logo
SARGF demands action on gambling and mental health

SARGF demands action on gambling and mental health

The Citizen27-04-2025
The South African Responsible Gambling Foundation (SARGF) is drawing attention to the policy issues of problem gambling as a mental health concern and the legislative frameworks in place to support affected individuals.
'Problem gambling, recognised as a mental health disorder, can have devastating effects on individuals, families, and communities.
'SARGF emphasises the importance of rehabilitation processes and the need to address legislative gaps to ensure comprehensive protection for vulnerable people.
'The foundation calls upon policy and lawmakers to develop a multi-cross-departmental policy,' said SARGF executive director Sibongile Simelane-Quntana.
Simelane highlighted that the Constitution of South Africa enshrines the right to access healthcare services, including mental health care, under Section 27(1)(a).
She mentioned that this provision underscores the state's obligation to provide adequate support and treatment for individuals struggling with mental health challenges, including gambling addiction.
'As a leading non-profit company (NPC), the SARGF reaffirms its commitment to advocating for the rights of problem gamblers to access quality mental health care and rehabilitation services, ensuring no one is left behind.
'Access to mental health care is a fundamental right and problem gambling is a serious life-changing experience that requires urgent attention.
'We are dedicated to ensuring that individuals affected by gambling addiction receive the support and treatment they need to rebuild their lives despite limited resources. No one should face this struggle alone,' said Simelane-Quntana.
'Problem gambling requires a compassionate and comprehensive response. While the self-exclusion and third-party exclusion mechanisms are valuable tools, we must address the gaps in our legislation to ensure that no one falls through the cracks.
'Human Rights Month is an opportune time to reflect on how we can better protect the rights and dignity of those affected by gambling addiction,' concluded Simelane-Quintana.
The Foundation's primary objectives are
Education: Raising public awareness about the dangers of gambling addiction and promoting responsible gambling habits.
Counselling: Providing support and counselling to individuals and families affected by gambling addiction.
Monitoring: Evaluating gambling trends to influence policy and advocate for effective treatment of gambling addiction.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Botox treatments in South Africa: what you need to know about safety
Botox treatments in South Africa: what you need to know about safety

IOL News

time9 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Botox treatments in South Africa: what you need to know about safety

Botox is widely used as an anti-ageing treatment, but there are risks if patients opt for budget deals with unregistered clinics. Image: Cottonbro studio / Pexels A South African cosmetic treatment expert says there's no need for panic here following global concerns over a recent case in the United States where a woman was left partially paralysed after having routine botulinum toxin anti-ageing injections, commonly known as Botox. And while the mother of three survived from what doctors later said was a mild stroke, it set off warning bells among thousands of people who are increasingly turning to the treatment that targets facial muscles, tightens and rejuvenates the skin. Dr J D Erasmus, a general practitioner with a special interest in aesthetics and the Head of Aesthetics at the Longevity Centre at RXME, says fears of botulism from Botox injections are largely misplaced. Dr J D Erasmus says South Africans need to be more discerning when choosing where to have cosmetic treatments. Image: Supplied Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'People hear the word 'toxin' and understandably get nervous. But iatrogenic botulism (caused by a medical treatment) after aesthetic treatments is extremely rare in medical clinics with qualified doctors who follow proper protocols and only inject trusted products from regulated manufacturers,' he says. He adds that botulinum toxin is one of the most extensively studied anti-ageing treatments in aesthetic medicine. In addition to smoothing lines and wrinkles, the treatment is also known to relieve tension headaches. 'In cosmetic treatments, it's used in very small, highly controlled doses by trained professionals. When done correctly, it stays where it's injected, does its job, and your body naturally breaks it down over time. "The horror stories we hear are almost always linked to unqualified practitioners, dangerously high doses, and fake or unregistered products, and are not the work of reputable doctors in South Africa.' In cases of iatrogenic botulism from botulinum toxin injections, the toxin moves further than the treatment area and causes muscle weakness, which is an unusual complication rarely seen in aesthetic injections, he says. 'Globally, thousands of people undergo botulinum toxin procedures safely every day. According to our research, there have not been any recorded cases linked to aesthetic treatments in South Africa. 'Overseas, however, the risks increase where regulations are weaker. "In one extreme case in Turkey two years ago, 71 people developed iatrogenic botulism from botulinum toxin injections in just over a month, and 66 of those cases were traced to the same clinic." Erasmus says this latest scare highlights the dangers associated with medical or cosmetic tourism that's poorly regulated. 'You don't always know what product is being used, who is injecting it, or whether proper safety standards are being followed, and you can't always follow up with your practitioner if you have any concerns after the procedure. 'These types of incidents are important reminders to take your health seriously and choose a clinic you can trust. Before booking a treatment, check your practitioner's qualifications and reputation and make sure that the facility follows stringent product quality and safety regulations.'

Call for probe into KZN Hospital Board appointments amid exclusion of traditional leaders
Call for probe into KZN Hospital Board appointments amid exclusion of traditional leaders

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Call for probe into KZN Hospital Board appointments amid exclusion of traditional leaders

Call for Transparency in KwaZulu-Natal's Hospital Board Appointments Image: SUPPLIED A formal complaint has been lodged at the office of the KwaZulu-Natal Premier, Thulasizwe Ntuli, raising concerns about the appointment process for hospital board members in KwaZulu-Natal and the alleged exclusion of Traditional Leadership from governance structures. In a letter dated July 28, Phakamani Owen Dlamini, Ndunankulu of the Esiphahleni Community, addressed to Premier Ntuli, accuses provincial health authorities of operating a meritless, opaque process and calls for independent oversight and formal inclusion of traditional leadership in local governance. He argued that the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health has not acknowledged or responded to Dlamini's inquiries about the criteria and procedures for appointing hospital board members in Richmond. Dlamini said he was the only applicant from the institution of Traditional Leadership in his municipality's nomination process and claimed there was an absence of transparency and accountability in the appointment process. He stated that a subsequent attempt to engage the MEC for Health, Nomagugu Simelane-Mngadi, yielded no constructive outcome. 'The appointment of Richmond Hospital Board members appears to be influenced by political affiliations rather than a transparent or merit-based process,' Dlamini wrote in the letter, which accuses officials of failing to provide an official confirmation of the appointments. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He cited Section 195(1)(a) and (f) of the Constitution, which obligates public administration to promote a high standard of professional ethics and accountability, and Section 212(1), which contemplates a role for traditional leadership at the local level in matters affecting local communities, along with the Traditional and Khoi-San Leadership Act, No. 3 of 2019. Dlamini's letter contends that excluding Traditional Leaders undermines legislative intent and reflects a troubling trend of marginalizing traditional governance in KwaZulu-Natal over the past three decades. He invokes historical figures and events tied to the region's leadership lineage, arguing that recognising the role of traditional leadership is essential to accurately reflecting community diversity and customs. The letter outlines three requests, including an independent province-wide investigation into hospital board appointments, beginning with Richmond Hospital, to ensure merit-based, transparent, and inclusive procedures. 'A written response from the Premier's Office within 14 working days addressing the inquiries on the appointment process, in line with the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA), Act No. 3 of 2000. 'Urgent measures to ensure Traditional Leadership is formally represented on all relevant public governance structures as provided under the Traditional and Khoi-San Leadership Act and the Constitution.' Dlamini also revealed that he has received death threats related to his advocacy, adding he will persist in pursuing accountability, fairness, and inclusivity, including potential escalation through legal or parliamentary channels. Attempts to obtain comment from Premier Ntuli's office were unsuccessful. The Premier's spokesperson, Lindelani Mbatha, did not respond to questions from the publication on Tuesday and Wednesday. On Tuesday, Dlamini told IOL he had been contacted by someone claiming to be from Ntuli's office. He alleged that the person said the matter was being attended to, but no official reply was received via email. Simelane-Mngadi's office did not respond to requests for comment. IOL sought to establish how the appointments favour individuals allegedly linked to the province's African National Congress (ANC), where Simelane Mngadi serves as one of the senior leaders in the province. IOL Politics

Glenmore's R2bn claims against health service providers dismissed by Competition Tribunal
Glenmore's R2bn claims against health service providers dismissed by Competition Tribunal

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Glenmore's R2bn claims against health service providers dismissed by Competition Tribunal

The decision comes after the Tribunal upheld exceptions filed by both the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) and AfroCentric Health, citing multiple deficiencies in Glenmore's case. Image: Supplied The Competition Tribunal has ruled against Glenmore Capital, dismissing its complaint regarding the alleged exclusion of its COVID-19 rapid antigen test kits from the South African public and private sectors. The decision comes after the Tribunal upheld exceptions filed by both the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) and AfroCentric Health, citing multiple deficiencies in Glenmore's case. Glenmore's complaint, originally lodged with the Competition Commission in August 2022, sought damages nearing R2 billion, claiming that NHLS and AfroCentric engaged in exclusionary practices that barred it from entering the market for COVID-19 test kits. The Commission, however, chose not to pursue the case, citing Glenmore's struggle to achieve market acceptance as a result of commercial factors, including delays in regulatory approval and a decrease in demand as the COVID-19 pandemic waned. Frustrated with the Commission's decision, Glenmore escalated the matter to the Tribunal. At a pre-hearing in December 2024, Glenmore was afforded an opportunity to amend its founding affidavit to address the concerns raised by NHLS and AfroCentric. Despite making amendments, both defendants argued that Glenmore's case remained fundamentally flawed. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ In its defence, NHLS and AfroCentric articulated four primary exceptions, asserting that Glenmore's complaint lacked a valid cause of action, failed to properly identify the legal entities involved, lacked a clear market definition, and exceeded the Tribunal's jurisdiction due to the nature of the claims made. No valid cause of action: Glenmore's complaint failed to establish a legal basis under the Competition Act, lacking both legal and factual foundation. Glenmore's complaint failed to establish a legal basis under the Competition Act, lacking both legal and factual foundation. Improper citation of entities: Glenmore did not adequately identify which legal entity allegedly contravened the Act, despite having been given several opportunities to rectify this. Lack of proper market definition: The complaint failed to clarify the relevant market, with Glenmore shifting references between disparate health products without defining a cohesive product or geographic market. The complaint failed to clarify the relevant market, with Glenmore shifting references between disparate health products without defining a cohesive product or geographic market. Lack of jurisdiction and procedural issues: The Tribunal highlighted that it cannot award damages unless under consent orders and noted allegations outside the ambit of competition law, such as irregular procurement and insider trading. The Tribunal noted that Glenmore had been granted ample opportunity to clarify and bolster its case but ultimately failed to provide a coherent argument. With the exceptions upheld, Glenmore's complaint referral was dismissed in its entirety. BUSINESS REPORT

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store