breaking the pledge by hiking employers' national insurance in the last budget, but a raid on private healthcare could get the Chancellor around the commitment by not raising the headline rate. Lord Kinnock, who lost two general elections for his party, told the i newspaper: 'Introducing VAT on private health provision could provide vital funding for the NHS and social care. 'After 14 years of underinvestment, many people are turning to private healthcare not out of choice, but because they cannot afford to wait. This has increasingly led to unequal access to care. 'Ending the VAT exemption to generate much-needed revenue is a reasonable and widely supported step.' The former Labour leader's comments come after he used an interview with Sky News last month to back a wealth tax, which led to weeks of speculation over whether such a policy would be implemented. The Chancellor appeared to shut down the speculation last week by saying Labour had already 'got the balance right' on wealth taxes after it increased capital gains tax and abolished non-dom status. It is feared any tax raid on private healthcare would lead to longer NHS waiting lists by making it more expensive for people to skip the queue by going private. Such an effect would echo that of the VAT raid on private schools, which has led or will lead to the closure of 44 schools according to Telegraph analysis. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, has previously said Labour will use the private sector for 'as long as it takes' to get waiting lists down. Data from private healthcare analyst LaingBuisson suggested 4.68 million people now have private medical insurance, the highest proportion since 2008. The raid on private healthcare was backed by the Good Growth Foundation think tank, which was founded by former Labour candidate Praful Nargund. It said private health companies had enjoyed bumper profits as people have turned to them to avoid a lengthy NHS wait, meaning any raid would amount to a windfall tax. Polling of more than 2,000 people for the think tank found 55 per cent of the public backed the raid, with just 17 per cent against the move. Mr Nargund, who stood unsuccessfully for Labour against Jeremy Corbyn at last year's general election, said: 'We are sleepwalking into a two-tier healthcare system, and we have to back our NHS. 'The NHS is in a dire state: from 8am GP scrambles to months-long waits for cancer care, this is simply not good enough. People are being forced to go private for care they should get for free. 'That's not a system in need of tweaks – it's a system on the brink, in need of major reform. A windfall tax on private healthcare would be a bold, fair first step to fund the innovation and change we need in the NHS.' A spokesperson for the Independent Healthcare Providers Network told the i newspaper: 'With record demand for both NHS and privately funded treatment, along with increasing numbers of employers providing medical insurance to keep their staff healthy, we would strongly warn against any changes to the tax system which may dis-incentivise people from accessing the healthcare that they need to live full and productive lives.' A Government spokesperson told the newspaper: 'Thanks to this Government's record investment, reforms and the hard work of NHS staff, we've cut the waiting list by over 260,000 since July 2024, which also fell for the first time in 17 years in April and May outside of the pandemic. On top of this, we have also delivered 4.6 million appointments – more than double the two million we promised.'
BBC News
13 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Manvers asylum seeker hotel riot will not stain our town'
On 4 August 2024, TV screens across Britain were filled with violent scenes unfolding in Manvers, a usually quiet suburb of Wath upon Dearne, near Rotherham in South watched live as fires were set outside a hotel housing 200 asylum seekers, with a mob chanting "burn it down" as bricks and bottles were hurled at windows and police officers. One year on, barely any visible signs of damage remain at the Holiday Inn Express on Manvers Way. But last year's riot left behind more than scorched walls and shattered glass - it exposed deep fractures in public trust and a town's quiet determination to rise above fear and division."I live about a mile away," Patrick tells the BBC. "I could see it burning, I could see the smoke coming from it."Patrick is one of about 17,000 people who live in Wath. That day, he watched as riot police scrambled to the scene, sirens and shouts echoing through the streets. A police helicopter circled overhead, mounted officers lined Manvers town, nestled in the triangle between Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham, was once the beating heart of the region's coal many former mining communities, the area has a complex relationship with authority - including the police and media - a tension deepened in the wake of the Rotherham child abuse scandal. On the morning of 4 August, members of anti-immigration and pro-immigration organisations gathered outside the hotel in Manvers for a peaceful early afternoon, the atmosphere had turned volatile. Pro-immigration protesters were led to safety by who is from Wath but now lives in Batley, says: "I remember seeing the images and I know the place well."I was a bit shocked by it all."He does not support what happened in Manvers but says the country has "an immigration problem that needs to be solved"."I don't know how we go about that, to be honest," he says."We're too full." On the day, dozens of anti-immigration protesters wore balaclavas, while others had England flags and Union Jacks draped around their shoulders. Some stood topless, drinking from cans of beer, and some had even brought their children. Bins were set alight and pushed against fire exits, preventing those inside - including 25 hotel staff - from fence posts, furniture and rocks were thrown at hotel windows and police officers. Smaller groups tried to tip over an occupied police van, while others made repeated attempts to breach the building, eventually managing to get it was all over, the cost of the damage had mounted to an estimated £1m. More than 100 people - mostly men from Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham - have since been convicted in relation to the Manvers riot. More than a dozen youths, aged between 13 and 17, received referral 64 police officers were injured - several seriously - as well as three police horses and one police Kent, chair of the South Yorkshire Police Federation, says many officers are still dealing with the physical and psychological effects."Some of the cops were at the (2001) Bradford riots and the (2011) London riots and they've said they've never known anything like the level of aggression and just viciousness of some of the behaviour that was put towards them on the day," he says."We had a flurry of officers (coming to us) at the time, but it's also since officers have been triggered by going to other disorder events at football." Stand Up To Racism campaigner, Phil Turner, says his group was forced to retreat on the day for safety reasons."The level of violence on the day last year was such where I think they could and certainly would have wanted to kill people inside the hotel," Mr Turner, a former journalist, the shocking scenes, Mr Turner says the support and "outpouring of solidarity" that followed the riot was encouraging."Forty years ago this was the heart of the mining strike, a very solidly working-class area where people stuck together," he says."I think it's something that we can rebuild." The Manvers riot, described as one of the worst cases of civil disorder in the UK in recent history, was part of a wave of unrest across the UK last summer, which broke out following the mass stabbings in perpetrator, who could not be named initially due to his age, had targeted a Taylor Swift-themed dance class and murdered Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Bebe King, circulating on social media claimed the 17-year-old killer was Muslim; an asylum seeker who had recently arrived to the country by boat. In reality, he was born and raised in Wales to Rwandan Christian parents who had migrated to the UK in 2002. Terri, who runs The Little Curiosity Shoppe in Wath, says misinformation and a lack of transparency over who was housed in the Manvers hotel escalated already growing tensions."I think that causes unrest," she says. "I think if people don't know, they then jump to their own conclusions."The Holiday Inn Express in Manvers was contracted to provide accommodation for refugees on behalf of the government in 2022, prompting protests in February 2024, about 200 asylum seekers were being housed in the building. None of the people who the BBC spoke to condone the summer violence but say they "can understand why it happened"."We're all fed up with having nothing," Pam says."You work all your lives and you can't get in to see a doctor, you can't get in to see a dentist. These people are coming over - who are all men - are walking around Wath."According to the Home Office, 109,343 people claimed asylum in the UK in the year ending March 2025. More than half were adult men and 11% were males aged 17 and seekers are not allowed to work and usually get an allowance of £49.18 per person per week for food, clothing and toiletries (or £9.95 per person if their accommodation provides meals) as well as access to free cannot choose where they live and are housed in either a flat, house, hostel or bed and breakfast. Pam, like many others, feels the country is at breaking point. With proposed benefit cuts and the cost of living crisis, she believes the UK can no longer afford to support asylum seekers in the way it once did."We've just got to look after our own and I feel very sorry that it's got to this, but this country needs to have a complete overhaul," she says."It's just continually 'you can't afford this, this has gone up, cost of living, your benefits are coming down' - and then they're walking round in new clothes and it's not right."South Yorkshire Mayor Oliver Coppard agrees more must be done to tackle "the immigration crisis", calling for greater government support for regions like his that have hosted asylum seekers, refugees and migrants. "I want those places to get support from the government to make sure that we have access equally in our communities, to opportunities, to jobs, to doctors' appointments, to school places," he says."We need a transport network that connects people up so that they can access opportunities outside of their community, and we need good homes, good houses for young people and education."To rebuild community trust, several grassroots initiatives received targeted funding, including Voluntary Action non-profit organisation's strategic cohesion coordinator, Jonathan Ellis, says the charity currently offers weekly walks to celebrate Rotherham's green spaces and is planning to host several celebrations over the next few months."I think people feel more connected now than perhaps they did 12 months ago and this project is about keeping that cohesion going, keeping those community links developing," Mr Ellis says. Saeed Sayed and Raja Khan, members of non-profit charity Rotherham Friends in Deed, say the riot was not a "real reflection" of the them, the true character of the town lies not in the headlines, but in the acts of people's kindness and their shared belief that Rotherham can - and will - move forward, together."I have been in this town for about 50 years and I found it very, very welcoming," Mr Sayed says."Where I live I am perhaps one of the only two Asian families and there's a lot of love, respect and care for each other."I feel very confidently that whatever the challenges we'll rise through them."Mr Khan, who was born in Kashmir, says that while he enjoys returning to his birthplace, Rotherham is where his heart is."My home is Rotherham and the home of my children and grandchildren and hopefully great-grandchildren is Rotherham," he says."We love Rotherham. It is a great town and it's not going to be stained by what happened at Manvers." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bank of England faces inflation challenge as it prepares to cut rates
LONDON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - The Bank of England is widely expected to cut its key interest rate to 4% from 4.25% on Thursday and to lower it once more before the end of the year, despite consumer price inflation rising to close to double the central bank's 2% target in June. But policymakers are divided over how much underlying price pressures are easing, and on whether a slowing labour market and sputtering growth will make inflation undershoot its target in the medium term if rates are not cut further. The following graphics set out some of the issues policymakers are likely to discuss before Thursday's decision. British inflation surged more than in the euro zone or the United States after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, hitting a peak of 11.1%, partly due to Britain's heavy reliance on natural gas for heating and electricity. Inflation fell sharply in 2023 and bottomed out at 1.7% in September 2024. But since then it has picked up more than in the United States or euro zone and in May the BoE forecast it would not be back to target until early 2027. Inflation rose to 3.6% in June, its highest since January 2024, and some economists think it will soon hit 4%. By contrast, the European Central Bank expects euro zone inflation to hover just below 2%. Most BoE officials view surveys of businesses and households' expectations for future inflation as an important guide to future price rises and wage demands, and even of the central bank's credibility. These measures have climbed over the past year. The Citi/YouGov measure of long-term expectations is near its highest since late 2022 - when headline inflation was in double digits - while the BoE's own survey is at its highest since 2019. However, some officials place less weight on these surveys, viewing responses as a reaction to recent inflation rather than a prediction of future behaviour. While headline consumer inflation fell sharply in 2023 before beginning to rise again, two components often used as a gauge of longer-term domestic price pressures have not dropped as much. Both services price inflation - which is heavily affected by increased labour costs - and core CPI, which strips out volatile elements - have stayed higher than headline inflation. Separately, food and drink inflation - which has a big impact on public perceptions of inflation and is especially noticeable for poorer Britons - has begun to pick up rapidly. Annual private-sector regular wage growth of just under 5% has slowed from a peak of more than 8% two years ago. But it is still about 2 percentage points higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic and the roughly 3% level which most policymakers view as consistent with 2% inflation. Both the central bank itself and employers surveyed by the BoE expect pay growth to slow further towards 3% over the next 18 months, putting downward pressure on inflation. But the drop in wage growth over the past year has not been smooth and rising unemployment and fewer job vacancies are not a guarantee that wage growth will slow as fast as the BoE expects. Purchasing Managers' index data for July showed British businesses were raising prices at a "robust pace" according to S&P Global which collects the monthly data. While down from 2022, the survey still shows bigger price increases than before the pandemic. Over the past year, costs for both services businesses and manufacturers have risen sharply - which will put upward pressure on prices if these are passed on to consumers.
