ChatGPT Go vs ChatGPT Plus vs ChatGPT Free: which plan should you pick?
However, ChatGPT's longstanding Plus subscription offers more features and tools at Rs 1,299 per month. It also includes a free subscription model with limited capabilities.
All three subscription plans cater to different user needs. With varying pricing, users may be unsure which plan suits them best. Here is a comparison of the three subscription options offered by OpenAI for its chatbot.
The new plan, known as ChatGPT Go, is available exclusively in India for Rs 399 per month and aims to make advanced artificial intelligence features more accessible to a broader audience.
Apart from the free version, ChatGPT Go users will gain access to several enhanced features. This includes access to the flagship GPT-5 model, allowing for greater utilisation and customised responses with an expanded memory.
Furthermore, the plan provides additional access to complex data analysis tools, file uploads, and image generation—all essential for various activities and projects.
The new subscription can also be used on the company's latest service via WhatsApp and the ChatGPT mobile app.
ChatGPT Plus, OpenAI's premium subscription, has become the preferred option for users seeking enhanced functionality and performance. Priced at Rs 1,999 per month in India, it offers a more comprehensive user experience and a suite of powerful tools, representing a significant upgrade over the free version.
Subscribers gain access to a wide array of features, including specialised tools like Deep Research and Agent Mode for complex tasks, as well as older models such as GPT-4. The membership also includes Sora, OpenAI's text-to-video AI model, for video creation.
Additional benefits include improved integrations with popular work platforms like Gmail, Teams, Notion, GitHub, and Canva. The subscription also comes with higher usage limits, allowing advanced users to work uninterrupted and fully harness the AI's capabilities.
With a few features and no monthly cost, this free subscription model provides a good starting point for customers to experiment with AI.
The most recent model, GPT-5, is available with ChatGPT's free edition, although there are usage limits, including on the number of messages that may be sent in a certain time frame and the number of images you could generate.
Additionally, users on the free plan can create and upload photos, use ChatGPT Voice, and do web searches for up-to-date information. Even though these sophisticated tools have usage restrictions, the free version is still a strong choice for novices and casual users to explore AI's possibilities.
The ChatGPT Go membership is positioned as an economical option for Indian students and part-time workers. It offers a significant upgrade over the free version at just Rs 399 per month. For those needing more than what the free tier provides but not the full features of the premium plans, this plan is an ideal starting point.
However, the ChatGPT Plus plan, which costs Rs 1,999 per month, is still an expensive subscription that is most appropriate for consumers who depend on AI for complex tasks as well as academics and professionals.
OpenAI also maintains a strong free version of ChatGPT, ensuring broad access to AI's potential. As a result, the free version is an excellent resource for casual use, for general questions, and creative brainstorming.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Visa Chaos, Harvard Shock & Canada Cap: What's Next for Indian Students Abroad?
Visa clampdowns, fake documents, and even Harvard's shock move—global education is shifting fast. Where does that leave Indian students? From CBSE vs IB competitiveness to whether Canada is still worth it, and if Asia is the new frontier, Namita Mehta, President and Partner, The Red Pen, breaks it all down. We dive into ROI across US, UK, Europe, and Canada, the misinformation crisis in visas, and the real opportunities in Ireland, Netherlands, and beyond. This is your essential guide to navigating the new study abroad landscape.
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump imposed ‘sanctions on India' to end war in Ukraine, says White House
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that US President Donald Trump took several actions, including the secondary tariffs on India, to bring the war in Ukraine to an end. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible.(AFP) This reiteration comes as a top US official said that India made "huge" profits on the sale of Russian oil during and after the war in Ukraine, and Trump said that his sanctions on New Delhi probably played a role in Russian President Vladimir Putin meeting him. Addressing a press briefing, Leavitt said, "The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war and he has rejected the ideas of others that have been raised that we should wait another month before any meetings takes place." She asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible. Earlier on Tuesday, Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, with the former signalling his openness to a trilateral meeting with Putin to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Trump said that he had a very successful day, while Zelensky noted that this was the "best conversation" he had with the US President so far. Scott Bessent on India tariffs US treasury secretary Scott Bessent, while speaking to CNBC, argued why China has not yet seen any penalties for buying Russian oil, while the case for India has been otherwise. He said that the treatment is different because India has been "profiteering" and "making billions" from its reselling of the oil. Bessent said India had "less than 1 per cent" of its oil from Russia "and now its up to 42 per cent". He added, "India is just profiteering, they are reselling... They made 16 billion in excess profits, some of the richest families in India." "This is a completely different thing. Indian arbitrage, which is buying cheap oil and reselling it, has just sprung up during the [Ukraine] war. This is just unacceptable," Bessent added. Top US advisor criticises India over Russian oil trade Meanwhile, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro criticised India for purchasing Russian energy and defence equipment, pledging to "hit India where it hurts" to get New Delhi to change its policy. He termed India's oil trade with Russia 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to end the war in Ukraine and isolate the Russian economy. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' Navarro wrote in an opinion piece for the Financial Times. Before his meeting with Putin in Alaska last week, Trump had told a Fox News Radio show that his 'penalty' on India prompted the Russian President to meet him, saying that "everything has an impact". The US President said that when he told India about the doubled tariffs, it "essentially took them out of buying oil from Russia". He noted that India is the second largest purchaser of Russian oil and said it was getting pretty close to China, the largest buyer of oil from Russia. Before Trump doubled India's tariff to 50 per cent by imposing an additional 25 per cent levy on the previously announced 25 per cent, he said that India was "fueling the war machine" by buying oil from Russia.
India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
Why India Can't Accept China's ‘Zero-Tariff' Offer Despite Its Market Appeal
New Delhi: After U.S. President Donald Trump signalled the possibility of higher tariffs on Indian exports, China renewed its pitch to bring India into a zero-tariff Asian trade market. Extending access to a massive consumer base, the offer has been positioned as a strategic opportunity. Analysts say the proposal, however, could pose a far more significant challenge for India than Trump's tariff threats. India's market is enormous. A population of 1.4 billion, coupled with a growing middle class and strong purchasing power, makes it one of the most attractive markets in the world. Global powers cannot achieve maximum economic leverage in the region without India's participation. In response to the rising pressure from Washington, China has once again invited India to join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Beijing has been lobbying for New Delhi's inclusion in the RCEP since 2019, offering zero tariffs as a key incentive. Still, India has repeatedly declined. It is wary of Beijing's ambitions and the potential risks to its domestic industries. Understanding RCEP The RCEP is a free-trade agreement encompassing 15 countries: 10 ASEAN members and five of their Free Trade Agreement (FTA) partners – China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. The RCEP is the world's largest trade bloc, representing nearly 30 percent of global GDP and covering roughly three billion people. The agreement aims to simplify trade rules, reduce barriers and integrate the markets of its member nations. Signed in November 2020, the RCEP came into effect on January 1, 2022. Its primary goals include lowering or eliminating tariffs, easing non-tariff restrictions and facilitating cross-border investment and commerce. China's Perspective China's state-run Global Times highlighted India's growing vulnerability due to its heavy reliance on the U.S. market, especially in light of Trump's proposed 50 percent tariff increases. The newspaper argued that diversifying toward Asian markets could not only mitigate risks but also provide India with strategic flexibility and greater market opportunities. According to the daily, India must actively explore alternative markets. Asia's expansive economies and untapped potential could provide India with a more stable path for growth. The paper suggested that joining the RCEP would represent a critical step toward restructuring India's trade orientation within the region. The publication also emphasised 'long-term benefits'. Over next 10 to 15 years, it says, RCEP's zero-tariff framework could apply to 90 percent of goods. For India, the daily says, this could act as a protective buffer against the volatility of U.S. trade policies, while opening access to a dynamic and growing market. India's Concerns India has consistently expressed reservations about the RCEP. The government believes the agreement does not adequately reflect India's interests and could have unbalanced outcomes. A primary concern is the potential impact on domestic industries. Cheap imports from China and other Asian nations could flood the Indian market, undermining local manufacturing and making it difficult for Indian products to compete. China's production efficiency exacerbates this risk. India had proposed mechanisms to limit imports of certain goods exceeding set thresholds, but negotiations failed to yield consensus. India also faces a significant trade deficit with China, which reached $99.2 billion in the 2024-25 fiscal year. Joining the RCEP without safeguards could worsen this imbalance. For China, India's inclusion is both an economic and geopolitical priority, supporting regional dominance and the Belt and Road Initiative. India continues to prioritise national interests, self-reliance and strategic autonomy. The government aims to maintain control over supply chains and assert a strong position in any scenario that may challenge its trade or geopolitical stance vis-à-vis China.
