Gujarat's ‘Namo Lakshmi Yojana' disburses ₹924 crore, benefits over 10 lakh girl students
Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, while reviewing the scheme's progress, said, 'Empowering daughters through education is empowering our future. The success of Namo Lakshmi Yojana proves our commitment to ensuring no girl is left behind due to financial constraints.'
Launched in 2024, the scheme provides ₹50,000 over four years to girls from families earning less than ₹6 lakh annually, helping them complete Classes 9 to 12. 'When we educate a girl, we uplift an entire generation,' Mr. Patel added, stating that the initiative's role in curbing dropout rates and fostering women's empowerment.
Mukesh Kumar, Principal Secretary of the Education Department, reported, 'The 16% enrollment jump in just one year reflects the scheme's transformative impact. We're not just funding education—we're building aspirations.'
Beneficiaries like Akshara Diwan, a Class 11 student from Mehsana, echoed this sentiment: 'The aid helps me buy books and supplies as I train to become a police officer.' Parents too hailed the initiative, with potter Shailesh Prajapati calling it 'a ray of hope for families like ours.'
'This is just the beginning,' affirmed Mr. Patel, 'We're working to make Gujarat a model state for girls' education.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Education Department layoffs: Why Supreme Court's decision is ‘willfully blind' and ‘naive', judges explain
A divided Supreme Court on Monday allowed President Donald Trump to execute his plan to dismantle the Education Department back on track and lay off nearly 1,400 employees. Three liberal judges, in their dissent, slammed the decision, saying it was 'naive' and 'willfully blind'. The decision pauses the order by Boston's Judge Myong Joun, who issued a preliminary injunction reversing the layoffs and calling into question the broader plan. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to execute mass layoffs in the Education Department(REUTERS) The layoffs 'will likely cripple the department', Joun wrote. While the majority did not explain its decision to back Trump, Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Elena Kagan were quick to publish their dissent. 'When the Executive publicly announces its intent to break the law, and then executes on that promise, it is the Judiciary's duty to check that lawlessness, not expedite it,' Sotomayor wrote. 'It hands the Executive the power to repeal statutes by firing all those necessary to carry them out,' the three justices further added. 'The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naive, but either way the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is grave." Meanwhile, Education Secretary Linda McMahon said it's a 'shame' it took the Supreme Court's intervention to let Trump's plan move ahead. 'Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies,' McMahon said in a statement. Earlier on Monday, over 20 states sued the administration over billions of dollars in frozen education funding for after-school care, summer programs and more. Education Department employees who were targeted by the layoffs have been on paid leave since March, according to a union that represents some of the agency's staff. Joun's order had prevented the department from fully terminating them, though none had been allowed to return to work, according to the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. Without Joun's order, the workers would have been terminated in early June. The Education Department had said earlier in June that it was 'actively assessing how to reintegrate' the employees. A department email asked them to share whether they had gained other employment, saying the request was meant to 'support a smooth and informed return to duty.' The current case involves two consolidated lawsuits that said Trump's plan amounted to an illegal closure of the Education Department. One suit was filed by the Somerville and Easthampton school districts in Massachusetts along with the American Federation of Teachers and other education groups. The other legal action was filed by a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general. The suits argued that layoffs left the department unable to carry out responsibilities required by Congress, including duties to support special education, distribute financial aid and enforce civil rights laws. (With AP inputs)
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Education Department layoffs: Here's who could face the heat of Supreme Court order
Back in March, the Trump administration laid off 1,378 Education Department employees, following $1.5 billion in grant cuts, including $600 million for teacher training and $900 million for research. US District Judge Myong Joun blocked these layoffs in May, citing an illegal attempt to dismantle the department without congressional approval. However, the Supreme Court on Monday overturned the Boston court's injunction, enabling Education Secretary Linda McMahon to proceed with workforce reductions. Education Secretary Linda McMahon speaks during a Senate Appropriations hearing(AP) ABC News, in March, cited senior officials to report that the impacted staff will be placed on administrative leave starting March 21. They will receive full pay and benefits through June 9. Read More: Education Department layoffs: Why Supreme Court's decision is 'willfully blind' and 'naive', judges explain Who could be laid off at the Education Department? K-12 Dive cited an organizational chart of the Education Department to detail the offices that were to be impacted by the March 11 layoffs. The report further listed about 970 union employees out of 1,300 employees who were let go. According to the report, the closure of seven of 12 Office for Civil Rights (OCR) regional offices (Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, New York, Philadelphia, San Francisco) jeopardizes over 30 million K-12 students across 60,000 schools. Teachers: $600 million in training grants (eg, Supporting Effective Educator Development) were cut, with a $65 million restoration overturned. College students: Federal Student Aid (FSA) layoffs threaten FAFSA delays for 17 million families, including 800,000 Californians receiving $3.5 billion in Pell Grants. Civil rights advocates: 243 OCR staff, including attorneys, were cut, stalling investigations. Lawsuits by the NAACP and parents claim violations of Fifth Amendment rights. Employees: 1,378 workers, including 970 unionized staff, face termination, with 600 taking $25,000 buyouts. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) was reduced to under 10 staff, as per the report.
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Narmada settlements to be brought under respective gram panchayats
The Gujarat government has finalised regulations to merge settlements under the Sardar Sarovar Punarvasvat Agency (SSPA) with the respective gram panchayats. Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel has approved the proposal, paving the way for integrating 127 Narmada rehabilitation settlements – housing people displaced by the Sardar Sarovar dam – located across 26 taluks in eight districts with the gram panchayats concerned, officials said on Monday (July 14, 2025). Also read:Chronicle of a tragedy foretold The move is set to benefit settlements in Ahmedabad Rural, Vadodara, Bharuch, Kheda, Panchmahal, Narmada, Chhota Udepur, and Mahisagar districts. Under the approved framework, the gram panchayats will now assume responsibility for key civic infrastructure and services in these settlements, including drinking water, internal and approach roads, streetlights, electricity bills, rainwater drainage, and general maintenance of public amenities. Better access The Department of Panchayat, Rural Housing and Rural Development, which presented the integration work plan, stated that the merger process is expected to be completed within two months. Once merged, residents of the settlements will be able to access welfare schemes through their respective gram panchayats as per existing norms, significantly improving their access to public services, officials said. While the SSPA will retain ownership of unallocated plots in the settlements, all relevant records will be transferred to the gram panchayats. Additionally, schools, anganwadis, and health centres in the settlements will be handed over to the relevant departments, the government said. Voting rights and representation of settlement residents will be ensured in accordance with the existing government provisions. 'The gram panchayats will also be empowered to assess properties and collect applicable taxes and levies under the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993,' they said The government has clarified that these rules will serve as the standard for future integration of the remaining SSPA settlements. A formal resolution to this effect has been issued by the Department of Panchayat, Rural Housing and Rural Development under the guidance of Mr. Patel.
