BBC star says school rewards kids for nodding along and many don't fit in the system
'If you run a company, go back to school. Mentor. Offer a placement. Let a young person shadow you, ask questions, and see what's possible'
BACK TO SCHOOL BBC star says school rewards kids for nodding along and many don't fit in the system
BBC Scotland's Home of the Year judge Danny Campbell has called for fellow entrepreneurs to return to the classroom.
The 33-year-old, who runs his own architect firm HOKO, took part in a new schools initiative called the START programme which connects senior school pupils with business mentors to help them pitch and develop real startup ideas.
3
Kids only learn to nod along in class, says Danny Campbell.
3
Danny Campbell is a co-host on Scotland's Home of the Year.
START Founder, Phil Ford, said: 'There's no better way to feel equipped with the necessary skills and mindsets to be an entrepreneur than by spending time with one.'
Here, Danny Campbell, explains why schools fail to hit the mark when it comes to developing business leaders of the future.
I WISH I could go back in time and speak to my 15-year-old self and tell him not to go to uni – start a business instead.
Recently, I've gone back to school, mentoring pupils at John Paul Academy in Glasgow through START – a programme that gives young people the chance to build and pitch real business ideas, matched with mentors who've been there and done it.
It struck me how little access many pupils have to this kind of thinking. A lot of them still believe starting a business is something for other people. It feels far away. But all it takes is one person to say: 'This could be you'.
Now, two pupils are coming to intern at my architecture company, HOKO.
It's a great opportunity for them, but they'll give us as much as we give them. They're smart, sharp, and curious. They'll bring a fresh perspective and help us question our assumptions. And for them, they'll see that entrepreneurship isn't some far-off dream.
Some of the most successful business owners I know hated school. Many had ADHD, couldn't sit still, got told off for not paying attention. But give them real-world problems to solve, and the chance to think on their feet, and they fly.
School rewards you for memorising and nodding along. Business rewards you for figuring things out.
I've seen that contrast play out in my own family. My younger brother Duncan was one of the most talented people I've ever known.
Before he passed away (last August from neoplasm brain cancer) he became an incredible actor and author.
But at school, he was misunderstood. The system didn't know what to do with his creativity, and it slowly chipped away at it.
I think about him constantly. I think about how many young people today don't fit within the system and wrongly believe they're not good enough, just because they don't tick the right boxes.
My own experience, my brother's experience, and the children I've worked with through START have all shaped how I parent my eight-year-old son, Teddy.
He loves Minecraft and YouTube. But I didn't want to just hand him an iPad and let him scroll.
Instead, we turned it into a project. He had to create something. A series of videos he recorded and edited himself. He learned structure, patience, and how to take feedback.
Now we're turning that into a mock business. Logo, a strategy. We're not going to post it – the learning is by doing.
In this safe environment he'll work through the messy mistakes early, learning that he can take control of his own ideas and run with them.
That's what most kids are missing today - real-world experiences that build belief.
Jonathan Haidt's book The Anxious Generation argues that we've removed all the safe, practical risks that used to teach resilience – climbing trees, walking to the shop, knocking on doors – and replaced them with hours online, scrolling alone and unguarded.
I am the way I am because I was allowed to live in the real world. When I was 10, I walked into a café in Garelochhead and asked if I could wash their customers' cars.
I charged £2.50, donated 50p to charity, and got my mate involved to scale the operation. We were rubbish at it, but I made enough money to buy my mum a horribly tacky dolphin ring with the profits.
I learned how to ask. I learned how to use what I had - my age, my cheek, my energy. That one summer gave me more belief and experience than years of school ever did.
But far too often now, kids are trained to be passive – either sitting and scrolling, or sitting and nodding. They deserve the chance to build a product, pitch an idea, or work on a team.
Programmes like START are about showing young people there's more than one path.
And this is my call to other business owners. If you run a company, go back to school. Mentor. Offer a placement. Let a young person shadow you, ask questions, and see what's possible.
Entrepreneurs are builders. Job creators. Problem-solvers. The government and education system should be actively encouraging them to get into the classroom – and entrepreneurs should grab any opportunity to do so.
If we want to improve the future, start with a classroom. We need more entrepreneurs back in schools to show that it can be done. Because if they don't see it, they won't believe it.
*To find out more visit: startforschools.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
31 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Zia Yusuf's return to Reform UK ‘great news', says deputy leader
He told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'Zia Yusuf has done a brilliant job in growing the party, creating huge infrastructure, over 400 branches, but it's a massive job and as we were growing incredibly fast, essentially that job was too much for one person, so we're reorganising, and I'm delighted that Zia is staying with the party, and he's going to be focusing on our Doge unit.
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Spending review: Schools to get more funding but police warned to ‘do their bit'
Schools are set to receive a funding boost in the spending review, a Cabinet minister has indicated, as he insisted other public services must 'do their bit' amid concerns about cuts to other budgets. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said the Government will commit to investing 'the most we've ever spent per pupil' next week, but declined to rule out the prospect of a real-terms squeeze on areas such as policing. Facing questions from broadcasters on Sunday about which public services will be prioritised, Mr Kyle said 'every part of our society is struggling' and numerous sectors had asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves for more money. 'On the fact that the police have been writing to the Chancellor, they have,' the Cabinet minister told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme. 'We also have letters from the universities, we have letters from doctors about the health service, we have letters from campaigners for child poverty writing to us, and other aspects of challenges in Britain at the moment. 'Every part of our society is struggling because of the inheritance that we had as a country and as a Government.' He pointed to the £1.1 billion extra funding already earmarked for police this year, warning that public services would be expected to 'do their bit' alongside Government as he defended Ms Reeves' stewardship of the country's finances. 'We expect the police to start embracing the change they need to do, to do their bit for change as well. We are doing our bit,' Mr Kyle said. 'You see a Chancellor that is striving to get investment to the key parts of our country that needs it the most… You will see the priorities of this Government reflected in the spending review, which sets the departmental spending into the long term. 'But this is a partnership. Yes, the Treasury needs to find more money for those key priorities, but the people delivering them need to do their bit as well.' The Department of Health is set to be the biggest winner in Ms Reeves' spending review on Wednesday, with the NHS receiving a boost of up to £30 billion at the expense of other public services. Economists have said the expected 2.8% annual increase in its day-to-day budget, which amounts to a rise of about £30 billion by 2028, or £17 billion in real terms, will see other departments squeezed. Speaking on Sunday, Mr Kyle said the schools system, along with an £86 billion funding package for research and development, would be top priorities as the Government seeks to 'invest in the future.' 'You will see in this spending review that we are investing the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system,' he told Sky News. Mr Kyle said Labour was 'absolutely laser-focused' on delivering manifesto pledges amid questions about how competing commitments will be balanced with little room for manoeuvre amid narrow fiscal headroom. For too long, communities across the country have been locked out of the investment they deserve. That's why on Wednesday, we announced funding worth £15.6bn, helping to drive cities, towns, and communities forward. — HM Treasury (@hmtreasury) June 6, 2025 Asked about the Government's plan to build 1.5 million new homes by the end of the Parliament, the minister declined to guarantee Housing Secretary Angela Rayner's department would not face cuts. But he added: 'We made a manifesto commitment. We are absolutely laser-focused on delivering that.' He said the Government was also 'on the way' to delivering 13,000 new police officers, another manifesto pledge. Ms Reeves has acknowledged that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding in a sign of the behind-the-scenes wrangling over her spending review. She blamed the former Conservative government's stewardship of the economy rather than her self-imposed fiscal rules, which include a promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. It comes after the Government announced science and technology sectors would receive new funding as part of an £86 billion package set to be confirmed next week. Mr Kyle's Department for Science, Technology and Innovation (DSIT) said the money would help research into new drug treatments and microchips used to power mobile phones and electric cars. The Tories accused Labour of copying their own plans in office over the commitment. Shadow technology secretary Alan Mak said: 'Labour's central budget announcement seems to be a reheat of Conservative plans just showing this Chancellor will copy and paste anyone's ideas to get out of the mess that she's put herself in. 'As Labour and Reform squabble over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are creating a serious plan for government to deliver growth and give you your country back.'
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Cuts to BBC World Service funding would ‘make us less safe', MPs tell ministers
Hours before Rachel Reeves stood up to deliver her budget last year, government officials were still in tense negotiations with bosses at the BBC over how much the World Service would be given. The amount they were haggling over was relatively small – just £5.5m out of a total budget of £400m. But BBC chiefs warned the government that if the cuts were imposed on them, they would have to close several language stations in parts of the world where the Russians already hold influence. Doing so would be a gift to Moscow, they added. The argument worked, and the BBC got the extra cash it was asking for. But executives at the corporation worry that their appeal to Britain's soft power might not prove so effective this time, especially in light of the government's recent cuts to the aid budget. 'The government is asking the World Service to model cuts that would definitely mean having to close important parts of the service,' said one person familiar with the negotiations. 'The BBC's lobbying worked last time, but this round is proving harder.' The Guardian recently revealed the government had asked the World Service to model two scenarios: one where their funding remains the same in cash terms; and one where it would be cut by 2% each year in cash terms. Each scenario would see the budget fall behind inflation, and could mean it ends up to £70m short of what its bosses believe it needs. Jonathan Munro, the global director of the BBC, said: 'When it comes to international impact and influence, the BBC World Service is the UK's most powerful asset. 'While we currently deliver news in 42 languages to over 400m people every week, at the greatest value for money compared to other international news providers, we are ambitious about going further to provide independent news where there is a vital need.' The service is just one institution promoting Britain's soft power abroad, but it is arguably the most powerful, reaching 450m people a week, according to the broadcaster's own figures. When pollsters asked people from around the world about various British exports and organisations, the BBC came out well ahead of any other, with nearly 80% having heard of it and nearly 50% saying it made them feel more positively about the UK. In comparison, only about 55% had heard of the monarchy, and only 25% said it made them view the UK more favourably. According to the same research, which the BBC commissioned, the organisation is also the most trusted of any global news outlet, ahead of CNN, Al Jazeera and Sky News. Jonathan McClory, the managing partner at Sanctuary Counsel and an expert on soft power, said: 'It's a gratuitous accident of history that we have the BBC World Service. You couldn't recreate it if you were starting from scratch, but it enables us to shape a global information landscape and promote British values, such as a free press, transparency and broad support for human rights.' Ministers say they understand this. Jenny Chapman, the international development minister, told the Guardian: 'The World Service do tremendous work, work that nobody else can do … They are soft power, an absolute gold standard resource. We respect that.' But supporters of the organisation fear that budgetary pressure has left its influence on the wane. In 2014, the coalition government stopped funding the world service, leaving the BBC to pay for it purely out of the licence fee. Two years later the government restored some direct funding, which was ringfenced for certain language services, but at a much lower level. Most of the service's £400m budget still comes from licence fee money – a situation the director general, Tim Davie, has warned is not sustainable, especially when domestic operations are being cut. Both scenarios that the government has asked BBC bosses to draw up for the World Service would involve closing certain parts of it. While it will not shut down operations in entire countries, BBC insiders say they are likely to have to close certain foreign language services where there are relatively few people who speak that language. Those services in places close to Russia – which corporation bosses warned last year would be closed if more money was not forthcoming – are once more on the chopping block. The problem with closing operations, even those with relatively small audiences, is that it can give Russia and China a perfect opportunity to push their own propaganda. When the BBC ended its long-wave BBC Arabic radio service in Lebanon, for example, Russian-backed media took over that exact frequency and began broadcasting on it instead. And on the day that thousands of pagers used by Hezbollah all simultaneously exploded in Lebanon, BBC monitors said they picked up what Davie later called 'unchallenged [Russian] propaganda' on that station. The BBC's research has found that its trust level was largely unchanged from four years ago at 78%. Trust in both Russia Today and China Global Television Network had jumped however, from 59% to 71% and from 62% to 70%, respectively. Last week Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative chair of the culture, media and sport select committee, wrote to cabinet ministers warning: 'Without sufficient resources, it could lead to more situations where the world service withdraws or reduces its services and Russian state media fills the vacuum, as in Lebanon. 'Ahead of the spending review, I invite you to reassure us that the government is not seeking to make a 2% cut to its funding of the World Service, at a time when it is vital to our strategic priorities, and that the government will not require cuts that will lead to the BBC having to close one or more language services.' Such arguments have worked with Reeves and her officials in the past. But the chancellor is hemmed in like never before, having already promised major funding increases for defence, the health service and local transport. Dinenage said: 'Ministers have told us that the world service bolsters UK security. Cutting its funding now would undoubtably make us all less safe.' A Foreign Office spokesperson said: 'Despite a tough fiscal situation, we continue to back the World Service, providing a large uplift of £32.6m this year alone, taking our total funding to £137m. 'The work they do as an independent and trusted broadcaster is highly valued by this government, as our continued financial support shows.'
