logo
Did the 2025 Legislature do enough for housing affordability in Utah?

Did the 2025 Legislature do enough for housing affordability in Utah?

Yahoo08-03-2025
The chairman of the powerful Senate Rules Committee, Sen. Lincoln Fillmore, R-South Jordan, clearly hasn't been pleased with the progress made on affordable housing at the 2025 Legislature.
When asked at a Senate media availability in the final weeks of the session if enough action has been taken this session given Utah voters put housing as their top priority in a new Sutherland Institute survey, Fillmore didn't hold back.
'The Legislature has done a lot over the last couple of years,' Fillmore said, including creating a $50 million first-time homebuyer program in 2023. Sponsored by Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton, the program provides up to $20,000 in loans to eligible buyers.
And last year, Gov. Spencer Cox helped push through novel legislation authorizing the state treasurer's office to make roughly $300 million in public investment funds available for three years for low-interest loans to developers building affordable homes.
In January, the governor stressed in his State of the State address that he remains committed to getting 35,000 starter homes, defined as single family units under $400,000, built over the next few years.
But Fillmore told reporters the shortage of starter homes in the state hasn't been adequately addressed this session.
'As long as Utah is a fantastic place to live, we're going to have demand for homes. We need to find ways to increase the supply of homes, particularly homes at the bottom rung, the first rung, of the home ownership ladder,' he said. 'That's really what we're missing.'
Attempts to boost supply this session have not been successful, Fillmore said.
'I do confess to this year being a little bit disappointed in what I felt like we were able to get done,' he said. 'We're getting some good policy in, but a lot of the proposals that really would have made a big difference in increasing supply have not passed.'
He cited efforts by Rep. Ray Ward, R-Bountiful, to mandate increased housing density in urban municipalities, including allowing single-family homes to be built on lots as small as 6,000 square feet.
That bill, HB90, was held in committee. Fillmore was its Senate sponsor.
'Cities very jealously guard their ability to restrict the supply of housing,' Fillmore said. 'That is a challenge for people who want to build homes, for people who want to buy homes and for people like us that are really interested in increasing the supply of housing.'
The senator quickly added that he wasn't talking about all local governments and made a point of praising Salt Lake City, South Jordan and other cities for the 'really great work' being done on housing there.
But, he said, 'it's been a little bit frustrating this year that really meaningful policies that would make a big difference in increasing the supply of first homes just have not been able to move because of the roadblocks created by local government.'
Adams tempered that sentiment before moving on to another topic.
'That's a high priority and we're going to keep working on it,' the Senate president said.
Cameron Diehl, executive director of the Utah League of Cities and Towns, said plenty did happen on housing this year.
'I actually think there have been some important bills this year that will make a difference in the land-use process space, and will make a difference in the housing affordability space,' Diehl told the Deseret News.
Among the legislation on his list is a Fillmore bill easing garage requirements for some new homes. The bill, SB181, was part of a consensus package of bills backed by the state Coalition on Housing Affordability that's co-chaired by Fillmore and Rep. Stephen Whyte, R-Mapleton.
When that bill was heard by a House committee, Fillmore referred to it as affordable housing legislation focused on parking by offering 'this really, novel, new way to think about parking, which is a two-car garage counts as two parking spaces.'
What that means is housing defined by a municipality as affordable and deed-restricted to owner occupancy doesn't need a garage but could be required to have on-site parking. Coming up with that compromise took some nine months of negotiations.
He used the word 'disappointing' again in committee when agreeing that local governments still have the power to mandate garages be built for other homes and described the bill as a 'good incremental step' towards affordable housing that 'nobody loves.'
Diehl sees the bill as ensuring the financial benefit from a city not requiring a garage goes to the homeowner, since those properties would have to be built as affordable, owner-occupied housing.
What the league opposes, he said, is any state presumption over land use planning.
'Everyone acknowledges the challenges around finding a place to live. City leaders recognize that, which is why we've spent a lot of time over the last few years looking to improve our land use processes and making efforts in what we can do,' Diehl said.
Utah communities, which have oversight responsibilities for new construction, have 'planned for many housing units that have not yet been built for market forces that are outside of our control,' Diehl said. 'So we get the frustration.'
For Tara Rollins, executive director of the Utah Housing Coalition, the biggest frustration this session was the failure of a bill she and other advocates saw as key to helping the state's low-income renters, HB286.
The bill would have diverted a share of state liquor sales to the Olene Walker Housing Loan Fund but was held by a House committee after a member, House Majority Leader Jefferson Moss, R-Saratoga Springs, suggested avoiding 'trying to find piecemeal ways to get around things.'
Backers joined the bill's sponsor, Rep. Carol Spackman Moss, D-Holladay, at a news conference at the Capitol called to revive interest in the idea, which could have added $28 million to the fund named for Utah's first woman governor. It didn't work.
'That's what we worked the hardest on,' Rollins said, noting the loan fund has helped with a lot of development over the years. She said the Legislature hasn't done enough this session to make housing more affordable, for either renters or buyers.
Gov. Spencer Cox's housing adviser, Steve Waldrip, said that and other issues left on the table this session will likely be hashed out as work continues on a new statewide housing plan set to be completed this fall.
The second phase of putting together the plan will be 'where the rubber meets the road,' Waldrip said. A balance will need to be found on issues like housing density, he said, where reductions in lot sizes will be weighed against preserving neighborhoods and quality of life.
But that doesn't mean there weren't significant efforts to make housing more affordable, Waldrip said. However, he said unlike with past programs, what's been accomplished just hasn't attracted a lot of attention.
'What we have done has kind of flown under the radar,' Waldrip said, pointing to changes made by HB360 that expand how the $300 million made available by the 2024 Legislature for the governor's starter homes initiative can be used.
Only about $30 million has been loaned out so far, Waldrip said, but the bill that passed in the final hours of the session earmarks money for programs that ready older houses that are currently being rented in Salt Lake City and Ogden to be sold as starter homes.
The bulk of the remaining dollars available for loans can now go towards building 'starter condos,' Waldrip said. The units, which he said could include conversions of existing apartments, would need to be 'truly affordable,' priced as much as $75,000 below market.
He anticipates there will be a mix of single-family homes and condominiums built. Construction on new condos could start as soon as this fall and going a long way towards meeting Cox's starter home goal, Waldrip said.
'That will probably have the most impact on the creation of starter units of anything that we do this session,' he said. 'There's a lot to go. We're fighting an uphill battle. We're growing faster than we're building.'
What's tricky, Waldrip said, has been figuring out the best way to unleash private markets to help solve a shortage of affordable housing that is way too big for government to try to 'subsidize out of existence.'
Allowing the state loan funds to be used to build condominiums may end up making a bigger impact on that shortage 'than anything else that we've done in the last 10 years,' he said, even though 'it's not as sexy or as flashy as some of the other things.'
Contributing: Brigham Tomco
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate judicial confirmation delays spark President Trump's ire
Senate judicial confirmation delays spark President Trump's ire

The Hill

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Senate judicial confirmation delays spark President Trump's ire

The recent flare-up between President Trump and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) conjures the image of two elderly neighbors quarrelling over a back fence about property line disagreements. That metaphor is not far from the reality of the latest clash. Presidents and Congress have been tangling over turf from the beginning of the republic. Who is encroaching on whose constitutional prerogatives. In the present instance, the president has attacked Grassley for allowing so-called 'blue slips' — 'an ancient and probably unconstitutional custom' — to get in the way of confirming nominees for federal district court judgeships and U.S. attorney posts. Grassley says he was especially 'offended' and 'disappointed' by the president's personal insults on his Truth Social platform. He called Grassley a RINO ('Republican in name only') for protecting Democratic senators and went on to call for term limits (Grassley was first elected to the Senate in 1981 and is 91 years old), saying it's time to 'dethrone the kings.' Fellow senators of both parties rallied to Grassley's defense. They like the seniority system (especially the closer they get to a committee chairmanship). They like the blue-slip system when it comes to confirming judicial nominees from their home states. And they dislike it when a president meddles in their chamber's internal rules and procedures since, as the Constitution makes clear, ' Each house may determine the rules of its proceedings.' What is a blue slip? It is a document, written on blue paper, on which the home state senators of presidential nominees for federal district court judgeships and U.S. attorney positions indicate their approval or disapproval of those nominees. In other words, only two senators are eligible to submit blue slips for each nominee. The blue slip process is not written in Senate rules or even in the rules of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Instead of a rule, it has been variously described as a 'custom' or 'tradition.' The Judiciary Committee chairmen set the ground rules for the confirmation process in each Congress. The president was correct when he said Chairman Grassley could abolish the blue slip requirements with 'just a flick of the pen.' In 2017, for instance, Judiciary Chairman Grassley declared that blue slips would no longer be required for appeals court judgeships, and that is still the case. The committee has gone through multiple iterations of the custom dating back to 1917. In many of those instances, the lack of both senators' approval would be taken into consideration by the committee in determining whether to proceed with confirmation hearings and whether to vote on sending the nomination to the Senate floor for debate and a vote. As it now stands, a covered nominee must have blue slip approvals from both senators for the nomination to move forward in committee, though a Judiciary Committee chair may declare an exception for any reason on any occasion — that was done twice during Joe Biden's tenure as Senate Judiciary Committee chairman. The president, in his attack on Grassley in July, incorrectly stated that presidents would never be able to appoint judges in liberal strongholds if even one senator in the opposition party refuses to submit a blue slip of approval. In fact, only the two senators from the home state of the judicial nominee may do so. Still, the president is understandably peeved that his judicial and executive nominees are taking too long to be confirmed. President Trump set two confirmation process records during the first 200 days of his second non-consecutive term. According to Chris Piper of Brookings, based on data compiled by his colleague Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, Trump submitted more executive and judicial nominations over that period (401) than any previous president. The second record he set, though, was that he faced more confirmation delays than any of his predecessors. Piper offers several explanations for the current delays, most notably that Senate Democrats are slow-walking nominations because they are not satisfied with their quality. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) attributes it to the nominees' lack of experience, ethical conflicts of interest and perceived extreme views. Consequently, Senate Democrats are demanding full debates and recorded votes on nearly every nominee, both in committee and on the floor. When Trump demanded that Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) cancel the August recess and keep the Senate in session until all pending nominations were dealt with, Thune extended the session by one day only and was able to clear the docket of several of the longstanding and most controversial nominees. It is doubtful that confirmations will pick up significantly in the fall, with critical budget-related deadlines once again pressing. The flurry of negative blue slips may still resemble record snowfalls by winter. Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year congressional staff veteran, culminating as the House Rules Committee chief of staff in 1995. He is author of, 'Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial' (2000), and, 'Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays' (2018).

Sherrod Brown challenges crypto PACs to rematch in Senate bid
Sherrod Brown challenges crypto PACs to rematch in Senate bid

Axios

time34 minutes ago

  • Axios

Sherrod Brown challenges crypto PACs to rematch in Senate bid

Political operatives working for the cryptocurrency industry will be on high alert now that Democrats appear to be all in on Sherrod Brown as the national party's candidate for Senate in Ohio. Why it matters: With Brown as their pick, Democrats — already facing steep odds of retaking the Senate in 2026 — are directly squaring off against Fairshake, the crypto PAC that helped unseat the industry critic just a year ago. At the SALT Wyoming Blockchain Summit Tuesday, Sen. Tim Scott (R.—SC) told the room, "Thank you to all y'all for getting rid of Sherrod Brown." Fairshake, the network of PACs that opposed Brown in 2024, has $140 million on hand already to support pro-crypto candidates and — crucially, for Brown — oppose those that are seen as impediments. Between the lines: The organization Stand With Crypto has ranked Brown as "strongly against crypto" based on his statements and actions in Congress. And his former position as chair of the Senate Banking Committee, from which he stonewalled industry-backed legislation, made him a target for Fairshake in the last election. What he's saying: "Cryptocurrency is a part of America's economy," Brown said in a statement Tuesday sent by the campaign to Axios, in response to a request for an interview. "My goal is to make sure that as more people use cryptocurrency, it expands opportunity and lifts up Ohioans and they are not put at risk." The campaign did not respond to multiple requests to answer follow up questions about whether his policy positions have shifted since his loss. In addition, neither the Ohio Democratic Party nor the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee replied to a request for comment from Axios. What they're saying: Brian Wright, a longtime Ohio-based political strategist serving as president of WrightPath Solutions, tells Axios that he can see why the party wants Brown. Over his 32 years in Congress, the last 18 spent in the Senate, Brown had been able to flip otherwise Republican counties with a pro-worker message, Wright explained, though it didn't work out as well in 2024. Still, even with millions spent against him, Brown only lost 46% to 50% a year ago. "Anything can really happen here, but is it a bad idea for him to run again? I don't think he was defeated soundly enough to say that," Wright says. Zoom out: A Democrat's odds of winning the Ohio Senate seat haven't risen above 33% on the Kalshi prediction market since the contract started in July, now with $2.7 million in volume. State of play: Party leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (D.—NY) wants Brown. Schumer has been perplexing on crypto issues, both acting as if pro-crypto legislation could pass in 2024 but also voting against the recently enacted stablecoin legislation, GENIUS. The Cook Political report still favors Jon Husted in the Ohio race, the Republican incumbent appointed to fill J.D. Vance's vacated seat, and the larger map still favors Republicans going into 2026.

Redistricting tests Trump's finely tuned influence machine
Redistricting tests Trump's finely tuned influence machine

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Redistricting tests Trump's finely tuned influence machine

Marrying the two, Trump has a singular strategy that he's employed to great effect so far this term to compel Republican lawmakers into supporting his appointees and legislative agenda. There are very few exceptions, in part because Trump has made clear the consequences for dissent. Trump and his team have repeatedly threatened primary challenges for GOP lawmakers who do not bend to his will, going as far as standing up a super PAC that's raising millions of dollars to target Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) for voting against the 'big, beautiful bill.' And the White House is vetting potential primary challengers to Massie, including Kentucky state Sen. Aaron Reed, who traveled to Washington for a meeting last month, two people familiar with the trip confirmed to POLITICO. 'Incumbent presidents have broad sway over their party…The only real difference is that Trump will operate with language and threats we haven't seen from other presidents,' said Doug Heye, a GOP strategist who has worked for House Republican leadership. 'He's more YOLO than lame duck.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Now Trump and his team are trying their playbook on GOP governors and state lawmakers as they push as many red states as possible into mid-decade redistricting. They are on the cusp of success in Texas, where the Republican-controlled Legislature is imposing a new map designed to net the party five seats. Missouri Republicans are widely expected to follow suit when they return to Jefferson City in September for their annual veto session — despite still smarting from a knock-down, drag-out redistricting fight just two years ago in which they ultimately rejected drawing an additional GOP district. While Republicans in the state Legislature are reluctant to revisit the difficult inter-party politics at play, the Trump administration is working to force them to submit anyway, calling up Gov. Mike Kehoe and local lawmakers who have expressed skepticism about the effort. There's also a less direct form of pressure at play — one that has guided GOP decision-making throughout Trump's time as the party's standard-bearer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store